|
Court Cases
| Most Popular Cases |  |
Cases with Faces | |
Cases by Type |  |
Cases by Reporter |  |
Cases by Year |  |
All Reporters → cal-lexis → Volume 2016
Opinions in cal-lexis Volume 2016
Concurring.—With the benefit of time to fully consider the issues presented by this writ petition, which go to the fundamental structure *551of our state government, I agree with and join the majority opinion. Proposition 49 is a valid exercise of the Legislature’s investigatory authority under the California Constitution. I also agree with the Chief Justice that the Legislature’s power to submit ...
Views: 0
Filed 1/14/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S219178
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/3 G048659
ISAIAS ARROYO, ...
Views: 0
Filed 1/21/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
CAROL COKER, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, ) S213137
)
v. ) Ct.App. 4/1 D061720
)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,...
Views: 0
Opinion A jury convicted defendant Billy Joe Johnson of the first degree murder of Scott Miller (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)),1 and found true the special circumstance allegations that the murder was committed by means of lying in wait (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(15)), and for the benefit of, or at the direction of, and in association with, a criminal street gang (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(22)). The jury also co...
Views: 0
Page 45
Filed 1/25/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER )
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, )
)
Petitioner, )
) S208838
v. )
) Cal.P.U.C. Dec...
Views: 0
The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Whether the authority granted to a jailer under Penal Code section 1269b, "to set the time and place for the appearance of the arrested person before the appropriate court and give notice thereof" makes the appearance in that court on that date "lawfully required" for purposes of forfeiting bail und...
Views: 0
Filed 2/1/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S218712
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/8 B243773
SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY ...
Views: 0
Filed 2/4/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S025748
v. )
)
JOSE LUPERCIO CASARES, )
...
Views: 0
Filed 2/4/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, ) S090602
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) Alameda County
) Super. Ct. No. 135280
v. )
...
Views: 0
Filed 2/11/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S143743
v. )
)
HUBER JOEL MENDOZA, )
...
Views: 0
Filed 2/18/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
TSVETANA YVANOVA, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S218973
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/1 B247188
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE ...
Views: 1
Filed 2/18/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S024046
v. )
)
JAMES FRANCIS O‘MALLEY, )
...
Views: 0
Filed 2/22/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S016883
v. )
)
JARVIS J. MASTERS, )
...
Views: 0
Page 1232
Filed 2/25/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S218233
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/1 D062659
HUGO GARCIA, ...
Views: 0
Filed 2/25/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
MILTON HOWARD GAINES, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S215990
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/8 B244961
FIDELITY NATIONAL T...
Views: 0
Opinion
Code of Civil Procedure section 1032, subdivision (a)(4) defines the “prevailing party” in litigation to include “the party with a net monetary recovery” and “a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered.” (All undesignated statutory references are to this code.) A “prevailing party,” so defined, “is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding.” (§ 1032...
Views: 0
Filed 3/17/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
ESTUARDO ARDON, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S223876
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/6 B252476
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ...
Views: 0
The petitions for review are granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in City of San Buenaventura *7v. United Water Conservation District, S226036 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2) ), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pen...
Views: 0
Dismissed and remanded to CA 1/1. Review in the above-captioned matter, which was granted and held for People v. Safety National Casualty Corp. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 703, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 272, 366 P.3d 57, is hereby dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(b)(1).)KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate....
Views: 0
Filed 3/28/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
MARIBEL BALTAZAR, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S208345
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/1 B237173
FOREVER 21, INC., et a...
Views: 1
Page 1816
Filed 3/28/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S076785
v. )
)
PEDRO RANGEL, JR., )
...
Views: 0
Petition for review granted; issues limited. The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: "May a contractor withhold retention payments when there is a good faith dispute of any kind between the contractor and a subcontractor, or only when the dispute relates to the retention itself?"KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate....
Views: 0
Filed 4/4/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
NYKEYA KILBY, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S215614
v. )
) 9th Cir. Nos.
CVS PHARMACY, INC., ...
Views: 0
Dismissed and remanded to CA 5. Review in the above-captioned matter is hereby dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(b).)KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate....
Views: 0
Page 2243
Filed 4/21/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S022998
v. )
)
ANTHONY LETRICE TOWNSEL, )
...
Views: 0
The above-captioned matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 919, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 66, 365 P.3d 845. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).)...
Views: 0
Petition for review granted....
Views: 0
Filed 5/5/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
CATHERINE FLORES, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S209836
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/3 B235409
PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY...
Views: 0
Filed 5/5/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
ALEYAMMA JOHN, )
)
Petitioner, )
) S222726
v. )
) ...
Views: 1
Page 2563
Filed 5/9/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S224599
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/5 B255894
STEVEN WADE, ...
Views: 1
Page 2564
Opinion While riding in a car driven by defendant Norma Lilian Cortez (defendant), Rodrigo Bernal fired five or six shots at 19-year-old Emanuel Z. and 16-year-old Miguel Guzman, killing the latter. In a joint trial, a jury convicted defendant and Bernal of premeditated murder and attempted premeditated murder. The Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed Bernal’s convictions. However, in a divided op...
Views: 0
Petition for review granted....
Views: 0
Filed 5/19/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
KATHLEEN A. WINN, et. al, )
)
Plaintiffs and Appellants, )
) S211793
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/8 B237712
PIONEER MEDICAL GROUP...
Views: 0
Page 3590
Filed 5/23/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S220247
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/3 G048155
LEE HOANG ROBINSON, ...
Views: 0
Opinion
Plaintiff William B. Webb was injured by exposure to asbestos products and sued a raw asbestos supplier for failing to warn him about the danger. His case raises a question about the extent of a supplier’s duty to warn. Specifically, when a company supplies a hazardous raw material for use in making a finished product, what is the scope of the supplier’s duty to warn ultimate users of the...
Views: 0
Page 3592
Filed 5/26/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S217699
v. )
) Ct.App. 1/3 A135607
TYRIS LAMAR FRANKLIN, ...
Views: 0
Page 3593
Filed 5/26/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S077524
v. )
)
MAGDALENO SALAZAR, )
...
Views: 0
Page 3594
Filed 5/26/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
)
) S223651
In re WILLIAM RICHARDS )
) Ct.App. 4/2 E049135
on Habeas Corpus. )
) San Bernardino C...
Views: 0
Filed 6/2/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S218861
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/1 D063394
EMMANUEL CASTILLOLOPEZ, ...
Views: 0
Opinion
Here we consider the scope of Elections Code provisions enacted in 2014, which created a new process by which a proposed initiative measure is submitted for public comment. (Elec. Code, § 9002.)1 After the comment period, the Ahorney General prepares an official circulating title and summary, including an estimate of the measure’s fiscal impact. (§ 9004.) The proponents may then solicit s...
Views: 0
Filed 6/9/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS NICKERSON, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S213873
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/3 B234271
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE ...
Views: 0
Page 3758
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Chaney, S223676, and People v. Valencia, S223825 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2) ), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further orde...
Views: 0
Petition for review granted....
Views: 0
Page 4000
Filed 6/16/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S216444
v. )
) ...
Views: 0
Page 4001
Filed 6/16/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S228030
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/3 G051142
JOSUE VARGAS MORALES, ...
Views: 0
Filed 6/23/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
FLAVIO RAMOS et al., )
)
Plaintiffs and Appellants, )
) S218176
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/4 B248038
BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES,...
Views: 0
Page 4575
Filed 6/27/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S065573
v. )
)
FRANK KALIL BECERRA, )
...
Views: 0
Page 4576
Filed 6/27/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S066940
v. )
)
WILLIAM CLINTON CLARK, )
...
Views: 2
Page 4577
Filed 6/30/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S216681
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/3 G047666
MARCOS ARTURO SANCHEZ, ...
Views: 0
Page 4578
Filed 6/30/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S211275
v. )
) Ct.App. 3 C070272
PATRICK LEE CONLEY, ...
Views: 0
Petition for review granted.CORRIGAN, J., was absent and did not participate....
Views: 0
**902Dismissed and remanded to CA 2/8. Review in the above-captioned matter, which was granted and held for Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 1237, 200 Cal.Rptr.3d 7, 367 P.3d 6, is hereby dismissed. (Rule 8.528(b)(1).)CORRIGAN, J., was absent and did not participate....
Views: 0
Page 4742
Opinion
The federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) provides: “In any involuntary proceeding in a State court, where the court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved, the party seeking the foster care placement of, or termination of parental rights to, an Indian child shall notify the parent or Indian custodian and the Indian child’s tribe, ...
Views: 0
Page 4743
Filed 7/11/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S097886
v. )
)
LOUIS RANGEL ZARAGOZA, )
...
Views: 0
Page 4744
Filed 7/11/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S224929
v. )
) Ct.App. 6 H039219
ZEFERINO ESPINOZA, JR., ...
Views: 0
Page 4745
Filed 7/14/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
In re ABBIGAIL A. et al., Persons Coming )
Under the Juvenile Court Law. )
___________________________________ )
)
SACRAMENTO COUNTY ) S220187
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND )
HUMAN SERVICES, )
...
Views: 0
Page 5038
Filed 7/18/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S102166
v. )
)
RICHARD NATHAN SIMON, )
...
Views: 0
Page 5084
Filed 7/21/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S219109
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/3 G048563
ALEXIS ALEJANDRO FUENTES...
Views: 0
Opinion
Plaintiff Timothy Sandquist and the various defendants here are parties to an arbitration agreement. A salient question is whether that agreement permits or prohibits arbitration on a classwide basis. Here we must answer a question one step removed—who decides whether the agreement permits or prohibits classwide arbitration, a court or the arbitrator? The question has divided the many sta...
Views: 2
Page 6382
Filed 8/1/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S139103
v. )
)
BAILEY LAMAR JACKSON, )
...
Views: 0
Page 6383
Filed 8/1/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT C. BARAL, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S225090
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/1 B253620
DAVID SCHNITT, ...
Views: 1
Page 6384
Filed 8/4/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S215914
v. )
) Ct.App. 6 H039330
JEFFREY MICHAEL MORAN, ...
Views: 0
Filed 8/8/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF MONTEBELLO, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S219052
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/1 B245959
ROSEMARIE VASQUEZ et al., ...
Views: 7
Opinion
A class action employment lawsuit settled before trial for $19 million, with the agreement that no more than a third of that recovery would go to class counsel as attorney fees. In seeking the trial court’s approval of the settlement, class counsel sought the maximum fee amount, $6,333,333.33. After considering information from class counsel on the hours they had worked on the case, appli...
Views: 0
Filed 8/11/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S130659
v. )
)
CRAIGEN LEWIS ARMSTRONG, )
...
Views: 0
Page 6389
Filed 8/11/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S179181
v. )
) Riverside County
MICHAEL RAY BURGENER, ...
Views: 0
Page 6748
Opinion
Defendant Sergio Dujuan Nelson was convicted of the first degree murders of Robin Shirley and Lee Thompson. (Pen. Code, § 187; all undesig-nated statutory references are to this code.) The jury also found true the special circumstance allegations that Nelson committed multiple murders and that the murders were committed while lying in wait. (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(3), (15).) It also found tru...
Views: 0
Opinion
The City of Perris (the City) is located 70 miles east of Los Angeles. This case involves the City’s condemnation of a 1.66-acre strip of defendants’ property in order to build a road. By taking the strip, the City has divided the property into two irregularly shaped parcels. The City claimed that defendants would have been required to dedicate the strip to the City, with no compensation,...
Views: 0
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Baral v. Schnitt, S225090. (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2) ), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court....
Views: 0
Filed 8/18/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
JANIS S. McLEAN, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, ) S221554
)
v. ) Ct.App. 3 C074515
)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ...
Views: 0
Page 6788
Filed 8/18/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S224546
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/3 G050399
JUANITA VIDANA, ...
Views: 0
The above-captioned matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of the enactment of Statutes 2015, chapter 505 (Sen. Bill No. 327 (2015-2016 Reg. Sess.)). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).)...
Views: 0
Page 6974
Filed 8/22/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S222620
v. )
) Ct.App. 3 C074662
BRANDON LANCE RINEHART, ...
Views: 0
Opinion
Criminal defendants routinely file motions at the outset of their cases to suppress the evidence against them. When a judge grants such a motion, the prosecution may decide to dismiss the case and refile charges. But if the prosecution does refile such charges, Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (p)1 provides that any suppression motion the defendant subsequently files must be heard b...
Views: 0
Page 6976
Filed 8/22/16; on rehearing
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S076339
v. )
)
GARY LEE GRIMES, )
...
Views: 1
Opinion
Under our state Constitution, if the Legislature or a state agency requires a local government to provide a new program or higher level of service, the local government is entitled to reimbursement from the state for the associated costs. (Cal. Const., art. XIII B, § 6, subd. (a).) There are exceptions, however. Under one of them, if the new program or increased service is mandated by a f...
