|
Court Cases
|
Recently Popular Cases
-
PAUL v. LAM RESEARCH, et al. 3,659 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
USA v. Acct 263226700, et al 1,950 views
Illinois Northern District Court
NigeriaNarcotraffickingMoney LaunderingBola TinubuAsset ForfeitureDrug Trafficking ProceedsCivil ForfeitureNarcotics
Nigerian President-Elect Bola Ahmed Tinubu was named as the owner of several bank accounts that were used to launder money for a heroin distribution network in Chicago, IL in the early 1990s. The members of the heroin ring were criminally charged in a separate case, Northern District of Illinois Case No. 2:92-cr-00113-RL. For unknown reasons, Tinubu was not. Instead, the U.S. Government seized the contents of the bank accounts based on several different seizure warrants across three different dockets, of which this is one. The other two, from 1992, are in the Southern District of New York and a separate docket in the Northern District of Illinois—both with unknown case numbers since the documents pre-date the federal court's PACER system by so many years. In total, about $2.4 million USD was seized from Tinubu's global bank accounts pursuant to these seizure warrants. While working for Mobil Oil Company in Nigeria, Tinubu used a variety of shell companies to move the money around, including Compass Finance & Investment Co., incorporated in Washington, D.C. Though he was not charged, Tinubu committed at least five federal crimes, according to the IRS Special Agent's affidavit in this case: 1) Money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956); 2) Using funds from unlawful activity (18 U.S.C. § 1957); 3) Bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344);
4) Failure to file tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7203); and 5) Lying to federal agents (18 U.S.C. § 1001). Tinubu was elected to be the next President of Nigeria in February 2023.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Doctors Medical Center of Modesto, Inc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. 1,257 views
California Eastern District Court
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 1,132 views
New Jersey District Court
This is a general administrative docket used by the New Jersey District Court to post new complaints. It's not actually a real lawsuit.
-
Boose v. Musk et al 669 views
Georgia Northern District Court
-
Zimmerman v. Pier 1. Imports (U.S.), Inc. 581 views
Nevada District Court
-
USA v. D2A213A 424 views
California Southern District Court
-
Maninang v. Randstad Employment Solutions, LP 411 views
California Southern District Court
-
Dymtrow v. Swift et al 380 views
New York Southern District Court
Pop StarsMusic IndustryChild StarsTalent ManagementBreach of ContractEntertainment LawTaylor Swift
Pop star Taylor Swift's early manager Daniel Dymtrow sued the Swift family after his services were terminated just before a meeting with Sony ATV that he alleges he helped to arrange, cutting him out of payments. He also sued Swift's new record label, Big Machine Records, and its founder, Scott Borchetta.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Resolution Trust, et al v. Landmark Land Co., et al 372 views
South Carolina District Court
-
Mathis et al v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al 369 views
Florida Southern District Court
Fair Labor Standards ActMinimum WageTip PoolingRestaurant IndustryCollective ActionWage TheftDarden RestaurantsOlive GardenRed Lobster
Current and former servers and bartenders at Darden Restaurants — the parent company of Olive Garden, Red Lobster, LongHorn Steakhouse, Seasons 52, and Bahama Breeze — filed this nationwide collective action in September 2012 in the Southern District of Florida, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs claimed that Darden illegally required tipped employees to participate in mandatory tip-sharing arrangements and otherwise failed to pay them the federal minimum wage applicable to tipped workers. The proposed class ultimately encompassed more than 216,000 servers and bartenders who worked for Darden brands during the three-year period covered by the claims.
