Court Cases Court Cases

  Most Popular Cases Tab Overlap Cases with Faces Tab Overlap Cases by Type Tab Overlap Cases by Reporter Tab Overlap Cases by Year Right End

Recently Popular Cases

  1. PAUL v. LAM RESEARCH, et al. 4,691 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

  2. GREENSPAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al 3,788 views
    District Of Columbia District Court

    Bola TinubuNigeriaFOIAGovernment TransparencyFBIDEAFederal RecordsInvestigative JournalismContempt of Court

    Based on the fact that a 1993 civil forfeiture lawsuit became one of the most popular dockets on PlainSite, PlainSite founder Aaron Greenspan sued six United States government agencies over their denial of FOIA requests and subsequent administrative appeals about Nigerian President Bold Tinubu, newly elected as of May 2023 in a highly controversial election.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

  3. USA v. Acct 263226700, et al 1,635 views
    Illinois Northern District Court

    NigeriaNarcotraffickingMoney LaunderingBola TinubuAsset ForfeitureDrug Trafficking ProceedsCivil ForfeitureNarcotics

    Nigerian President-Elect Bola Ahmed Tinubu was named as the owner of several bank accounts that were used to launder money for a heroin distribution network in Chicago, IL in the early 1990s. The members of the heroin ring were criminally charged in a separate case, Northern District of Illinois Case No. 2:92-cr-00113-RL. For unknown reasons, Tinubu was not. Instead, the U.S. Government seized the contents of the bank accounts based on several different seizure warrants across three different dockets, of which this is one. The other two, from 1992, are in the Southern District of New York and a separate docket in the Northern District of Illinois—both with unknown case numbers since the documents pre-date the federal court's PACER system by so many years. In total, about $2.4 million USD was seized from Tinubu's global bank accounts pursuant to these seizure warrants. While working for Mobil Oil Company in Nigeria, Tinubu used a variety of shell companies to move the money around, including Compass Finance & Investment Co., incorporated in Washington, D.C. Though he was not charged, Tinubu committed at least five federal crimes, according to the IRS Special Agent's affidavit in this case: 1) Money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956); 2) Using funds from unlawful activity (18 U.S.C. § 1957); 3) Bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344); 4) Failure to file tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7203); and 5) Lying to federal agents (18 U.S.C. § 1001). Tinubu was elected to be the next President of Nigeria in February 2023.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

  4. Ge Healthcare Bio-sciences Ab v. Spiber Inc. 1,516 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  5. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 1,414 views
    New Jersey District Court

    This is a general administrative docket used by the New Jersey District Court to post new complaints. It's not actually a real lawsuit.

  6. Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al 732 views
    Massachusetts District Court

    Fake Non-Fiction BooksFalse AdvertisingThe Social Network (2010 Movie)Defamation By OmissionAaron SorkinConsumer ReviewsFake AccountsFacebook OriginsHarvard UniversityCopyright InfringementDefamationFacebookThe Social NetworkHollywoodUnfair CompetitionHarvard

    Aaron Greenspan, creator of the 2003 predecessor to The Facebook at Harvard University, sued popular author Benjamin Mezrich, his publisher Random House, and Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement, defamation and false advertising due to the statements made by Mezrich in and about his book "The Accidental Billionaires." Mezrich's book, which cites Greenspan's as a source, has been marketed as supposed non-fiction, even though the story is full of inconsistencies and outright falsifications, many of which Mezrich admits to. Mezrich notably omitted Greenspan's role in the creation of the web site, and helped to prop up Mark Zuckerberg as a "genius" in his book, leading to the eventual motion picture "The Social Network," and contributing to the frenzy surrounding Facebook's problematic IPO.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

  7. Vidia Inc v. Selfreliance Ukrainian American Federal 706 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  8. 311 N. Bowling Green Way, LLC v. Kinder Ready, Inc., et al. 690 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  9. Flowserve Management Company v. Valtek Sulamericana Industria E Comercio Ltda., 671 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  10. Dymtrow v. Swift et al 668 views
    New York Southern District Court

    Pop StarsMusic IndustryChild StarsTalent ManagementBreach of ContractEntertainment LawTaylor Swift

    Pop star Taylor Swift's early manager Daniel Dymtrow sued the Swift family after his services were terminated just before a meeting with Sony ATV that he alleges he helped to arrange, cutting him out of payments. He also sued Swift's new record label, Big Machine Records, and its founder, Scott Borchetta.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

  11. Harding v. Rubenstein et al 581 views
    West Virginia Northern District Court

  12. (gemco) Aziz Noghreian v. David Oren Shachar et al 578 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  13. Emmanuel Macron v. Candace Owens, et al. 563 views
    Superior Court of Delaware

    FranceSocial Media

  14. Raymond B Simmons v. San Francisco Housing Authority et al 561 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

  15. Sega Of America, Inc. v. Dustin Hensley 536 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  16. Ideanova Technologies Inc. v. Techsmith Corporation 530 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  17. Giuffre v. Maxwell 459 views
    New York Southern District Court

    Sexual PredatorsJeffrey E. EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGDefamationJeffrey EpsteinGhislaine MaxwellSealed RecordsCourt TransparencySexual Abuse

    Virginia Giuffre sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation after Maxwell alleged that Giuffre's claims about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, which ensnared Giuffre as a minor, were not true. Thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein and his associates, including former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, have been released in this case as a result of the discovery process.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

  18. In the Matter of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein 459 views
    U.S. Virgin Islands Superior Court

    Jeffrey E. Epstein

  19. USA v. Houck 450 views
    Missouri Western District Court

  20. Levi Strauss & Co. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" 448 views
    Illinois Northern District Court

  21. Cooke v. Yates 407 views
    Oregon District Court

  22. Assurant, Inc. v. Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company 400 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  23. Towable Water Sports Apparatus Such As A Water Ski 396 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  24. Unknown Bankruptcy Case Title 395 views
    Illinois Northern Bankruptcy Court - Chicago

  25. Jamal Hamadah v. Samer Sannoufi 385 views
    California Central District Court

  26. Wei Zhang v. More E & Assoicates Real Estate 378 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  27. Perforated Nut Tensioning System 363 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  28. Brooks v. Waters, et al 341 views
    Maryland District Court

  29. Drilling System Drive Steel 333 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  30. Amberg, Etal V. Pulte Home 319 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino

  31. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 318 views
    New Jersey District Court

  32. Immunosuppressive compositions 312 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  33. Jane Roe 424 E.l., An Individual v. Doe 1, A Public Entity 310 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  34. Exhibition Employees Local 829 I.A.T.S.E. Annuity Fund v. Showtime on the Piers, LLC 309 views
    New York Southern District Court

  35. DOWNING v. CASEY 307 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

  36. Neumann V. Silver Valley Usd 306 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino

  37. Mathis et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al 300 views
    Florida Southern District Court

    Fair Labor Standards ActMinimum WageTip PoolingRestaurant IndustryCollective ActionWage TheftDarden RestaurantsOlive GardenRed Lobster

    Current and former servers and bartenders at Darden Restaurants — the parent company of Olive Garden, Red Lobster, LongHorn Steakhouse, Seasons 52, and Bahama Breeze — filed this nationwide collective action in September 2012 in the Southern District of Florida, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs claimed that Darden illegally required tipped employees to participate in mandatory tip-sharing arrangements and otherwise failed to pay them the federal minimum wage applicable to tipped workers. The proposed class ultimately encompassed more than 216,000 servers and bartenders who worked for Darden brands during the three-year period covered by the claims. The case generated extensive procedural litigation over conditional certification, the scope of the class list, and discovery. In November 2013, the parties discovered that Darden had inadvertently omitted approximately 1,586 bartenders from the class list — those coded under a "Bartender Tip Share" designation introduced at Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Bahama Breeze, and Seasons 52 when those brands rolled out mandatory tip-share programs around 2011. The parties jointly moved to extend the opt-in period to cover these workers. The case proceeded to mediation before a private mediator in June 2014.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

  38. Luke Mulhall v. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 288 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

  39. DITHRICH v. DHOOGHE 286 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

    Dismissed

    This case was brought before the court because Justin R. Dhooghe found out about an affair between his then fiance Laura V. Rivera and Charles W. Dithrich and wanted information. Charles W. Dithrich wanted to settle out of court for a list of demands including the deletion of all information and pictures Justin R. Dhooghe had in his possession of the affair along with the sum of five thousand dollars in exchange for a non-CLETs restraining order, one that was not on his permanent record. Justin R. Dhooghe eventually refused and the case was brought before the judge and ultimately was dismissed due to insufficient grounds. No restraining order is in effect.

  40. Binary Semantics Limited v. Minitab 285 views
    Pennsylvania Middle District Court

  41. Keyless Latch For Orienting And Anchoring Downhole Tools 282 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  42. Optical Plug-in Connector 280 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  43. Derek J. Rundell Et. Al. Vs. Michael Jackson 279 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  44. Christine Kasparian Vs. Avalonbay Communities, Inc. 277 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  45. Amber L Wuchitech v. Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc et al 275 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  46. PENOBSCOT INDIAN NATION et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al 271 views
    District Of Columbia District Court

  47. Trend Sound Promoter AMG Corp- Adversary Proceeding 262 views
    Washington Western Bankruptcy Court

  48. Support And Anchoring Mechanism For Membranes In Selectively Responsive Field Effect Devices 259 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  49. Garcia Juarez Const V. City Of Riverside 253 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino

  50. Katherine Barrese v. Jacques Gaston Murray 250 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  51. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 246 views
    New Jersey District Court

  52. Emerson Electric Co. v. Emerson Radio Corp. 239 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  53. USA v. Sanchez-Lopez 238 views
    Arizona District Court

  54. Mishel Melamed v. Parvin Mesbah 235 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  55. Template system for hair removal 231 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  56. MAUGE v. FINANCIAL RECOVERIES 230 views
    Pennsylvania Eastern District Court

