Shakur v. Stewart, et al

Federal Civil Lawsuit Arizona District Court, Case No. 2:01-cv-02470-ROS
District Judge Roslyn O Silver, presiding
Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
District Judge Roslyn O Silver
Update UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Alerts
Summary Parties (5) Timeline (152) Attributes (17) Tools

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

Complaints
Not on file here yet. PRISONER Civil Rights Complaint filed. (LSP)ComplaintDocument 1
12/18/2001
Not on file here yet. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by pla Amin Rahman Shakur ; [1-1] terminating dft G Grant, dft M Errol;adding dft M Errol G Grant, Melvin Thomas (KMG)Amended ComplaintDocument 9
5/7/2002
Not on file here yet. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by pla Amin Rahman Shakur ; [9-1] per court order (KMG)Amended ComplaintDocument 19
8/22/2002
Not on file here yet. SECOND AAMENDED COMPLAINT by pla Amin Rahman Shakur ; [1-1] (KMG)Amended ComplaintDocument 20
9/4/2002
Responses
Not on file here yet. ANSWER to amended complaint [20-1] by dft Terry L Stewart, dft Mike Linderman, dft Bhishim Naraine (REW)AnswerDocument 29
2/11/2003
Not on file here yet. ANSWER to complaint (amended) [20-1] by Dfts G Grant, Melvin Thomas (MAP)AnswerDocument 62
2/2/2004
Not on file here yet. MOTION to dismiss as to dft Melvin Thomas by pla Amin Rahman Shakur [64-1] (REW)Motion to DismissDocument 64
3/9/2004
Summary Judgment
Not on file here yet. MOTION for summary judgment by dft Terry L Stewart, dft Mike Linderman, dft Bhishim Naraine, dft M Errol G Grant [91-1] and memorandum of points and authorities. (KCS)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 91
12/28/2004
Not on file here yet. MOTION for summary judgment on the unconstitutionality of the religious land use and institutionalized persons act by dft Terry L Stewart, dft Mike Linderman, dft Bhishim Naraine, dft M Errol G Grant [98-1] (KCS) Modified on 01/19/2005Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 97
1/19/2005
Orders
ORDER granting [91] Dfts' Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Dfts and against Pla with regard to the claims stated in the second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt on 8/9/05. (LSP)Order on Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 106
8/10/2005
ORDER of 9th Circuit; appellant's in forma pauperis status continues in this court; within 21 days appellant shall complete and file with this court the authorization form regarding the collection of the fees; if appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the clerk; re...Order of 9th CircuitDocument 111
10/28/2005
ORDER of 9th Circuit; appellant granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal; prison officials to assess, collect and forward fees to the district court pursuant to 28:1915(b)(1)and(2), appeal case number 05-16705, as to [108] Notice of Appeal filed by Amin Rahman Shakur, (cc: finance) ...Order of 9th CircuitDocument 112
11/9/2005

Statistics

This case has been viewed 239 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro