Court Cases Court Cases

  Most Popular Cases Recent Judicial Opinions Cases by Geography Cases by Year Right End
  1. United States of America v. Bossingham 141,764 views

    Kitchen NightmaresBig3packagngBig3packagingBoliviaVictor thachCR02-477-PHX-SRB

    Case Summary: Amanda Patricia Bossingham, also known as "Amy," the proprietor of Amy's Baking Company in Scottsdale, AZ, featured on the popular Fox television show "Kitchen Nightmares," was convicted of bank fraud in 2008 after she falsified a Social Security number on an application for a five-figure bank loan.

  2. James Edward Holmes v. San Francisco Police Department Et Al 58,736 views

    Police Brutality

    Case Summary: A San Francisco man unfortunate enough to share the name of the 2012 Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooter was senselessly beaten by the San Francisco Police Department in California shortly after the shooting took place in Colorado. He is suing the San Francisco Police Department. The case received notoriety after an another man was similarly beaten and then put into solitary confinement by the San Francisco police, and linked to Holmes's docket in his blog.

  3. V. Adamson, III v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LL 46,923 views

  4. Zhang Ziyi v. China Free Press Inc et al 25,089 views

    China

    Case Summary: Chinese actress Zhang Ziyi sued American-run Boxun News for libel and defamation in 2012 after Boxun published what she alleges to be false accounts of her being a high-priced prostitute that earned millions of dollars for having relations with Chinese government officials. Boxun refused to print a retraction.

  5. Douglas Alan Stromback, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. New Line Cinema, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant, Larry Hess 22,910 views

  6. Murray Hill Publications, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee 17,611 views

  7. OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. v. SANDOZ, INC. 11,245 views

    Case Summary: The Japanese manufacturer of the drug aripiprazole, marketed as Abilify®, is suing an American generic drug manufacturer for patent infringement.

  8. Universal City Studios, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., Tristar Pictures, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Disney Enterprises Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Eric Corley, Also Known as Emmanuel Goldstein, and 2600 Enterprises Inc., United States of America, Intervenor 10,628 views

  9. Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., Etc. 10,307 views

  10. Mazer v. Stein 9,470 views

  11. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 7,869 views

  12. The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Skylink Technologies, Inc. 7,784 views

  13. No. 98-17072 7,100 views

  14. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. And the Reader's Digest Association, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises and the Nation Associates, Inc 6,969 views

  15. USA v. In Re: Information Associated with an Email Account at Lavabit.com 6,854 views

    LavabitNational Security AgencyEdward Snowden

  16. Joao Control and Monitoring Systems of California LLC v. Sling Media, Inc., et al 6,729 views

  17. Jazz Photo Corporation, and Dynatec International, Inc., and Opticolor, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, and Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Intervenor 6,403 views

  18. Arar v. Ashcroft 6,369 views

  19. Think Computer Corp v. Venchiarutti et al 6,151 views

    Banking & FinanceBitcoinMoney TransmissionALECCalifornia Department of Financial InstitutionsModel LegislationDelayed Cases

    Case Summary: Think Computer Corporation is suing the State of California Department of Financial Institutions, alleging that the 2010 California Money Transmission Act (MTA) is unconstitutional. There are three main claims: that the MTA violates the Due Process Clause by requiring companies to apply for licenses before learning their prerequisites for applying; that the MTA violates the Dormant Commerce Clause by regulating commerce outside of California; and that the MTA violates the Dormant Commerce Clause by causing uneven requirements for licensure across various states, and by imposing more of a burden on society than it creates benefits.

  20. Automated Tracking Solutions, LLC v. Awarepoint Corporation et al 5,910 views

  21. Computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant 5,887 views

  22. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr. 5,848 views

  23. James G. Gilles Timothy Petit v. Sergeant Gregory Davis, Indiana University Police Department Officer Christopher D. Goenner, Indiana University Police Department Terry Appolonia, Director, Student Life, Indiana University of Pennsylvania Rhonda H. Luckey, ed.d., Associate President of Student Affairs for Indiana University of Pennsylvania William Montgomery, Director of Public Safety, Indiana University of Pennsylvania 5,379 views

  24. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO. 5,329 views

  25. New Jersey v. T.L.O 5,202 views

    Fourth AmendmentSearch and SeizureEducationLandmark Supreme Court Cases

  26. United States v. Brandon 5,167 views

  27. Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al 5,099 views

    Public DomainAaron SwartzCorporate Self-RepresentationPACERElectronic Access to Government Data

  28. Maksym Pashanin v. David Tamboury 5,049 views

    In The News

  29. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Bob Taft 4,933 views

  30. A. A. Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc., and Michael MacDonald Mooney 4,894 views

  31. National Labor Relations Board v. Mason and Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., the Rust Engineering Co., a Joint Venture D/B/A Mason-Rust 4,862 views

  32. USA, et al v. Alvarado-Orozco 4,795 views

  33. Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al 4,785 views

  34. United States v. Moore 4,777 views

  35. Ernesto A. Miranda v. State of Arizona. Michael Vignera v. State of New York. Carl Calvin Westover v. United States. State of California v. Roy Allen Stewart 4,688 views

    Self-IncriminationRight To Remain SilentDue Process RightsLandmark Supreme Court Cases

  36. Davidson Oil Country Supply Co., Inc. v. Klockner, Inc. 4,646 views

  37. Atari Games Corp. And Tengen, Inc. v. Nintendo of America Inc. And Nintendo Co., Ltd. 4,641 views

  38. United States v. Genaro Brandell Patterson 4,526 views

  39. Jane Roe v. Henry Wade 4,489 views

    AbortionPrivacyLandmark Supreme Court CasesRoe v. Wade

  40. Cummings v. Sallie Mae, Inc. 4,448 views

  41. Advisys, Inc. v. Advicent Solutions, Lp 4,433 views

  42. United States v. Angel Petit, Roger Fernandez, Francisco Pasqual 4,378 views

  43. Taylor, Jacqueline v. FDIC 4,304 views

  44. USA v. Su 4,177 views

  45. FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC. et al v. USA 4,092 views

  46. United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert Stewart 3,949 views

  47. 76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1450, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,397, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,202, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4837 Tonyja Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Company, a Partnership Robertson Stephens & Company, a Corporation 3,890 views

  48. Puro v. Integrity Financial Partners, Inc. et al 3,829 views

  49. 3,825 views

  50. Doug Morgan v. Plano Independent School Dis 3,753 views

  51. Mary Carroll Smith v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill John H. Schutz Ruel W. Tyson, Jr., Mary Carroll Smith v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill John H. Schutz Ruel W. Tyson, Jr. 3,718 views

  52. PATERSON POLICE PBA, et al v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al 3,717 views

  53. Marc S. Kirschner, as Litigation Trustee for the Tribune Litigation Trust v. Dennis J FitzSimons, et al 3,706 views

  54. Igartua v. United States 3,627 views

  55. Novel Formulations Of Pharmacological Agents, Methods For The Preparation Thereof And Methods For The Use Thereof 3,598 views

  56. USA v. BOGDANOFF et al 3,559 views

  57. Arlam Carr, Jr., a Minor by Arlam Carr and Johnnie Carr, Etc., National Education Association Inc., Intervenor, Penelope Anne Jenkins, Intervenors-Appellants v. Montgomery County Board of Education, Etc., United States of America, Amicus Curiae 3,470 views

  58. MCCARTER et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 3,409 views

  59. Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California Corporation 3,342 views

  60. USA v. Zauder 3,338 views

    "emanuel lazar"

  61. OWENS, et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, et al 3,316 views

  62. Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. 3,305 views

  63. United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy Sweeton 3,290 views

  64. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al 3,246 views

    In The NewsiPhone

    Case Summary: In one of the most notable patent cases in history, technology giants Apple and Samsung have fought for years over patents related to smartphones such as Apple's iPhone and Samsung's Galaxy line of devices.

  65. Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al 3,238 views

    Fake Non-Fiction BooksFalse AdvertisingThe Social Network (2010 Movie)Defamation By Omission

    Case Summary: Aaron Greenspan, creator of the 2003 predecessor to The Facebook at Harvard University, sued popular author Benjamin Mezrich, his publisher Random House, and Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement, defamation and false advertising due to the statements made by Mezrich in and about his book "The Accidental Billionaires." Mezrich's book, which cites Greenspan's as a source, has been marketed as supposed non-fiction, even though the story is full of inconsistencies and outright falsifications, many of which Mezrich admits to. Mezrich notably omitted Greenspan's role in the creation of the web site, and helped to prop up Mark Zuckerberg as a "genius" in his book, leading to the eventual motion picture "The Social Network," and contributing to the frenzy surrounding Facebook's problematic IPO.

  66. USA v. Renfrow et al 3,190 views

  67. Benzion et al v. Vivint, Inc. 3,145 views

    Randall Snyder

  68. Sheehan v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al 3,050 views

  69. Federal Trade Commission v. BF Labs, Inc. et al 3,017 views

    Bitcoin

  70. Beta-amyloid Peptide-binding Proteins And Polynucleotides Encoding The Same 3,002 views

  71. 741 & 745 Clement Street Owners Association, v. 9th/clement Associates, Llc Et Al 2,947 views

  72. In Re: 2,943 views

  73. Mathis et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al 2,901 views

  74. David Randall Tinsley Boitano and Jeannine Marie Asturias-Tinsley- Adversary Proceeding 2,863 views

  75. Harden Manufacturing Corporation v. Pfizer, Inc. et al 2,795 views

  76. Lawsky v. Condor Capital Corporation et al 2,771 views

  77. Johansen v. Vivint, Inc. 2,753 views

  78. USA v. Hall et al 2,738 views

  79. USA v. Binday et al 2,738 views

  80. SEC v. Hourmouzis, et al 2,693 views

  81. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 2,639 views

  82. Thiel et al v. Wyeth Incorporated et al 2,635 views

  83. Beth Petit v. US Department of Education 2,576 views

  84. United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. Turns 2,572 views

  85. Glassroth v. Moore 2,550 views

  86. United States v. Stephen Miknevich 2,529 views

  87. KIVOTIDIS, et al v. HHS 2,529 views

  88. Reebok International Limited v. Paul R. Ingrisano 2,499 views

  89. The Hanover Insurance Comapny v. Smith Brothers Insurance, LLC et al 2,488 views

  90. BRAZOS EUROPE, INC. v. CAPITAL RESOURCE GROUP, LLC et al 2,471 views

  91. USA, et al v. Champagne, et al 2,468 views

  92. STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. et al v. FUTURE GRAPHICS, LLC 2,458 views

  93. Kathleen M Barish Et Al v. Steven D Brooks 2,455 views

  94. Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,907 Angeles Real Estate Company v. Alan S. Kerxton, as Trustee of the Estate of Construction General, Inc., in the Matter of Construction General, Inc., a Corporation, Bankrupt 2,437 views

  95. Think Computer Corporation v. Dwolla, Inc. et al 2,430 views

    Money TransmissionBitcoinUnfair CompetitionVenture CapitalSilicon ValleyMobile Payments

    Case Summary: Think Computer Corporation, creator of the FaceCash mobile payment system, is suing its competitors in the payments space and their venture capital investors over their intentional failure to properly comply with federal and state laws concerning money transmission licenses.

  96. Lexmark Intl v. Static Control Cmpnt 2,418 views

  97. Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke 2,416 views

    Affirmative ActionEqual ProtectionRaceEducationLandmark Supreme Court Cases

  98. In Re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation 2,400 views

  99. Mary Elizabeth Leary Glenda H. Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Stephen W. Daeschner, Superintendent of the Jefferson County Board of Education, Defendant-Appellee 2,378 views

  100. American Honda Motor, et al v. MDL No. 1069, et al 2,302 views

Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Pro Se Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Pro Se Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Need Password Help?