|
Court Cases
|
Recently Popular Cases
-
PAUL v. LAM RESEARCH, et al. 3,444 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
USA v. Acct 263226700, et al 1,955 views
Illinois Northern District Court
NigeriaNarcotraffickingMoney LaunderingBola TinubuAsset ForfeitureDrug Trafficking ProceedsCivil ForfeitureNarcotics
Nigerian President-Elect Bola Ahmed Tinubu was named as the owner of several bank accounts that were used to launder money for a heroin distribution network in Chicago, IL in the early 1990s. The members of the heroin ring were criminally charged in a separate case, Northern District of Illinois Case No. 2:92-cr-00113-RL. For unknown reasons, Tinubu was not. Instead, the U.S. Government seized the contents of the bank accounts based on several different seizure warrants across three different dockets, of which this is one. The other two, from 1992, are in the Southern District of New York and a separate docket in the Northern District of Illinois—both with unknown case numbers since the documents pre-date the federal court's PACER system by so many years. In total, about $2.4 million USD was seized from Tinubu's global bank accounts pursuant to these seizure warrants. While working for Mobil Oil Company in Nigeria, Tinubu used a variety of shell companies to move the money around, including Compass Finance & Investment Co., incorporated in Washington, D.C. Though he was not charged, Tinubu committed at least five federal crimes, according to the IRS Special Agent's affidavit in this case: 1) Money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956); 2) Using funds from unlawful activity (18 U.S.C. § 1957); 3) Bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344);
4) Failure to file tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7203); and 5) Lying to federal agents (18 U.S.C. § 1001). Tinubu was elected to be the next President of Nigeria in February 2023.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 1,092 views
New Jersey District Court
This is a general administrative docket used by the New Jersey District Court to post new complaints. It's not actually a real lawsuit.
-
Boose v. Musk et al 669 views
Georgia Northern District Court
-
Zimmerman v. Pier 1. Imports (U.S.), Inc. 584 views
Nevada District Court
-
Maninang v. Randstad Employment Solutions, LP 414 views
California Southern District Court
-
350 views
Indiana Southern District Court
-
The R&d Credit Company, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company v. Network Optix, Inc. 341 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
United States v. Bossingham 334 views
Arizona District Court
Kitchen NightmaresTurbodisputeIdentity TheftSocial Security FraudCredit FraudFederal SentencingPlea AgreementAmy's Baking Company
Amanda Patricia Bossingham, also known as "Amy," the proprietor of Amy's Baking Company in Scottsdale, AZ, featured on the popular Fox television show "Kitchen Nightmares," was convicted of bank fraud in 2008 after she falsified a Social Security number on an application for a five-figure bank loan.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Jane Roe 424 E.l., An Individual v. Doe 1, A Public Entity 321 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
GREENSPAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al 304 views
District Of Columbia District Court
Bola TinubuNigeriaFOIAGovernment TransparencyFBIDEAFederal RecordsInvestigative JournalismContempt of Court
Based on the fact that a 1993 civil forfeiture lawsuit became one of the most popular dockets on PlainSite, PlainSite founder Aaron Greenspan sued six United States government agencies over their denial of FOIA requests and subsequent administrative appeals about Nigerian President Bold Tinubu, newly elected as of May 2023 in a highly controversial election.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Mathis et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al 298 views
Florida Southern District Court
Fair Labor Standards ActMinimum WageTip PoolingRestaurant IndustryCollective ActionWage TheftDarden RestaurantsOlive GardenRed Lobster
Current and former servers and bartenders at Darden Restaurants — the parent company of Olive Garden, Red Lobster, LongHorn Steakhouse, Seasons 52, and Bahama Breeze — filed this nationwide collective action in September 2012 in the Southern District of Florida, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs claimed that Darden illegally required tipped employees to participate in mandatory tip-sharing arrangements and otherwise failed to pay them the federal minimum wage applicable to tipped workers. The proposed class ultimately encompassed more than 216,000 servers and bartenders who worked for Darden brands during the three-year period covered by the claims.
The case generated extensive procedural litigation over conditional certification, the scope of the class list, and discovery. In November 2013, the parties discovered that Darden had inadvertently omitted approximately 1,586 bartenders from the class list — those coded under a "Bartender Tip Share" designation introduced at Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Bahama Breeze, and Seasons 52 when those brands rolled out mandatory tip-share programs around 2011. The parties jointly moved to extend the opt-in period to cover these workers. The case proceeded to mediation before a private mediator in June 2014.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Kahn v. Anthropic PBC 296 views
California Northern District Court
Artificial IntelligenceClaude Max
-
Streckfuss v. Pizza My Heart Inc. 265 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
DITHRICH v. DHOOGHE 264 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Dismissed
This case was brought before the court because Justin R. Dhooghe found out about an affair between his then fiance Laura V. Rivera and Charles W. Dithrich and wanted information. Charles W. Dithrich wanted to settle out of court for a list of demands including the deletion of all information and pictures Justin R. Dhooghe had in his possession of the affair along with the sum of five thousand dollars in exchange for a non-CLETs restraining order, one that was not on his permanent record. Justin R. Dhooghe eventually refused and the case was brought before the judge and ultimately was dismissed due to insufficient grounds. No restraining order is in effect.
-
Particle guidance system 261 views
United States Patent and Trademark Office
-
Giuffre v. Maxwell 255 views
New York Southern District Court
Sexual PredatorsJeffrey E. EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGDefamationJeffrey EpsteinGhislaine MaxwellSealed RecordsCourt TransparencySexual Abuse
Virginia Giuffre sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation after Maxwell alleged that Giuffre's claims about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, which ensnared Giuffre as a minor, were not true. Thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein and his associates, including former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, have been released in this case as a result of the discovery process.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
One Workplace L. Ferrari, LLC v. Bravanta, Inc. Fka Bravogifts.com, Inc. et al 244 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Koninklijke Philips N v. v. YiFang USA, Inc. 240 views
Delaware District Court
-
USA v. Houck 233 views
Missouri Western District Court
-
Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al 228 views
Massachusetts District Court
Fake Non-Fiction BooksFalse AdvertisingThe Social Network (2010 Movie)Defamation By OmissionAaron SorkinConsumer ReviewsFake AccountsFacebook OriginsHarvard UniversityCopyright InfringementDefamationFacebookThe Social NetworkHollywoodUnfair CompetitionHarvard
Aaron Greenspan, creator of the 2003 predecessor to The Facebook at Harvard University, sued popular author Benjamin Mezrich, his publisher Random House, and Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement, defamation and false advertising due to the statements made by Mezrich in and about his book "The Accidental Billionaires." Mezrich's book, which cites Greenspan's as a source, has been marketed as supposed non-fiction, even though the story is full of inconsistencies and outright falsifications, many of which Mezrich admits to. Mezrich notably omitted Greenspan's role in the creation of the web site, and helped to prop up Mark Zuckerberg as a "genius" in his book, leading to the eventual motion picture "The Social Network," and contributing to the frenzy surrounding Facebook's problematic IPO.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Household Finance Corporation Of California A v. Tom J Beno et al 226 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Akop Terpogosyan 211 views
California Central Bankruptcy Court
-
NVE Experience Agency, LLC et al v. Pension Systems Corporation et al 210 views
California Central District Court
-
Brand New School LLC v. The Mill Group et al 206 views
New York Southern District Court
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 205 views
New Jersey District Court
-
BRAGGS, et al. v. BEI CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al. 204 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump et al 203 views
California Central District Court
Jeffrey E. EpsteinPresident Donald J. TrumpDonald J. Trump Child Rape AllegationsSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinChild ExploitationPro Se LitigationCivil RightsPersonal injury
A woman filing under the pseudonym Katie Johnson, a self-represented plaintiff from Twentynine Palms, California, filed this lawsuit in April 2016 in the Central District of California before Judge Dolly Gee against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that when she was 13 years old in 1994, she was sexually assaulted by both Trump and Epstein at Epstein's Manhattan residence. The complaint was filed pro se.
The case was assigned on April 26, 2016 and initial documents were filed. A renewed judgment/renewal of judgment filing appeared in April 2026, more than a decade later, suggesting residual enforcement activity. The original lawsuit was withdrawn and refiled in New York before being voluntarily dismissed in November 2016.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
United States of America et al v. Durrani et al 198 views
Ohio Southern District Court
Forged Declarations
-
Directv Inc v. Greg A Fischer 198 views
California Central District Court
-
MARTIN EBERHARD v. ELON MUSK 182 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
BillionairesDefamationSlanderTeslaELON MUSKBreach of ContractFounder DisputeWage ClaimElectric Vehicles
Martin Eberhard, co-founder of Tesla Motors and its first CEO, filed this lawsuit against Elon Musk and Tesla Motors in May 2009 in San Mateo County Superior Court. Eberhard alleged that after he was pushed out of Tesla in 2007, Musk and the company launched a coordinated campaign to defame him by publicly blaming him for Tesla's early production delays and financial difficulties, spreading false narratives about his management of the company, and attempting to rewrite the company's origin story to diminish his role as a co-founder. The complaint asserted eleven causes of action including libel, slander, breach of contract, specific performance, unpaid wages, and conversion.
Eberhard had originally co-founded the company with Marc Tarpenning in 2003 and served as CEO through 2007, overseeing the development of the original Tesla Roadster. After his departure — which he alleged was effectively a forced ouster — Musk had assumed a more prominent public role and, Eberhard claimed, began making statements that falsely cast Eberhard as responsible for the company's technical and financial problems.
The parties reached a confidential settlement in September 2009, less than four months after the complaint was filed. As part of the resolution, both sides agreed to treat each other with respect and to acknowledge each other's contributions to Tesla's founding.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Dutcher v. Google LLC d/b/a YouTube, et al. 181 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Dymtrow v. Swift et al 180 views
New York Southern District Court
Pop StarsMusic IndustryChild StarsTalent ManagementBreach of ContractEntertainment LawTaylor Swift
Pop star Taylor Swift's early manager Daniel Dymtrow sued the Swift family after his services were terminated just before a meeting with Sony ATV that he alleges he helped to arrange, cutting him out of payments. He also sued Swift's new record label, Big Machine Records, and its founder, Scott Borchetta.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Emmanuel Macron v. Candace Owens, et al. 172 views
Superior Court of Delaware
FranceSocial Media
-
Moguldom Media Group, LLC v. Okasi 169 views
Georgia Northern District Court
-
Binary Semantics Limited v. Minitab 168 views
Pennsylvania Middle District Court
-
USA v. Santana-Rosales 167 views
Texas Southern District Court
-
Yaser A. Albahri, Petitioner v. Florida 165 views
Supreme Court of the United States
-
In the Matter of the Accusation Against: TESLA INC., dba TESLA MOTORS INC., a Vehicle Manufacturer 161 views
California Department of Motor Vehicles
Tesla AutopilotTesla Full Self-Driving
-
Doe v. Trump et al 160 views
New York Southern District Court
Jeffrey E. EpsteinSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGChild Sexual AbuseDefamation
A woman proceeding under the pseudonym Jane Doe filed this lawsuit in June 2016 in the Southern District of New York against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that she had been sexually assaulted by both men at a series of parties hosted by Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse in 1994, when the plaintiff was 13 years old. The complaint alleged rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and defamation. It described a pattern of abuse over multiple encounters that the plaintiff alleged was facilitated by an unnamed woman who recruited her with promises of money and modeling work.
The case attracted significant media attention given the identities of the defendants and the gravity of the allegations. A companion affidavit filed with the complaint included similar allegations from a second anonymous woman who claimed to have witnessed some of the events. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case in November 2016, with her attorney citing fear for her safety and the psychological toll of the publicity as the reasons for withdrawal. The dismissal was without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of refiling, though no subsequent federal action was recorded.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
USA v. Vasquez-Bazet 159 views
Texas Southern District Court
-
Vieira v. One Workplace L. Ferrari LLC (Class Action) 158 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Perfect Plastic v. CPI Card Grp, et al 154 views
Illinois Northern District Court
-
LeDoux v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles L L C 150 views
Louisiana Western District Court
-
Gupta v. Yash Technologies 149 views
Illinois Central District Court
-
Scott Haskins v. Karen Francis et al 149 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Fileff v. General Motors LLC 148 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Sinora Freeland v. Momentum For Mental Health, a California corporation 147 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
In Re: Dylan Palmer 141 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. Gerea, Paul Haidu 141 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
USA v. O'Donovan 141 views
California Central District Court
-
USA v. Coates 137 views
New York Southern District Court
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 134 views
New Jersey District Court
-
The Haven Detox Fort Pierce, LLC v. City of Fort Pierce 133 views
Florida Southern District Court
-
Graham v. UMG Recordings, Inc. 133 views
New York Southern District Court
DrakeCelebritiesRap Artists
-
Pampena v. Musk 130 views
California Northern District Court
TwitterFake Accounts
-
Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC et al v. Non Typical, Inc. 129 views
Texas Eastern District Court
-
Jacqueline L Domac v. Edward Furlong 128 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Samuelson v. Tower Hill Preferred Insurance Company 125 views
Florida Middle District Court
-
Luis Ahedo v. Omega Global Technologies, Inc. 125 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Shafi et al 125 views
California Northern District Court
Silicon Valley
-
United States v. CLARK 124 views
District Of Columbia District Court
-
The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust et al v. Capital One, N.A. 123 views
Florida Southern District Court
President Donald J. Trump
-
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC 122 views
California Northern District Court
Artificial IntelligenceMass Corporate Book TheftFair Use Doctrine
-
Sega Of America, Inc. v. Dustin Hensley 122 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Brown v. 93 NYRPT, LLC 121 views
New York Western District Court
-
DBRAND INC. v. Casetagram Limited d/b/a Casetify 121 views
Illinois Northern District Court
-
EB IP Holdings LLC et al v. Pro-Driver Leasing Systems, Inc. et al 119 views
Texas Southern District Court
-
United States v. Arencibia 119 views
Florida Southern District Court
-
Eleazar Lopez v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al 118 views
California Central District Court
-
Optical Fiber Unit Installation Apparatus Including A Unit For Preventing Backward Flowing Of Fluid 117 views
United States Patent and Trademark Office
-
ALMOUSA v. TELSA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al. 117 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Tesla Worker Rights
-
United States of America v. May 115 views
Michigan Eastern District Court
-
Claimant ID 100271726 v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al 113 views
Louisiana Eastern District Court
-
X.AI LLC v. Ellison 111 views
Minnesota District Court
PornographyNudityArtificial Intelligence
-
Vyskocil v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 109 views
California Central District Court
-
USA v. Vilneus 109 views
Rhode Island District Court
Criminal ConspiracyOrganized CrimeRelated Cases
Federal prosecutors in the District of Rhode Island charged Irvin Vilneus and four co-defendants — Junior Mertile, Tony Mertile, James Legerme, and Allen Bien-Aime — in a series of related criminal cases filed in late 2020. A notice of related case filed in November 2020 formally linked the five proceedings, indicating the defendants were charged in connection with a common scheme or organization. The cases proceeded together before the court, which is common in prosecutions involving multiple members of an alleged criminal enterprise or conspiracy. The related-case structure suggested the defendants were charged with overlapping or coordinated criminal conduct in Rhode Island.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sherrifs et al v. County of Los Angeles et al 108 views
California Central District Court
-
Vogel v. 9429 Walnut Cake, LLC et al 107 views
California Central District Court
-
USA v. Kincaid 106 views
Massachusetts District Court
-
10/12/2010 Govaerts, Lucien vs Suntec Industries Inc 106 views
Court of Chancery of Delaware
-
Jones et al v. Midwest Poultry Services, LP et al 106 views
Kentucky Western District Court
-
Baker et al v. Farmers Group Incorporated et al 106 views
Arizona District Court
-
United States v. Irizarry 105 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Fenix International Limited dba OnlyFans 4th Floor, Imperial House, 8 Kean Street London, England WC2B 4AS United Kingdom 105 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Soniya Soniya v. United Valet Parking, Inc, et al. 104 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Gary B Schaeffer 102 views
New York Southern Bankruptcy Court
-
Jason J. Emer, Md, Professional Corporation, A California Corporation v. Soma Surgery Center, Inc., A California Corporation, et al. 102 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Coultrip et al v. Pfizer, Inc 100 views
New York Southern District Court
-
The Hartford Gold Group, LLC v. Brandon Anthony Thor, et al. 100 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Basil M Hantash v. Blue Cross Of California Dba Anthem Blue Cross, et al. 100 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Tesla Inc. v. EVject, Inc. 100 views
California Northern District Court
-
ESTATE OF: ARRON WARD STANLEY SR. 100 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Cunningham v. Choice Hotels, et al 99 views
Maryland District Court
-
USA v. Nakielny 99 views
Rhode Island District Court
-
JENKINS v. JENKINS 98 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Bolze et al 97 views
Tennessee Eastern District Court
-
United States of America v. David Champion 97 views
California Central District Court
-
USA v. Reeves 97 views
Alabama Middle District Court
-
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. et al v. United Egg Producers et al 96 views
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
|
United States of America
Washington D.C. | Guam | Northern Marinara Islands | Puerto Rico | U.S. Virgin Islands
View near real-time filings with PlainSite Pro.
|
A
B
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bankman-Fried, Samuel
|
Bannon, Stephen Kevin
|
Barr, William P.
|
Benioff, Marc
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bernanke, Ben Shalom
|
Berryhill, Nancy A.
|
Bessent, Scott
|
Bezos, Jeffrey P.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Biden Jr., Joseph R.
|
Blanche, Todd
|
Blankfein, Lloyd C.