The case generated extensive procedural litigation over conditional certification, the scope of the class list, and discovery. In November 2013, the parties discovered that Darden had inadvertently omitted approximately 1,586 bartenders from the class list — those coded under a "Bartender Tip Share" designation introduced at Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Bahama Breeze, and Seasons 52 when those brands rolled out mandatory tip-share programs around 2011. The parties jointly moved to extend the opt-in period to cover these workers. The case proceeded to mediation before a private mediator in June 2014.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Greenspan v. Random House, Inc. et al 360 views
Massachusetts District Court
Fake Non-Fiction BooksFalse AdvertisingThe Social Network (2010 Movie)Defamation By OmissionAaron SorkinConsumer ReviewsFake AccountsFacebook OriginsHarvard UniversityCopyright InfringementDefamationFacebookThe Social NetworkHollywoodUnfair CompetitionHarvard
Aaron Greenspan, creator of the 2003 predecessor to The Facebook at Harvard University, sued popular author Benjamin Mezrich, his publisher Random House, and Columbia Pictures for copyright infringement, defamation and false advertising due to the statements made by Mezrich in and about his book "The Accidental Billionaires." Mezrich's book, which cites Greenspan's as a source, has been marketed as supposed non-fiction, even though the story is full of inconsistencies and outright falsifications, many of which Mezrich admits to. Mezrich notably omitted Greenspan's role in the creation of the web site, and helped to prop up Mark Zuckerberg as a "genius" in his book, leading to the eventual motion picture "The Social Network," and contributing to the frenzy surrounding Facebook's problematic IPO.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Jane Roe 424 E.l., An Individual v. Doe 1, A Public Entity 326 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
United States v. Bossingham 320 views
Arizona District Court
Kitchen NightmaresTurbodisputeIdentity TheftSocial Security FraudCredit FraudFederal SentencingPlea AgreementAmy's Baking Company
Amanda Patricia Bossingham, also known as "Amy," the proprietor of Amy's Baking Company in Scottsdale, AZ, featured on the popular Fox television show "Kitchen Nightmares," was convicted of bank fraud in 2008 after she falsified a Social Security number on an application for a five-figure bank loan.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
The R&d Credit Company, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company v. Network Optix, Inc. 319 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
USA v. Houck 313 views
Missouri Western District Court
-
306 views
Indiana Southern District Court
-
Kahn v. Anthropic PBC 299 views
California Northern District Court
Artificial IntelligenceClaude Max
-
DITHRICH v. DHOOGHE 275 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Dismissed
This case was brought before the court because Justin R. Dhooghe found out about an affair between his then fiance Laura V. Rivera and Charles W. Dithrich and wanted information. Charles W. Dithrich wanted to settle out of court for a list of demands including the deletion of all information and pictures Justin R. Dhooghe had in his possession of the affair along with the sum of five thousand dollars in exchange for a non-CLETs restraining order, one that was not on his permanent record. Justin R. Dhooghe eventually refused and the case was brought before the judge and ultimately was dismissed due to insufficient grounds. No restraining order is in effect.
-
GREENSPAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al 272 views
District Of Columbia District Court
Bola TinubuNigeriaFOIAGovernment TransparencyFBIDEAFederal RecordsInvestigative JournalismContempt of Court
Based on the fact that a 1993 civil forfeiture lawsuit became one of the most popular dockets on PlainSite, PlainSite founder Aaron Greenspan sued six United States government agencies over their denial of FOIA requests and subsequent administrative appeals about Nigerian President Bold Tinubu, newly elected as of May 2023 in a highly controversial election.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Yaser A. Albahri, Petitioner v. Florida 251 views
Supreme Court of the United States
-
Giuffre v. Maxwell 249 views
New York Southern District Court
Sexual PredatorsJeffrey E. EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGDefamationJeffrey EpsteinGhislaine MaxwellSealed RecordsCourt TransparencySexual Abuse
Virginia Giuffre sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation after Maxwell alleged that Giuffre's claims about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, which ensnared Giuffre as a minor, were not true. Thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein and his associates, including former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, have been released in this case as a result of the discovery process.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 245 views
New Jersey District Court
-
Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump et al 239 views
California Central District Court
Jeffrey E. EpsteinPresident Donald J. TrumpDonald J. Trump Child Rape AllegationsSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinChild ExploitationPro Se LitigationCivil RightsPersonal injury
A woman filing under the pseudonym Katie Johnson, a self-represented plaintiff from Twentynine Palms, California, filed this lawsuit in April 2016 in the Central District of California before Judge Dolly Gee against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that when she was 13 years old in 1994, she was sexually assaulted by both Trump and Epstein at Epstein's Manhattan residence. The complaint was filed pro se.
The case was assigned on April 26, 2016 and initial documents were filed. A renewed judgment/renewal of judgment filing appeared in April 2026, more than a decade later, suggesting residual enforcement activity. The original lawsuit was withdrawn and refiled in New York before being voluntarily dismissed in November 2016.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Mann v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company 237 views
Florida Southern District Court
-
One Workplace L. Ferrari, LLC v. Bravanta, Inc. Fka Bravogifts.com, Inc. et al 232 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Streckfuss v. Pizza My Heart Inc. 223 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Directv Inc v. Greg A Fischer 209 views
California Central District Court
-
Akop Terpogosyan 206 views
California Central Bankruptcy Court
-
Particle guidance system 203 views
United States Patent and Trademark Office
-
Emmanuel Macron v. Candace Owens, et al. 198 views
Superior Court of Delaware
FranceSocial Media
-
United States of America et al v. Durrani et al 197 views
Ohio Southern District Court
Forged Declarations
-
Brand New School LLC v. The Mill Group et al 195 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Doe v. Trump et al 191 views
New York Southern District Court
Jeffrey E. EpsteinSexual AssaultJeffrey EpsteinSEX TRAFFICKINGChild Sexual AbuseDefamation
A woman proceeding under the pseudonym Jane Doe filed this lawsuit in June 2016 in the Southern District of New York against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that she had been sexually assaulted by both men at a series of parties hosted by Epstein at his Manhattan townhouse in 1994, when the plaintiff was 13 years old. The complaint alleged rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and defamation. It described a pattern of abuse over multiple encounters that the plaintiff alleged was facilitated by an unnamed woman who recruited her with promises of money and modeling work.
The case attracted significant media attention given the identities of the defendants and the gravity of the allegations. A companion affidavit filed with the complaint included similar allegations from a second anonymous woman who claimed to have witnessed some of the events. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case in November 2016, with her attorney citing fear for her safety and the psychological toll of the publicity as the reasons for withdrawal. The dismissal was without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of refiling, though no subsequent federal action was recorded.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
MARTIN EBERHARD v. ELON MUSK 183 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
BillionairesDefamationSlanderTeslaELON MUSKBreach of ContractFounder DisputeWage ClaimElectric Vehicles
Martin Eberhard, co-founder of Tesla Motors and its first CEO, filed this lawsuit against Elon Musk and Tesla Motors in May 2009 in San Mateo County Superior Court. Eberhard alleged that after he was pushed out of Tesla in 2007, Musk and the company launched a coordinated campaign to defame him by publicly blaming him for Tesla's early production delays and financial difficulties, spreading false narratives about his management of the company, and attempting to rewrite the company's origin story to diminish his role as a co-founder. The complaint asserted eleven causes of action including libel, slander, breach of contract, specific performance, unpaid wages, and conversion.
Eberhard had originally co-founded the company with Marc Tarpenning in 2003 and served as CEO through 2007, overseeing the development of the original Tesla Roadster. After his departure — which he alleged was effectively a forced ouster — Musk had assumed a more prominent public role and, Eberhard claimed, began making statements that falsely cast Eberhard as responsible for the company's technical and financial problems.
The parties reached a confidential settlement in September 2009, less than four months after the complaint was filed. As part of the resolution, both sides agreed to treat each other with respect and to acknowledge each other's contributions to Tesla's founding.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
NVE Experience Agency, LLC et al v. Pension Systems Corporation et al 182 views
California Central District Court
-
Household Finance Corporation Of California A v. Tom J Beno et al 179 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Scott Haskins v. Karen Francis et al 178 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Dutcher v. Google LLC d/b/a YouTube, et al. 171 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Binary Semantics Limited v. Minitab 167 views
Pennsylvania Middle District Court
-
Jacqueline L Domac v. Edward Furlong 164 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
In the Matter of the Accusation Against: TESLA INC., dba TESLA MOTORS INC., a Vehicle Manufacturer 164 views
California Department of Motor Vehicles
Tesla AutopilotTesla Full Self-Driving
-
BRAGGS, et al. v. BEI CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al. 161 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
-
Wixon et al v. Wyndham Resort Development Corp., et al 157 views
California Northern District Court
-
Anderson v. Office Depot, Inc. 154 views
California Southern District Court
-
PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT 151 views
New Jersey District Court
-
LeDoux v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles L L C 150 views
Louisiana Western District Court
-
GREENLIGHT CAPITAL INC v. FISHBACK 150 views
Florida Northern District Court
-
Gupta v. Yash Technologies 148 views
Illinois Central District Court
-
Fileff v. General Motors LLC 148 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Perfect Plastic v. CPI Card Grp, et al 145 views
Illinois Northern District Court
-
United States v. Arencibia 142 views
Florida Southern District Court
-
Sega Of America, Inc. v. Dustin Hensley 142 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Moguldom Media Group, LLC v. Okasi 141 views
Georgia Northern District Court
-
Pampena v. Musk 139 views
California Northern District Court
TwitterFake Accounts
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. Gerea, Paul Haidu 139 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Wilton Corporation 138 views
Louisiana Western Bankruptcy Court
-
In Re: Dylan Palmer 138 views
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
-
Sinora Freeland v. Momentum For Mental Health, a California corporation 138 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
USA v. O'Donovan 136 views
California Central District Court
-
Western Alliance Bank, An Arizona Corporation v. Cantor Group V, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company, et al. 136 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
USA v. Coates 135 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Graham v. UMG Recordings, Inc. 135 views
New York Southern District Court
DrakeCelebritiesRap Artists
-
The Haven Detox Fort Pierce, LLC v. City of Fort Pierce 129 views
Florida Southern District Court
-
Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC et al v. Non Typical, Inc. 128 views
Texas Eastern District Court
-
Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sherrifs et al v. County of Los Angeles et al 125 views
California Central District Court
-
Samuelson v. Tower Hill Preferred Insurance Company 124 views
Florida Middle District Court
-
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Shafi et al 124 views
California Northern District Court
Silicon Valley
-
Robert Gallegos v. Volkswagen Group Of America Inc., A Corporation 124 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
United States v. CLARK 123 views
District Of Columbia District Court
-
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC 122 views
California Northern District Court
Artificial IntelligenceMass Corporate Book TheftFair Use Doctrine
-
Brown v. 93 NYRPT, LLC 120 views
New York Western District Court
-
USA v. Vilneus 118 views
Rhode Island District Court
Criminal ConspiracyOrganized CrimeRelated Cases
Federal prosecutors in the District of Rhode Island charged Irvin Vilneus and four co-defendants — Junior Mertile, Tony Mertile, James Legerme, and Allen Bien-Aime — in a series of related criminal cases filed in late 2020. A notice of related case filed in November 2020 formally linked the five proceedings, indicating the defendants were charged in connection with a common scheme or organization. The cases proceeded together before the court, which is common in prosecutions involving multiple members of an alleged criminal enterprise or conspiracy. The related-case structure suggested the defendants were charged with overlapping or coordinated criminal conduct in Rhode Island.
AI case summary available — Subscribe to Pro to view.
-
Allan Brooks v. Openai, Inc., et al. 118 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Cyrene R. Houdini v. Houdini's Magic Shop, Inc. 117 views
USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
-
USA v. Lopez 117 views
New York Eastern District Court
-
Eleazar Lopez v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al 117 views
California Central District Court
-
USA v. Sauceda et al 117 views
Texas Northern District Court
-
ALMOUSA v. TELSA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al. 116 views
Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Tesla Worker Rights
-
Luis Ahedo v. Omega Global Technologies, Inc. 116 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Frances Alley Vs. Rick James, et al., 115 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Jyoti Americas LLC 113 views
Texas Southern District Court
-
The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust et al v. Capital One, N.A. 113 views
Florida Southern District Court
President Donald J. Trump
-
Claimant ID 100271726 v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al 113 views
Louisiana Eastern District Court
-
Golden Hammer Ops, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company v. Jetnet, LLC, A New York Limited Liability Company, et al. 111 views
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
-
Albanese v. WCI COMMUNITIES, INC. et al 110 views
Virginia Eastern District Court
-
United States of America v. May 110 views
Michigan Eastern District Court
-
YouTube, LLC v. Ganjingworld Corporation 109 views
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
-
Coultrip et al v. Pfizer, Inc 108 views
New York Southern District Court
-
Vyskocil v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 108 views
California Central District Court
-
Sleep Number Corporation v. Sizewise Rentals LLC 108 views
Texas Northern District Court
-
Fuller v. General Motors LLC 107 views
New York Southern District Court
-
DBRAND INC. v. Casetagram Limited d/b/a Casetify 107 views
Illinois Northern District Court
-
Harrell v. IRS, et al 106 views
Illinois Central District Court
-
X.AI LLC v. Ellison 106 views
Minnesota District Court
PornographyNudityArtificial Intelligence
-
10/12/2010 Govaerts, Lucien vs Suntec Industries Inc 105 views
Court of Chancery of Delaware
-
Baker et al v. Farmers Group Incorporated et al 105 views
Arizona District Court
-
Jones et al v. Midwest Poultry Services, LP et al 104 views
Kentucky Western District Court
-
United States v. Irizarry 103 views
New York Southern District Court
-
USA v. Diamond 103 views
California Central District Court
|
United States of America
Washington D.C. | Guam | Northern Marinara Islands | Puerto Rico | U.S. Virgin Islands
View near real-time filings with PlainSite Pro.
|
A
B
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bankman-Fried, Samuel
|
Bannon, Stephen Kevin
|
Barr, William P.
|
Benioff, Marc
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bernanke, Ben Shalom
|
Berryhill, Nancy A.
|
Bessent, Scott
|
Bezos, Jeffrey P.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Biden Jr., Joseph R.
|
Blanche, Todd
|
Blankfein, Lloyd C.
|
Blinken, Antony J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bloomberg, Michael Rubens
|
Bondi, Pamela
|
Booker, Cory A.
|
Bovino, Gregory
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bowles, Erskine B.
|
Breed, London
|
Breyer James
|
Brin, Sergey
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Brockman, Greg D.
|
Bush, George Walker
|
Buttigieg, Pete
|
|
C
 |
 |
 |
 |
Carson, Sr., Ben S.
|
Chao, Elaine L.
|
Chenault, Kenneth I.
|
Cheney, Richard B.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Chertoff, Michael
|
Clinton, Hillary Rodham
|
Clinton, William Jefferson
|
Combs, Sean
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Comey, James B.
|
Cook, Timothy D.
|
Cosby, William H., Jr.
|
|
D
 |
 |
 |
 |
De Blasio, Bill
|
Denholm, Robyn M.
|
Depp, II, John Christopher
|
Dershowitz, Alan M.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
DeSantis, Ronald D.
|
Desmond-Hellmann, Susan
|
DeVos, Elisabeth
|
Dimon, Jamie
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Doerr, L. John
|
Dorsey, Jack
|
Duncan, Arne
|
|
E
F
G
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gabbard Tamayo, Tulsi
|
Garland, Merrick
|
Gates, Melinda French
|
Gates, Robert M.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gates, William Henry
|
Gebbia, Joseph Nicholas
|
Gillibrand, Kirsten
|
Giuliani, Rudolph
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Gracias, Antonio J.
|
Graham, Donald
|
Graham, Lindsey O.
|
Greenspan, Aaron
|
 |
|
|
|
Greenspan, Alan
|
|
|
|
H
 |
 |
 |
 |
Harris, Kamala Devi
|
Hastings, W. Reed
|
Hawley, Joshua D.
|
Hayden, Michael V.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hegseth, Peter Brian
|
Hennessy John L
|
Holder, Jr., Eric H.
|
Holmes, Elizabeth A.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Huang, Jen-hsun
|
Hughes, Christopher Ray
|
|
|
I
J
K
L
M
 |
 |
 |
 |
Madoff, Bernard L.
|
Maduro Moros, Nicolas
|
Manafort, Paul J., Jr.
|
Manning, Chelsea
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Martin, Edward R., Jr.
|
Maxwell, Ghislaine
|
McConnell, Jr., Addison Mitch
|
McFarland, William
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
McKesson, DeRay
|
Milton, Trevor Robert
|
Mnuchin, Steven
|
Moritz, Michael J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Moskovitz, Dustin A.
|
Mueller, Robert S., III
|
Mulvaney, Mick
|
Murdoch, A.C., K. Rupert
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Murdoch, James R.
|
Murdoch, Lachlan K.
|
Musk, Elon Reeve
|
Musk, Kimbal J.
|
 |
|
|
|
Myhrvold, Nathan P.
|
|
|
|
N
O
P
 |
 |
 |
 |
Page, Lawrence
|
Patel, Kashyap
|
Pelosi, Nancy
|
Pence, Michael Richard
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Petit, Parker H.
|
Pichai, Sundar
|
Pompeo, Michael Richard
|
Powell, Sidney
|
 |
 |
|
|
Prince, Erik D.
|
Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich
|
|
|
Q
R
S
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sandberg, Sheryl K.
|
Saverin, Eduardo
|
Saylor, Michael Jerry
|
Schiff, Adam
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Schmidt, Eric E.
|
Schroepfer, Michael Todd
|
Schultz Howard D
|
Sessions, Jefferson Beauregard, III
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sharpton, Alfred
|
Shkreli, Martin
|
Shriram Kavitark Ram
|
Snowden, Edward
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Spears, Britney
|
Spiegel, Evan Thomas
|
Spiro, Alexander Benjamin
|
Stone, Roger J.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Straubel, Jeffrey Brian
|
Summers, Lawrence Henry
|
Sutskever, Ilya
|
Swift, Taylor
|
T
 |
 |
 |
 |
Taylor, Bret Steven
|
Teller, Samuel
|
Thiel, Peter
|
Tillerson, Rex W.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tinubu, Bola Ahmed
|
Trump, Donald J.
|
Trump, Donald J. Jr.
|
Trump, Eric
|
 |
 |
|
|
Trump, Ivanka
|
Trump, Melania
|
|
|
U
V
W
Y
Z
All Reporters → l-ed-2d → Volume 52 Opinions in l-ed-2d Volume 52
This tort action was removed from the Texas state courts to the United States District Court on the grounds of diversity of citizenship but was remanded as having been “improperly removed” when it seemed that there was not complete diversity among the parties. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, by mandamus, ordered the District Court to vacate its remand order because the latter had empl... Views: 11
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question for decision is how unearned premium reserves for accident and health (A&H) insurance policies should be allocated between a primary insurer and a reinsurer for federal tax purposes. We granted certiorari in these three cases to resolve a conflict between the Circuits and the Court of Claims. 425 U. S. 990 (1976).
I
An insurance company is considere... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court.
At issue in this case is the constitutionality of § 12 of the Illinois Probate Act1 which allows illegitimate children to inherit by intestate succession only from their mothers. Under Illinois law, legitimate children are allowed to inherit by intestate succession from both their mothers and their fathers.2
I
Appellant Deta Mona Trimble is the illegitimate daug... Views: 1
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case brings before us a constitutional challenge to §§ 101 (b) (1) (D) and 101 (b) (2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Act), 66 Stat. 182, as amended, 8 U. S. C. §§ 1101 (b) (1) (D) and 1101 (b) (2).
I
The Act grants special preference immigration status to aliens who qualify as the “children” or “parents” of United States citizens or lawful... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The issue in this case is whether States must protect the right of prisoners to access to the courts by providing them with law libraries or alternative sources of legal knowledge. In Younger v. Gilmore, 404 U. S. 15 (1971), we held per curiam that such services are constitutionally mandated. Petitioners, officials of the State of North Carolina, ask us *818to o... Views: 1
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case presents a challenge to a New Jersey statute, 1974 N. J. Laws, c. 25, as violative of the Contract Clause1 of the United States Constitution. That statute, together with a concurrent and parallel New York statute, 1974 N. Y. Laws, c. 993, repealed a statutory covenant made by the two States in 1962 that had limited the ability of The Port Authority of ... Views: 13
431 U.S. 63 (1977)
BLACKLEDGE, WARDEN, ET AL.
v.
ALLISON.
No. 75-1693.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 22, 1977.
Decided May 2, 1977.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
*64 Richard N. League, Assistant Attorney General of North *65 Carolina, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General.
C. Fr... Views: 89
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case presents the question whether the First Amendment permits a municipality to prohibit the posting of “For Sale” or “Sold” signs when the municipality acts to stem what it perceives as the flight of white homeowners from a racially integrated community.
Petitioner Linmark Associates, a New Jersey corporation, owned a piece of realty in the t... Views: 27
431 U.S. 99 (1977)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
v.
BROWN, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
No. 75-909.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 12, 1977.
Decided May 2, 1977.[*]
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Deputy Solicitor General Randolph argued the cause for petitioners in Nos. 75-909 and 75-960, for petitioner in No. 75-1055, and for responden... Views: 7
431 U.S. 105 (1977)
DIXON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ILLINOIS
v.
LOVE.
No. 75-1513.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 1-2, 1977.
Decided May 16, 1977.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
*106 Patricia Rosen, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were William J. Scott, Attorney General, ... Views: 26
431 U.S. 119 (1977)
KREMENS, HOSPITAL DIRECTOR, ET AL.
v.
BARTLEY ET AL.
No. 75-1064.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 1, 1976.
Decided May 16, 1977.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
*120 Norman J. Watkins, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Robert P. Kane, Attor... Views: 33
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent is in petitioner’s custody pursuant to a conviction for second-degree murder. The question presented to us is whether the New York State trial judge’s failure to instruct the jury on the issue of causation was constitutional error requiring a Federal District Court to grant habeas corpus relief. Disagreeing with a divided panel of the Court of Appeals... Views: 5
The motion of We the People for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The motion of James W. Jeffords, et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. Appellant challenges the operation of certain provisions of the Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act of 1967, 2 U. S. C. §§ 351-361, and of the 1975 Executive Salary Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act, 2 U. S. C. § ... Views: 0
Appellee’s 18-year-old son was shot and killed by police while attempting to escape arrest. Appellee filed suit under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 against the police officers in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. He sought to recover damages, and also to obtain a declaratory judgment that the Missouri statutes authorizing the police action were unconstitutional.
