Court Cases Court Cases

  Most Popular Cases Recent Judicial Opinions Cases by Geography Cases by Year Right End
  1. United States of America v. Bossingham 143,016 views

    Kitchen NightmaresBig3packagngBig3packagingBoliviaVictor thachCR02-477-PHX-SRB

    Case Summary: Amanda Patricia Bossingham, also known as "Amy," the proprietor of Amy's Baking Company in Scottsdale, AZ, featured on the popular Fox television show "Kitchen Nightmares," was convicted of bank fraud in 2008 after she falsified a Social Security number on an application for a five-figure bank loan.

  2. James Edward Holmes v. San Francisco Police Department Et Al 59,014 views

    Police Brutality

    Case Summary: A San Francisco man unfortunate enough to share the name of the 2012 Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooter was senselessly beaten by the San Francisco Police Department in California shortly after the shooting took place in Colorado. He is suing the San Francisco Police Department. The case received notoriety after an another man was similarly beaten and then put into solitary confinement by the San Francisco police, and linked to Holmes's docket in his blog.

  3. V. Adamson, III v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LL 46,979 views

  4. Zhang Ziyi v. China Free Press Inc et al 25,234 views


    Case Summary: Chinese actress Zhang Ziyi sued American-run Boxun News for libel and defamation in 2012 after Boxun published what she alleges to be false accounts of her being a high-priced prostitute that earned millions of dollars for having relations with Chinese government officials. Boxun refused to print a retraction.

  5. Douglas Alan Stromback, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. New Line Cinema, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant, Larry Hess 23,751 views

  6. Murray Hill Publications, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee 17,786 views


    Case Summary: The Japanese manufacturer of the drug aripiprazole, marketed as Abilify®, is suing an American generic drug manufacturer for patent infringement.

  8. Universal City Studios, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., Tristar Pictures, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Disney Enterprises Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Eric Corley, Also Known as Emmanuel Goldstein, and 2600 Enterprises Inc., United States of America, Intervenor 10,806 views

  9. Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., Etc. 10,411 views

  10. Mazer v. Stein 9,615 views

  11. Arar v. Ashcroft 8,420 views

  12. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 8,315 views

  13. No. 98-17072 7,932 views

  14. The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Skylink Technologies, Inc. 7,907 views

  15. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. And the Reader's Digest Association, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises and the Nation Associates, Inc 7,134 views

  16. Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Odyssey (VIII) DP I, LLC et al 6,989 views

  17. USA v. In Re: Information Associated with an Email Account at 6,930 views

    LavabitNational Security AgencyEdward Snowden

  18. Joao Control and Monitoring Systems of California LLC v. Sling Media, Inc., et al 6,786 views

  19. United States v. Brandon 6,575 views

  20. Jazz Photo Corporation, and Dynatec International, Inc., and Opticolor, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, and Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Intervenor 6,541 views

  21. New Jersey v. T.L.O 6,418 views

    Fourth AmendmentSearch and SeizureEducationLandmark Supreme Court Cases

  22. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr. 6,383 views

  23. Think Computer Corp v. Venchiarutti et al 6,267 views

    Banking & FinanceBitcoinMoney TransmissionALECCalifornia Department of Financial InstitutionsModel LegislationDelayed CasesStupid Government Bureaucrats

    Case Summary: Think Computer Corporation is suing the State of California Department of Financial Institutions, alleging that the 2010 California Money Transmission Act (MTA) is unconstitutional. There are three main claims: that the MTA violates the Due Process Clause by requiring companies to apply for licenses before learning their prerequisites for applying; that the MTA violates the Dormant Commerce Clause by regulating commerce outside of California; and that the MTA violates the Dormant Commerce Clause by causing uneven requirements for licensure across various states, and by imposing more of a burden on society than it creates benefits.