|
Blinken, Antony J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bloomberg, Michael Rubens
|
Bondi, Pamela
|
Booker, Cory A.
|
Bovino, Gregory
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bowles, Erskine B.
|
Breed, London
|
Breyer James
|
Brin, Sergey
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Brockman, Greg D.
|
Bush, George Walker
|
Buttigieg, Pete
|
|
C
 |
 |
 |
 |
Carson, Sr., Ben S.
|
Chao, Elaine L.
|
Chenault, Kenneth I.
|
Cheney, Richard B.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Chertoff, Michael
|
Clinton, Hillary Rodham
|
Clinton, William Jefferson
|
Combs, Sean
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Comey, James B.
|
Cook, Timothy D.
|
Cosby, William H., Jr.
|
|
D
 |
 |
 |
 |
De Blasio, Bill
|
Denholm, Robyn M.
|
Depp, II, John Christopher
|
Dershowitz, Alan M.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
DeSantis, Ronald D.
|
Desmond-Hellmann, Susan
|
DeVos, Elisabeth
|
Dimon, Jamie
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Doerr, L. John
|
Dorsey, Jack
|
Duncan, Arne
|
|
E
F
G
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gabbard Tamayo, Tulsi
|
Garland, Merrick
|
Gates, Melinda French
|
Gates, Robert M.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gates, William Henry
|
Gebbia, Joseph Nicholas
|
Gillibrand, Kirsten
|
Giuliani, Rudolph
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gracias, Antonio J.
|
Graham, Donald
|
Graham, Lindsey O.
|
Greenspan, Aaron
|
 |
|
|
|
Greenspan, Alan
|
|
|
|
H
 |
 |
 |
 |
Harris, Kamala Devi
|
Hastings, W. Reed
|
Hawley, Joshua D.
|
Hayden, Michael V.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hegseth, Peter Brian
|
Hennessy John L
|
Holder, Jr., Eric H.
|
Holmes, Elizabeth A.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Huang, Jen-hsun
|
Hughes, Christopher Ray
|
|
|
I
J
K
L
M
 |
 |
 |
 |
Madoff, Bernard L.
|
Maduro Moros, Nicolas
|
Manafort, Paul J., Jr.
|
Manning, Chelsea
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Martin, Edward R., Jr.
|
Maxwell, Ghislaine
|
McConnell, Jr., Addison Mitch
|
McFarland, William
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
McKesson, DeRay
|
Milton, Trevor Robert
|
Mnuchin, Steven
|
Moritz, Michael J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Moskovitz, Dustin A.
|
Mueller, Robert S., III
|
Mulvaney, Mick
|
Murdoch, A.C., K. Rupert
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Murdoch, James R.
|
Murdoch, Lachlan K.
|
Musk, Elon Reeve
|
Musk, Kimbal J.
|
 |
|
|
|
Myhrvold, Nathan P.
|
|
|
|
N
O
P
 |
 |
 |
 |
Page, Lawrence
|
Patel, Kashyap
|
Pelosi, Nancy
|
Pence, Michael Richard
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Petit, Parker H.
|
Pichai, Sundar
|
Pompeo, Michael Richard
|
Powell, Sidney
|
 |
 |
|
|
Prince, Erik D.
|
Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich
|
|
|
Q
R
S
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sandberg, Sheryl K.
|
Saverin, Eduardo
|
Saylor, Michael Jerry
|
Schiff, Adam
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Schmidt, Eric E.
|
Schroepfer, Michael Todd
|
Schultz Howard D
|
Sessions, Jefferson Beauregard, III
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sharpton, Alfred
|
Shkreli, Martin
|
Shriram Kavitark Ram
|
Snowden, Edward
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Spears, Britney
|
Spiegel, Evan Thomas
|
Spiro, Alexander Benjamin
|
Stone, Roger J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Straubel, Jeffrey Brian
|
Summers, Lawrence Henry
|
Sutskever, Ilya
|
Swift, Taylor
|
T
 |
 |
 |
 |
Taylor, Bret Steven
|
Teller, Samuel
|
Thiel, Peter
|
Tillerson, Rex W.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tinubu, Bola Ahmed
|
Trump, Donald J.
|
Trump, Donald J. Jr.