Views: 0
Opinion
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS), a pharmaceutical manufacturer, conducts significant business and research activities in California but is neither incorporated nor headquartered here. In March 2012, eight separate amended complaints were filed in San Francisco Superior Court by or on behalf of 678 individuals, consisting of 86 California residents and 592 nonresidents, all of whom alle...
Views: 0
Filed 9/8/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S075136
v. )
)
DANIEL SANCHEZ COVARRUBIAS, )
...
Views: 0
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in In re Ricardo P., S230923 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2) ), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court. Corrigan, J., was...
Views: 0
Filed 9/19/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
FRIENDS OF THE COLLEGE OF )
SAN MATEO GARDENS, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S214061
v. )
) Ct.App. 1...
Views: 0
The petitions for review are granted. The issues to be briefed and argued by the parties are limited to the following: (1) Did plaintiffs' causes of action alleging the breach of and interference with an exclusive agency agreement to negotiate the designation and development of a National Football League (NFL) stadium and related claims arise out of a public issue or an issue of public interest wi...
Views: 0
Transferred to CA 4/3 after hold. Review in the above-captioned matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three, for reconsideration in light of Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 233, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 359, 376 P.3d 506. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).)...
Views: 0
Transferred to CA 1/1 after hold. Review in the above-captioned matter is transferred to the First District Court of Appeal, Division One, for reconsideration in light of the decision in People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665, 204 Cal.Rptr.3d 102, 374 P.3d 320. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 8.528(d).)...
Views: 0
The above-entitled matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, for reconsideration in light of the decision in Baral v. Sc h nitt (2016) 1 Cal.5th 376, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 475, 376 P.3d 604. The Reporter of Decisions is directed not to publish the Court of Appeal opinion in this matter, filed April 14, 2016, in the Official Reports....
Views: 0
Filed 11/7/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL EUGENE MAAS, )
)
Petitioner, )
) S225109
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/1 D064639
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ...
Views: 0
Filed 11/10/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
MORRIS GLEN HARRIS, JR., )
) S231489
Petitioner, )
) Ct.App. 2/5 B264839
v. )
)
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ...
Views: 0
Filed 11/21/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
HIROSHI HORIIKE, )
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S218734
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/5 B246606
COLDWELL BANKER RES...
Views: 0
Page 9432
Filed 12/1/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S033901
v. )
)
CATHERINE THOMPSON, )
...
Views: 0
Page 9586
Filed 12/5/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S221852
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/5 B248316
PAUL MACABEO, ...
Views: 0
Page 9587
Filed 12/5/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S131819
v. )
)
GEORGE WILLIAMS, JR., )
...
Views: 0
Page 9590
Filed 12/8/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S118384
v. )
)
ANGELO MICHAEL MELENDEZ, )
...
Views: 0
Filed 12/8/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S229446
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/5 B251230
FINANCIAL CASUALTY ...
Views: 0
Filed 12/12/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
In re )
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX CASES. ) S218400
) Ct.App. 2/2 B243800
)
) Los Angeles County
) ...
Views: 0
Page 9593
Filed 12/12/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S100735
v. )
)
DANIEL GARY LANDRY, )
...
Views: 0
Page 9594
Filed 12/15/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
) S222211
RACEWAY FORD CASES. )
) Ct.App. 4/2 E054517, E056595
) Riverside County Super. Ct.
) ...
Views: 2
Filed 12/22/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE ex rel. JAN LYNN OWEN, )
as Commissioner, etc., )
)
)
Plaintiff and Appellant, )
) S216878
v. )
...
Views: 0
Filed 12/29/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S228258
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/1 D064986
TORY J. CORPENING, ...
Views: 0
Filed 12/29/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD )
OF SUPERVISORS et al., )
)
Petitioners, )
) S226645
v. )
) Ct.App. ...
Views: 0
Filed 12/22/16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
JENNIFER AUGUSTUS et al., )
)
Plaintiffs and Respondents, )
) S224853
v. )
) Ct.App. 2/1 B243788, B247392
ABM SECURITY SERVICES...
Views: 0
**1105Petition for review granted; briefing deferred. The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending the decision of the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Four, in Alameda County Deputy Sheriff's Association **1106et al. v. Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association et al., A141913 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2) ) or pendin...
Views: 0
 | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
About Privacy Security Contact Us
| |||||||||||||||