... Views: 19
The judgment is reversed. Turner v. Fouche, 396 U. S. 346, 361-364 (1970).... Views: 0
431 U.S. 161
97 S.Ct. 2166
52 L.Ed.2d 225
State of TEXASv.State of LOUISIANA
No. 36
Supreme Court of the United States
May 16, 1977
1
On Bill of Compl-
2
aint DECREE
3
For the purpose of giving effect to the opinion of this Court announced on June 14, 1976, 426 U.S. 465, 96 S.Ct. 2155, 48 L.Ed.2d 775:
... Views: 12
DECREE
For the purpose of giving effect to the opinion of this Court announced on June 14, 1976, 426 U. S. 465:
It Is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed As Follows:
1. That the extension of the boundary southerly from the point where the line forming the boundary between Texas and Louisiana southerly from the Arkansas boundary, intersects the geographical middle of the Sabine River (Latitude 31°59' 56.... Views: 2
delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari to decide whether a witness who, while under investigation for possible criminal activity, is *175 called to testify before a grand jury and who is later indicted for perjury committed before the grand jury, is entitled to have the false testimony suppressed on the ground that no effective warning of the Fifth Amendment privilege to re... Views: 23
431 U.S. 181 (1977)
UNITED STATES
v.
WASHINGTON.
No. 74-1106.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 6, 1976.
Decided May 23, 1977.
CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS.
William F. Sheehan III argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, *182 Assistant Attorney General Thornburgh, Deputy Solicitor General Frey, and Sidney M... Views: 31
delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision in this case is whether the provision of § 22 of the 1950 Organic Act of Guam that the District Court of Guam “shall have such appellate jurisdiction as the [Guam] legislature may determine” authorizes the Legislature of Guam to divest the appellate jurisdiction of the District Court under the Act to hear appeals from local Guam courts,... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The State of Michigan has enacted legislation authorizing a system for union representation of local governmental employees. A union and a local government employer are specifically permitted to agree to an “agency shop” arrangement, whereby every employee represented by a union— even though not a union member — must pay to the union, as a condition of employmen... Views: 1
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The issue in this case is the validity of two Virginia statutes that limit the right of nonresidents and aliens to catch fish in the territorial waters of the Commonwealth.
I
Persons or corporations wishing to fish commercially in Virginia must obtain licenses. Section 28.1-81.1 of the Virginia Code (§81.1) (Supp. 1976),1 enacted in 1975, limits the *268issuance... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court. In Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973), this Court rejected a plea for a uniform national standard as to what *293appeals to the prurient interest and as to what is patently offensive; the Court held, instead, that these essentially were questions of fact to be measured by contemporary standards of the community. Id., at 30-34. The instant case presents th... Views: 2
Respondent Westcott was arrested for violating a Massachusetts statute that prohibits nonresidents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from dragging for fish by beam or otter trawl in Vineyard Sound during July, August, and September. 1 After he was found guilty, he pursued his right to de novo review and filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court grant... Views: 12
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 8
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3
C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.... Views: 9
ante, p. 1; ante, p. 1 ; ante, p. 1; ante, p. 905; ante, p. 906; ante, p. 274; 429 U. S.1121; 429 U. S. 1121; 429 U. S. 1092; 429 U. S. 1081; 429 U. S. 1093; 429 U. S. 1088; 429 U. S. 1082; ante, p. 915 ; 429 U. S. 1098; ante, p. 909; and ante, p. 934. Petitions for rehearing denied.... Views: 7
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3
Ct. Civ. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of Lawrence K. Benson et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.... Views: 9
Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2
Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This litigation brings here several important questions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e et seg. (1970 ed. and Supp. V). The issues grow out of alleged unlawful employment practices engaged in by an employer and a union. The employer is a common carrier of motor freight with nationwide operations, and... Views: 3
delivered the opinion of the Court.
These cases, like
Teamsters
v.
United States, ante,
p. 324, involve alleged employment discrimination on the part of an employer and unions in the trucking industry. The employer, East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc., is a common carrier that employs city and over-the-road, or “line,” truckdrivers. The company has a “no-transfer” p... Views: 25
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question in this litigation concerns the constitutional validity of a legislative reapportionment plan devised by a three-judge Federal District Court for Mississippi’s Senate and House of Representatives. In Nos. 76-777 and 76-935, the *409appellants are the Mississippi voters who originally brought this class action in the District Court. They challenge th... Views: 2
431 U.S. 434 (1977)
TRAINOR, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, ET AL.
v.
HERNANDEZ ET UX.
No. 75-1407.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 18, 1977.
Decided May 31, 1977.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
*435 Paul J. Bargiel, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were... Views: 23
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case presents a challenge to Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4141.29 (D) (1) (a) (1973). That statute, at the times rele
*473
vant to this suit, imposed a disqualification for unemployment benefits when the claimant’s unemployment was “due to a labor dispute other than a lockout at any factory . . . owned or operated by the employer by which he i... Views: 23
431 U.S. 494 (1977)
MOORE
v.
CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO.
No. 75-6289.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 2, 1976.
Decided May 31, 1977.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, CUYAHOGA COUNTY.
*495 Edward R. Stege, Jr., argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Francis D. Murtaugh, Jr., and Lloyd B. Snyder.
Leonard Young argued the cause for appellee. With him on... Views: 58
with whom Mr. Justice Brennan joins, dissenting. But for her sex, respondent Carolyn Evans presently would enjoy all of the seniority rights that she seeks through this litigation. Petitioner United Air Lines has denied her those rights pursuant to a policy that perpetuates past discrimination by awarding the choicest jobs to those possessing a *561credential married women were unlawfully prevente... Views: 1
delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner was convicted of possessing a firearm in violation of Title YII of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets *564Act of 1968 (Omnibus Crime Control Act), 18 U. S. C. App. §§ 1201-1203. The statute provides, in pertinent part: “Any person, who— “(1) has been convicted by a court of the United States or of a State or any political subdivision, thereof ... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent Davis became a permanent employee of petitioner Alabama Power Co. on August 16, 1936, and continued to work until March 18, 1943, when he left to enter the military. After serving in the military for 30 months, he resumed his position with Alabama Power, where he worked until he retired on June 1, 1971. Davis received credit under the company ... Views: 10
delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner Splawn was convicted in 1971 of the sale of two reels of obscene film, a misdemeanor violation of California Penal Code §311.2 (West 1970). After the conviction was affirmed on appeal by the California First District Court of Appeal and the State Supreme Court denied review, this Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded for conside... Views: 2
delivered the opinion of the Court. Customs officials, acting with “reasonable cause to suspect” a violation of customs laws, opened for inspection incoming international letter-class mail without first obtaining a search warrant. A divided Court of Appeals for the District of Co*608lumbia Circuit held, contrary to every other Court of Appeals which has considered the matter,1 that the Fourth Amen... Views: 1
Petitioner Harry Roberts was indicted, tried, and convicted of the first-degree murder of Police Officer Dennis Mclnemey, who at the time of his death was engaged in the performance *634of his lawful duties. As required by a Louisiana statute, petitioner was sentenced to death. La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:30 (2) (1974) ,1 On appeal, the Supreme Court of Louisiana affirmed his conviction and sentence.... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted certiorari to determine whether a pretrial order denying a motion to dismiss an indictment on double jeopardy grounds is a final decision within the meaning of 28 U. S. C. § 1291
1
and thus immediately appealable. If it is a final decision, we must also decide: (a) whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars the instant prosecution; (b)... Views: 75
431 U.S. 666 (1977)
STENCEL AERO ENGINEERING CORP.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 76-321.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 22, 1977.
Decided June 9, 1977.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
*667 Thomas J. Whalen argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Thomas S. Martin argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solic... Views: 36
delivered the opinion of the Court (Parts I, II, III, and V), together with an opinion (Part IV), in which Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Blackmun joined.
Under New York Educ. Law § 6811 (8) (McKinney 1972) it is a crime (1) for any person to sell or distribute any contraceptive of any kind to a minor under the age of 16 years ; (2) for anyone other than a licensed phar... Views: 0
431 U.S. 720 (1977)
ILLINOIS BRICK CO. ET AL.
v.
ILLINOIS ET AL.
No. 76-404.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 23, 1977.
Decided June 9, 1977.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
*722 Edward H. Hatton argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Lynne E. McNown, Alan L. Metz, Samuel J. Betar, Earl E. Pollack, James P. Morgan, Thoma... Views: 21
431 U.S. 767 (1977)
WARD
v.
ILLINOIS.
No. 76-415.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 27, 1977.
Decided June 9, 1977.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
*768 J. Steven Beckett argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Donald M. Reno, Jr.
Melbourne A. Noel, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Willia... Views: 17
431 U.S. 783 (1977)
UNITED STATES
v.
LOVASCO.
No. 75-1844.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 21-22, 1977.
Decided June 9, 1977.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
*784 John P. Rupp argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Thornburgh, Deputy Solicitor General Frey, Jerome M... Views: 88
|
Federal District Court Case Types
|
Federal Appellate Court Case Types
|
|