Recently Popular Cases

1. USA v. Acct 263226700, et al 4,335 views
   Illinois Northern District Court

   NigeriaNarcotraffickingMoney LaunderingBola TinubuAsset ForfeitureDrug Trafficking ProceedsCivil ForfeitureNarcotics

   Nigerian President-Elect Bola Ahmed Tinubu was named as the owner of several bank accounts that were used to launder money for a heroin distribution network in Chicago, IL in the early 1990s. The members of the heroin ring were criminally charged in a separate case, Northern District of Illinois Case No. 2:92-cr-00113-RL. For unknown reasons, Tinubu was not. Instead, the U.S. Government seized the contents of the bank accounts based on several different seizure warrants across three different dockets, of which this is one. The other two, from 1992, are in the Southern District of New York and a separate docket in the Northern District of Illinois—both with unknown case numbers since the documents pre-date the federal court's PACER system by so many years. In total, about $2.4 million USD was seized from Tinubu's global bank accounts pursuant to these seizure warrants. While working for Mobil Oil Company in Nigeria, Tinubu used a variety of shell companies to move the money around, including Compass Finance & Investment Co., incorporated in Washington, D.C. Though he was not charged, Tinubu committed at least five federal crimes, according to the IRS Special Agent's affidavit in this case: 1) Money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956); 2) Using funds from unlawful activity (18 U.S.C. § 1957); 3) Bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344); 4) Failure to file tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7203); and 5) Lying to federal agents (18 U.S.C. § 1001). Tinubu was elected to be the next President of Nigeria in February 2023.

   AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

2. PAUL v. LAM RESEARCH, et al. 2,997 views
   Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

3. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 821 views
   New Jersey District Court

   This is a general administrative docket used by the New Jersey District Court to post new complaints. It's not actually a real lawsuit.

4. GREENSPAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al 808 views
   District Of Columbia District Court

   Bola TinubuNigeriaFOIAGovernment TransparencyFBIDEAFederal RecordsInvestigative JournalismContempt of Court

   Based on the fact that a 1993 civil forfeiture lawsuit became one of the most popular dockets on PlainSite, PlainSite founder Aaron Greenspan sued six United States government agencies over their denial of FOIA requests and subsequent administrative appeals about Nigerian President Bold Tinubu, newly elected as of May 2023 in a highly controversial election.

   AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

5. Wyer v. Tesla, Inc. et al. 650 views
   California Court of Appeal

   Tesla Worker RightsEmployment DiscriminationPersonal injuryAppellateTeslaAppeal

   The heart of my case is that Tesla, Inc. illegally terminated me in violation of the FEHA and well-established public policy. More specifically, Tesla illegally fired me for the following reasons: 1) I have a disability (ASD and hypertension that required emergency care). 2) I requested accommodations and unilaterally attempted to engage in a good faith interactive process and was denied. 3) I am an older person. I was almost 62 years old when I was illegally fired. I was replaced immediately (3-days-later) by a software engineer who was approximately half my age. Coworkers made comments about my age and indicated that I was an “old man.” 4) I complained that Rollins and my co-workers were engaging in sexual harassment and offensive communications referring to their penis sizes on Tesla’s communications network. Also, sexual videos of women twerking were placed in the team’s chat that displayed women’s breasts. Reporting was required by Tesla’s own Sexual Harassment and Bullying Training Program. 5) I was forced to open a workers’ compensation case for injuries I sustained as a result of work. I was awarded $45,000 for this claim. 6) Moreover, I was fired because I engaged in whistleblowing regarding sexual harassment, sabotage, and other security issues. Whistleblowing is a protected activity.

   AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

6. USA v. Chang Monroy 400 views
   Virginia Eastern District Court

7. Jenkins v. Boward 396 views
   Maryland District Court

8. Digital 2260 East El Segundo LLC v. Net Data Centers Inc 389 views
   Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

9. DITHRICH v. DHOOGHE 330 views
   Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

   Dismissed

   This case was brought before the court because Justin R. Dhooghe found out about an affair between his then fiance Laura V. Rivera and Charles W. Dithrich and wanted information. Charles W. Dithrich wanted to settle out of court for a list of demands including the deletion of all information and pictures Justin R. Dhooghe had in his possession of the affair along with the sum of five thousand dollars in exchange for a non-CLETs restraining order, one that was not on his permanent record. Justin R. Dhooghe eventually refused and the case was brought before the judge and ultimately was dismissed due to insufficient grounds. No restraining order is in effect.

10. USA v. Vasquez-Bazet 326 views
    Texas Southern District Court

11. Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al 312 views
    Massachusetts District Court

    Fake Non-Fiction BooksFalse AdvertisingThe Social Network (2010 Movie)Defamation By OmissionAaron SorkinConsumer ReviewsFake AccountsFacebook OriginsHarvard UniversityCopyright InfringementDefamationFacebookThe Social NetworkHollywoodUnfair CompetitionHarvard

    Aaron Greenspan, creator of the 2003 predecessor to The Facebook at Harvard University, sued popular author Benjamin Mezrich, his publisher Random House, and Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement, defamation and false advertising due to the statements made by Mezrich in and about his book "The Accidental Billionaires." Mezrich's book, which cites Greenspan's as a source, has been marketed as supposed non-fiction, even though the story is full of inconsistencies and outright falsifications, many of which Mezrich admits to. Mezrich notably omitted Greenspan's role in the creation of the web site, and helped to prop up Mark Zuckerberg as a "genius" in his book, leading to the eventual motion picture "The Social Network," and contributing to the frenzy surrounding Facebook's problematic IPO.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

12. Willson Davis Company v. Superior Tomato-Avocado, Ltd et al 304 views
    Texas Western District Court

13. Szpila v. Monticciolo Family and Sedation Dentistry, P.A. 269 views
    Florida Middle District Court

14. Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump et al 251 views
    California Central District Court

    Jeffrey E. EpsteinPresident Donald J. TrumpDonald J. Trump Child Rape AllegationsSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinChild ExploitationPro Se LitigationCivil RightsPersonal injury

    A woman filing under the pseudonym Katie Johnson, a self-represented plaintiff from Twentynine Palms, California, filed this lawsuit in April 2016 in the Central District of California before Judge Dolly Gee against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that when she was 13 years old in 1994, she was sexually assaulted by both Trump and Epstein at Epstein's Manhattan residence. The complaint was filed pro se. The case was assigned on April 26, 2016 and initial documents were filed. A renewed judgment/renewal of judgment filing appeared in April 2026, more than a decade later, suggesting residual enforcement activity. The original lawsuit was withdrawn and refiled in New York before being voluntarily dismissed in November 2016.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

15. United States v. Bossingham 246 views
    Arizona District Court

    Kitchen NightmaresTurbodisputeIdentity TheftSocial Security FraudCredit FraudFederal SentencingPlea AgreementAmy's Baking Company

    Amanda Patricia Bossingham, also known as "Amy," the proprietor of Amy's Baking Company in Scottsdale, AZ, featured on the popular Fox television show "Kitchen Nightmares," was convicted of bank fraud in 2008 after she falsified a Social Security number on an application for a five-figure bank loan.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

16. Giuffre v. Maxwell 231 views
    New York Southern District Court

    Sexual PredatorsJeffrey E. EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGDefamationJeffrey EpsteinGhislaine MaxwellSealed RecordsCourt TransparencySexual Abuse

    Virginia Giuffre sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation after Maxwell alleged that Giuffre's claims about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, which ensnared Giuffre as a minor, were not true. Thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein and his associates, including former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, have been released in this case as a result of the discovery process.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

17. Tierpoint Midwest, LLC v. The Gage Team, Inc. 210 views
    Nebraska District Court

18. 263BE83 v. Baucum et al 205 views
    Texas Northern District Court

19. Robert McCarthy v. Americasia Investment LLC et al 203 views
    California Central District Court

20. Particle guidance system 200 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

21. 197 views
    Indiana Southern District Court

22. USA v. Urbina-Espinosa 196 views
    Texas Southern District Court

23. United States v. Ham 193 views
    Texas Southern District Court

24. USA v. Blanco-Flores 188 views
    Texas Southern District Court

25. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. Gerea, Paul Haidu 186 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

26. Blueberries, S.A. v. Fresh Results, LLC 178 views
    Florida Southern District Court

27. USA v. Zapata 177 views
    Texas Southern District Court

28. DSV AIR & SEA, INC., A CORPORATION v. PROMAXO INC., A CORPORA... 175 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

29. Streckfuss v. Pizza My Heart Inc. 173 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

30. USA v. Santana-Rosales 172 views
    Texas Southern District Court

31. USA v. Harris 172 views
    Texas Southern District Court

32. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 171 views
    New Jersey District Court

33. USA v. Solis-Cruz 171 views
    Texas Southern District Court

34. Vogel v. 9429 Walnut Cake, LLC et al 171 views
    California Central District Court

35. EB IP Holdings LLC et al v. Pro-Driver Leasing Systems, Inc. et al 170 views
    Texas Southern District Court

36. United States v. Lopez-Hernandez 170 views
    Texas Southern District Court

37. Vnh Enterprises Inc. v. Jennifer Maglaya 152 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

38. USA v. Castillo-Macias et al 150 views
    Texas Southern District Court

39. Victor Guzman, et al. v. Dr. Squatch, LLC 148 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

40. NVE Experience Agency, LLC et al v. Pension Systems Corporation et al 147 views
    California Central District Court

41. BRAGGS, et al. v. BEI CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al. 145 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

42. USA v. Castaneda-Benitez 143 views
    Texas Southern District Court

43. RICHARDSON v. TELECARE CORPORATION 140 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

44. United States v. Sanchez 137 views
    Texas Southern District Court

45. Mathis et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al 136 views
    Florida Southern District Court

    Fair Labor Standards ActMinimum WageTip PoolingRestaurant IndustryCollective ActionWage TheftDarden RestaurantsOlive GardenRed Lobster

    Current and former servers and bartenders at Darden Restaurants — the parent company of Olive Garden, Red Lobster, LongHorn Steakhouse, Seasons 52, and Bahama Breeze — filed this nationwide collective action in September 2012 in the Southern District of Florida, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs claimed that Darden illegally required tipped employees to participate in mandatory tip-sharing arrangements and otherwise failed to pay them the federal minimum wage applicable to tipped workers. The proposed class ultimately encompassed more than 216,000 servers and bartenders who worked for Darden brands during the three-year period covered by the claims. The case generated extensive procedural litigation over conditional certification, the scope of the class list, and discovery. In November 2013, the parties discovered that Darden had inadvertently omitted approximately 1,586 bartenders from the class list — those coded under a "Bartender Tip Share" designation introduced at Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Bahama Breeze, and Seasons 52 when those brands rolled out mandatory tip-share programs around 2011. The parties jointly moved to extend the opt-in period to cover these workers. The case proceeded to mediation before a private mediator in June 2014.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

46. Venetia v. Fritz-Herman Brandhorst et al 134 views
    New York Southern District Court

47. One Workplace L. Ferrari, LLC v. Bravanta, Inc. Fka Bravogifts.com, Inc. et al 132 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

48. Jacqueline L Domac v. Edward Furlong 126 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

49. Pampena v. Musk 126 views
    California Northern District Court

    TwitterFake Accounts

50. Kahn v. Anthropic PBC 125 views
    California Northern District Court

    Artificial IntelligenceClaude Max

51. Archer v. Decker et al 124 views
    New York Southern District Court

52. Gonzalez v. DSV Air & Sea, Inc. 124 views
    Florida Middle District Court

53. LANDRUM v. SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS LLC 124 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

54. Nutrition Distribution LLC v. Chaos and Pain, LLC 115 views
    California Southern District Court

55. Alan S Ruttenberg v. Sovereign Ventures, Inc., A California Corporation, et al. 114 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

56. WORKSHARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. V LITERA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC 111 views
    North Carolina Middle District Court

57. Wong-Mikhail v. Sutter Bay Medical Foundation 111 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

58. Vieira v. One Workplace L. Ferrari LLC (Class Action) 111 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

59. Jacob Talasazan Vs. Anna Buechler Et. Al. 109 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

60. Peter Gustavo Pacheco Cateriano v. Gustavo Mauricio Pacheco De Olazaval 106 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

61. Sternberg v. Warneck et al 105 views
    Nevada District Court

62. (PC) Williams v. Price 102 views
    California Eastern District Court

63. Basil M Hantash v. Blue Cross Of California Dba Anthem Blue Cross, et al. 102 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

64. Aglubat v. Formfactor, Inc. 101 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

65. Luis Ahedo v. Omega Global Technologies, Inc. 101 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

66. Doe v. Trump et al 99 views
    New York Southern District Court

    Jeffrey E. EpsteinSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGChild Sexual AbuseDefamation

    A woman proceeding under the pseudonym Jane Doe filed this lawsuit in June 2016 in the Southern District of New York against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that she had been sexually assaulted by both men at a series of parties hosted by Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse in 1994, when the plaintiff was 13 years old. The complaint alleged rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and defamation. It described a pattern of abuse over multiple encounters that the plaintiff alleged was facilitated by an unnamed woman who recruited her with promises of money and modeling work. The case attracted significant media attention given the identities of the defendants and the gravity of the allegations. A companion affidavit filed with the complaint included similar allegations from a second anonymous woman who claimed to have witnessed some of the events. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case in November 2016, with her attorney citing fear for her safety and the psychological toll of the publicity as the reasons for withdrawal. The dismissal was without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of refiling, though no subsequent federal action was recorded.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

67. Maria Wong-Mikhail v. Sutter Bay Medical Foundation et al 99 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

68. Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, Inc. v. Montana Opticom et al 98 views
    Montana District Court

69. PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 96 views
    New Jersey District Court

70. Household Finance Corporation Of California A v. Tom J Beno et al 96 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

71. EQUINIX INC. v. JOIN DIGITAL, INC. 96 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

72. Murakami Swenson Inc v. Mirage Studios et al 95 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

73. United States v. Dominguez 95 views
    Texas Southern District Court

74. Emmanuel Macron v. Candace Owens, et al. 92 views
    Superior Court of Delaware

    FranceSocial Media

75. The Wong Family Trust v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stablization And 91 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

76. Michelle Dopak v. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, et al. 90 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

77. Plaintiff v. Defendant 89 views
    Georgia Northern District Court

78. Jerry J. Nieuwenhuis and Jennifer S. Nieuwenhuis 88 views
    Iowa Northern Bankruptcy Court

79. Graham v. UMG Recordings, Inc. 88 views
    New York Southern District Court

    DrakeCelebritiesRap Artists

80. USA v. DADIG 88 views
    Pennsylvania Western District Court

    Artificial IntelligenceInternet Harassment

81. Manalo v. San Jose, LLC, et al. 84 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

82. Tricontinental Industries, Limited and Tricontinental Distribution, Limited v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP 82 views
    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

83. Gaia Leasing LLC v. Wendelta, Inc. 82 views
    Minnesota District Court

84. Optical Fiber Unit Installation Apparatus Including A Unit For Preventing Backward Flowing Of Fluid 81 views
    United States Patent and Trademark Office

85. BITRO GROUP, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL LIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 79 views
    New Jersey District Court

86. Dymtrow v. Swift et al 78 views
    New York Southern District Court

    Pop StarsMusic IndustryChild StarsTalent ManagementBreach of ContractEntertainment LawTaylor Swift

    Pop star Taylor Swift's early manager Daniel Dymtrow sued the Swift family after his services were terminated just before a meeting with Sony ATV that he alleges he helped to arrange, cutting him out of payments. He also sued Swift's new record label, Big Machine Records, and its founder, Scott Borchetta.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

87. Pepperball Technologies Inc v. Security with Advanced Technology Inc 78 views
    California Southern District Court

88. 112F9A7 v. CNH Industrial America LLC 78 views
    Minnesota District Court

89. BITRO GROUP INC. v. GLOBAL LUX INC. 77 views
    New Jersey District Court

90. Moguldom Media Group, LLC v. Okasi 77 views
    Georgia Northern District Court

91. The People Of The State Of California v. David Gonzalez 77 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino

92. DSV Air & Sea Inc. v. Lopez Stone, a corporation 76 views
    Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

93. Doe v. Trump et al 75 views
    New York Southern District Court

    Jeffrey E. EpsteinSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinChild Sexual AbuseSEX TRAFFICKINGDefamation

    This lawsuit was the second complaint filed by a woman proceeding under the pseudonym Jane Doe against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of New York, filed in September 2016 — four months after the plaintiff had voluntarily dismissed an earlier action in the same court. The refiled complaint contained substantially similar allegations: that the plaintiff, who was 13 years old in 1994, had been raped and sexually abused by both Trump and Epstein at parties hosted by Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse. The complaint alleged that Epstein lured the plaintiff with promises of money and modeling opportunities and that Trump and Epstein subjected her to multiple assaults over the course of several encounters. Like the earlier filing, it included accounts from an alleged witness proceeding as a second anonymous declarant. The refiled case attracted even greater media attention because it was filed shortly before the November 2016 presidential election. A press conference at which the plaintiff and her attorney had planned to speak publicly was canceled, with the attorney citing death threats. The plaintiff again voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit in November 2016, citing fear for her safety. No criminal charges were ever brought based on these specific allegations.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

94. Godwin v. Wendelta, Inc. 75 views
    Mississippi Northern District Court

95. Yaser A. Albahri, Petitioner v. Florida 74 views
    Supreme Court of the United States

96. In Re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation 73 views
    New York Southern District Court

97. Aaron Greenspan v. Elon Musk et al 73 views
    Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

    Social MediaDisinformationInternet HarassmentTesla Full Self-DrivingArtificial Intelligence

98. USA v. Vilneus 72 views
    Rhode Island District Court

    Criminal ConspiracyOrganized CrimeRelated Cases

    Federal prosecutors in the District of Rhode Island charged Irvin Vilneus and four co-defendants — Junior Mertile, Tony Mertile, James Legerme, and Allen Bien-Aime — in a series of related criminal cases filed in late 2020. A notice of related case filed in November 2020 formally linked the five proceedings, indicating the defendants were charged in connection with a common scheme or organization. The cases proceeded together before the court, which is common in prosecutions involving multiple members of an alleged criminal enterprise or conspiracy. The related-case structure suggested the defendants were charged with overlapping or coordinated criminal conduct in Rhode Island.

    AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.

99. Coultrip et al v. Pfizer, Inc 71 views
    New York Southern District Court

100. BITRO GROUP, INC. v. LEDWHOLESALERS.COM, INC. 71 views
     New Jersey District Court

Washington D.C. | Guam | Northern Marinara Islands | Puerto Rico | U.S. Virgin Islands

View near real-time filings with PlainSite Pro.

Federal District Court Case Types

• 100 - Contract
• 102 - Contract
• 104 - Contract
• 110 - Contract - Insurance
• 111 - Miscellaneous
• 112 - Contract - Sale (CDA)
• 114 - Contract - Service (CDA)
• 116 - Contract - Supply (CDA)
• 118 - Contract - Other (CDA)
• 120 - Contract: Marine
• 122 - Contract - Bid Preparation Costs
• 128 - Contract - Subsidy
• 130 - Contract - Surety
• 134 - Contract - Other
• 136 - Contract - Other - Wunderlich
• 138 - Contract - (Pre Award) Injunctions
• 140 - Contract - Injunction (Post Award)
• 150 - Contract: Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment
• 151 - Contract: Medicare Act
• 152 - Contract: Defaulted Student Loan
• 153 - Contract: Recovery Veteran Ben.
• 160 - Contract: Stockholders' Suits
• 190 - Contract: Other Contract Actions
• 195 - Contract Product Liability
• 196 - Contract: Franchise
• 200 - Tax - Allowance of Interest
• 202 - Tax - Declaratory Judgment 28:1507
• 204 - Tax - Estate
• 206 - Tax - Excise
• 208 - Tax - Gift
• 210 - Real Property: Land Condemnation
• 212 - Tax - Income Individual
• 214 - Tax - Informer's Fees
• 220 - Foreclosure (Diversity)
• 224 - Tax -100% Penalty-26:6672- Withhold.
• 226 - Tax - Other
• 230 - Real Property: Rent Lease & Ejectment
• 240 - Real Property: Torts to Land
• 245 - Real Property: Tort Product Liability
• 290 - Real Property: Other
• 300 - Civilian Pay - Back Pay
• 302 - Civilian Pay - COLA
• 304 - Civilian Pay - FLSA
• 306 - Civilian Pay - Overtime Compensation
• 310 - Personal Injury: Airplane
• 312 - Civilian Pay - Other
• 315 - Personal Injury: Airplane Product Liability
• 320 - Personal Injury: Assault Libel & Slander
• 330 - Personal Injury: Federal Employer's Liability
• 340 - Personal Injury: Marine
• 344 - Military Pay - Correct Records
• 345 - Marine Product Liability
• 346 - Military Pay - Correct/Reinstate
• 348 - Military Pay - Reinstatement
• 350 - Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
• 352 - Military Pay - Retirement
• 354 - Military Pay - SBP
• 355 - Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
• 356 - Military Pay - Other
• 360 - Personal Injury: Other
• 362 - Personal Injury: Medical Malpractice
• 365 - Personal Injury: Product Liability
• 367 - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
• 368 - Personal Injury: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
• 370 - Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
• 371 - Personal Property: Truth in Lending
• 375 - Other Statutes: False Claims Act
• 376 - Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))
• 380 - Personal Property: Other Personal Property Damage
• 385 - Personal Property: Property Damage Product Liability
• 400 - State Reapportionment
• 410 - Anti-Trust
• 422 - Bankruptcy Appeals, Rule 28 U.S.C. § 158
• 423 - Bankruptcy Withdrawal, Rule 28 U.S.C. § 157
• 424 - (Obj/Revocation Discharge 727
• 430 - Banks and Banking
• 434 - Injunctive Relief
• 435 - Validity/Priority/Extent Lien
• 440 - Civil Rights: Other
• 441 - Civil Rights: Voting
• 442 - Civil Rights: Employment
• 443 - Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations
• 444 - Civil Rights: Welfare
• 445 - Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
• 446 - Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
• 448 - Civil Rights: Education
• 450 - Commerce ICC Rates Etc.
• 454 - Recover Money/Property
• 455 - Revoke Plan Confirmation
• 456 - Declaratory Judgment
• 457 - Subordinate Claim/Interest
• 458 - Injury - DTP/DPT
• 460 - Deportation
• 462 - Naturalization Application
• 463 - Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees
• 464 - Injury - Polio inactive
• 465 - Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
• 467 - Injury - Tetanus & Diptheria
• 469 - Injury - Other
• 470 - Civil (RICO) Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
• 472 - Death - DTP/DPT
• 480 - Consumer Credit
• 483 - Death - Other
• 484 - Injury - Hepatitis B
• 485 - Injury - Hemophilus influenzae
• 486 - Injury - Varicella
• 490 - Cable/Satellite TV
• 492 - Injury - Thimerosal
• 494 - Injury - Influenza
• 496 - Injury - Meningococcal
• 498 - Other Action
• 499 - Death - Human Papillomavirus
• 500 - Common Carrier - Transportation
• 502 - Copyright
• 504 - Native American
• 508 - Patent
• 510 - Taking - Personalty
• 511 - Taking - FIRREA
• 512 - Taking - Realty
• 513 - Taking - Rails to Trails
• 514 - Taking - Other
• 515 - Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment
• 516 - Miscellaneous - Damages
• 528 - Miscellaneous - Other
• 530 - Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
• 535 - Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
• 536 - Spent Nuclear Fuel
• 540 - Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other
• 550 - Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
• 555 - Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
• 560 - Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
• 610 - Forfeit/Penalty: Agriculture
• 620 - Forfeit/Penalty: Food and Drug
• 625 - Drug Related Seizure of Property
• 630 - Miscellanous
• 650 - Forfeit/Penalty: Airline Regs.
• 660 - Forfeit/Penalty: Occup. Safety
• 690 - Forfeiture/Penalty: Other
• 710 - Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act
• 720 - Labor: Labor/Management Relations
• 730 - Labor: Reporting/Disclosure
• 740 - Labor: Railway Labor Act
• 751 - Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
• 790 - Labor: Other
• 791 - Labor: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
• 810 - Selective Service
• 820 - Property Rights: Copyright
• 830 - Property Rights: Patent
• 840 - Property Rights: Trademark
• 850 - Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange
• 861 - Social Security: HIA
• 862 - Social Security: Black Lung
• 863 - D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W. (US Defendant)
• 864 - Social Security: SSID Title XVI
• 865 - Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
• 870 - Federal Tax Suits: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
• 871 - Federal Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party
• 875 - Taxes: Customer Challenge
• 890 - Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
• 891 - Agriculture Acts
• 892 - Economic Stabilization Act
• 893 - Environmental Matters
• 894 - Energy Allocation Act
• 895 - Freedom of Information Act
• 896 - Other Statutes: Arbitration
• 899 - Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
• 900 - Appeal of Fee Determination
• 908 - Miscellaneous Case - Other
• 950 - Other Statutes: Constitutionality of State Statutes
• 990 - Other
• 999 - Miscellaneous Cases

Federal Appellate Court Case Types

• 1152 - Contract: Recovery of Student Loan Defaults
• 1190 - Contract: Other Contract Action
• 1220 - Foreclosure
• 1240 - Torts to Land
• 1290 - Real Property - Other
• 1370 - Other Fraud
• 1371 - Truth in Lending
• 1380 - Other Personal Property Damage
• 1410 - Antitrust
• 1422 - Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 - USC 158
• 1440 - Other Civil Rights
• 1441 - Civil Rights: Voting
• 1442 - Civil Rights: Jobs
• 1443 - Civil Rights: Accommodations
• 1445 - Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
• 1446 - Americans w/Disabilities Act - Other
• 1465 - Other Immigration Actions
• 1470 - Civil (RICO)
• 1625 - Forfeiture - Drug Related
• 1690 - Forfeiture - Other
• 1720 - Labor Laws - Labor/Mgmt Relation
• 1791 - Labor Laws - Retirement Act 1974
• 1850 - Securities Commodities Exchange
• 1870 - Tax Suits
• 1890 - Other Statutory Actions
• 1891 - Agricultural Acts
• 1893 - Environmental Matters
• 2110 - Insurance
• 2151 - Contract: Medicare Act Overpay
• 2152 - Recvry of Defaulted Student Loans
• 2190 - Contract: Other Contract Action
• 2210 - Condemnation
• 2220 - Real Property: Foreclosure
• 2240 - Real Property: Torts to Land
• 2290 - Real Property: Other
• 2320 - Assault Libel and Slander
• 2330 - Personal Injury: Federal Employers Liability
• 2340 - Marine Personal Injury
• 2350 - TORTS INJURY: Motor Vehicle
• 2360 - Personal Injury: Other Personal
• 2362 - Personal Injury: Medical Malpractice
• 2370 - Personal Property: Fraud
• 2371 - Truth in Lending
• 2380 - Personal Property: Other
• 2410 - Antitrust
• 2422 - Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
• 2423 - Withdrawal
• 2430 - Banks and Banking
• 2440 - Civil Rights: Other
• 2441 - Civil Rights Voting
• 2442 - Civil Rights: Jobs
• 2443 - Civil Rights: Accomodations
• 2445 - Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl
• 2446 - Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr
• 2460 - Deportation
• 2462 - Naturalization Application
• 2463 - Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees
• 2465 - Other Immigration Actions
• 2480 - Consumer Credit
• 2510 - Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
• 2530 - Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
• 2535 - Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty
• 2540 - Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other
• 2550 - Prisoner - Civil Rights
• 2555 - Prison Conditions
• 2560 - Civ Detainee - Cond of Confinement
• 2625 - Drug Related Seizure of Property
• 2690 - Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
• 2710 - Fair Labor Standards Act
• 2720 - Labor/Management Relations
• 2790 - Other Labor Litigation
• 2791 - Employee Retirement
• 2830 - Patent
• 2850 - Securities Commodities Exchange
• 2860 - Social Security
• 2861 - Medicare
• 2862 - Social Security: Black Lung
• 2863 - DIWC / DIWW (Social Security)
• 2864 - SSID Title XVI (Social Security)
• 2865 - R.S.I.
• 2870 - Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant)
• 2871 - IRS Third Party Suits (TAX DC)
• 2890 - Other Statutory Actions
• 2891 - Agricultural Acts
• 2893 - Environmental Matters
• 2895 - Freedom of Information Act
• 2899 - Adminstrative Review Act
• 2950 - Constitutionality of State Statutes
• 2990 - Other
• 3110 - Contract: Insurance
• 3120 - Contract: Marine
• 3130 - Contract: Miller Act
• 3140 - Contract: Negotiable Instrument
• 3150 - Overpayments & Enforcement of Judgments
• 3151 - Overpayments Under the Medicare Act
• 3160 - Contract: Stockholder Suits
• 3190 - Contract: Other
• 3196 - Franchise
• 3210 - Land Condemnation
• 3220 - Real Property: Foreclosure
• 3230 - Real Property: Rent Lease Ejectment
• 3240 - Real Property: Torts to Land
• 3290 - Real Property: Other
• 3310 - Airplane Personal Injury
• 3315 - Airplane Product Liability
• 3320 - Assault Libel and Slander
• 3330 - Federal Employers Liability
• 3340 - Personal Injury: Marine
• 3350 - Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle
• 3355 - Motor Vehicle Product Liability
• 3360 - Personal Injury: Other
• 3362 - Personal Injury: Medical Malpractice
• 3365 - Personal Injury: Product Liability
• 3367 - Torts
• 3368 - Personal Injury: Asbestos Prod Lia
• 3370 - Personal Property: Fraud
• 3371 - TORTS-Truth in Lending
• 3375 - Other Statutes: False Claims Act
• 3380 - TORTS PERSONAL PROPERTY-Other
• 3385 - Property Damage: Product Liability
• 3400 - STATUTES-State Reapportionment
• 3410 - Antitrust
• 3422 - Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
• 3423 - Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
• 3430 - STATUTES-Banks & Banking
• 3440 - Civil Rights: Other
• 3441 - Civil Rights: Voting
• 3442 - Civil Rights: Jobs
• 3443 - Civil Rights: Accommodations
• 3444 - Civil Rights Welfare
• 3445 - Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
• 3446 - Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
• 3448 - Civil Rights
• 3450 - Interstate Commerce
• 3470 - Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations (RICO)
• 3480 - Consumer Credit
• 3490 - Cable/Satellite TV
• 3530 - Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
• 3535 - Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
• 3540 - Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other
• 3550 - Prisoner: Civil Rights
• 3555 - Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
• 3560 - Prisoner Petitions
• 3710 - Labor: Fair Standards
• 3720 - Labor/Management Relations Act
• 3730 - Labor: Reporting/Disclosure
• 3740 - Labor: Railway Labor Act
• 3750 - Labor
• 3751 - Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
• 3790 - Labor: Other
• 3791 - Employee Retirement (ERISA)
• 3820 - Property Rights: Copyright
• 3830 - Property Rights: Patent
• 3840 - Property Rights: Trademark
• 3850 - Securities Commodities Exchange
• 3864 - SOC SEC-SSID Title XVI
• 3890 - Statutes: Other
• 3891 - Statutes: Agricultural Acts
• 3892 - Economic Stabilization Act
• 3893 - Environmental Matters
• 3895 - Statutes: FOIA 1974
• 3896 - Other Statutes
• 3899 - Other Statutes
• 3950 - Constitutionality of State Statutes
• 3990 - Other
• 3999 - Miscellaneous
• 4110 - Contract: Insurance
• 4120 - Marine Contract Actions
• 4140 - Contract: Negotiable Instruments
• 4150 - Contract: Overpayment Recovery
• 4160 - Contract: Stockholders Suits
• 4190 - Contract: Other
• 4195 - Contract: Product Liability
• 4196 - Franchise
• 4220 - Real Property: Foreclosure
• 4230 - Rent Lease Ejectment
• 4240 - Torts to Land
• 4245 - Tort: Personal Liability
• 4290 - Real Property: Other
• 4310 - Personal Injury: Airplane
• 4315 - Airplane Product Liability
• 4320 - Personal Injury: Assault Libel & Slander
• 4340 - Marine Personal Injury
• 4345 - Marine Product Liability
• 4350 - Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle
• 4355 - Motor Vehicle Product Liability
• 4360 - Personal Injury: Other Personal
• 4362 - Personal Injury: Medical Malpractice
• 4365 - Personal Injury: Product Liability
• 4367 - Torts
• 4368 - Personal Injury: Asbestos
• 4370 - Personal Property: Fraud
• 4371 - Truth in Lending
• 4380 - Personal Property: Other
• 4385 - Property Damage-Product Liability
• 4440 - Civil Rights-Other
• 4442 - Civil Rights Jobs
• 4443 - Civil Rights Accommodations
• 4470 - STATUTES-RICO
• 4480 - Consumer Credit
• 4790 - Other Labor Litigation
• 4890 - Other Statuatory Actions
• 4896 - Other Statutes
• 4950 - Constitutionality of State Statutes
• 5362 - Medical Malpractice
• 5870 - STATUTES-Tax Suits
• 9992 - MISC case matters requiring a judicial signature ie: letters rogatory jdgm dbtr exam
• 9993 - MISC case matters not requiring a judicial signature ie: out-of-district ntc of takg depo