Name: ANN LAI vs. BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al :: Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo :: State Civil Lawsuit No. 17-CIV-02882
Creator: Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
Published: 2017-06-28
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Keywords: court documents, legal case, docket, PACER, Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

172	Filed: 9/22/2020, Entered: 9/22/2020	Request For Dismissal
	With Prejudice AS TO COMPLAINT ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT JONATHAN TEO AND EXCLUDING ALL PAGA CLAIMS
	Request

171	Filed: 9/21/2020, Entered: 9/21/2020	Proof of Service
	REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF; ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

170	Filed: 9/21/2020, Entered: 9/21/2020	Request For Dismissal
	With Prejudice COMPLAINT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS EXCEPT TEO AND EXCLUDING ALL PAGA CLAIMS
	Request

169	Filed: 9/21/2020, Entered: 9/21/2020	Request For Dismissal
	With Prejudice CROSS COMPLAINT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
	Request

168	Filed: 9/1/2020, Entered: 9/1/2020	Proof Of Service By Mail
	NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER APPROVING PAGA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND AWARD OF FEES AND COSTS
	Request

167	Filed: 9/1/2020, Entered: 9/1/2020	Notice of Entry of Order
	APPROVING PAGA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND AWARD OF FEES AND COSTS
	Request

166	Filed: 8/31/2020, Entered: 8/31/2020	Order
	Type: APPROVING PAGA SETTLMENT AGREEMENT AND AWRD OF FEES AND COSTS Signed by: JUDGE FINEMAN Date Signed: 08/31/20.
	Request

165	Filed: 8/28/2020, Entered: 8/28/2020	Tentative ruling adopted and becomes order:
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S AND DEFENDANT(S) BINARY CAPITAL'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT, AND (2) PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS FROM THE COMMON FUND PAGA SETTLEMENT Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Approval of PAGA settlement and for fees and costs is GRANTED. Pursuant to Labor Code 2699(l), the Court has reviewed the moving and supplemental briefs, which supplemental brief responded to the Court's questions about certain aspects of the settlement, and all supporting documentation before granting the motion. Settlement Approval Standards: For class action settlements, there is an established body of law setting forth the standards for approval. For PAGA claims, there is less guidance. The Legislature's express command that PAGA settlements be approved by the court necessarily implies that there is some substantive dimension to the review. (Labor Code 2699(l).) There appears to be no California precedent to guide trial court judges. Federal precedent is helpful. In O'Connor v. Uber Techs, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2016) 201 F.Supp.3d 1110, 1133, for example, the court denied approval of class action settlements that included PAGA claims in part because the plaintiffs' claims added up to as much as $1 billion in PAGA penalties but parties settled those claims for $1 million, or 0.1% of their alleged maximum value. As Judge Edward Chen stated, "where plaintiffs bring a PAGA representative claim, they take on a special responsibility to their fellow aggrieved workers who are effectively bound by any judgment. [citation omitted] Such a plaintiff also owes responsibility to the public at large; they act, as the statute's name suggests, as a private attorney general, and 75% of the penalties go to the LWDA 'for enforcement of labor laws . . . and for education of employers and employees about their rights and responsibilities under this code.'" (Id., at 1134.) In that case, the Labor Workforce and Development Agency ("LWDA") itself filed a brief stating that "[i]t is thus important that when a PAGA claim is settled, the relief provided for under the PAGA be genuine and meaningful, consistent with the underlying purpose of the statute to benefit the pubic and, in the context of a class action, the court evaluate whether the settlement meets the standards of being 'fundamentally fair, reasonable, and adequate' with reference to the public policies underlying the PAGA." (Id., at 1133.) Judge Chen noted that "a court may reduce the penalty when 'to do otherwise would result in an award that is unjust, arbitrary and oppressive, or confiscatory.'" (Id., at 1134, citing Labor Code 2699(e)(2).) California law provides some general guidance concerning judicial approval of any settlement. First, public policy generally favors settlement. (Neary v. Regents of University of California (1992) 3 Cal.4th 273.) Nonetheless, the court should not approve an agreement contrary to law or public policy. (Bechtel Corp. v. Superior Court (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 405, 412; Timney v. Lin (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 1121, 1127.) Moreover, "[t]he court cannot surrender its duty to see that the judgment to be entered is a just one, nor is the court to act as a mere puppet in the matter." (California State Auto. Assn. Inter-Ins. Bureau v. Superior Court (1990) 50 Cal.3d 658, 664.) As a result, courts have specifically noted that Neary does not always apply, because "[w]here the rights of the public are implicated, the additional safeguard of judicial review, though more cumbersome to the settlement process, serves a salutatory purpose." (Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Kintetsu Enterprises of America (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 48, 63.) Other statutory schemes also provide some guidance. In California False Claims Act (CFCA), the court may consider "the best interests of the parties involved and the public purposes behind the act" (Govt. Code 12652(c)(1), as well as whether the settlement is "fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances." (Govt. Code 12652(e)(2)(B).) Similarly, under Prop 65, a court may consider whether a settlement is just and serves the public interest. (Consumer Advocacy, 6 Cal.App.4th at 61-62.) The primary purpose of PAGA is "to achieve maximum compliance with state labor laws" and "to ensure an effective disincentive for employers to engage in unlawful and anticompetitive business practices." (2003 Cal. Legis. Serv. Ch. 906 1(a).) The Legislature further found that, while self-policing efforts have had some success, "in other cases the only meaningful deterrent to unlawful conduct is the vigorous assessment and collection of civil penalties as provided in the Labor Code." (Id., at 1(b).) Terms and Background of the Settlement: The gravamen of the complaint is that Defendants, contrary to California law, impermissibly imposed non-disclosure ("NDA"), non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in agreements with its employees. According to Plaintiff, after she left her employment, Binary Capital improperly warned Plaintiff about violating these provisions. On June 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed her initial complaint and the parties have engaged in motion practice and discovery. The parties were unsuccessful in settlement discussions in 2017, but were able to resolve the action in 2019. Plaintiff has also settled her individual claims with an individual defendant, Jonathan Teo and a Binary entity and shared the individual settlements with the LWDA PAGA unit. She receives monetary amounts and an indirect equity interest in a Binary entity in her individual settlement. The terms of this settlement are that the Binary Capital Entity Defendants have agreed to pay $60,800 to resolve the PAGA claims arising from its mandatory non-disclosure/non-disparagement agreements. According to Plaintiff, Binary Capital had nine employees and there are 125 pay periods at issue. Plaintiff calculates that Binary Capital is paying close to $500 per pay period or more than $6,750 per employee. Specifically, the common fund settlement will be distributed as follows: (1) Plaintiff's counsel will be entitled to an award of fees and costs from the common fund, to be determined by the Court (Settlement III.E); (2) $18,000 of the remaining amount will be allocated to the Labor Code 1102.5 PAGA claim, with each employee receiving 25% of a $2000 per-employee penalty amount (or $500 per employee), and the State receiving 75% (or $1500 per employee) (See Settlement III.F-G); and (3) the remainder of the common fund will be distributed as follows: 23 75% of the remainder to the State, and 25% of the remainder to the employees on a pro-rated per-24 pay-period basis. (Id.) In addition, a settlement term is that Binary Capital and its principles (Justin Caldbeck and Teo) will be prohibited by Court order from taking any steps to enforce the NDA provisions against the PAGA Group members, who will receive notice of this injunctive relief and other terms of the settlement. The settlement is not with defendants Teo or Caldbeck, who were sued under an alter ego theory because Plaintiff determined their signature was not necessary to obtain penalties and injunctive relief. Plaintiff represents that she will pursue the individual defendants under an alter ego theory if the Binary Capital Entity Defendants do not pay the settlement amounts. There is no general release. The settlement agreement provides that the State and Plaintiff will enter into the following release: "All claims asserted in the Action under PAGA, based upon the factual allegations set forth in the Second Amended Complaint, including but not limited to all PAGA claims arising from any non-disclosure or non-disparagement provisions in any agreement signed by any Binary Capital employee (Excluding Jonathan Teo and Justin Caldbeck) at issue in the Complaint during the 'Covered Period.'" The Binary Capital Defendants deny all liability. They have joined in this motion for approval of settlement. Analysis of the Settlement: The Court finds that there has been proper notice given of the settlement and this hearing, including to the LAWDA. Plaintiff calculates that the maximum exposure in this case is $234,000 based upon (1) liability; (2) "stacking" of penalties; (3) a $10,000 per-employee penalty for the Labor Code 1102.5 violations; (4) a $200 per-pay-period/per-employee penalty for all violations but the "initial" violation; (5) a per-pay-period (as opposed to per-signature) penalty for the Labor Code 432.5 violations; and (6) no discretionary reduction in penalties under Labor Code 2699(e)(1). The Binary Capital Defendants dispute liability and can be expected to fully litigate the issues. There are issues regarding liability since NDAs can be appropriate. Additionally, there are issues of whether a court will award the maximum penalties and whether Defendants can be liable based upon a "subsequent violation" defense. Even if liability is established at a trial, Plaintiff might only receive 20% of the maximum exposure. Taking into account the time and expense of litigation, the uncertainty of litigation, the policy favoring settlement, the Court, in exercising its discretion after review of the pleadings and evidence, finds that the settlement amount is fair and reasonable. The Court finds as additional support for this conclusion because the settlement has the additional benefit of the injunction. The value of an injunction cannot be monetized, but provides significant benefits for the employees. Based upon all of the circumstances and in exercising its discretion, the Court concludes that the settlement is genuine and meaningful, and consistent with the underlying purpose of the statute to benefit the pubic. There is no request for any incentive payments for the Plaintiff and no evidence of fraud or collusion in the settlement negotiations. The Court finds the Release narrowly tailored to the claims in the case and reasonable, and that the notice to the employees fairly apprises them of the settlement. Plaintiff's counsel is to provide mail notice to the employees. Attorney fees: Plaintiff seeks attorneys' fees in the amount of $20,064 (33% of the common fund) and costs in the amount of $4,345.38 to be paid out of the settlement amount as fees, relying on the "common fund" theory. While a common fund fee is appropriate here, even a proper common fund-based fee award should be reviewed through a lodestar cross-check. In Lafitte v. Robert Half International (2016) 1 Cal.5th 480, 503, the Supreme Court endorsed the use of a lodestar cross-check as a way to determine whether the percentage allocated is reasonable. The Supreme Court stated: "If the multiplier calculated by means of a lodestar cross-check is extraordinarily high or low, the trial court should consider whether the percentage used should be adjusted so as to bring the imputed multiplier within a justifiable range, but the court is not necessarily required to make such an adjustment." (Id., at 505.) Plaintiff's counsel, Chris Baker, submits a declaration setting forth his experience and that of the other attorneys who worked on the case. The hourly rates they charge their hourly paying clients range from $640-$875 per hour. He represents that the amount requested far exceeds the lodestar amount, but does not provide that figure or any billing statements. The declaration does detail the work on the case including preparing the complaint and subsequent complaint, demurrers, discovery, arbitration motions, and the settlement negotiations. He provides other examples where state court judges have awarded his firm or other firms in PAGA cases a 33% award. The Court finds the amount of attorneys' fees and costs fair and reasonable and grants the request. Even though Plaintiff's counsel does not provide billing statements, the work performed clearly exceeded the amount of fees requested even if the Court were to calculate fees at $500 per hour. Since the case was taken on a contingency, Plaintiff could have requested a multiplier. (Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1132.) Plaintiff could have also requested fees based upon the value of the injunction, but did not. This Court may use its own experience to determine the value of attorneys' fees. (Spencer v. Collins (1909) 156 Cal. 298, 306 ("The value of attorney's services is a matter with which a judge must necessarily be familiar. When the court is informed of the extent and nature of such services, its own experience furnishes it with every element necessary to fix their value.") ."); Reynolds v. Ford Motor Company (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 1105, 1113-14 ("The trial court acted well within its discretion in using 'the prevailing market value in the community for similar legal services' relying on its personal knowledge and familiarity with the area legal services, as the 'touchstone' for determination" of the reasonable hourly rates.'" (citations omitted).) This Court had extensive experience in class action and other common fund cases while an attorney and has made decisions about attorneys' fees and costs frequently during her time as a judicial officer. Given that this is a "common fund" fee, and the lodestar analysis is only for purposes of the "cross check" required by Lafitte, the Court finds that no adjustment is necessary, and the requested fee is approved. The costs are also reasonable and compensable. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for Plaintiff shall prepare a written order consistent with the Court's ruling and including the relevant information included in her May 27, 2020 proposed order for the Court's signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.
	Request

164	Filed: 8/28/2020, Entered: 8/28/2020	Motion for Approval
	JOINT MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS
	Request

163	Filed: 8/10/2020, Entered: 8/10/2020	Jury Trial
	JURY TRIAL TIME ESTIMATE 7 DAYS
	Request

162	Filed: 8/7/2020, Entered: 8/7/2020	Notice
	OF NEW HEARING DATE AND TIME FOR JOINT MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS
	Request

161	Filed: 7/28/2020, Entered: 7/28/2020	Motion for order
	FOR FEES AND COSTS
	Request

160	Filed: 7/28/2020, Entered: 7/28/2020	Motion for Approval
	OF PAGA SETTLEMENT
	Request

159	Filed: 7/27/2020, Entered: 7/27/2020	Mandatory Settlement Conference
	Hearing Time: 1:30 PM
	Request

158	Filed: 7/22/2020, Entered: 7/22/2020	Supplemental
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
	Request

157	Filed: 7/13/2020, Entered: 7/13/2020	Proof Of Service By Mail
	PAGA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; ETC
	Request

156	Filed: 7/10/2020, Entered: 7/10/2020	Proof Of Service By Mail
	CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.1 BY JUDGE FINEMAN
	Request

155	Filed: 7/10/2020, Entered: 7/10/2020	Affidavit of Mailing
	CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 BY JUDGE FINEMAN
	Request

154	Filed: 7/10/2020, Entered: 7/10/2020	Order
	CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 BY JUDGE FINEMAN
	Request

153	Filed: 7/8/2020, Entered: 7/8/2020	Order Granting Challenge Request against Judicial Officer
	Pursuant to CCP Section 170.6
	Request

152	Filed: 7/6/2020, Entered: 7/6/2020	Peremptory Challenge Pursuant to CCP 170.6 Against
	Judicial Officer; SENT TO DEPT. 20, COPY TO DEPT 2
	Request

151	Filed: 6/30/2020, Entered: 6/30/2020	Affidavit of Mailing
	Order Designating As Complex Case and Assigning Judge For All Purposes
	Request

150	Filed: 6/30/2020, Entered: 6/30/2020	Affidavit of Mailing
	CMO #1
	Request

149	Filed: 6/30/2020, Entered: 6/30/2020	Case Management Order
	CMO #1
	Request

148	Filed: 6/29/2020, Entered: 6/29/2020	Order
	Designating As Complex Case and Assigning Judge For All Purposes
	Request

147	Filed: 6/9/2020, Entered: 6/9/2020	Proof Of Service By Mail
	Notice of New Hearing Date, Time and Department for Joint Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement and Plaintiff???s Motion for Fees and Costs;ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

146	Filed: 6/9/2020, Entered: 6/9/2020	Notice
	Notice of New Hearing Date, Time and Department for Joint Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement and Plaintiff's Motion for Fees and Costs
	Request

145	Filed: 5/27/2020, Entered: 5/27/2020	Proof Of Service By Mail
	PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT; ETC...
	Request

144	Filed: 5/27/2020, Entered: 5/27/2020	Motion
	FOR FEES AND COSTS
	Request

143	Filed: 5/27/2020, Entered: 5/27/2020	Proposed Order Received
	APPROVING PAGA SETTLEMENT
	Request

142	Filed: 5/27/2020, Entered: 5/27/2020	Declaration in Support
	OF MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT
	Request

141	Filed: 5/27/2020, Entered: 5/27/2020	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support
	OF JOINT NOTICE FOR MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT
	Request

140	Filed: 5/27/2020, Entered: 5/27/2020	Motion
	FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT
	Request

139	Filed: 9/16/2019, Entered: 9/16/2019	Stipulation and Proposed Order received & forwarded to Dept
	25, STIPULATION & ORDER TO ADR
	Request

138	Filed: 8/28/2019, Entered: 8/28/2019	ADR Referral
	Order to ADR within 21 days
	Request

137	Filed: 8/13/2019, Entered: 8/13/2019	Case Management Statement
	CMC 8/28/19
	Request

136	Filed: 7/17/2019, Entered: 7/17/2019	Answer
	to DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MTGP I, L.P.'S CROSS-COMPLAINT
	Request

135	Filed: 6/19/2019, Entered: 6/19/2019	Answer
	Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by Defendants Binary Capital, a General Partnership, Binary Capital Management, LLC, Binary Capital MTGP I, LP, Binary Capital TTGP, Ltd., and Binary Capital MTGP II, LP
	Request

134	Filed: 6/10/2019, Entered: 6/10/2019	Case Management Statement
	CMC 6/26
	Request

133	Filed: 5/23/2019, Entered: 5/23/2019	Notice of Entry of Order
	OVERRULING BINARY DEFENDANTS' DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S 15TH CAUSE OF ACTION.
	Request

132	Filed: 5/14/2019, Entered: 5/14/2019	Order
	Type: OVERRULING BINARY DEFENDANTS' DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S 15TH CAUSE OF ACTION Signed by: JUDGE FINEMAN Date Signed: 5-13-19
	Request

131	Filed: 5/2/2019, Entered: 5/2/2019	Order sent for signature to Judicial Officer
	#3 OVERRULING BINARY DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S 15TH CAUSE OF ACTION
	Request

130	Filed: 4/24/2019, Entered: 4/24/2019	Hearing on Demurrer
	TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
	Request

129	Filed: 4/18/2019, Entered: 4/18/2019	Proof of Service by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY of
	REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY WAGES DUE UPON SEPARATION BY BINARY CAPITAL DEFENDANTS; ETC... served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

128	Filed: 4/17/2019, Entered: 4/17/2019	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply
	BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY WAGES DUE UPON SEPARATION BY BINARY CAPITAL DEFENDANTS
	Request

127	Filed: 4/17/2019, Entered: 4/17/2019	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition
	TO PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
	Request

126	Filed: 4/16/2019, Entered: 4/16/2019	Proof of Service by PERSONAL SERVICE of
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO THE FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION; ETC... served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

125	Filed: 4/15/2019, Entered: 4/15/2019	Notice of Case Management Conference
	CMC 6/26/19
	Request

124	Filed: 4/11/2019, Entered: 4/11/2019	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S TO DEMURRER TO THE FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTIONS
	Request

123	Filed: 4/11/2019, Entered: 4/11/2019	Request For Judicial Notice
	IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO THE FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
	Request

122	Filed: 4/10/2019, Entered: 4/10/2019	Motion to Deem Facts as Admitted
	Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
	Request

121	Filed: 4/9/2019, Entered: 4/9/2019	Case Management Statement
	CMC 4/24
	Request

120	Filed: 4/3/2019, Entered: 4/3/2019	Proof of Service by PERSONAL SERVICE of
	ANN LAI'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED AND TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AGAINST BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

119	Filed: 4/3/2019, Entered: 4/3/2019	Proposed Order Received
	GRANTING PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MOTION TO HAVE RESPONSES DEEMED ADMITTED, TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY, AND FOR SANCTIONS
	Request

118	Filed: 4/3/2019, Entered: 4/3/2019	Declaration in Reply
	SCHWARTZ DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF LAI'S MOTION TO HAVE REQUEST DEEMED ADMITTED AND TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AGAINST BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
	Request

117	Filed: 4/3/2019, Entered: 4/3/2019	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply
	IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED AND TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AGAINST BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
	Request

116	Filed: 3/27/2019, Entered: 3/27/2019	Proof of Service by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY of
	DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGMENT LLC'S MEMOARNDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED AND TO COMPE FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

115	Filed: 3/27/2019, Entered: 3/27/2019	Declaration in Opposition
	OF JONATHAN TEO OF DEFENDANT BINARY CAPTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC'S MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED AND TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES
	Request

114	Filed: 3/27/2019, Entered: 3/27/2019	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition
	DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC'S TO MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED ANT TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES
	Request

113	Filed: 3/27/2019, Entered: 3/27/2019	Declaration in Opposition
	OF MARK R. CONRAD OF DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC'S TO MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED AND TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES
	Request

112	Filed: 3/22/2019, Entered: 3/22/2019	Proof of Service by PERSONAL SERVICE of
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED AND TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES, ETC... served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

111	Filed: 3/22/2019, Entered: 3/22/2019	Notice
	OF APPEARANCE OF JAY RAPAPORT
	Request

110	Filed: 3/18/2019, Entered: 3/18/2019	Proof of Service
	VIA EMAIL AND US MAIL served on SEE SERVICE LIST with a service date of 03/18/2019
	Request

109	Filed: 3/18/2019, Entered: 3/18/2019	Notice
	OF NEW HEARING DATE FOR DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY WAGES DUE UPON SEPARATION BY BINARY CAPITAL DEFENDANTS
	Request

108	Filed: 3/15/2019, Entered: 3/15/2019	Proof Of Service By Mail
	NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY WAGES DUE UPON SEPARATION ETC... served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

107	Filed: 3/15/2019, Entered: 3/15/2019	Proposed Order Received
	GRANTING THE DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY WAGES DUE UPON SEPARATION
	Request

106	Filed: 3/15/2019, Entered: 3/15/2019	Declaration in Support
	OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION ETC...
	Request

105	Filed: 3/15/2019, Entered: 3/15/2019	Demurrer to
	TO PLAINTIFF'S FIFTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY WAGES DUE UPON SEPARATION BY BINARY CAPITAL DEFENDANTS; ETC...
	Request

104	Filed: 3/14/2019, Entered: 3/14/2019	Notice of Related Case
	CGC-19-573412
	Request

103	Filed: 3/13/2019, Entered: 3/13/2019	Declaration in Support
	OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MOTION TO HAVE REQUESTS DEEMED ADMITTED, TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AGAINST BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS


102	Filed: 3/13/2019, Entered: 3/13/2019	Notice of Motion and Motion to Deem Matters Admitted
	AND TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AGAINST BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
	Request

101	Filed: 3/6/2019, Entered: 3/6/2019	Order
	Type: FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR BINARY CAPITAL DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT Signed by: V. RAYMOND SWOPE Date Signed: 03/05/2019
	Request

100	Filed: 3/4/2019, Entered: 3/4/2019	Order sent for signature to Judicial Officer
	23; SWOPE; JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR BINARY CAPITAL DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OF OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
	Request

99	Filed: 3/4/2019, Entered: 3/4/2019	Proof Of Service By Mail
	JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR BINARY CAPITAL DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OF OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
	Request

98	Filed: 2/26/2019, Entered: 2/26/2019	Notice of Entry of Order
	STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER BETWEEN P[LAINTIFF ANN LAI AND JUSTIN CALDBECK, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND STANDISH MANAGEMENT
	Request

97	Filed: 2/21/2019, Entered: 2/21/2019	Answer
	TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
	Request

96	Filed: 2/19/2019, Entered: 2/19/2019	Stipulation and Order
	Type: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH JUSTIN CALDBECK, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND STANDISH MANAGEMENT Signed by: JUDGE GEORGE A. MIRAM Date Signed: 02/13/2019
	Request

95	Filed: 2/19/2019, Entered: 2/19/2019	Notice of Entry of Order
	GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
	Request

94	Filed: 2/7/2019, Entered: 2/7/2019	Proof Of Service By Mail
	CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY MARK R CONRAD
	Request

93	Filed: 2/7/2019, Entered: 2/7/2019	Notice
	of APPEARANCE BY MARK R. CONRAD
	Request

92	Filed: 2/7/2019, Entered: 2/7/2019	Proof of Service
	COMPLAINT, SUMMONS ON DEFENDANTS VIA TWITTER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; SUMMONS; ORDER GRANTING PUBLICATION OF SUMMONS
	Request

91	Filed: 2/6/2019, Entered: 2/6/2019	Stipulation and Order
	Type: PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION Signed by: JUDGE MIRAM Date Signed: 02/06/19
	Request

90	Filed: 2/6/2019, Entered: 2/6/2019	Notice
	of APPEARANCE OF ELLIOT R PETERS
	Request

89	Filed: 2/6/2019, Entered: 2/6/2019	Notice
	of APPEARANCE OF ANJALI SRINIVASAN
	Request

88	Filed: 2/6/2019, Entered: 2/6/2019	Notice
	of APPEARANCE OF ELIZABETH K MCCLOSKEY
	Request

87	Filed: 2/6/2019, Entered: 2/6/2019	Stipulation and Proposed Order received & forwarded to Dept
	DEPARTMENT 28
	Request

86	Filed: 2/4/2019, Entered: 2/4/2019	Stipulation and Proposed Order received & forwarded to Dept
	28 - PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
	Request

85	Filed: 1/31/2019, Entered: 1/31/2019	Notice
	OF ENTRY OF DISMISSAL OF CALDBECK
	Request

84	Filed: 1/22/2019, Entered: 1/22/2019	Proof of Service by PUBLICATION of
	SUMMONS ON SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

83	Filed: 1/9/2019, Entered: 1/9/2019	Notice of Case Management Conference
	CMC 2/22/19
	Request

82	Filed: 12/26/2018, Entered: 12/26/2018	Notice of Entry of Order
	NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN LAI'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER OF PUBLICATION OF SUMMONS
	Request

81	Filed: 12/26/2018, Entered: 12/26/2018	Request For Dismissal
	With Prejudice
	Request

80	Filed: 12/20/2018, Entered: 12/20/2018	Order
	Type: GRANTING PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER OF PUBLICATION OF SUMMONS Signed by: JUDGE GREENBERG Date Signed: 12/20/18
	Request

79	Filed: 12/20/2018, Entered: 12/20/2018	Ex-Parte Application
	FOR ORDER OF PUBLICATION OF SUMMONS, ETC
	Request

78	Filed: 11/20/2018, Entered: 11/20/2018	Notice of Case Management Conference
	CMC 1/23/19
	Request

77	Filed: 10/25/2018, Entered: 10/25/2018	Notice of Case Management Conference
	CMC 12/12/18
	Request

76	Filed: 10/18/2018, Entered: 10/18/2018	Answer
	TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

75	Filed: 10/9/2018, Entered: 10/9/2018	Proof of Service
	PERSONAL SERVICE IS QUESTIONABLE, SEPARATE PROOF OF SERVICE IS REQUIRED FOR EACH PARTY
	Request

74	Filed: 10/1/2018, Entered: 10/1/2018	Notice of Entry of Order
	GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.
	Request

73	Filed: 9/24/2018, Entered: 9/24/2018	Order
	Type: GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Signed by: JUDGE GREENBERG Date Signed: 09/20/18
	Request

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

72	Filed: 9/24/2018, Entered: 9/24/2018	Proof Of Service By Mail
	SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, SUMMONS
	Request

71	Filed: 9/24/2018, Entered: 9/24/2018	Proof of Service on CORPORATION, LLC, etc
	SUMMONS, SECON AMENDED COMPLAINT, SERVED ON BECKY DEGEORGE - CSC - PERSON AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT SERVICE
	Request

70	Filed: 9/17/2018, Entered: 9/17/2018	Summons: Issued/Filed
	2ND AMENDED


69	Filed: 9/13/2018, Entered: 9/13/2018	Mail returned undelivered
	Notice of CMC set on 9/13/18
	Request

68	Filed: 9/11/2018, Entered: 9/11/2018	Notice
	OF REPRESENTATION
	Request

67	Filed: 9/10/2018, Entered: 9/10/2018	Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint/Answer
	Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
	Request

66	Filed: 8/31/2018, Entered: 8/31/2018	Proof Of Service By Mail
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S REPLY served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

65	Filed: 8/31/2018, Entered: 8/31/2018	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

64	Filed: 8/28/2018, Entered: 8/28/2018	Opposition
	TO PLAINTIFF LAI'S MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

63	Filed: 8/27/2018, Entered: 8/27/2018	Notice of Case Management Conference
	CMC set for 11/1/18
	Request

62	Filed: 8/14/2018, Entered: 8/14/2018	Proof Of Service By Mail
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST CORRECTED PROOF OF SERVICE RE PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

61	Filed: 8/8/2018, Entered: 8/8/2018	Declaration in Support
	DECLARATION OF CHRIS BAKER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

60	Filed: 8/8/2018, Entered: 8/8/2018	Proof Of Service By Mail
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

59	Filed: 8/8/2018, Entered: 8/8/2018	Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to Amend
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF
	Request

58	Filed: 7/31/2018, Entered: 7/31/2018	Motion to Lift Stay
	Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
	Request

57	Filed: 7/23/2018, Entered: 7/23/2018	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply
	BRIEF RE: MOTION TO LIFT STAY
	Request

56	Filed: 7/18/2018, Entered: 7/18/2018	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition
	DEFENDANT JUSTIN CALDBECK'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND PETITION TO RESUME ARBITRATON AS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED BY COURT
	Request

55	Filed: 6/28/2018, Entered: 6/28/2018	Notice of Court Hearing
	Notice of CMC set for 9/13/18
	Request

54	Filed: 6/25/2018, Entered: 6/25/2018	Proof Of Service By Mail
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO LIFT STAY; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

53	Filed: 6/20/2018, Entered: 6/20/2018	Proposed Order Received
	GRANTING PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MOTION TO LIFT STAY
	Request

52	Filed: 6/20/2018, Entered: 6/20/2018	Declaration in Support
	OF CHRIS BAKER OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MOTION TO LIFT STAY
	Request

51	Filed: 6/20/2018, Entered: 6/20/2018	Motion
	AND MOTION TO LIFT STAY, ETC
	Request

50	Filed: 5/9/2018, Entered: 5/9/2018	Motion for leave
	TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

49	Filed: 5/8/2018, Entered: 5/8/2018	Proof of Service by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY of
	DEFENDANT AND CROSS-COMPLAINANT TORA HOLDINGS, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE , SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

48	Filed: 5/8/2018, Entered: 5/8/2018	Proof Of Service By Mail
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ETC served on JONATHAN TEO
	Request

47	Filed: 5/2/2018, Entered: 5/2/2018	Proof of Service by PERSONAL SERVICE of
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT served on DONNA M. RUTTER, ESQ
	Request

46	Filed: 5/2/2018, Entered: 5/2/2018	Declaration in Reply
	IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

45	Filed: 5/2/2018, Entered: 5/2/2018	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply
	IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

44	Filed: 4/27/2018, Entered: 4/27/2018	Opposition
	TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

43	Filed: 4/27/2018, Entered: 4/27/2018	Declaration
	OF DONNA M. RUTTER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

42	Filed: 4/25/2018, Entered: 4/25/2018	Order
	Type: GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Signed by: JUDGE GREENBERG Date Signed: 04/24/18
	Request

41	Filed: 4/24/2018, Entered: 4/24/2018	Proof of Service by PERSONAL SERVICE of
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ETC
	Request

40	Filed: 4/24/2018, Entered: 4/24/2018	Proof of Service by PERSONAL SERVICE of
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, ETC served on DONNA M. RUTTER
	Request

39	Filed: 4/23/2018, Entered: 4/23/2018	Order sent for signature to Judicial Officer
	TO DEPT. 3 ORDER AFTER HEARING
	Request

38	Filed: 4/18/2018, Entered: 4/18/2018	Notice of Court Hearing
	Notice of CMC: 7/11/18
	Request

37	Filed: 4/17/2018, Entered: 4/17/2018	Proposed Order Received
	GRANTING MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

36	Filed: 4/17/2018, Entered: 4/17/2018	Declaration in Support
	OF PLAINTIFF'S ANN LAI'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

35	Filed: 4/17/2018, Entered: 4/17/2018	Motion
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
	Request

34	Filed: 4/11/2018, Entered: 4/11/2018	Motion To Be Relieved As Counsel
	Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
	Request

33	Filed: 3/16/2018, Entered: 3/16/2018	Proof of Service
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL ETC.. served on JONATHAN TEO
	Request

