|
All Reporters → us-lexis → Volume 1952 Opinions in us-lexis Volume 1952The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in the light of King v. United States, ante, p. 254, decided this day.... Views: 4 It is ordered that John Raeburn Green, Esquire, of St. Louis, Missouri, be, and he is hereby, appointed special master in this cause, with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The master is directed to hold hearings, take such evidence as may be necessary and, with all convenient speed, to subm... Views: 0 Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus dismissed on motion of counsel for the petitioner.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma upholding the validity of a loyalty oath1 prescribed by Oklahoma statute for all state officers and *185employees. Okla. Stat. Ann., 1950, Tit. 51, §§ 37.1-37.8 (1952 Supp.). Appellants, employed by the State as members of the faculty and staff of Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College, fai... Views: 3 Page 1431 delivered the opinion of the Court.
The petitioner, Schwartz, a pawnbroker, entered into a conspiracy with Jarrett and Bennett whereby the latter two were to rob places to be designated by Schwartz and *200bring the loot to him to dispose of and divide the proceeds with them. Pursuant to the plan, Jarrett and Bennett robbed a woman in Dallas, Texas, of her valuable jewels and brought the loot to t... Views: 2 The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 5 *901The appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee is dismissed on motion of counsel for the appellant. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. William Waller for the Crescent Amusement Co. et al.; and W. H. Mitchell for the Muscle Shoals Theatres et al., appellees.... Views: 2 Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.... Views: 2 Page 1438 *902C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 Page 1439 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.... Views: 2 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 Page 1454
344 U.S. 143 (1952)
DIXON
v.
DUFFY, WARDEN.
No. 4.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 16, 1951.
Continued November 5, 1951.
Further continued May 12, 1952.
Decided December 8, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
Franklin C. Stark, acting under appointment by the Court, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General of C... Views: 6 Page 1455
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In 1901 an Apache Indian, Paukune, was issued a trust patent to land in Caddo County, Oklahoma. This allotment was made under the General Allotment Act of Feb
*172
ruary 8, 1887, 24 Stat. 388, 389.
1
Paukune died testate in 1919, leaving a wife Juana and a son Jose. By his will he devised an undivided one-third interest in the all... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. Respondent was convicted of violating § 301 (f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1040, 21 U. S. C. § 331 (f). That section prohibits “The refusal to permit entry or inspection as authorized by section 704.” 1 Section 704 authorizes the federal officers or employees “after first making request and obtaining permis *175 sion of the owne... Views: 26 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 *895Court of Claims. Certiorari denied. Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States.... Views: 3 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Cer-tiorari denied.... Views: 0 Circuit Court of. Randolph County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 Page 1496
344 U.S. 133 (1952)
MANDOLI
v.
ACHESON, SECRETARY OF STATE.
No. 15.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 17, 1952.
Decided November 24, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
*134 Jack Wasserman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Gaspare Cusumano and Harry Meisel.
Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for responden... Views: 4 This action was instituted by the appellants attacking a Kansas statute which authorized segregation in the schools of that State. It was urged that the State of Kansas was without power to enact such legislation, claimed by appellants to be in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment. In the District Court, the State, by its Governor and Attorney General, intervened and defended the constitut... Views: 3 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Colorado. Cer-tiorari granted.... Views: 0 Page 1504 *891C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Harry Polikoff and Edgar J. Goodrich for respondent.... Views: 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0
344 U.S. 66 (1952)
UNITED STATES
v.
HENNING ET AL.
No. 10.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 1, 1952.
Reargued October 14, 1952.
Decided November 17, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
*67 Morton Liftin argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge and Samuel ... Views: 19
344 U.S. 82 (1952)
BAUMET ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
No. 39.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15, 1952.
Decided November 17, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Louis A. D'Agosto argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.
Morton Liftin argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General *... Views: 4 Page 1518
344 U.S. 86 (1952)
SWEENEY, SHERIFF,
v.
WOODALL.
No. 100.
Supreme Court of United States.
Certiorari granted and judgment reversed, November 17, 1952.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
Frank T. Cullitan and Gertrude M. Bauer for petitioner.
Frank C. Lyons for respondent.
*87 Eugene Cook, Attorney General, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy ... Views: 6 Judgment affirmed. United States v. Tucker Truck Lines, 344 U. S. 33, decided November 10, 1952.... Views: 7 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the *884question of the jurisdiction of the District Court. Roscoe H. Hupper for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern filed a memorandum for the United States stating that the Government does not oppose the granting of a writ of certiorari in this case limited to the question of jurisdiction.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 1528 Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Certio-*885rari denied. Henry P. Fielding, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Richard Wait for petitioners. Charles B. Rugg for respondents. Briefs of amici curiae supporting the petition were filed by Timothy J. Donovan and John P. Clair for the Department of Banks of Massachusetts; and Fred N. Oliver and M. F. McCarthy for the National Assoc... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the cause is moot.... Views: 7 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the application therefor was not made within the time provided by law. 28 U. S. C. §2101 (c).... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Welborn B. Cody for the Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Pension Fund of Atlanta, appellee.... Views: 4 The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 1 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal *872is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Samuel Kagle for appellant. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.... Views: 0 Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 Page 1577 Court of Appeals of Kentucky. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 9 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 1585 Supreme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 3 Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or *879decision of this application. Jack L. Rorschach for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, James L. Morrisson and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.... Views: 5 ante, p. 818. Rehearing denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 4 ante, p. 805. Motions for leave to file briefs of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, as amici curiae, denied. Petitions for rehearing also denied.... Views: 0 The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. With him on the brief were Ansley W. Sawyer and W. Crosby Roper, Jr. John Lord O’Brian was also of counsel for respondent.... Views: 2 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Stephen H. Hart for appellees.... Views: 0 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 0 *862C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Georgia. Certiorari granted. Counsel are requested to discuss in their briefs and on oral argument the question whether the judgment sought to be reviewed is final within the meaning of 28 U. S. C. § 1257.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certi-orari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *865Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of North Carolina. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 *866C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 3 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 The motion to withhold the order denying certiorari, ante, p. 818, pending the filing and disposition of a petition for rehearing is denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.... Views: 1 Certiorari, 343 U. S. 963, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Cir*851cuit. Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel. John L. Laskey for petitioner. E. C. Iden for respondent.... Views: 3 Page 1674 Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 1682 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 11 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 Page 1686 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Petition for rehearing on petition for extension of time denied. Certiorari also denied.... Views: 8 Page 1696 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.... Views: 11 The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 3 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Burton is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.... Views: 0 The motion to substitute Tighe E. Woods, present Director of Price Stabilization, as the party petitioner in the place and stead of Ellis Arnall, resigned, is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Emergency Court of Appeals for consideration in the light of amendments to the Defense Production Act, approved Ju... Views: 0 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Missouri, 342 U. S. 421. Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Jackson are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.... Views: 4 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 0 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 5 Philip B. Perlman, then Solicitor General, Acting Solicitor General Stern, Philip Elman and Morton Hollander for appellant. Carl McFarland, Ashley Sellers, Raymond S. Smethurst and Kenneth L. Kimble for appellees. The motion to vacate is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the ca... Views: 2 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by *80628 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied. Hayden C. Covington for appellants. W. S. Elkins and Leroy Jeffers for appellee.... Views: 0 Page 1738 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus also denied.... Views: 3 Page 1739 Motion to amend the petition for writ of certiorari granted.... Views: 1 Page 1743 Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.... Views: 6 Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 5 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Cer*810tiorari granted. Denis M. Hurley and Seymour B. Quel for petitioner. Edward R. Brumley for respondent.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 Page 1760 Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Certiorari granted.... Views: 2 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted. Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision *813of this application. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. Donald B. Richberg, Alfons B. Landa and Delmar W. Holloman for respondent.... Views: 1 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to question No. 2 presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.: “Does not the Pennsylvania Statute, as construed by the Court below, violate the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution?”... Views: 5 Supreme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Page 1774 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 8 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of North Carolina. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari *826denied. Henry S. Drinker and Frederick E. S. Morrison for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack and Harry Marselli for respondent.... Views: 0 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 8 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Solicitor General Perlman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack and John Lockley for the United States.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 1831 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 1832 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 Page 1838 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Michigan. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 *834C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. John H. Bruninga for respondents.... Views: 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *835C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 1862 Supreme Court of Delaware. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certi-orari denied. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion cer-tiorari should be granted.... Views: 6 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 United States Emergency Court of Appeals. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 2 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 9 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 In two appeals now pending, No. 8, Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al., and No. 101, Briggs et al. v. Elliott et al., the appellants challenge, respectively, the constitutionality of a statute of Kansas, and a statute and the Constitution of South Carolina, which provide for segregation in the schools of these states. Appellants allege that segregation is, per se, a viol... Views: 6 Page 1955
343 U.S. 790 (1952)
LELAND
v.
OREGON.
No. 176.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 29, 1952.
Decided June 9, 1952.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
*791 Thomas H. Ryan argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Harold L. Davidson.
J. Raymond Carskadon and Charles Eugene Raymond argued the cause for appellee. With them on the brief was George Neuner, Attorney Gene... Views: 39
343 U.S. 808 (1952)
CASEY ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 379.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted March 3, 1952.
Decided June 9, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
F. M. Reischling submitted on brief for petitioners.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General McInerney, James L. Morrisson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Murry Lee Randall submitted... Views: 4 Page 1957 The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the petition for *971writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the cause is moot. Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney Gen... Views: 4 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 Page 1959 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 1 The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Winnebago County for further consideration in the light of the response filed by the Attorney General of Illinois to the application for the writ.... Views: 0 This case is ordered restored to the docket for reargument. In view of the opinion, concurring opinion, dissent, judgment and re-mittitur of the Court of Appeals of New York concerning the status of the Patriarchate in Russia, counsel are requested to include in their presentation a discussion of whether the judgment may be sustained on state grounds.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, limited to the issue raised as to the application of Rule 50 (b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.... Views: 1 *975C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari granted. Counsel are requested to discuss on briefs and oral argument the question whether a single judge had jurisdiction to hear and determine this case in view of 28 U. S. C. § 2281.... Views: 1 Page 1976 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.... Views: 4 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 *978C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 1994 Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 8
343 U.S. 717 (1952)
KAWAKITA
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 570.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 2-3, 1952.
Decided June 2, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
*719 Morris Lavine and A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief was Fred Okrand.
Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Sol... Views: 14 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 1 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question pursuant to the stipulation of counsel to abide the judgment in No. 688, Hays Finance Co. v. Bailey, decided this day, supra.... Views: 0 Page 2020 The judgment is reversed. See Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U. S. 495, and Winters v. New York, 333 U. S. 507.... Views: 2 Supreme Court of Arkansas. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 2 *963Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Page 2029 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *964United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 United States Emergency-Court of Appeals. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Motion to substitute the United States as party respondent granted. Certi-orari denied.... Views: 0 Page 2056 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2
343 U.S. 451 (1952)
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.
v.
POLLAK ET AL.
No. 224.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 3, 1952.
Decided May 26, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.[*]*453 W. Theodore Pierson argued the cause for petitioners in No. 224 and respondents in No. 295. On the brief were Vernon E. ... Views: 21 delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner was convicted of voluntary manslaughter for the fatal shooting of an eighteen-year-old woman in an altercation growing out of a business transaction. A second woman was wounded in the affray. At his trial, petitioner claimed that he killed the deceased in self-defense. The jury obviously did not believe him or it would not have found him guilty of vol... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari granted.... Views: 6 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 89 U. S. App. D. C. 273, 191 F. 2d 658.... Views: 6 *955Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certio*957rari denied. Harlan L. Hackbert for petitioner. Joseph D. Ryan and Louis P. Miller for respondent.... Views: 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 2088 Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2
These two appeals challenge the constitutionality of Okla. Stat., 1941 (Cum. Supp. 1949), Tit. 52, §§ 286.1-286.17, providing for unitized management of common sources of supply of oil and gas in Oklahoma. This statute was repealed by the Oklahoma Legislature on May 26, 1951, Okla. Laws 1951, c. 3a, § 16, p. 142, and we ordered the causes continued in order to determine the effect of this repea... Views: 5 Page 2099 On November 5,1951, we ordered this cause “continued for such period as will enable counsel for petitioner to secure a determination from the Supreme Court of California as to whether the judgment herein was intended to rest on an adequate independent state ground or whether decision of the federal claim was necessary to the judgment rendered.” 342 U. S. 33, 34 (1951). We have not yet been advi... Views: 3 The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.... Views: 1 The motion of petitioner to vacate and remand is denied.... Views: 8 Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh Judicial District. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 Page 2111 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 315 U. S. 501.... Views: 2 The motion to dis*940miss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Leo Pfeffer for appellant. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, Joseph S. Gill, First Assistant Attorney General, John W. Hardwick, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert E. Leach, Chief Counsel, for appellee.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Petitioner by Alden Chas. Palmer, its President.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Circuit Court of Randolph County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 2152 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 Page 2156 delivered the opinion of the Court.