|
Trump, Eric
|
 |
 |
|
|
Trump, Ivanka
|
Trump, Melania
|
|
|
U
V
W
Y
Z
All Reporters → bnh → Volume 2006 Opinions in bnh Volume 2006
MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Edmond J. Ford, chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”), filed a three count complaint against the Debtor’s former spouse, Donna Skorich (“Skorich”), seeking (1) to avoid an alleged preferential transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 547; (2) to avoid transfers of property as a hypothetical lien creditor under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a); and (3) a declaratory judgment that, pursuan... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Scott Edward Baldassaro (the “Debtor”) filed a Motion for Continuation of the Automatic Stay (Doc. No. 8) (the “Motion”) pursuant to § 362(c)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code. 1 This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a) and the “Standing Order of Referral of Title 11 Proceedings to the United Stat... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleges fourteen counts against nine defendants (and a tenth subsequently added). Presently before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on Count VII, which is a fraudulent transfer claim against defendant Gordon Properties, Ltd. (“Gordon”). Gordon objected and upped the ante with a cross-motion for summary judgme... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION The issue presented in this Chapter 13 case, which is governed by the Bankruptcy Code as amended by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”), is whether a below median debtor’s “projected disposable income,” as that term is used in section 1325(b)(1)(B) 1 is determined from Form B22C or whether “projected disposable income” is determi... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION
I. INTRODUCTION
On November 19, 2004, Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. and Auto Image ID, Inc. (collectively the “Debtors”) sought bankruptcy protection under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On October 11, 2005, the Court converted the Debtors’ jointly administered cases to chapter 7, and the United States Trustee (the “UST”) appointed Steven M. Notinger (the “T... Views: 2
Memorandum Opinion
The Court has before it the “Debtor’s Motion to Convert Case to One Under Chapter 13.” Paul Harris (the “Debtor”) seeks to convert pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 706(a). The Chapter 7 trustee (the “trustee”), the United States Trustee, and Joel B. Alvord have filed objections to the Debtor’s motion. The Court held a full-day evidentiary hearing on April 17, 2006. For the r... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States Trustee (the “Trustee”) filed a motion to dismiss John and Susan Krause’s (the “Debtors”) bankruptcy case pursuant to section 707(b) 1 on the grounds that granting Chapter 7 relief would be a “substantial abuse” of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors objected to the Trustee’s motion. The Court held two hearings on the matter, the second being an evidentiary... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION This case concerns the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act’s (BAPCPA) treatment of 401k contributions and 401k loan payments in Chapter 13 plans. The Chapter 13 Trus *690 tee filed an objection to the confirmation of Anne W. Njuguna’s (the “Debtor”) plan on the ground that the plan does not commit “all of the debtor’s projected disposable income” for p... Views: 1
MEMORANDUM OPINION
I. INTRODUCTION
The New Hampshire Supreme Court Professional Conduct Committee (the “Committee”) filed a complaint pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7) seeking to except
*8
from the Debtor’s discharge his obligations to the Committee arising out of two attorney disciplinary proceedings commenced by the Committee against the Debtor. The parties agreed ... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is the determination of the amount of Sumac Corporation’s (“Sumac”) allowed claim. Newfound Lake Marina, Inc., and Newfound Marine, Inc. (individually, “Newfound Lake Marina” and “Newfound Marine,” and collectively, the “Debtors”), objected to Sumac’s proof of claim. The essence of the dispute involves a forbearance agreement (the “Agreement”) enter... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objection to the confirmation of
*342
the Debtors’ above median plan. The Trustee argues that several of the Debtors’ claimed expense deductions from disposable income should not be allowed and that the plan fails to satisfy section 1325(b)
1
in that it does not devote all available disposable inco... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court has before it the Debtor’s Application for Authority to Retain Counsel, namely, William S. Gannon, Esquire, and William S. Gannon PLLC. On September 20, 2006, the Debtor, Pittsfield Weaving Company, filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The application currently before this Court was filed on November 3, 2006, but does not see... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is the Debtors’ complaint seeking an undue hardship discharge of their student loans pursuant to section 523(a)(8).
1
The Court held a trial on August 17, 2006, at which Mrs. Neal testified under oath. At the close of the trial, the Court took the matter under advisement and asked the New Hampshire Higher Education Assistance Foundation (... Views: 0
MEMORANDUM OPINION This case involves an above-median debtor whose financial circumstances have changed since filing her bankruptcy petition. Before the Court is the Chapter 13 trustee’s motion to dismiss Erin M. Teixeira’s (the “Debtor”) bankruptcy case on the ground that her Chapter 13 plan payments are less than her “projected disposable income.” At a December 12, 2006, hearing, the Court ... Views: 0
|
Federal District Court Case Types
|
Federal Appellate Court Case Types
|
|