32	Filed: 3/14/2018, Entered: 3/14/2018	Proof of Service by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY of
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

31	Filed: 3/14/2018, Entered: 3/14/2018	Declaration
	IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEYS' MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
	Request

30	Filed: 3/14/2018, Entered: 3/14/2018	Proposed Order Received
	GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
	Request

29	Filed: 3/14/2018, Entered: 3/14/2018	Motion
	AND MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
	Request

28	Filed: 2/2/2018, Entered: 2/2/2018	Motion to Seal
	Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
	Request

27	Filed: 12/20/2017, Entered: 12/20/2017	Other Hearing
	Hearing Time: 02:00 PM
	Request

26	Filed: 12/13/2017, Entered: 12/13/2017	Joinder
	TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY, ETC
	Request

25	Filed: 12/13/2017, Entered: 12/13/2017	Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay
	Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
	Request

24	Filed: 12/11/2017, Entered: 12/11/2017	Proof Of Service By Mail
	DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO SEAL....
	Request

23	Filed: 12/11/2017, Entered: 12/11/2017	Proposed Order Received
	GRANTING DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGMENT, LLC'S MOTION TO SEAL....
	Request

22	Filed: 12/11/2017, Entered: 12/11/2017	Declaration
	OF April SUN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC'S MOTION TO SEAL....
	Request

21	Filed: 12/11/2017, Entered: 12/11/2017	Motion
	AND MOTION TO SEAL, ETC
	Request

20	Filed: 12/6/2017, Entered: 12/6/2017	Proof of Service by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY of
	REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND FOR IMMEDIATE STAY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, ETC
	Request

19	Filed: 12/6/2017, Entered: 12/6/2017	Declaration
	OF April SUN IN SUPPORT OF REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S CLAIMS AND FOR IMMEDIATE STAY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
	Request

18	Filed: 12/6/2017, Entered: 12/6/2017	Declaration in Support
	OF REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S CLAIMS AND FOR IMMEDIATE STAY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
	Request

17	Filed: 12/6/2017, Entered: 12/6/2017	Memorandum Of Points And Authorities;
	IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND FOR IMMEDIATE STAY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
	Request

16	Filed: 12/5/2017, Entered: 12/5/2017	Proof of Service by PERSONAL SERVICE of
	PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

15	Filed: 12/5/2017, Entered: 12/5/2017	Documents Lodged Conditionally Under Seal
	Document(s): EXHIBITS A AN B TO PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
	Request

14	Filed: 12/5/2017, Entered: 12/5/2017	Documents Lodged Conditionally Under Seal
	Document(s): UNREDACTED VERSION OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
	Request

13	Filed: 11/30/2017, Entered: 11/30/2017	Declaration
	IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
	Request

12	Filed: 11/30/2017, Entered: 11/30/2017	Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition
	TO MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
	Request

11	Filed: 11/21/2017, Entered: 11/21/2017	Proof of Service by MESSENGER SERVICE of
	DEFENDANT JUSTIN CALDEBECK'S NOTICE OF JOINDER OF BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

10	Filed: 11/21/2017, Entered: 11/21/2017	Proof of Service by MESSENGER SERVICE of
	DEFENDANT BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

9	Filed: 11/17/2017, Entered: 11/17/2017	Proof of Service by MESSENGER SERVICE of
	DEFENDANTS BINARY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC served on SEE SERVICE LIST
	Request

8	Filed: 11/17/2017, Entered: 11/17/2017	Proposed Order Received
	GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC
	Request

7	Filed: 11/17/2017, Entered: 11/17/2017	Declaration
	OF JONATHAN TEO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC
	Request

6	Filed: 11/17/2017, Entered: 11/17/2017	Notice
	OF JOINDER OF MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S CLAIMS AND FOR IMMEDIATE STAY, ETC
	Request

5	Filed: 11/17/2017, Entered: 11/17/2017	Motion
	TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF PLAINTIFF ANN LAI'S CLAIMS AND FOR IMMEDIATE STAY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, ETC
	Request

4	Filed: 10/26/2017, Entered: 10/26/2017	Case Management Conference
	Hearing Time: 9:00 AM
	Request

3	Filed: 9/20/2017, Entered: 9/20/2017	Stipulation and Order
	TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND SIGNED BY JUDGE CRETAN
	Request

2	Filed: 9/11/2017, Entered: 9/11/2017	Stipulation and Proposed Order received & forwarded to Dept
	DEPT 6, STIP AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND
	Request

1	Filed: 8/21/2017, Entered: 8/21/2017	Notice & Acknowledgment of Receipt of
	SUMMONS & COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF CMC
	Request

AI text generation	None
AI document summarization	None
AI-augmented search	None
AI-generated images	None
AI chat or Q&A interface	Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents	Possible