  57. USA v. Lay et al 228 views
    New York Southern District Court

  58. United States v. Arencibia 228 views
    Florida Southern District Court

  59. Yergeau v. General Signal Corp., et al 226 views
    Rhode Island District Court

  60. Cavalry Spv I, LLC v. Charlie Cooc 225 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  61. Lenovo Pc International Limited v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 224 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  62. Perfect Plastic v. CPI Card Grp, et al 219 views
    Illinois Northern District Court

  63. Carlin v. ConocoPhillips Co, et al 218 views
    Arizona District Court

  64. Friedkin Group Incorporated v. danfriedkin.com 217 views
    Arizona District Court

  65. United States v. Huerta-Tizoc 216 views
    California Southern District Court

  66. TYSON v. HOWARD 215 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

  67. Methods and materials for fabrication of alumoxane polymers 213 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  68. Emilio Garcia v. Roc Nation LLC et al 211 views
    New York Southern District Court

  69. United States v. DA FONSECA 208 views
    District Of Columbia District Court

  70. United States v. Williams 203 views
    Massachusetts District Court

  71. Amanda Sainz, v. Shoe Palace Corporation 203 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  72. Shah v. Hart 202 views
    Illinois Northern District Court

  73. USA v. Joy et al 196 views
    Missouri Western District Court

  74. Directv Inc v. Greg A Fischer 196 views
    California Central District Court

  75. Ho v. Kiewit Building Group, Inc. 195 views
    Hawaii District Court

  76. LeBlanc v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company 194 views
    Texas Southern District Court

  77. In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation 193 views
    Illinois Northern District Court

    African American Hair Straightening Products

  78. Wei Hong Liu, et al. v. Fashion Nova, LLC 193 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  79. Govind R. Vaghasha et al Vs. Estate Of James W. Martin et al 189 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  80. Mariah Huarte v. Brian Boxer Wachler M D et al 187 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  81. Greenlight Capital Inc. v. Fishback 186 views
    New York Southern District Court

  82. 919-921 Broadway Llc et al v. Farmers Group Inc et al 184 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  83. Rwa Wealth Partners, LLC v. Mariner Platform Solutions, LLC, et al. 180 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  84. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VELASQUEZ-ORTIZ 176 views
    Georgia Middle District Court

  85. Wyer v. Tesla, Inc. et al. 175 views
    California Court of Appeal

    Tesla Worker RightsEmployment DiscriminationPersonal injuryAppellateTeslaAppeal

    The heart of my case is that Tesla, Inc. illegally terminated me in violation of the FEHA and well-established public policy. More specifically, Tesla illegally fired me for the following reasons: 1) I have a disability (ASD and hypertension that required emergency care). 2) I requested accommodations and unilaterally attempted to engage in a good faith interactive process and was denied. 3) I am an older person. I was almost 62 years old when I was illegally fired. I was replaced immediately (3-days-later) by a software engineer who was approximately half my age. Coworkers made comments about my age and indicated that I was an “old man.” 4) I complained that Rollins and my co-workers were engaging in sexual harassment and offensive communications referring to their penis sizes on Tesla’s communications network. Also, sexual videos of women twerking were placed in the team’s chat that displayed women’s breasts. Reporting was required by Tesla’s own Sexual Harassment and Bullying Training Program. 5) I was forced to open a workers’ compensation case for injuries I sustained as a result of work. I was awarded $45,000 for this claim. 6) Moreover, I was fired because I engaged in whistleblowing regarding sexual harassment, sabotage, and other security issues. Whistleblowing is a protected activity.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

  86. Technology Insurance Company Inc. v. Roadstarr Motor Sports Inc. 174 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

  87. REV 973 LLC v. John Mouren-Laurens, et al 172 views
    California Central District Court

  88. Pampena v. Musk 169 views
    California Northern District Court

    TwitterFake Accounts

  89. DENIS J ARTILES 167 views
    Arizona Bankruptcy Court

  90. Bliss Products Holdings LLC v. Australia Hansway International Pty Ltd. 166 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  91. 037A4D3 v. Tucker, Albin & Associates, Inc. 164 views
    Pennsylvania Middle District Court

  92. Coultrip et al v. Pfizer, Inc 163 views
    New York Southern District Court

  93. Delphi Technologies, Inc. v. Skyworks Solutions, Inc. 161 views
    USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  94. Sound Reproduction Apparatus And Sound Reproduction Method 160 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  95. Schoonover v. Brigano 157 views
    Ohio Southern District Court

  96. Positional Information Storage System And Method , Semiconductor Memory, And Program 156 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

  97. Salatino v. Imperial Merchant Services LLC 156 views
    New York Southern District Court

  98. Kell v. Crowther 155 views
    Utah District Court

  99. Apparatus for blow molding 154 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

Recent Court Filings

Loading Map...

United States of America

Washington D.C. | Guam | Northern Marinara Islands | Puerto Rico | U.S. Virgin Islands

Fetching initial filings...

View near real-time filings with PlainSite Pro.

Non-Government Works Copyright © 2001-2026 Think Computer Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

About   Privacy   Security   Contact Us

ⓘ Information Facts

Sign In Sign Up
Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro
Sign In Sign Up