  24. United States v. Moore 6,064 views

  25. Computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant 6,040 views

  26. Automated Tracking Solutions, LLC v. Awarepoint Corporation et al 5,964 views

  27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO. 5,676 views

  28. James G. Gilles Timothy Petit v. Sergeant Gregory Davis, Indiana University Police Department Officer Christopher D. Goenner, Indiana University Police Department Terry Appolonia, Director, Student Life, Indiana University of Pennsylvania Rhonda H. Luckey, ed.d., Associate President of Student Affairs for Indiana University of Pennsylvania William Montgomery, Director of Public Safety, Indiana University of Pennsylvania 5,616 views

  29. Jane Roe v. Henry Wade 5,614 views

    AbortionPrivacyLandmark Supreme Court CasesRoe v. Wade

  30. Advisys, Inc. v. Advicent Solutions, Lp 5,569 views

  31. United States v. Angel Petit, Roger Fernandez, Francisco Pasqual 5,452 views

  32. United States v. Genaro Brandell Patterson 5,345 views

  33. Ernesto A. Miranda v. State of Arizona. Michael Vignera v. State of New York. Carl Calvin Westover v. United States. State of California v. Roy Allen Stewart 5,314 views

    Self-IncriminationRight To Remain SilentDue Process RightsLandmark Supreme Court Cases

  34. Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al 5,287 views

    Public DomainAaron SwartzCorporate Self-RepresentationPACERElectronic Access to Government Data

  35. Taylor, Jacqueline v. FDIC 5,244 views

  36. Maksym Pashanin v. David Tamboury 5,183 views

    In The News

  37. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Bob Taft 5,115 views

  38. A. A. Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc., and Michael MacDonald Mooney 5,023 views

  39. National Labor Relations Board v. Mason and Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., the Rust Engineering Co., a Joint Venture D/B/A Mason-Rust 4,951 views

  40. Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al 4,891 views

  41. Atari Games Corp. And Tengen, Inc. v. Nintendo of America Inc. And Nintendo Co., Ltd. 4,856 views

  42. USA, et al v. Alvarado-Orozco 4,837 views

  43. Doug Morgan v. Plano Independent School Dis 4,800 views

  44. Davidson Oil Country Supply Co., Inc. v. Klockner, Inc. 4,713 views

  45. 76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1450, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,397, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,202, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4837 Tonyja Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Company, a Partnership Robertson Stephens & Company, a Corporation 4,625 views

  46. Cummings v. Sallie Mae, Inc. 4,608 views

  47. FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC. et al v. USA 4,442 views

  48. USA v. Su 4,371 views

  49. Igartua v. United States 4,364 views

  50. Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California Corporation 4,328 views

  51. United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert Stewart 4,131 views

  52. Benzion et al v. Vivint, Inc. 4,088 views

    Randall Snyder

  53. 4,078 views

  54. Marc S. Kirschner, as Litigation Trustee for the Tribune Litigation Trust v. Dennis J FitzSimons, et al 4,045 views

  55. PATERSON POLICE PBA, et al v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al 4,005 views

  56. Puro v. Integrity Financial Partners, Inc. et al 3,890 views

  57. Mary Carroll Smith v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill John H. Schutz Ruel W. Tyson, Jr., Mary Carroll Smith v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill John H. Schutz Ruel W. Tyson, Jr. 3,857 views

  58. Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc 3,811 views

    Happy Birthday

  59. Novel Formulations Of Pharmacological Agents, Methods For The Preparation Thereof And Methods For The Use Thereof 3,655 views

  60. USA v. BOGDANOFF et al 3,645 views

  61. USA v. Renfrow et al 3,627 views

  62. OWENS, et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, et al 3,611 views

  63. Arlam Carr, Jr., a Minor by Arlam Carr and Johnnie Carr, Etc., National Education Association Inc., Intervenor, Penelope Anne Jenkins, Intervenors-Appellants v. Montgomery County Board of Education, Etc., United States of America, Amicus Curiae 3,603 views

  64. United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy Sweeton 3,592 views


  66. USA v. Zauder 3,393 views

    "emanuel lazar"

  67. Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. 3,365 views

  68. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al 3,361 views

    In The NewsiPhone

    Case Summary: In one of the most notable patent cases in history, technology giants Apple and Samsung have fought for years over patents related to smartphones such as Apple's iPhone and Samsung's Galaxy line of devices.

  69. Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al 3,319 views

    Fake Non-Fiction BooksFalse AdvertisingThe Social Network (2010 Movie)Defamation By OmissionAaron SorkinConsumer Reviews

    Case Summary: Aaron Greenspan, creator of the 2003 predecessor to The Facebook at Harvard University, sued popular author Benjamin Mezrich, his publisher Random House, and Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement, defamation and false advertising due to the statements made by Mezrich in and about his book "The Accidental Billionaires." Mezrich's book, which cites Greenspan's as a source, has been marketed as supposed non-fiction, even though the story is full of inconsistencies and outright falsifications, many of which Mezrich admits to. Mezrich notably omitted Greenspan's role in the creation of the web site, and helped to prop up Mark Zuckerberg as a "genius" in his book, leading to the eventual motion picture "The Social Network," and contributing to the frenzy surrounding Facebook's problematic IPO.

  70. Federal Trade Commission v. BF Labs, Inc. et al 3,217 views


  71. Lawsky v. Condor Capital Corporation et al 3,171 views

  72. Sheehan v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al 3,168 views

  73. USA v. Svanikier 3,143 views

  74. Mathis et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al 3,136 views

  75. Beta-amyloid Peptide-binding Proteins And Polynucleotides Encoding The Same 3,057 views

  76. In Re: 3,023 views

  77. 741 & 745 Clement Street Owners Association, v. 9th/clement Associates, Llc Et Al 2,988 views

  78. SEC v. Hourmouzis, et al 2,937 views

  79. David Randall Tinsley Boitano and Jeannine Marie Asturias-Tinsley- Adversary Proceeding 2,925 views

  80. USA v. Hall et al 2,910 views

  81. Harden Manufacturing Corporation v. Pfizer, Inc. et al 2,908 views

  82. Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke 2,887 views

    Affirmative ActionEqual ProtectionRaceEducationLandmark Supreme Court Cases

  83. Johansen v. Vivint, Inc. 2,867 views

  84. USA v. Binday et al 2,840 views

  85. United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. Turns 2,719 views

  86. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 2,692 views

  87. Thiel et al v. Wyeth Incorporated et al 2,676 views

  88. Securities and Exchange Commission v. CKB168 Holdings Ltd. et al 2,668 views

  89. Glassroth v. Moore 2,665 views

  90. The Hanover Insurance Comapny v. Smith Brothers Insurance, LLC et al 2,634 views

  91. Beth Petit v. US Department of Education 2,620 views

  92. Clarence Earl Gideon v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections 2,620 views

    Right to CounselDue Process RightsLandmark Supreme Court Cases

  93. Reebok International Limited v. Paul R. Ingrisano 2,579 views

  94. KIVOTIDIS, et al v. HHS 2,574 views

  95. United States v. Stephen Miknevich 2,571 views

  96. United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy White 2,563 views

  97. Mary Elizabeth Leary Glenda H. Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Stephen W. Daeschner, Superintendent of the Jefferson County Board of Education, Defendant-Appellee 2,551 views

  98. USA, et al v. Champagne, et al 2,549 views

  99. In Re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation 2,533 views

  100. Think Computer Corporation v. Dwolla, Inc. et al 2,527 views

    Money TransmissionBitcoinUnfair CompetitionVenture CapitalSilicon ValleyMobile Payments

    Case Summary: Think Computer Corporation, creator of the FaceCash mobile payment system, is suing its competitors in the payments space and their venture capital investors over their intentional failure to properly comply with federal and state laws concerning money transmission licenses.

Issues Laws Cases Pro Pro Se Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Pro Se Articles Firms Entities
Need Password Help?