Barracuda Networks Inc. v. Idea Potent, Inc.

Administrative Proceeding USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. 91224034-OPP
Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Update UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert AlertsSpaceJump Jump
Summary

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

Parties
No Logo Barracuda Networks, Inc., Plaintiff

Represented by Duane Morris LLP

v.
No Logo Idea Potent, Inc., Defendant

Represented by De Novo Legal Pc

Name Phone Fax E-Mail
Space E Michelle Tyde +1 212 893 8181 +1 212 583 1919 kgrierson@culhanemeadows.com
Attributes
Type Opposition
Interlocutory Attorney YONG OH (RICHARD) KIM
Date in Location 9/24/2015
Status Code 2
Location Code 845
Timeline
  Entries (9) Tab Overlap Calendar Events Tab Overlap Related (3) Tab Overlap Tools Right End
Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 9 Filed: 12/31/2015, Entered: None T
Bd Decision: Dismissed W/o Prej
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 8 Filed: 12/21/2015, Entered: None N
W/draw Of Opposition
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 7 Filed: 12/1/2015, Entered: None W
Extension Of Time Granted
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 6 Filed: 12/1/2015, Entered: None T
Stip For Ext
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 5 Filed: 10/29/2015, Entered: None S
Suspended
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 4 Filed: 10/29/2015, Entered: None W
Stip To Susp Pend Settl Negotiations
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 3 Filed: 9/24/2015, Entered: None T
Pending, Instituted
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 2 Filed: 9/24/2015, Entered: None T
Notice And Trial Dates Sent; Answer Due:
Request RequestSpace LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 1 Filed: 9/24/2015, Entered: None N
Filed And Fee
Request RequestSpace LREF

Statistics

This case has been viewed 641 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro