|
Court Cases
|
Recently Popular Cases
-
PAUL v. LAM RESEARCH, et al. 3,632 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
USA v. Acct 263226700, et al 1,960 views
Illinois Northern District Court
NigeriaNarcotraffickingMoney LaunderingBola TinubuAsset ForfeitureDrug Trafficking ProceedsCivil ForfeitureNarcotics
Nigerian President-Elect Bola Ahmed Tinubu was named as the owner of several bank accounts that were used to launder money for a heroin distribution network in Chicago, IL in the early 1990s. The members of the heroin ring were criminally charged in a separate case, Northern District of Illinois Case No. 2:92-cr-00113-RL. For unknown reasons, Tinubu was not. Instead, the U.S. Government seized the contents of the bank accounts based on several different seizure warrants across three different dockets, of which this is one. The other two, from 1992, are in the Southern District of New York and a separate docket in the Northern District of Illinois—both with unknown case numbers since the documents pre-date the federal court's PACER system by so many years. In total, about $2.4 million USD was seized from Tinubu's global bank accounts pursuant to these seizure warrants. While working for Mobil Oil Company in Nigeria, Tinubu used a variety of shell companies to move the money around, including Compass Finance & Investment Co., incorporated in Washington, D.C. Though he was not charged, Tinubu committed at least five federal crimes, according to the IRS Special Agent's affidavit in this case: 1) Money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956); 2) Using funds from unlawful activity (18 U.S.C. § 1957); 3) Bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344);
4) Failure to file tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7203); and 5) Lying to federal agents (18 U.S.C. § 1001). Tinubu was elected to be the next President of Nigeria in February 2023.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Doctors Medical Center of Modesto, Inc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. 1,192 views
California Eastern District Court
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 1,090 views
New Jersey District Court
This is a general administrative docket used by the New Jersey District Court to post new complaints. It's not actually a real lawsuit.
-
Boose v. Musk et al 668 views
Georgia Northern District Court
-
Zimmerman v. Pier 1. Imports (U.S.), Inc. 584 views
Nevada District Court
-
Maninang v. Randstad Employment Solutions, LP 413 views
California Southern District Court
-
The R&d Credit Company, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company v. Network Optix, Inc. 356 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
USA v. D2A213A 332 views
California Southern District Court
-
331 views
Indiana Southern District Court
-
United States v. Bossingham 328 views
Arizona District Court
Kitchen NightmaresTurbodisputeIdentity TheftSocial Security FraudCredit FraudFederal SentencingPlea AgreementAmy's Baking Company
Amanda Patricia Bossingham, also known as "Amy," the proprietor of Amy's Baking Company in Scottsdale, AZ, featured on the popular Fox television show "Kitchen Nightmares," was convicted of bank fraud in 2008 after she falsified a Social Security number on an application for a five-figure bank loan.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Jane Roe 424 E.l., An Individual v. Doe 1, A Public Entity 321 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Mathis et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al 312 views
Florida Southern District Court
Fair Labor Standards ActMinimum WageTip PoolingRestaurant IndustryCollective ActionWage TheftDarden RestaurantsOlive GardenRed Lobster
Current and former servers and bartenders at Darden Restaurants — the parent company of Olive Garden, Red Lobster, LongHorn Steakhouse, Seasons 52, and Bahama Breeze — filed this nationwide collective action in September 2012 in the Southern District of Florida, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs claimed that Darden illegally required tipped employees to participate in mandatory tip-sharing arrangements and otherwise failed to pay them the federal minimum wage applicable to tipped workers. The proposed class ultimately encompassed more than 216,000 servers and bartenders who worked for Darden brands during the three-year period covered by the claims.
The case generated extensive procedural litigation over conditional certification, the scope of the class list, and discovery. In November 2013, the parties discovered that Darden had inadvertently omitted approximately 1,586 bartenders from the class list — those coded under a "Bartender Tip Share" designation introduced at Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Bahama Breeze, and Seasons 52 when those brands rolled out mandatory tip-share programs around 2011. The parties jointly moved to extend the opt-in period to cover these workers. The case proceeded to mediation before a private mediator in June 2014.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
GREENSPAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al 296 views
District Of Columbia District Court
Bola TinubuNigeriaFOIAGovernment TransparencyFBIDEAFederal RecordsInvestigative JournalismContempt of Court
Based on the fact that a 1993 civil forfeiture lawsuit became one of the most popular dockets on PlainSite, PlainSite founder Aaron Greenspan sued six United States government agencies over their denial of FOIA requests and subsequent administrative appeals about Nigerian President Bold Tinubu, newly elected as of May 2023 in a highly controversial election.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Kahn v. Anthropic PBC 296 views
California Northern District Court
Artificial IntelligenceClaude Max
-
Giuffre v. Maxwell 258 views
New York Southern District Court
Sexual PredatorsJeffrey E. EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGDefamationJeffrey EpsteinGhislaine MaxwellSealed RecordsCourt TransparencySexual Abuse
Virginia Giuffre sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation after Maxwell alleged that Giuffre's claims about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, which ensnared Giuffre as a minor, were not true. Thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein and his associates, including former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, have been released in this case as a result of the discovery process.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
DITHRICH v. DHOOGHE 253 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Dismissed
This case was brought before the court because Justin R. Dhooghe found out about an affair between his then fiance Laura V. Rivera and Charles W. Dithrich and wanted information. Charles W. Dithrich wanted to settle out of court for a list of demands including the deletion of all information and pictures Justin R. Dhooghe had in his possession of the affair along with the sum of five thousand dollars in exchange for a non-CLETs restraining order, one that was not on his permanent record. Justin R. Dhooghe eventually refused and the case was brought before the judge and ultimately was dismissed due to insufficient grounds. No restraining order is in effect.
-
One Workplace L. Ferrari, LLC v. Bravanta, Inc. Fka Bravogifts.com, Inc. et al 244 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
USA v. Houck 244 views
Missouri Western District Court
-
Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al 240 views
Massachusetts District Court
Fake Non-Fiction BooksFalse AdvertisingThe Social Network (2010 Movie)Defamation By OmissionAaron SorkinConsumer ReviewsFake AccountsFacebook OriginsHarvard UniversityCopyright InfringementDefamationFacebookThe Social NetworkHollywoodUnfair CompetitionHarvard
Aaron Greenspan, creator of the 2003 predecessor to The Facebook at Harvard University, sued popular author Benjamin Mezrich, his publisher Random House, and Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement, defamation and false advertising due to the statements made by Mezrich in and about his book "The Accidental Billionaires." Mezrich's book, which cites Greenspan's as a source, has been marketed as supposed non-fiction, even though the story is full of inconsistencies and outright falsifications, many of which Mezrich admits to. Mezrich notably omitted Greenspan's role in the creation of the web site, and helped to prop up Mark Zuckerberg as a "genius" in his book, leading to the eventual motion picture "The Social Network," and contributing to the frenzy surrounding Facebook's problematic IPO.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Koninklijke Philips N v. v. YiFang USA, Inc. 240 views
Delaware District Court
-
Streckfuss v. Pizza My Heart Inc. 236 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Particle guidance system 231 views
United States Patent and Trademark Office
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 213 views
New Jersey District Court
-
Akop Terpogosyan 210 views
California Central Bankruptcy Court
-
Brand New School LLC v. The Mill Group et al 206 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump et al 202 views
California Central District Court
Jeffrey E. EpsteinPresident Donald J. TrumpDonald J. Trump Child Rape AllegationsSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinChild ExploitationPro Se LitigationCivil RightsPersonal injury
A woman filing under the pseudonym Katie Johnson, a self-represented plaintiff from Twentynine Palms, California, filed this lawsuit in April 2016 in the Central District of California before Judge Dolly Gee against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that when she was 13 years old in 1994, she was sexually assaulted by both Trump and Epstein at Epstein's Manhattan residence. The complaint was filed pro se.
The case was assigned on April 26, 2016 and initial documents were filed. A renewed judgment/renewal of judgment filing appeared in April 2026, more than a decade later, suggesting residual enforcement activity. The original lawsuit was withdrawn and refiled in New York before being voluntarily dismissed in November 2016.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Directv Inc v. Greg A Fischer 199 views
California Central District Court
-
United States of America et al v. Durrani et al 198 views
Ohio Southern District Court
Forged Declarations
-
Household Finance Corporation Of California A v. Tom J Beno et al 197 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
NVE Experience Agency, LLC et al v. Pension Systems Corporation et al 194 views
California Central District Court
-
Dymtrow v. Swift et al 182 views
New York Southern District Court
Pop StarsMusic IndustryChild StarsTalent ManagementBreach of ContractEntertainment LawTaylor Swift
Pop star Taylor Swift's early manager Daniel Dymtrow sued the Swift family after his services were terminated just before a meeting with Sony ATV that he alleges he helped to arrange, cutting him out of payments. He also sued Swift's new record label, Big Machine Records, and its founder, Scott Borchetta.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
MARTIN EBERHARD v. ELON MUSK 180 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
BillionairesDefamationSlanderTeslaELON MUSKBreach of ContractFounder DisputeWage ClaimElectric Vehicles
Martin Eberhard, co-founder of Tesla Motors and its first CEO, filed this lawsuit against Elon Musk and Tesla Motors in May 2009 in San Mateo County Superior Court. Eberhard alleged that after he was pushed out of Tesla in 2007, Musk and the company launched a coordinated campaign to defame him by publicly blaming him for Tesla's early production delays and financial difficulties, spreading false narratives about his management of the company, and attempting to rewrite the company's origin story to diminish his role as a co-founder. The complaint asserted eleven causes of action including libel, slander, breach of contract, specific performance, unpaid wages, and conversion.
Eberhard had originally co-founded the company with Marc Tarpenning in 2003 and served as CEO through 2007, overseeing the development of the original Tesla Roadster. After his departure — which he alleged was effectively a forced ouster — Musk had assumed a more prominent public role and, Eberhard claimed, began making statements that falsely cast Eberhard as responsible for the company's technical and financial problems.
The parties reached a confidential settlement in September 2009, less than four months after the complaint was filed. As part of the resolution, both sides agreed to treat each other with respect and to acknowledge each other's contributions to Tesla's founding.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Dutcher v. Google LLC d/b/a YouTube, et al. 179 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Emmanuel Macron v. Candace Owens, et al. 175 views
Superior Court of Delaware
FranceSocial Media
-
BRAGGS, et al. v. BEI CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al. 174 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Yaser A. Albahri, Petitioner v. Florida 168 views
Supreme Court of the United States
-
Binary Semantics Limited v. Minitab 168 views
Pennsylvania Middle District Court
-
Moguldom Media Group, LLC v. Okasi 166 views
Georgia Northern District Court
-
Doe v. Trump et al 162 views
New York Southern District Court
Jeffrey E. EpsteinSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGChild Sexual AbuseDefamation
A woman proceeding under the pseudonym Jane Doe filed this lawsuit in June 2016 in the Southern District of New York against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that she had been sexually assaulted by both men at a series of parties hosted by Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse in 1994, when the plaintiff was 13 years old. The complaint alleged rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and defamation. It described a pattern of abuse over multiple encounters that the plaintiff alleged was facilitated by an unnamed woman who recruited her with promises of money and modeling work.
The case attracted significant media attention given the identities of the defendants and the gravity of the allegations. A companion affidavit filed with the complaint included similar allegations from a second anonymous woman who claimed to have witnessed some of the events. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case in November 2016, with her attorney citing fear for her safety and the psychological toll of the publicity as the reasons for withdrawal. The dismissal was without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of refiling, though no subsequent federal action was recorded.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
In the Matter of the Accusation Against: TESLA INC., dba TESLA MOTORS INC., a Vehicle Manufacturer 161 views
California Department of Motor Vehicles
Tesla AutopilotTesla Full Self-Driving
-
Perfect Plastic v. CPI Card Grp, et al 154 views
Illinois Northern District Court
-
LeDoux v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles L L C 151 views
Louisiana Western District Court
-
Gupta v. Yash Technologies 149 views
Illinois Central District Court
-
Scott Haskins v. Karen Francis et al 149 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Sinora Freeland v. Momentum For Mental Health, a California corporation 148 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Fileff v. General Motors LLC 148 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Graham v. UMG Recordings, Inc. 143 views
New York Southern District Court
DrakeCelebritiesRap Artists
-
Jacqueline L Domac v. Edward Furlong 141 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
In Re: Dylan Palmer 141 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. Gerea, Paul Haidu 139 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
USA v. O'Donovan 139 views
California Central District Court
-
USA v. Coates 137 views
New York Southern District Court
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 135 views
New Jersey District Court
-
The Haven Detox Fort Pierce, LLC v. City of Fort Pierce 133 views
Florida Southern District Court
-
Pampena v. Musk 131 views
California Northern District Court
TwitterFake Accounts
-
Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC et al v. Non Typical, Inc. 129 views
Texas Eastern District Court
-
Samuelson v. Tower Hill Preferred Insurance Company 125 views
Florida Middle District Court
-
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Shafi et al 125 views
California Northern District Court
Silicon Valley
-
Luis Ahedo v. Omega Global Technologies, Inc. 124 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
United States v. CLARK 123 views
District Of Columbia District Court
-
Sega Of America, Inc. v. Dustin Hensley 123 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC 122 views
California Northern District Court
Artificial IntelligenceMass Corporate Book TheftFair Use Doctrine
-
Brown v. 93 NYRPT, LLC 121 views
New York Western District Court
-
DBRAND INC. v. Casetagram Limited d/b/a Casetify 121 views
Illinois Northern District Court
-
The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust et al v. Capital One, N.A. 120 views
Florida Southern District Court
President Donald J. Trump
-
United States v. Arencibia 119 views
Florida Southern District Court
-
Eleazar Lopez v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al 118 views
California Central District Court
-
ALMOUSA v. TELSA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al. 117 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Tesla Worker Rights
-
United States of America v. May 115 views
Michigan Eastern District Court
-
USA v. Vilneus 115 views
Rhode Island District Court
Criminal ConspiracyOrganized CrimeRelated Cases
Federal prosecutors in the District of Rhode Island charged Irvin Vilneus and four co-defendants — Junior Mertile, Tony Mertile, James Legerme, and Allen Bien-Aime — in a series of related criminal cases filed in late 2020. A notice of related case filed in November 2020 formally linked the five proceedings, indicating the defendants were charged in connection with a common scheme or organization. The cases proceeded together before the court, which is common in prosecutions involving multiple members of an alleged criminal enterprise or conspiracy. The related-case structure suggested the defendants were charged with overlapping or coordinated criminal conduct in Rhode Island.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sherrifs et al v. County of Los Angeles et al 114 views
California Central District Court
-
Claimant ID 100271726 v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al 113 views
Louisiana Eastern District Court
-
Optical Fiber Unit Installation Apparatus Including A Unit For Preventing Backward Flowing Of Fluid 111 views
United States Patent and Trademark Office
-
X.AI LLC v. Ellison 110 views
Minnesota District Court
PornographyNudityArtificial Intelligence
-
Vyskocil v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 109 views
California Central District Court
-
Vieira v. One Workplace L. Ferrari LLC (Class Action) 108 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
10/12/2010 Govaerts, Lucien vs Suntec Industries Inc 106 views
Court of Chancery of Delaware
-
Baker et al v. Farmers Group Incorporated et al 106 views
Arizona District Court
-
United States v. Irizarry 105 views
New York Southern District Court
-
USA v. Kincaid 105 views
Massachusetts District Court
-
Jones et al v. Midwest Poultry Services, LP et al 105 views
Kentucky Western District Court
-
Soniya Soniya v. United Valet Parking, Inc, et al. 105 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Plaintiff v. Defendant 104 views
Georgia Northern District Court
-
Fenix International Limited dba OnlyFans 4th Floor, Imperial House, 8 Kean Street London, England WC2B 4AS United Kingdom 103 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Gary B Schaeffer 102 views
New York Southern Bankruptcy Court
-
Jason J. Emer, Md, Professional Corporation, A California Corporation v. Soma Surgery Center, Inc., A California Corporation, et al. 102 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Coultrip et al v. Pfizer, Inc 100 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Basil M Hantash v. Blue Cross Of California Dba Anthem Blue Cross, et al. 100 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Tesla Inc. v. EVject, Inc. 100 views
California Northern District Court
-
ESTATE OF: ARRON WARD STANLEY SR. 100 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Cunningham v. Choice Hotels, et al 99 views
Maryland District Court
-
USA v. Nakielny 99 views
Rhode Island District Court
-
The Hartford Gold Group, LLC v. Brandon Anthony Thor, et al. 99 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
JENKINS v. JENKINS 98 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Bolze et al 97 views
Tennessee Eastern District Court
-
United States of America v. David Champion 97 views
California Central District Court
-
USA v. Reeves 97 views
Alabama Middle District Court
-
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. et al v. United Egg Producers et al 96 views
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
-
BSG Clearing Solutions North America, LLC et al v. VoiceXpress, Inc et al 96 views
Texas Western District Court
|
United States of America
Washington D.C. | Guam | Northern Marinara Islands | Puerto Rico | U.S. Virgin Islands
View near real-time filings with PlainSite Pro.
|
A
B
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bankman-Fried, Samuel
|
Bannon, Stephen Kevin
|
Barr, William P.
|
Benioff, Marc
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bernanke, Ben Shalom
|
Berryhill, Nancy A.
|
Bessent, Scott
|
Bezos, Jeffrey P.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Biden Jr., Joseph R.
|
Blanche, Todd
|
Blankfein, Lloyd C.
|
Blinken, Antony J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bloomberg, Michael Rubens
|
Bondi, Pamela
|
Booker, Cory A.
|
Bovino, Gregory
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bowles, Erskine B.
|
Breed, London
|
Breyer James
|
Brin, Sergey
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Brockman, Greg D.
|
Bush, George Walker
|
Buttigieg, Pete
|
|
C
 |
 |
 |
 |
Carson, Sr., Ben S.
|
Chao, Elaine L.
|
Chenault, Kenneth I.
|
Cheney, Richard B.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Chertoff, Michael
|
Clinton, Hillary Rodham
|
Clinton, William Jefferson
|
Combs, Sean
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Comey, James B.
|
Cook, Timothy D.
|
Cosby, William H., Jr.
|
|
D
 |
 |
 |
 |
De Blasio, Bill
|
Denholm, Robyn M.
|
Depp, II, John Christopher
|
Dershowitz, Alan M.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
DeSantis, Ronald D.
|
Desmond-Hellmann, Susan
|
DeVos, Elisabeth
|
Dimon, Jamie
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Doerr, L. John
|
Dorsey, Jack
|
Duncan, Arne
|
|
E
F
G
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gabbard Tamayo, Tulsi
|
Garland, Merrick
|
Gates, Melinda French
|
Gates, Robert M.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gates, William Henry
|
Gebbia, Joseph Nicholas
|
Gillibrand, Kirsten
|
Giuliani, Rudolph
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gracias, Antonio J.
|
Graham, Donald
|
Graham, Lindsey O.
|
Greenspan, Aaron
|
 |
|
|
|
Greenspan, Alan
|
|
|
|
H
 |
 |
 |
 |
Harris, Kamala Devi
|
Hastings, W. Reed
|
Hawley, Joshua D.
|
Hayden, Michael V.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hegseth, Peter Brian
|
Hennessy John L
|
Holder, Jr., Eric H.
|
Holmes, Elizabeth A.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Huang, Jen-hsun
|
Hughes, Christopher Ray
|
|
|
I
J
K
L
M
 |
 |
 |
 |
Madoff, Bernard L.
|
Maduro Moros, Nicolas
|
Manafort, Paul J., Jr.
|
Manning, Chelsea
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Martin, Edward R., Jr.
|
Maxwell, Ghislaine
|
McConnell, Jr., Addison Mitch
|
McFarland, William
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
McKesson, DeRay
|
Milton, Trevor Robert
|
Mnuchin, Steven
|
Moritz, Michael J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Moskovitz, Dustin A.
|
Mueller, Robert S., III
|
Mulvaney, Mick
|
Murdoch, A.C., K. Rupert
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Murdoch, James R.
|
Murdoch, Lachlan K.
|
Musk, Elon Reeve
|
Musk, Kimbal J.
|
 |
|
|
|
Myhrvold, Nathan P.
|
|
|
|
N
O
P
 |
 |
 |
 |
Page, Lawrence
|
Patel, Kashyap
|
Pelosi, Nancy
|
Pence, Michael Richard
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Petit, Parker H.
|
Pichai, Sundar
|
Pompeo, Michael Richard
|
Powell, Sidney
|
 |
 |
|
|
Prince, Erik D.
|
Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich
|
|
|
Q
R
S
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sandberg, Sheryl K.
|
Saverin, Eduardo
|
Saylor, Michael Jerry
|
Schiff, Adam
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Schmidt, Eric E.
|
Schroepfer, Michael Todd
|
Schultz Howard D
|
Sessions, Jefferson Beauregard, III
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sharpton, Alfred
|
Shkreli, Martin
|
Shriram Kavitark Ram
|
Snowden, Edward
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Spears, Britney
|
Spiegel, Evan Thomas
|
Spiro, Alexander Benjamin
|
Stone, Roger J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Straubel, Jeffrey Brian
|
Summers, Lawrence Henry
|
Sutskever, Ilya
|
Swift, Taylor
|
T
 |
 |
 |
 |
Taylor, Bret Steven
|
Teller, Samuel
|
Thiel, Peter
|
Tillerson, Rex W.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tinubu, Bola Ahmed
|
Trump, Donald J.
|
Trump, Donald J. Jr.
|
Trump, Eric
|
 |
 |
|
|
Trump, Ivanka
|
Trump, Melania
|
|
|
U
V
W
Y
Z
All Reporters → alr-fed → Volume 110 Opinions in alr-fed Volume 110
Rare is the occasion that Congress passes an act after the district court’s ruling in a case, telling us how to dispose of the appeal. In this case, Congress amended the Federal Arbitration Act,
1
effective November 19, 1988, and by implication has decided that we may not exercise jurisdiction over the pending appeal from a district court’s orders compelling arbitration and granting ... Views: 1
110 B.R. 628 (1990)
In re Roger A. DIQUINZIO, Helen J. Diquinzio, Debtors.
Bankruptcy No. 89-10780.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island.
February 14, 1990.
John Rao, Rhode Island Legal Services, Inc., Woonsocket, R.I., for debtors.
Larry Dub, Law Office of Larry Dub, Pawtucket, R.I., for ITT Financial Services.
John Boyajian, Boyajian, Harrington & Richardson, Providence, R.I., Tr... Views: 0
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court to consider the cross motions for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. In this action the plaintiffs charge the defendant school system with an unconstitutional restraint upon their first, ninth, and fourteenth amendment rights by prohibiting their religious organization from a meeting time of their choice at Herbert Mills Elementary Scho... Views: 2
On January 28, 1988, pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 11(a)(2), Pamela Iglesias entered a conditional guilty plea to a charge of possession with intent to distribute heroin, reserving her right to appeal the district court’s denial of her motions to suppress and to compel discovery. We first determine whether the district court erred in refusing to suppress Iglesias’ incriminating cash that was seized w... Views: 0
The appellant, Albert Stark, filed an age discrimination suit against his former employer, Dynascan Corporation (“Dynas-can”). Dynascan, in turn, filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Stark had failed to file a timely charge of discrimination with the EEOC, a prerequisite to suit in federal court. The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding t... Views: 1
843 F.2d 276
46 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 645, 110 A.L.R.Fed. 475,46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,891, 56 USLW 2563
Nancy C. STILLIANS, Appellant,v.STATE OF IOWA, et al., Appellees.
No. 87-1321.
United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 3, 1987.Decided March 30, 1988.
Artis Reis Breon, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellant.
Scott M. Galenbeck, Asst. Atty. Ge... Views: 0
The defendant, Bennie Wren Bolton, was found guilty on charges of receiving and possessing a firearm after being convicted of a felony and possessing a firearm not registered in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record. He received a forty-year sentence on the first charge and a ten-year sentence on the second, to run concurrently. Bolton now appeals his conviction and sentence on... Views: 3
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. Donna Smith (“Smith” or “appellant”) appeals from her conviction of conspiracy to commit medicaid fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and five substantive counts of medicaid fraud in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b. She argues that the District Court’s method of jury selection improperly interfered with the exercise of her right to pere... Views: 0
864 F.2d 271
110 A.L.R.Fed. 669
UNITED STATES of Americav.Vincent Di PASQUALE, Appellant in 86-5810.UNITED STATES of Americav.Di NORSCIO, Giacomo, Appellant in 86-5835 & 87-5284.UNITED STATES of Americav.COHEN, Gerald, Appellant in 86-5841 & 87-5285.UNITED STATES of Americav.DELUCA, Gerald, Appellant in 86-5836 & 87-5286.UNITED STATES of Americav.SINICO, John, Appellant in 86-5... Views: 0
OPINION
I. INTRODUCTION.
Defendants Victor Posner, Ivan F. Boe-sky, and Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. (“Drexel”), respectively, have filed motions to dismiss this shareholder’s derivative action brought on behalf of Pennsylvania Engineering Corporation (“PEC”) by plaintiffs Sadie Rubin and Julie Stone (“plaintiffs”). The complaint alleges (1) that Posner and Boesky violated § 10(b) of... Views: 0
Kevin Watson (Watson) and Raymond Wayne Thrash (Thrash) (collectively, the Inmates), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants based on that court’s conclusion that as a matter of law, the Inmates are not employees of the private defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or the Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201
et seq.,
and are not entitled to re... Views: 3
The International Paper Company (“IP”), an industry operating in the town of Jay, Maine (“the Town” or “Jay”), brought suit to invalidate and enjoin enforcement of a
*482
municipal ordinance (“the Ordinance”) which regulated the emission of pollutants by Jay industries, including IP. IP claimed that the Ordinance placed undue restrictions upon its bargaining power in a labor disput... Views: 3
Defendants-appellants Errol Maynard, Glen Petersen, and Austin Caines, appeal their jury conviction of possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 46 U.S.C.App. § 1903(a), (e), and (f), on the grounds, inter alia, that their vessel was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States when the Coast Guard boarded and searched it. We reverse the convictions for lack of jur... Views: 3
|
Federal District Court Case Types
|
Federal Appellate Court Case Types
|
|