The principal question here is whether a United States Court of the Allied High Commission for Germany had jurisdiction, in 1950, to try a civilian citizen of the United States, who was the dependent wife of a member of the United States Armed Forces, on a charge of murdering her husband in violation of § 211 of the German Criminal *343Code. The homicide occurre... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 3 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 23 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.... Views: 0 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 0 This case is restored to the docket for reargument.... Views: 3 343 U.S. 924
72 S.Ct. 665
96 L.Ed. 1335
ON LEEv.UNITED STATES of America.
No. 543.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 21, 1952
Memorandum of Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER.
1
The rule governing the filing of amici briefs clearly implies that such briefs should be allowed to come before the Court not merely on the Court's exercise of judgment ... Views: 4 Page 2192 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus also denied.... Views: 5 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Supreme Court of Oregon. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Jackson are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.... Views: 7 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5
343 U.S. 156 (1952)
KAUFMAN ET AL.
v.
SOCIETE INTERNATIONALE POUR PARTICIPATIONS INDUSTRIELLES ET COMMERCIALES, S. A., ET AL.
No. 172.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 2, 1952.
Decided April 7, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
Irving Moskovitz argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were William Radner, Henr... Views: 6 dissenting. The only thing certain about § 20 (c) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, is that violation of its terms is a felony punishable by ten years’ imprisonment. An alien ordered deported by the Bureau of Immigration is subject to this ten-year penalty if he “willfully fail or refuse to make timely application in good faith for travel or other documents necessary to his departure.” T... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Petitioner has been convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death. He asks this Court to reverse his conviction as wanting in that due process of law guaranteed against state encroachment by the Fourteenth Amendment. Petitioner claims (1) that his conviction was based in part on a coerced confession; (2) that a fair trial was impossible because of infl... Views: 2 Judgment reversed. Blau v. United States, 340 U. S. 159. Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.... Views: 15 Judgment reversed. Hoffman v. United States, 341 U. S. 479. Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Burton dissent. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.... Views: 7 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Alabama. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *920United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certio-rari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 8 Page 2245 343 U.S. 154
72 S.Ct. 598
96 L.Ed. 852
RAYv.BLAIR.
No. 649.
Argued March 31, 1952.
Decided April 3, 1952.
Subsequent Opinion April 15, 1952.
See 343 U.S. 214, 72 S.Ct. 654.
Messrs. Marx Leva, Washington, D.C., Harold M. Cook, Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner.
Mr. Horace C. Wilkinson, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
... Views: 3 Page 2246 delivered the opinion of the Court. The Supreme Court of Alabama upheld a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the petitioner, the chairman of that state’s Executive Committee of the Democratic Party, to certify respondent Edmund Blair, a member of that party, to the Secretary of State of Alabama as a candidate for Presidential Elector in the Democratic Primary to be held May 6,1952. Respondent B... Views: 0
343 U.S. 148 (1952)
UNITED STATES
v.
HOOD ET AL.
No. 426.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 4, 1952.
Decided March 31, 1952.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI.
Philip Elman argued the cause for the United States. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General *149 McInerney and Beatrice Rosenberg filed a brief for the United St... Views: 17 Page 2249 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See MacDougall v. Green, 335 U. S. 281 (1948); Colegrove v. Green, 328 U. S. 549 (1946); Wood v. Broom, 287 U. S. 1 (1932). Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.... Views: 7 Petition denied.... Views: 0 Application for bail denied.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari granted.... Views: 4 Page 2262 Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 7 Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 2270 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 Page 2271 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 2283 The motion of respondent to vacate or modify the stay order of March 24, 1952, ante, p. 901, is denied. Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.... Views: 4
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In 1941, petitioner was appointed a civilian fire chief at Camp Wheeler, Georgia, by a local army commander acting under authority delegated by the Secretary of War. In 1948, petitioner brought this action in the District Court to recover overtime compensation allegedly due for his services as fire chief. Jurisdiction to enter judgment against the United... Views: 15 The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 2 Page 2286 The application for a stay is granted and it is ordered that the judgments and mandates of the Circuit Court and Supreme Court of Alabama be, and they are hereby, stayed pending further consideration and disposition of the case by this Court. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama is granted and the case is assigned for argument on Monday, March 31, next, at the head o... Views: 0 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed on motion of counsel for petitioner.... Views: 1 Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit also denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 3 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Page 2306 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Colorado. Certiorari denied.... Views: 8 343 U.S. 907
72 S.Ct. 580
96 L.Ed. 1325
William Walter REMINGTON, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES of America.
No. 387.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 24, 1952
Messrs. William C. Chanler and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General McInerney, Robert L. Stern and Beatrice Rosenberg, for the United States.... Views: 9 delivered the opinion of the Court. After a turbulent nine months of trial, eleven Communist Party leaders were convicted of violating the Smith Act.1 On receiving the verdict, the trial judge at once filed a certificate under Rule 42 (a), Fed. Rules Crim. Proc., finding petitioners guilty of criminal contempt and imposing various jail terms up to six months. Those sentenced were defense counsel, ... Views: 0 Page 2343 delivered the opinion of the Court, Acting as his own lawyer, 1 the respondent Shirley Collins brought this habeas corpus case in a United States *520 District Court seeking release from á Michigan state prison where he is serving a life sentence for murder. His petition alleges that while he was living in Chicago, Michigan officers forcibly seized, handcuffed, blackjacked and took him to M... Views: 31 Page 2344 delivered the opinion of the Court.
These cases present a narrow question with several related issues. May the Attorney General, as the executive head of the Immigration and Naturalization Service,1 after taking into custody active alien Communists on warrants,2 charging either membership in a group that ad*527vocates the overthrow by force of this Government3 or inclusion in sny prohibited classe... Views: 2
342 U.S. 580 (1952)
HARISIADES
v.
SHAUGHNESSY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION.
No. 43.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 5, 1951.
Decided March 10, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.[*]*581 Richard F. Watt argued the cause for petitioner in No. 43. With him on the brief was Walter F. Dodd.
Jack Wasserman argued the cau... Views: 20 The judgment is affirmed. Adler v.' Board of Education, 342 U. S. 485, decided March 3, 1952. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in their respective dissenting opinions in Adler v. Board of Education, supra, at pp. 496, 497, 508.... Views: 1 Page 2356 C. A. 9th Cir. Certi*953orari granted. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioners. Respondent pro se.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 7 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 8 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2
342 U.S. 389 (1952)
MEMPHIS STEAM LAUNDRY CLEANER, INC.
v.
STONE, CHAIRMAN, STATE TAX COMMISSION.
No. 253.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 3, 1951.
Decided March 3, 1952.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
C. E. Clifton argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were W. H. Watkins, Sr., P. H. Eager, Jr. and Thomas H. Watkins.
J. H. Sumrall submitted on brief ... Views: 16 delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question before us is whether a Mississippi tax laid upon the privilege of soliciting business for a laun*390dry not licensed in. that State infringes the Commerce Clause.1
Appellant operates a laundry and cleaning establishment in Memphis, Tennessee. In serving the area sur rounding Memphis, appellant sends ten of its trucks into eight Mississippi counties ... Views: 9 whom Mr. Justice Minton joins, concurring in the result. I part company with the Court as to the road we will' travel to reach a destination where all agree we will stop, at least for the night: But sometimes the path that we are beating out by our travel is more important to the future wayfarer than the place in which we choose to lodge. *399There are two possible routes to the agreed destination... Views: 0 Page 2383 delivered the opinion of the Court.
By reason of a divorce in an Illinois state court, with a judgment for monthly installments of alimony until remarriage, petitioner asserts that her divorced husband, the respondent Leib, is liable for unpaid installments of alimony. Asserting diversity jurisdiction, petitioner, a divorcee, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. The Territorial Legislature of Alaska, provided for the licensing of commercial fishermen in territorial waters, imposing a $5 license fee on resident fishermen and a $50 fee on nonresidents. Alaska Laws, 1949, c. 66. The Alaska Fishermen’s Union and its Secretary-Treasurer, on behalf of some 3,200 nonresident union members, brought this action in the Distric... Views: 20 delivered the opinion of the Court. This action for a declaratory judgment on a question of federal constitutional law was prosecuted in the state courts of New Jersey. It sought to declare invalid a statute of that State which provides for the reading, without comment, of five verses of the Old Testament at the Opening of each public-school day. N. J. Rev. Stat., 1937, 18:14-77. No issue was rais... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case calls for an answer to the question whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States precludes Ohio from subjecting a foreign corporation to the jurisdiction of its courts in this action in personam. The corporation has been carrying on in Ohio a continuous and systematic, but limited, part of its gene... Views: 0 with whom Mr. Justice Black concurs, dissenting. I have not been able to accept the recent doctrine that a citizen who enters the public service can be forced to sacrifice his civil-rights.* I cannot for example find in our constitutional scheme the power of a state to place its employees in the category of second-class citizens by denying them freedom of thought and expression. The Constitution g... Views: 0 Page 2388
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Petitioner, a veteran employed as authorization officer in the Regional Office of the Veterans’ Administration in New Orleans, was removed from his position. He appealed under § 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944 (5 U. S. C. (Sppp. IV) § 863) to the Tenth Regional Office of the United States Civil Service Commission in New Orleans. The Regional B... Views: 9 Appellants, on behalf of themselves and other Negroes “similarly situated,” sued in the District Court to enjoin appellees from alleged violations of the Fourteenth Amendment in refusing to admit Negroes to the Univer *518 sity of Tennessee. A three-judge cohrt, convened at appellants’ request, held that this case was not within the jurisdiction of a three-judge court under 28 U. S. C. (Supp. I... Views: 3 The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Dice v. Akron, C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U. S. 359.
Mr. Justice Éeed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice' Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton concur, adhering to the views expressed in Dicev. Akron, C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U. S. 359,364.... Views: 3 The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Board of Trade v. United States, 314 U. S. 534.... Views: 0 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 0 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.... Views: 2 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion .that probable jurisdiction should be noted.... Views: 6 The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Me. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed,' and Mr. Justice' Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 2 Page 2398 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 3 The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 2 This case is set down for argument on the motion for leaye to file the complaint.... Views: 0 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 2 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted. Counsel are requested to discuss on briefs and oral argument the question as to the timeliness of the application for the writ.... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted. Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *941C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Clement C. Rinehart for respondent.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 2421 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Page 2426 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 7 Page 2428 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Tenth Supreme Judicial District, Certiorari denied.... Views: 14 Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied:'... Views: 7 Page 2430 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 *944C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Leland W. Scott for Zelle; Henry S. Mitchell for the Canadian Pacific R. Co.; Thomas P. Helmey for the Empire Trust Co.; James L. Hetland for the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R. Co.; Josiah E. Brill for the Mortgage Bondholders Protective Committee; and Abraham K. Weber for the Wisconsin Central R. Co., respondents.... Views: 2 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 United Statfes Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Page 2442 *946The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida is denied-for the reason th^t the judgment of the court below is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Mr. Justice. Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are1 of the opinion certiorari should be granted. J. W. Watson,- Jr. and John D. Marsh for respondent.... Views: 3 United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Motion for leave to file brief of National Council of American Importers, Inc., as amicus curiae, denied. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Motion for leave to file brief of Seymour F. Simon et al., as amici curiae, denied. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 1 Page 2448 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no' part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 10 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4
342 U.S. 359 (1952)
DICE
v.
AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO.
No. 374.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 3-4, 1951.
Decided February 4, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
Rice A. Hershey argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Frederic O. Hatch.
William A. Kelly argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Cletus G. Roetzel and... Views: 25
342 U.S. 382 (1952)
STANDARD OIL CO.
v.
PECK, TAX COMMISSIONER, ET AL.
No. 184.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 3-4, 1952.
Decided February 4, 1952.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
Isador Grossman and Rufus S. Day, Jr. argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
Isadore Topper argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were C. William O'Neill, Attorney Gener... Views: 11 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Motor Carrier Claims Commission denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1
342 U.S. 299 (1952)
GEORGIA RAILROAD & BANKING CO.
v.
REDWINE, STATE REVENUE COMMISSIONER.
No. 1.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 13, 1950.
Continued February 20, 1950.
Reargued November 26, 1951.
Decided January 28, 1952.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.
*300 Furman Smith argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs ... Views: 16 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant was incorporated in 1833 by a Special Act of the Georgia General Assembly that included a provision for exemption from taxation.1 In 1945, the Georgia Constitution was amended to provide that “All exemptions from taxation heretofore granted in corporate charters are declared to be henceforth null and void.” 2 According to appellant’s complaint, appelle... Views: 8 delivered the opinion of the Court. In this suit the Attorney General of the United States as successor to the Alien Property Custodian1 seeks payment by petitioners of two 5% gold debentures of the face value of $1,000 each and payable to bearer. Petitioner Cities Service Company is obligor on the debentures and petitioner Chase National Bank of New York is the indenture trustee, v The obligation... Views: 0 On February 1, 1942, pursuant to the Alien Enemy Act of 1798, as amended, 1 the Attorney. General of the United States interned petitioner, a German citizen residing in this country. On May 3, 1946, acting under the same *348 statute, the Attorney General directed petitioner’s removal to Germany. Thereafter, petitioner applied for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Eastern ... Views: 3 Page 2486 Appellant Negro school children brought this action in the Federal District Court to enjoin appellee school officials from making any distinctions based upon race or color in providing educational facilities for School District No. 22, Clarendon County, South Carolina. As the b'asis for their complaint, appellants alleged that equal •facilities are not provided for Negro pupils aAd that those con... Views: 10 Page 2487 The .judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.... Views: 12 Page 2488 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial féderal question. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion , that probable jurisdiction should be noted.... Views: 5 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 Page 2500 Supreme Court of Indiana. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, and Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 18 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 14 *926C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Frank G. Raichle, Edward C. Rajtery and John F. Caskey for respondents. Solicitor General PerB man filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petitioner.... Views: 8 Page 2511 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case brought here on writ of certiorari1 tests the validity under the Anti-Assignment Act, R. S. § 3477,2 of an assignment of a claim against the United States for property damage. In an effort to escape the prohibition of that Act, respondents joined their assignors, Mrs. Kathleen Boshamer et al.,3 as well as the United States as parties defendant. The Dis... Views: 0 The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion the writ should be dismissed as improvidently granted and has expressed his views in a memorandum filed in No. 47, United States v. Shannon, decided this day, ante, pp. 288, 294.... Views: 6 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Territory of Hawaii. Dismissed on motion of counsel for the appellant.... Views: 2 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 3 Denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. In its 19.48 revision of the Judicial Code, Congress provided that prisoners in custody under sentence of a fe'd *207 eral court may move the sentencing court ot “Vacate, set aside or correct any sentence subject to collateral attack. 28 U. S. C. (Supp. IV) § 2255. 1 *208 Respondent, confined, at the McNeil Island penitentiary in the Western District ... Views: 25 delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellee was indicted on eight counts in the District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin for violation of § 213 of the Criminal Code of 1909, 35 Stat. 1129-1130, 18 U. S. C. § 336. The District Court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss the indictment, and the United States *278 appealed directly to this Court, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. (Supp. IV) § ... Views: 10 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 Page 2568 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 13 delivered the opinion of the Court.
- Having “some information that [the petitioner here] was selling narcotics,” three deputy sheriffs of the County of Los Angeles, on the morning of July 1, 1949, made for the two-story dwelling house in which Rochin lived with his mother, commonrlaw wife, brothers and sisters. Finding,the outside door open, they entered and then forced open the door to Rochin’s ... Views: 2
342 U.S. 193 (1952)
UNITED STATES
v.
KELLY ET AL.
No. 209.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 30, 1951.
Decided January 2, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
Saul R. Gamer argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, Paul A. Sweeney and Herman Marcuse.
Henry J. Fox argued the cause and filed ... Views: 3 Page 2578 The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for specific findings as to the circumstances attending appellee’s service in the Japanese Army and voting in the Japanese elections and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. Mr. Justice Black is of. the opinion the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that the findings are adequate to ... Views: 1 Page 2579 The judgment is vacated and the ease is remanded to the District Court for specific findings as to the circumstances attending appellee’s service in the Japanese Army and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that the findings are adequate to show that the services of appellee to ... Views: 4 Page 2580 Thq appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 4 Charles A. Helsell for appellant^ The appeal is dismissed, for the want of a substantial federal question.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 *901C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Supreme *903Court of Florida. Certiorari denied. T. Blackwell for petitioner. William C, Gaither for respondent.... Views: 0 Supreme Court of Texas. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 2 United States Emergency Court of Appeals. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 3 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0
344 U.S. 48 (1952)
JOHNSON, ADMINISTRATRIX,
v.
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO.
No. 40.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 23-24, 1952.
Decided November 17, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
*49 Jacquin Frank argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Herman B. Gerringer.
Robert M. Peet argued the cause for re... Views: 10 delivered the opinion of the Court.
We are asked to decide whether the President was acting within his constitutional power when he issued an order directing the Secretary of Commerce to take possession of and operate most of the Nation’s steel mills. The mill owners argue that the President’s order amounts to lawmaking, a legislative function which the Constitution has expressly confided to the C... Views: 2
343 U.S. 427 (1952)
JOHANSEN
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 401.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 4, 1952.
Decided May 26, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.[*]*428 Louis R. Harolds argued the cause for petitioner in No. 401. With him on the brief was William L. Standard.
Abraham E. Freedman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 41... Views: 8 delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case we granted cross-petitions for certiorari to review the decree of the Court of Appeals affirming, but refusing to enforce, a cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission to the Ruberoid Co.
Ruberoid is one of the nation’s largest manufacturers of asphalt and asbestos roofing materials and allied products. The Commission found that R... Views: 0 Page 2628 delivered the opinion of the Court. In the spring of 1947, respondent purchased certain properties for the manufacture of lumber, including a sawmill at Juneau, Alaska, and commenced operations. Shortly thereafter, the International Woodworkers of America requested negotiation of' a contract with respondent, claiming representation of a majority of respondent’s employees. A bargaining agreement... Views: 15 Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellee Smith (No. 20) was indicted October 2, 1950, for having on or about July 1, 1947, forged the name of the payee on a check drawn on the Treasurer of the United States. *226Appellee Dailey (No. 162) was indicted September 29, 1950, for having on or about March 14, 1947, knowingly made a false statement in connection with his application for Farmers Home A... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Each of the respondent oil companies owned terminal facilities in the Pandacan district of Manila at the time of the Japanese attack upon Pearl Harbor. These were used to receive, handle and store petroleum products from incoming ships and to release them for further distribution throughout the Philippine Islands. Wharves, rail and automotive equipment, pumps, p... Views: 3
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question before us arises in an admiralty proceeding by a seaman against his employer to recover wages earned on a merchant vessel of United States registry. The question is whether the employer may set off against the seaman’s wages its expenditures for the medical care and hospitalization of another member of the crew necessitated by injuries infli... Views: 10 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondents are cargo owners1 who shipped goods on the steamship Nathaniel Bacon owned by petitioner, the United States, and operated as a common carrier of goods for hire. It collided with the Esso Belgium and respondents’ cargo was damaged. The ships were also damaged. This litigation was brought in the District Court to determine liability for the damages suf... Views: 0
342 U.S. 570 (1952)
FAR EAST CONFERENCE ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
No. 15, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 30, 1952.
Decided March 10, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
*571 Elkan Turk argued the cause for the Far East Conference et al., petitioners. With him on the brief were John Milton and Seymour H. Kligler.
John W. D... Views: 19
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Halcyon Lines
1
hired the Haenn Ship Ceiling and Refitting Corporation
2
to make repair's on Halcyon’s ship which was moored in navigable waters. Salvador Baccile, an employee of Haenn, was injured aboard ship while engaged in making these repairs. Alleging that his injuries were caused by Halcyon’s negligence and the unseaworthines... Views: 25
342 U.S. 197 (1952)
PILLSBURY ET AL., DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS,
v.
UNITED ENGINEERING CO. ET AL.
No. 229.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 6, 1951.
Decided January 2, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Samuel D. Slade argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, L... Views: 8 delivered .the opinion of the Court. Petitioner brought suit under the Jones Act 1 to recover damages for the death of her intestate son from injuries sustained during the. course of his employment by respondent. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the judgment of the District Court entered on a jury’s verdict in petitioner’s favor. 2 This Court granted certiorari. 3 R... Views: 11
344 U.S. 206 (1952)
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
v.
MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR CO.
No. 11.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15-16, 1952.
Decided December 22, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
*207 Acting Solicitor General Stern argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Acting Assistant Attorney General Clapp, Daniel M.... Views: 9
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent applied to petitioner under § 4 (e) of the Federal Power Act, 41 Stat. 1065, 49 Stat. 840, 16 U. S. C. § 797 (e), for a license to construct, operate, and maintain a hydroelectric project (known as the Bliss development) on the Snake River in southern Idaho. This project included a dam and power plant occupying some 500 acres of lands of the U... Views: 8
343 U.S. 414 (1952)
PENNSYLVANIA WATER & POWER CO. ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.
No. 428.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 3-4, 1952.
Decided May 26, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.[*]*415 Wilkie Bushby argued the cause for the Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. et al., petitioners in No. 428. With him on the... Views: 5
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Petitioner sued in the District Court for the District of Columbia for the return of certain of its property vested by the Alien Property Custodian in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, 40 Stat. 411, as amended by the First War Powers Act, 1941, 55 Stat. 839. The District Court found for the Custodian, 82 F. Supp. 602, and the Court of Ap... Views: 5
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Retailers’ Sales Tax Act of Tennessee, Tenn. Acts 1947, c. 3, imposes a sales tax on the sale of goods in Tennessee and a use tax on the use within the state of goods purchased elsewhere. Tennessee collected these taxes' from respondents who paid them under protest and then brought these suits to recover them and to enjoin future collections. Two of ... Views: 6
344 U.S. 237 (1952)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH ET AL.
v.
WYCOFF COMPANY, INC.
No. 44.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 13, 1952.
Decided December 22, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
*238 Wood R. Worsley argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were C. W. Ferguson and D. A. Skeen.
Harold S. Shertz and Wayne C. Durha... Views: 22 delivered the opinion of the Court.
One Cunningham applied to the Interstate Commerce Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to authorize extension of his existing motor carrier route.1 A railroad and eleven motor carriers, including appellee, intervened to oppose. The issues were referred to an examiner who after hearing recommended that, with exceptions not material her... Views: 0
344 U.S. 254 (1952)
KING ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA RAILROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
No. 9.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15, 1952.
Decided December 22, 1952.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.
*255 Lewis W. Petteway argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.
Charles H. Weston argued th... Views: 7 delivered the opinion of the Court.
The petitioner, Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, manufactures asphalt roofing products in Memphis, Tennessee, and sends them in trucks to customers in nearby states. Some of these trucks are driven by their owners who have allegedly leased them to the petitioner. Five of these driver-owners while carrying Fry’s interstate shipments on Arkansas highways were arreste... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 4 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3
The certificate is dismissed.
Labor Board
v.
White Swan Co.,
313 U. S. 23 (1941);
Lowden
v.
Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co.,
298 U. S. 160 (1936);
White
*5
v.
Johnson,
282 U. S. 367 (1931);
United States
v.
Union Pacific R. Co.,
168 U. S. 505 (1897).
The Civil Aeronautics Board has appli... Views: 8 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The sole question before the Court in this case concerns the content of the term “through route” as used in the Interstate Commerce Act.
1
The question arises out of a controversy as to the shipment of grain to market from points in Kansas on the Central Branch of the Missouri Pacific Railroad. From Lenora, Kansas, a typical origin point, gr... Views: 6
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a suit to enjoin enforcement of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission establishing joint rates over through routes. In this case, unlike
Thompson
v.
United States,
343 U. S. 549 (decided this day), the through routes in question already exist since the carriers
*564
concerned have continuously provided ... Views: 11 delivered the opinion of the Court.
On July 28, 1947, the appellant, Swift and Company, filed a complaint, later amended, before the Interstate Commerce Commission against the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe and other railroads, alleging that the charges on direct carload shipments of livestock1 from points outside Illinois to its proposed new plant in the Chicago Packingtown area are (1) unreasonab... Views: 0 Page 2659 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellants, American citizens, are taxicab drivers. They were arrested by the Sheriff of San Diego County, California, and charged with driving taxicabs in the unincorporated area of San Diego County without a permit from the Sheriff as required by § 9 of Ordinance 464, the pertinent provisions of which are set forth in the margin.* The facts were stipulated wit... Views: 0 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Mechling, 330 U. S. 567.... Views: 2 delivered the opinion of the Court.
The petitioner is charged with the violation of a regulation promulgated by the Interstate Commerce Commission under 18 U. S. C. § 835.1 The. Regulation provides:
“Drivers of motor vehicles transporting any explosive, inflammable liquid, inflammable compressed *339gas, or poisonous gas shall avoid, so far as practicable, and, where feasible, by prearrangement of... Views: 3 dissenting. I think the question whether an employer has violated the criminal provisions of the Act is determined by reference to what he has done to a particular employee. The Act does not speak of “course of conduct.” That is the Court’s terminology, not the Act’s. The Act requires the employer to pay “each of his employees” not less than 75 cents an hour, prohibits him from employing “any of h... Views: 0
344 U.S. 280 (1952)
STEELE ET AL.
v.
BULOVA WATCH CO., INC.
No. 38.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 10, 1952.
Decided December 22, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
Wilbur L. Matthews argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.
*281 Marx Leva argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Alexander B. Hawes, A. Lloyd... Views: 15 Page 2664 delivered the opinion of the Court.
The respondent filed a bill in equity in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama, to enjoin certain picketing activities, wholly peaceful, carried on by the petitioners, labor organizations. Upon the sworn bill and without notice, the court issued forthwith a “Temporary Writ of Injunction.” The petitioners appeared and filed an answer and a motion to dis... Views: 0 Page 2665 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied for the reason that application therefor was not made within the time provided by law. 28 U. S. C. § 2101 (c).... Views: 0
344 U.S. 94 (1952)
KEDROFF ET AL.
v.
SAINT NICHOLAS CATHEDRAL OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH IN NORTH AMERICA.
No. 3.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 1, 1952.
Reargued October 14, 1952.
Decided November 24, 1952.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
*95 Philip Adler argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.
Ralph Montgomery Arkush argued the cause and filed th... Views: 25 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent, the National Labor Relations Board, issued a complaint against the present bankrupt company alleging unfair labor practices, and, after appropriate proceedings, ordered the bankrupt to pay certain employees back pay which they had lost on account of an unfair labor practice of the bankrupt. Before the order was enforced by the Court of Appeals an inv... Views: 0 Certiorari, 344 U. S. 814, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The motion of Local No. 24, American Federation of Musicians, for leave to intervene is denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 6 *863C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Mozart G. Ratner and Elizabeth W. Weston filed a memorandum for respondent stating that they do not oppose the granting of the petition limited to the question of the interpretation of § 8 (a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act.... Views: 1 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.... Views: 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Page 2680 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Page 2681 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to question No. 2 presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.: “Whether the demand and insistence of the International Typographical Union that publishers pay employees in their composing rooms for setting ‘bogus’ violated Section 8 (b)(6) of the National Labor Relations Act in view of the fact that composing room employees perform no service incident or... Views: 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case raises questions concerning the power of courts to protect Negro railroad employees from loss of their jobs under compulsion of a bargaining agreement which, to avoid a strike, the railroad made with an exclusively white man’s union. Respondent Simon Howard, a Frisco1 train employee for nearly forty years, *770brought this action on behalf of himself a... Views: 0 Memorandum of in con- nection with the denial of the petitions for writs of certiorari. Reference to the opinion in Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, 338 U. S. 912, makes it unnecessary to indicate the reasons which preclude the Court from stating, however briefly, the grounds for denial of petitions for certiorari. Selective notations of dissent from such denials would not correctly re... Views: 6 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Page 2694 Supreme Court of Alabama. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 Page 2695 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5
343 U.S. 395 (1952)
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.
No. 126.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 4, 1952.
Decided May 26, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
*396 Mozart G. Ratner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Findling and Marcel Ma... Views: 14 Page 2699 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a direct appeal by the United States 1 from dismissal by the District Court 2 of its complaint seeking an injunction to prevent and restrain violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. §§ 1, 2. 3 Appellees are the Oregon State Medical Society, eight county medical societies, Oregon Physicians’ Service (an... Views: 50 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Missouri has a statute, Mo. Rev. Stat., 1949, § 129.060, first enacted in 1897, which was designed to end the coercion of employees by employers in the exercise of the franchise. It provides that an employee may absent him*422self from his employment for four hours between the opening and closing of the polls without penalty, and that any employer who among othe... Views: 1 Page 2709 delivered the opinion of the Court.
This action by dairy farmers, nonmembers of cooperative, associations, concerns 1941 amendments to an order, of the Secretary of Agriculture dealing with the marketing of milk in the Boston area. It was previously here as Stark v. Wickard, 321 U. S. 288 (1944), where it was held that the respondents had such an interest in the Order as to give them legal standin... Views: 0 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *919C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This would have remained a profoundly insignificant case to all except its immediate parties had it not been so tried and submitted to the jury as to raise questions both fundamental and far-reaching in federal criminal law, for which reason we granted certiorari.
1
On a large tract of uninhabited and untilled land in a wooded and sparsely p... Views: 97 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 C. A. 9th. Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.... Views: 0 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent. Mr. Justice Burton is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.... Views: 2 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 Circuit Court of Wayne County, Michigan. Certiorari denied.... Views: 6 The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The orders of the District Court are vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the cause is moot.... Views: 0 Page 2726 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 Court of Appeals of Kentucky. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *903C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 Page 2736 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.... Views: 4 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or deci*857sion of this application. Robert J. Pleus, Chris Dixie and Joseph P. Lea, Jr. for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Ralph McLane, Assistant Attorney General, Henry P. Adair, Donald Russell, Charles R. Scott and H. M. Voorhis for respondents.... Views: 2 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.... Views: 8 United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted, limited to the question presented by the application of § 101 (b) of Title 17 of the United States Code to this case.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 *914C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 3d Cir. *910Certiorari denied. C, Russell Phillips and Herman T. Van Mell for petitioner. Delbert T. Kirk for respondent.... Views: 2 Judgment affirmed. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.... Views: 0 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.... Views: 1
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The questions in these two income tax cases are so much alike that they can be treated in one opinion. Both taxpayers had moneys embezzled by trusted agents and employees. As' usual, the defalcations had been going on for many years before they were discovered. On discovery, efforts were made immediately to identify the takers and fix the dates and amoun... Views: 8 delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an income tax controversy growing out of the following facts as shown by findings of the Tax Court. In 1937 two taxpayers, petitioners here, decided to liquidate and divide the proceeds of a corporation in which they had equal stock ownership.* Partial distributions made in 1937, 1938, and 1939 were followed by a final one in 1940. Petitioners reported t... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. On March 16, 1951, a one-count indictment was returned in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the appellees, Beacon Brass Company, a corporation, and Maurice Feinberg, its *44 president and treasurer. The indictment charged that in violation of § 145 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 40 Stat. 1085, as amended, 26 U. S.... Views: 18 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 5 Page 2773 dissenting. By way of emphasizing my agreement with Mr. Justice Jackson's dissent, I add a few words. The Court tells us that in the maintenance of its public schools, “[The State government] can close its doors or suspend its operations” so that its citizens may be free for religious devotions or instruction. If that were the issue, it would not rise to the dignity of a constitutional controversy... Views: 2 The Court is of the opinion that the issues raised by this appeal are substantially the same as those decided in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 337 U. S. 293 (1949). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton, while adhering to their views expressed in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, supra,... Views: 2 delivered the opinion of the Court. The question here is whether, for federal income tax purposes, an individual taxpayer was entitled to deduct, from his gross income, an attorney’s fee paid for contesting the amount of his federal gift tax. For the reasons hereafter stated we hold that he was not. In 1940, Joseph T. Lykes, petitioner herein, gave to his wife and to each of his three children, re... Views: 1
343 U.S. 130 (1952)
RUTKIN
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 195.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 3, 1951.
Decided March 24, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
Jack L. Cohen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Edward Halle.
*131 Irving I. Axelrad argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor Gener... Views: 11
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Petitioners, Thomas B. Lilly and Helen W. Lilly, his wife, were engaged in the optical business in North Carolina and Virginia in 1943 and 1944. Pursuant to agreements reflecting an established and widespread practice in that industry in those localities, they paid to the respective doctors, who prescribed the eyeglasses which they sold, one-third of the... Views: 13 Page 2778 The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice. Burton are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be 'noted and the case set down for argument.... Views: 2 Opinion of the Court by announced by Mr. Justice Douglas. A three-judge District Court has construed certainsprovisións of a Sherman Act Consent decree as compelling the sale of certain moving picture stocks owned by the appellant Hughes. This clise is properly here on appeal from an order entered to compel the sale. 15 U. S. C. (Supp. IV). § 29. These anti-trust proceedings were originally... Views: 11 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent brought this action under the Copyright Act to recover for infringement of copyright on a work of art entitled “Cocker Spaniel in Show Position.” The District Court found the copyright, of which respondent was assignee, valid and infringed and awarded statutory damages of $5,000, with a $2,000 attorney’s fee. The Court of Appeals affirmed.1 We granted... Views: 0 Page 2785 delivered the opinion of the Court. Claiming he was the original and sole inventor of a mechanical device, the respondent Kepner asked the United States Patent Office for a patent. Later the petitioner Sanford filed a similar application making the same claim. As authorized by R. S. § 4904, 35 U. S. C. § 52, the Commissioner of Patents directed a board of interference examiners to hold hearings... Views: 7 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 0 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 3 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Colum*832bia Circuit. Certiorari denied. Frank R. Bruce and A. K. Shipe for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Rowland F. Kirks, James D. Hill, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel for respondent.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner was convicted on a two-count indictment, one charging the substantive offense of selling a pound of opium in violation of 21 U. S. C. §§ 173 and 174, the other conspiring to sell the opium in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 371. The Court of Appeals sustained the conviction by a divided court.1 We granted certiorari.2 The questions raised by petitioner hav... Views: 4 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. The issue here is the constitutionality, under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, of a New York statute which permits the banning of motion picture films on the ground that they are “sacrilegious.” That statute makes it unlawful “to exhibit, or to sell, lease or lend for exhibition at any place of amusement for pay or in connection with any business in the sta... Views: 3 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0
343 U.S. 250 (1952)
BEAUHARNAIS
v.
ILLINOIS.
No. 118.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 28, 1951.
Decided April 28, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
*251 Alfred A. Albert argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Herbert Monte Levy.
William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were... Views: 13 C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a case brought under § 9 (a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, as amended, 50 U. S. C. App. § 1 et seq.,1 to recover property vested by the Alien Property Custodian. The District Court granted the Government’s motion to dismiss, holding that plaintiff, *310while not “resident within” Germany within the meaning of § 2 of the Act, , and thus... Views: 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0
delivered the opinion of the Court. .
The C-O-Two Fire Equipment Company, the respondent here, owns two patents, one issued on November 23, 1948, and the other reissued on August 23, 1949, for squeeze-grip valves and discharge heads for portable fire extinguishers. C-O-Two, incorporated in Delaware, has offices in Newark, New Jersey. On January 17, 1950, it commenced in the District Court ... Views: 13 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 0 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.... Views: 4 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.... Views: 2 delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner is a musician and composer who between the years 1936 and 1939 composed a symphony. In 1945 Henry H. Reichhold, a philanthropist, established a music award offering $25,000, $5,000, and $2,500 for the three *712 best symphonic works written by native-born composers of this hemisphere. The terms of the offer provided that none of the compositions ... Views: 5 delivered the opinion of the Court. The United States brought this civil action under § 4 of the Sherman Act charging appellants and others with conspiring to restrain and monopolize interstate commerce in concrete block-making machinery in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Act, and charging appellants with monopolizing and attempting to monopolize the same industry in violation of § 2 of the Act.... Views: 6
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This suit against New Wrinkle, Inc., and The Kay & Ess Co. was instituted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio by the United States, as a civil proceeding under § 4 óf the Sherman Act.
1
Defendants are charged with having violated § 1 of that law
2
by conspiring to fix uniform minimum prices and to e... Views: 7 | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||