Name: Dimitrios P. Biller v. Los Angeles County et al :: California Central District Court :: Federal Civil Lawsuit No. 2:09-cv-03079-GHK-RZ, Judge George H. King presiding
Creator: California Central District Court
Published: 2009-05-01
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Keywords: court documents, legal case, docket, PACER, California Central District Court

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

166	Filed: 6/3/2011, Entered: None
	Letter Re: Return of original deposition Lodged 5/19/10 doc #157 by defendants. (bm) (Entered: 06/03/2011)
	Request

165	Filed: 12/7/2010, Entered: None
	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios Biller and Defendants Pam Brookwell, Los Angeles County, Victor Rodriguez.(House, Calvin) (Entered: 12/07/2010)
	Request

164	Filed: 7/19/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. The Court conducted a settlement conference in this case on July 16, 2010. Appropriate representatives of all parties were present. No settlement was achieved. (mz) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
	Request

163	Filed: 6/17/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER SETTING FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE held before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. The parties are directed to appear for a further settlement conference on July 16, 2010, at 3:30 p.m. By July 9, 2010, each party shall deliver to chambers a confidential settlement brief updating the Court on the case since the last settlement conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mz) (Entered: 06/17/2010)
	Request

162	Filed: 6/11/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER re: Settlement Conference beforeJudge George H. King: The record in the above-captioned case reflects that the Parties have not participated in settlement discussions since September 28, 2009, when they attended a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. (Dkt. No. 74 , Sept. 28, 2009). Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days hereof, counsel SHALL contact the court clerk to Judge Zarefsky to clear a date for further settlement discussions before Judge Zarefsky. This mediation SHALL take place within thirty (30) to forty-five (45) days hereof. (lw) (Entered: 06/11/2010)
	Request

161	Filed: 6/8/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge George H. King: taking under submission 125 Motion for Summary Judgment: On the court's own motion, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 125 , noticed for hearing on June 14, 2010, is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR and will be taken UNDER SUBMISSION without oral argument on that date. F.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15 (formerly 7.11). No appearance by counsel shall be necessary. The hearing date is vacated. Further briefing, if any, shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules as if the noticed hearing date had not been vacated. (bm) (Entered: 06/08/2010)
	Request

160	Filed: 5/21/2010, Entered: None
	DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, VICTOR RODRIGUEZ AND PAM BROOKWELL ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by defendants Victor Rodriguez, Los Angeles County, Pam Brookwell. (bm) (Entered: 05/21/2010)
	Request

159	Filed: 5/21/2010, Entered: None
	ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION ALLOWING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED ANSWER by Judge George H. King, re Stipulation 123 : In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), Defendants are hereby allowed to file an second amended answer to Plaintiffs' complaint. (bm) (Entered: 05/21/2010)
	Request

158	Filed: 5/19/2010, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically filed documents: Document is STRICKEN. Counsel shall re-file the notice of lodging and attach the Second Amended Answer RE: Notice of Lodging of Second Amended Answer 153 (ir) (Entered: 05/19/2010)
	Request

157	Filed: 5/19/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF LODGING filed DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 (House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/19/2010)
	Request

156	Filed: 5/19/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Notice of Lodging, 135 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Judgment re: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/19/2010)
	Request

155	Filed: 5/19/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Amended Answer to Complaint, 121 (Attachments: # 1 Supplement DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, VICTOR RODRIGUEZ AND PAM BROOKWELL, ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, 2nd AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/19/2010)
	Request

154	Filed: 5/19/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Lodging of Second Amended Answer 153 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): Second Amended Answer is not attached as a separate, additional attachment to the Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm) (Entered: 05/19/2010)
	Request

153	Filed: 5/18/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Stipulation to Amend/Correct 123 (House, Calvin) STRICKEN PURSUANT TO RESPONSE BY COURT FILED 05/19/10 Modified on 5/19/2010 (ir). (Entered: 05/18/2010)
	Request

152	Filed: 5/18/2010, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS 148 by Clerk of Court that document #135 is stricken as to the document on its face indicates the wrong proposed order. Documents 136-145 are accepted as e-filed. Counsel is advised that future e-filed documents shall be incompliance with the local rules and general order 08-02. RE: Notice of Lodging 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 . (bm) (Entered: 05/18/2010)
	Request

151	Filed: 5/18/2010, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS 147 by Clerk of Court that document #134 is stricken from the record. Documents #131, 132, 133 are accepted as e-filed. However, counsel shall ensure in the future e-filed documents shall be filed in accordance with the local rules and 08-02. RE: Declarations 131 , 132 , 133 , Exhibit [proposed judgment] 134 . (bm) (Entered: 05/18/2010)
	Request

150	Filed: 5/18/2010, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS 146 by Clerk of Court that document #124 is stricken from the record. Documents 129-130 are accepted as e-filed RE: Motion for summary Judgment 124 , Declarations 129 , 130 . (bm) Modified on 5/18/2010 (bm). (Entered: 05/18/2010)
	Request

149	Filed: 5/18/2010, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS 122 by Clerk of Court that the document is stricken from the record. If counsel desires to file a Stipulation for Leave to Amend, They Shall Do So Immediately. RE: Amended Answer 121 . (bm) (Entered: 05/18/2010)
	Request

148	Filed: 5/17/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Exhibits 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 . The following error(s) was found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm) (Entered: 05/17/2010)
	Request

147	Filed: 5/17/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Declarations 131 , 132 , Exhibit 133 , [Proposed] Judgment 134 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): Declarations and Exhibit 131 , 132 , 133 : Title page is missing. [Proposed] Judgment 134 : Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Notices-Notice of Lodging, with [proposed] judgment a separate additional attachment to the Notice of Lodging. Document is a duplicate of document 135.. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm) (Entered: 05/17/2010)
	Request

146	Filed: 5/17/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion for Summary Judgment 124 , Declarations 129 , 130 . The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected. Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. The correct event is: Motions-Summary Judgment. Other error(s) with document(s): Docket entry text does not indicate noticed motion hearing date. Document is a duplicate of document 125 . Title page is missing on declarations 129 , 130 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm) (Entered: 05/17/2010)
	Request

145	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 115 and 116 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exibit 116)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

144	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 103, 113, and 114 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 113, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 114)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

143	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 66, 100, 101 and 102 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 100, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 101, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 102)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

142	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 64-1, 64-2 and 65 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 64-2, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 65)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

141	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibit 61, 62 and 63 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 62, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 63)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

140	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 54, 55, 57, 59, 60 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 55, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 57, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 59, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 60)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

139	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 40, 41, 42, 44, 45 and 50 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 41, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 42, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 44, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 45)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

138	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 31, 32, 33 and 35 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 32, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 33, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 35)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

137	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibits 25 and 27 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 27)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

136	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibit 17 and 23 to MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 23)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

135	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 134 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Judgment)(House, Calvin) *DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 5/18/10, DOCUMENT 152 .* Modified on 5/18/2010 (bm). (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

134	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Proposed Judgement Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. Motion set for hearing on 6/14/2010 at 09:30 AM before Judge George H. King. (House, Calvin) *DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 5/18/10, DOCUMENT 151 .* Modified on 5/18/2010 (bm). (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

133	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT Exhibit 6 and 15 to MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 15)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

132	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Rudnick in support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Silva, # 2 Declaration Turkal)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

131	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Medina and Moore in support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Moore)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

130	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Lacey In support of defendants summary judgment motion MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 filed by Defendants Pam Brookwell, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, Victor Rodriguez. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

129	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Biller MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

128	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	EXHIBIT to MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 JOINT EVIDENTIARY APPENDIX filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

127	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	JOINT STATEMENT of Uncontroverted Facts MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 125 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

126	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM in Support JOINT BRIEF OF THE PARTIES ON DEFENDANTS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)


125	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. Motion set for hearing on 6/14/2010 at 09:30 AM before Judge George H. King. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

124	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) *DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 5/18/10, DOCUMENT 150 .* Modified on 5/18/2010 (bm). (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

123	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	Joint STIPULATION to to Allow Defendants to file Second Amended Answer to Complaint filed by Defendants Pam Brookwell, Los Angeles County, Victor Rodriguez. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

122	Filed: 5/14/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Answer 121 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): Leave of the court is required to file an amended answer. Joint Stipulation to Allow Filing (Attachment #1) should be filed as a separate document with the additional, separate attachment of a proposed order.. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
	Request

121	Filed: 5/13/2010, Entered: None
	AMENDED ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, PAM BROOKWELL, ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 2ND AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Joint Stipulation to Allow Defendant to Amend Answer)(House, Calvin) *DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 5/18/10, DOCUMENT 149 .* Modified on 5/18/2010 (bm). (Entered: 05/13/2010)
	Request

120	Filed: 2/26/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER re: Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Evidence 109 held before Judge George H. King: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Dimitrios Biller's ("Plaintiff") Motion to Exclude Evidence ("Motion") under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1). We have considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to this Motion, and deem this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. L.R. 7-15. As the Parties are familiar with the facts in this case, we will repeat them only as necessary. Accordingly, we rule as follows. With respect to this purported failure to supplement, the Motion is hereby DENIED. With respect to the second alleged failure to supplement, we do not find any affirmative defense in the Answer premised upon the litigation privilege under California Civil Code Â§ 47(b). (Answer 17-18). To the extent any such defense is being raised, Plaintiff has not clearly identified the relevant factual assertions in the draft Joint Statement of Uncontroverted Facts, which he claims were not disclosed to him in response to his interrogatory. (Biller Decl., Ex. 12). Though it appears any such factual assertions were simply not responsive to Special Interrogatory No. 45, we will neutralize any dispute by granting a FINAL extension of the discovery completion date. All discovery (fact and expert) SHALL be completed BY NO LATER THAN THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 2010. Completion means that any discovery that is not received in hand by the requesting party by the completion date will be denied. Any motion for summary judgment SHALL be filed in compliance with the Local Rules, as well as our Order re: Summary Judgment Motions, BY NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 14, 2010. There will be no further extension of these deadlines. Accordingly, we urge Plaintiff to promptly notice any depositions and propound any discovery he believes is necessary to respond to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
	Request

119	Filed: 2/24/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS); On the court's own motion, Motion by Plaintiff to Exclude Evidence that Defendants Did Not Produce in Discovery In Violation of Rule 26(e)(1) and Rule 37(c)(1) [Filed 1-29-10, 109 , noticed for hearing on MARCH 1, 2010 AT 9:30 a.m., is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR and will be taken UNDER SUBMISSION without oral argument on that date. F.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15 (formerly 7.11). No appearance by counsel shall be necessary. The hearing date is vacated. Further briefing, if any, shall be filed in accordance with LocalRules as if the noticed hearing date had not been vacated IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge George H. King. (ir) (Entered: 02/25/2010)
	Request

118	Filed: 2/17/2010, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF Dimitrios P. Biller, re Reply Brief (Motion related) 116 , Declaration of Dimitrios P. Biller (Motion related) 117 served on 2/17/2010 to: Jeremy r. Swartz. (lw) (Entered: 02/17/2010)
	Request

117	Filed: 2/17/2010, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Dimitrios P. Biller In Support of Plaintiff's Reply Brief re: Plaintiff's motion to Exclude Evidence 109 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (lw) (Entered: 02/17/2010)
	Request

116	Filed: 2/17/2010, Entered: None
	PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN DISCOVERY IN VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. 109 (lw) (Entered: 02/17/2010)
	Request

115	Filed: 2/8/2010, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Jeremy Schwartz REGARDING SERVICE OF JOINT STATUS REPORT OF THE PARTIES RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Schwartz, Jeremy) (Entered: 02/08/2010)
	Request

114	Filed: 2/8/2010, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Order for EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) MOTION for Order for EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) 109 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (Schwartz, Jeremy) (Entered: 02/08/2010)
	Request

113	Filed: 2/1/2010, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re Declaration (Motion related), MOTION for Order for EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) MOTION for Order for EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) 109 , Memorandum in Support of Motion, 110 , Declaration (Motion related) 111 , [Proposed] Order served on 1/22/10. (bm) (Entered: 02/01/2010)
	Request

112	Filed: 1/29/2010, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re MOTION for Order for EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) 109 , Declaration (Motion related) 111 served on 1/22/10. (ir) (Entered: 02/01/2010)
	Request

111	Filed: 1/29/2010, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Dimitrios P Biller in support of Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to EXCLUDE EVIDENCE 109 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (ir) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2010: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3) (ir). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2010: # 3 Part 4, # 4 Part 5, # 5 Part 6, # 6 Part 7) (ir). (Entered: 02/01/2010)
	Request

110	Filed: 1/29/2010, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in support of Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN Discovey in VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) 109 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (ir) (Entered: 02/01/2010)
	Request

109	Filed: 1/29/2010, Entered: None
	PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS DID NOT PRODUCE IN VIOLATION OF RULE 26(e)(1) and RULE 37(c)(1) filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. Motion set for hearing on 3/1/2010 at 9:30 AM before Judge George H. King. (bm) (Entered: 02/01/2010)
	Request

108	Filed: 1/27/2010, Entered: None
	ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES by Judge George H. King, re Stipulation 106 : Upon reading and filing the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal of the First and Fourth through Ninth Causes of Action and the claim for Punitive Damages, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41: the first and fourth through ninth causes of action and the claim for punitive damages. (bm) (Entered: 01/28/2010)
	Request

107	Filed: 1/25/2010, Entered: None
	STATUS REPORT (JOINT) OF THE PARTIES RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 01/25/2010)
	Request

106	Filed: 1/25/2010, Entered: None
	STIPULATION for Order Dismissing Certain Claims for Punitive Damages filed by Defendants Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 signature page, # 2 Proposed Order)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 01/25/2010)
	Request

105	Filed: 1/21/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky: The Court discharges its Order to Show Cause issued 1/13/10. The Court has reviewed the in camera submission. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 83 as to this submission is denied. (ib) (Entered: 01/21/2010)
	Request

104	Filed: 1/20/2010, Entered: None
	RESPONSE filed by Defendant Los Angeles County to Order to Show Cause (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Schwartz, Jeremy) (Entered: 01/20/2010)
	Request

103	Filed: 1/14/2010, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion, 102 served on 1/14/10. (bm) (Entered: 01/19/2010)
	Request

102	Filed: 1/14/2010, Entered: None
	PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE DECLARATION OF DIMITRIOS P. BILLER IN SUPPORT OF HIS OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Opposition Part 2)(bm) (Entered: 01/19/2010)
	Request

101	Filed: 1/15/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER re: Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Extend Dispositive Motions Deadline by Judge George H. King granting 99 Ex Parte Application: We have reviewed the papers filed in support of and in opposition to this Application and find that there is "good cause" to extend the deadline. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The Application is hereby GRANTED. However, given the Parties' representations as to the rampant miscommunication in this case, Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller ("Plaintiff") and counsel for Defendants SHALL meet and confer in person to fully discuss every aspect of any contemplated motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days hereof. The Parties SHALL file a Joint Status Report representing to the Court that they have met and conferred in person and fully complied with Local Rule 7-3 by no later than January 29, 2010. If this Court determines that the in-person meet and confer has not been conducted adequately or in good faith, we will require the Parties to meet and confer on the record, with a court reporter present, so that we can determine that a good faith effort has been made to comply with Local Rule 7-3, and if not, which party should be sanctioned for his misconduct. If the Parties demonstrate that Local Rule 7-3 has been satisfied, then the dispositive motion(s) discussed at the in-person meet and confer SHALL be filed by no later than March 1, 2010 in compliance with the Local Rules as well as our Order re: Summary Judgment Motions. (Dkt. No. 70). (bm) (Entered: 01/15/2010)
	Request

100	Filed: 1/13/2010, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF LODGING filed [PROPOSED] ORDER re EXPARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions Deadline 99 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 01/13/2010)
	Request

99	Filed: 1/13/2010, Entered: None
	EXPARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions Deadline filed by Defendant Los Angeles County.(House, Calvin) (Entered: 01/13/2010)
	Request

97	Filed: 12/14/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF HEARING RE PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY MOTION held before Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky: Motion 83 is granted in part and denied in part. Documents to be produced for in camera inspection to be submitted by 12/16/09. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is denied. Court Recorder: Recorded on CourtSmart. (ib) (Entered: 12/17/2009)
	Request

96	Filed: 12/17/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE of Under Seal Filing filed Los Angeles County (Schwartz, Jeremy) (Entered: 12/17/2009)
	Request

95	Filed: 12/15/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order regarding Defendants' Motion to extend deadline for Disclosure of Expert Reports; This matter is before the Court on Defendants Los Angeles County, Los Angeles District Attorneys Office, Victory Rodriguez, and Pam Brookwells (Defendants) Motion to Extend Deadline for Disclosure of Expert Reports (Motion) (see Dkts. No. 89 & 94). We have considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to this Motion, and deem this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. L.R. 7-15. The hearing date set for January 11, 2010, is hereby VACATED and TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. The Motion 89 94 is hereby GRANTED. The Parties SHALL designate their expert witnesses, and make the required disclosures, by no later than February 15, 2010, and do likewise for any rebuttal expert witnesses by no later than March 1, 2010. All discovery (fact and expert) SHALL be completed by no later than March 15, 2010 IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge George H. King. (ir) (Entered: 12/16/2009)
	Request

94	Filed: 12/8/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing Motion to Extend Deadline for Disclosure of Expert Reports, re REQUEST to Extend Time to for Disclosure of Expert Reports 89 , Notice of Lodging 92 , filed by Defendants Los Angeles County. Motion set for hearing on 1/11/2010 at 09:30 AM before Judge George H. King. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 12/08/2009)
	Request

93	Filed: 12/7/2009, Entered: None
	OPPOSITION to Defendants' Motion to Extend deadline for Disclosure of Expert Reports 89 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (ir) (Entered: 12/07/2009)
	Request

92	Filed: 12/4/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF LODGING filed re REQUEST to Extend Time to for Disclosure of Expert Reports 89 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 12/04/2009)
	Request

91	Filed: 12/4/2009, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS 90 by Clerk of Court that the document is accepted as filed. Counsel shall file a Notice of Lodging along with a Proposed Order as an attachment. RE: Request to ext deadline for disclosure of expert rpts 89 . (bm) (Entered: 12/04/2009)
	Request

90	Filed: 12/3/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Request to Extend Time 89 . Proposed order was not submitted as a separate attachment to the Request. A stand-alone proposed order can be e-filed by submitting a Notice of Lodging with the additional, separate attachment of the proposed order. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (bm) (Entered: 12/03/2009)
	Request

89	Filed: 12/2/2009, Entered: None
	REQUEST to Extend Time to for Disclosure of Expert Reports filed by Defendants Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 12/02/2009)
	Request

88	Filed: 11/24/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion For An Order Compelling Defendants to: (1) Produce Documents; (2) Produce Pam Brookwell; (3) Rulings on Objections Defendants Lodged At the Deposition of Julie Dixon-Silva, (4) Produce Julie Dixon-Silva For The Completion of Her Deposition; and (5) Sanctions for $8,500.00 87 served on 11/24/09 (es) (Entered: 11/30/2009)
	Request

87	Filed: 11/24/2009, Entered: None
	Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion For An Order Compelling Defendants to: (1) Produce Documents; (2) Produce Pam Brookwell; (3) Rulings on Objections Defendants Lodged At the Deposition of Julie Dixon-Silva, (4) Produce Julie Dixon-Silva For The Completion of Her Deposition; and (5) Sanctions for $8,500.00 83 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (es) (Entered: 11/30/2009)
	Request

86	Filed: 11/20/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re Amended Joint Stipulation, 85 served on 11/20/09. (mz) (Entered: 11/23/2009)
	Request

85	Filed: 11/20/2009, Entered: None
	(AMENDED) JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIES REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING: (1)PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; (2)PRODUCTION FO PAM BROOKWELL; (3)RULINGS ON OBJECTIONS DEFENDANTS' LODGE AT THE DEPOSITION OF JULIA DIXON-SILVA AND; (4)PRODUCTION OF JULIE DIXON-SILVA FOR THE COMPLETION OF HER DEPOSITION; AND (6)SANCTIONS FOR $8,500.00 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. Amendment to Stipulation to Compel, 82 (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3, # 3 Part 4, # 4 Part 5)(mz) (Entered: 11/23/2009)
	Request

84	Filed: 11/19/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re: Stipulation to Compel, 82 and MOTION to Compel, 83 served on 11/18/09. (mz) (Entered: 11/20/2009)
	Request

83	Filed: 11/19/2009, Entered: None
	PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING DEFENDANTS TO: (1) PRODUCE DOCUMENTS; (2) PRODUCE PAM BROOKWELL; (3) RULINGS ON OBJECTIONS DEFENDANTS' LODGED AT THE DEPOSITION OF JULIA DIXON-SILVA; (4) PRODUCE JULIA DIXON-SILVA FOR THE COMPLETION O HER DEPOSITION; AND (5) SANCTIONS FOR $8,500.00 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. Motion set for hearing on 12/14/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. Lodged Proposed Order. (mz) (Entered: 11/20/2009)
	Request

82	Filed: 11/19/2009, Entered: None
	JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIES REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING: (1) PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; (2) PRODUCTION OF PAM BROOKWELL; (3) RULING ON OBJECTIONS DEFENDANTS' LODGE AT THE DEPOSITION OF JULIA DIXON-SILVA; (4) PRODUCTION OF JULIA DIXON-SILVA FO RTHE COMPLETION OF HER DEPOSITION; AND (6) SANCTIONS FOR $8,500.00 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Part 1, # 2 Part 2, # 3 Part 3)(mz) (Entered: 11/20/2009)
	Request

81	Filed: 11/5/2009, Entered: None
	ORDER ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky: granting in part and denying in part 75 Plaintiff's Motions to Compel. The request for sanctions is denied. The hearing set 11/9/09 is vacated. (See document for details). (ib) (Entered: 11/05/2009)
	Request

80	Filed: 10/26/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, documents served not indicated. (bm) (Entered: 10/28/2009)
	Request

79	Filed: 10/27/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky, ORDERING Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for an Order submitted by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller received on 10/23/09 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: No proof of service attached to documents. (mz) (Entered: 10/27/2009)
	Request

78	Filed: 10/13/2009, Entered: None
	JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FRO AN ORDER: (A) COMPELLING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE MEANINGFUL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES; (B) PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS: (C) COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE JULIE DIXON-SILVA FOR THE COMPLETION OF HER DEPOSITION; (D) OVERRULING DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; AND (E) MONETARY, EVIDENTIARY AND/OR ISSUE SANCTIONS BECAUSE OF DEFENDANTS ABUSIVE, OPPRESSIVE, AND EVASIVE DISCOVERY PRACTICES filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix PART 2, # 2 Appendix PART 3, # 3 Appendix PART 4)(mz) (Entered: 10/19/2009)
	Request

77	Filed: 10/13/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related) 76 , MOTION to Compel 75 served on Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order (1) Compelling Defendnats to Provide all Responsive Documents and Responses to Plaitiff's Reequest for Production of document; (2) Compelling Further Answers to Special Interrogatories Without Objections; (3) Allow Plaintiff 15 Addition Depositions; (4) Monetary Scantions i nthe Amount of $20,157.80; (5) Negative Jury Instruction. (es) (Entered: 10/15/2009)
	Request

76	Filed: 10/13/2009, Entered: None
	DECLARATION OF DIMITRIOS P. BILLER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER (1) COMPELLING DEFENDANT TO PRODUCE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S WRITTEN DISCOVERY; (2) PROVIDING PLAINTIFF WITH 15 ADDITIONAL DEPOSITION; (3) REQUIRE DEFENDANTS TO PAY PLAINTIFF MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000.00; AND (4) DRAFT A SPECIAL JURY INSTRUCTION RELATED TO DEFENDANTS DESCRUCTION OF EVIDENCE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix PART 2, # 2 Appendix PART 3, # 3 Appendix PART 5, # 4 Appendix PART 6, # 5 Appendix PART 7, # 6 Appendix PART 8, # 7 Appendix PART 9, # 8 Appendix PART 10)(mz) (Entered: 10/15/2009)


75	Filed: 10/13/2009, Entered: None
	PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER: (1) COMPELLING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE ALL RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION WITHOUT OBJECTIONS; (2) COMPELLING FURTHER ANSWERS TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES WITHOUT OBJECTIONS; (3) ALLOW PLAINTIFF 15 ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS; (4) ISSUE MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,150.80; AND (5) ISSUE A NEGATIVE JURY INSTRUCTION SANCTION filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. (mz) (Entered: 10/15/2009)
	Request

74	Filed: 9/28/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich: No settlement was achieved. (yb) (Entered: 09/29/2009)
	Request

73	Filed: 8/25/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE held before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. The parties are directed to appear for a settlement conference on September 28, 2009, 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 690, Roybal Building. Each party shall deliver a confidential settlement conference statement to the chambers of the Magistrate Judge on or before September 21, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mz) (Entered: 08/25/2009)
	Request

72	Filed: 8/25/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Plaintiff's Status Report 71 . Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Miscellaneous Filings (Non-Motion)-Status Report. Docket entry text does not match caption of attached document. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (bm) (Entered: 08/25/2009)
	Request

71	Filed: 8/25/2009, Entered: None
	STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Attorney Settlement Officer Filed; Parties stipulate that Judge Zarefsky may serve as Attorney Settlement Officer for an early settlement conference. Filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller(Biller, Dimitrios) (Entered: 08/25/2009)
	Request

70	Filed: 8/3/2009, Entered: None
	ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge George H. King: A deadline for dispositive motions has been set in the above-captioned case. Any motion(s) for summary judgment SHALL comply with all Federal and Local Rules, as well as this Order. Please be advised that this Order contains requirements more specific than the Local and Federal Rules. (bm) (Entered: 08/04/2009)
	Request

69	Filed: 8/3/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER (1) TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE OFF CALENDAR; AND (2) SETTING SCHEDULING DATES held before Judge George H. King: This matter is before us for scheduling conference on Monday, August 3, 2009. Having considered the Report of Parties' Planning Meeting, we determine that an in-person scheduling conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the August 3, 2009 scheduling conference is hereby vacated and taken off calendar. We now enter the following scheduling order: 1. Any stipulation or motion to amend as to any claims, defenses and/or parties shall be lodged/filed by no later than September 4, 2009, failing which it shall be deemed that party's waiver of any such amendments in this action. 2. All discovery (fact and expert) shall be completed by no later than November 30, 2009. Completion means that any discovery that is not received in hand by the requesting party by the completion date will be denied. 3. The parties shall designate their expert witnesses, and make the required disclosures, by no later than November 2, 2009, and do likewise for any rebuttal expert witnesses by no later than November 16, 2009. 4. The parties shall comply with Local Rule 16-15 by no later than December 11, 2009. Within 21 days hereof, counsel shall contact the court clerk to Judge Ralph Zarefsky to clear a date for settlement conference before Judge Zarefsky within the deadline set forth above. Within 30 days hereof, counsel shall file a joint status report with the court setting forth the date cleared with Judge Zarefsky's clerk for settlement conference. 5. Any motion for summary judgment shall be filed in compliance with the Local Rules, as well as our Order Re: Summary Judgment Motions issued concurrently herewith, by no later than January 18, 2010, and noticed for hearing thereafter regularly under the Local Rules. Any untimely or non-conforming motion shall bedenied. 6. The court will set pre-trial conference and trial dates, if necessary, after resolution of the summary judgment motion. (bm) (Entered: 08/03/2009)
	Request

68	Filed: 7/31/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge George H. King: On the Court's own motion the above scheduling conference hearing of August 03, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. is taken off calendar. No appearance by counsel shall be necessary. The hearing date is vacated. (bm) (Entered: 07/31/2009)
	Request

67	Filed: 7/30/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. correcting Report, 64 Notice of Manual Filing of Joint Report of Parties Planning (Biller, Dimitrios) (Entered: 07/30/2009)
	Request

66	Filed: 7/27/2009, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS 65 by Clerk of Court that the document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by 7/31/09. Other: Wrong document attached to docket entry; docket text and document must match RE: Notice of Manual filing 64 . (bm) (Entered: 07/27/2009)
	Request

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

65	Filed: 7/22/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: incorrect document is attached to the docket entry; incorrect event selected; correct event is located under other filings: Notices; docket text and document must match. RE: Report 64 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (ab) (Entered: 07/22/2009)
	Request

64	Filed: 7/21/2009, Entered: None
	REPORT OF PARTIES PLANNING MEETING REQUIRED BY RULE 26(f) REPORT of Report of Parties Planning Meeting for Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Biller, Dimitrios) DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 7/27/09, DOCUMENT 66 . Modified on 7/27/2009 (bm). (Entered: 07/21/2009)
	Request

63	Filed: 7/20/2009, Entered: None
	REPORT OF PARTIES PLANNING MEETING pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; estimated length of trial Plaintiff 6 days; Defendant 2 days, filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller.(ir) (Entered: 07/20/2009)
	Request

62	Filed: 7/14/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR, Re: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) 61 . (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

61	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re Exhibit (non-trial), Exhibit (non-trial) 59 , Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 58 , Declaration (non-motion), Declaration (non-motion) 60 served on 6/30/09. (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

60	Filed: 6/30/2009, Entered: None
	DECLARATION OF DIMITRIOS P. BILLER IN SUPPOT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE EX PARTE APPLICATIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO SEAL DOCUMENTS THAT TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. FILED ON JUNE 29, 2009 58 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

59	Filed: 6/30/2009, Entered: None
	PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SEAL THAT TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. FILED ON JUNE 29, 2009 58 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit PART 2, # 2 Exhibit PART 3)(mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

58	Filed: 6/30/2009, Entered: None
	PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 8 AND EX PARTE APPLICATION TO DOCUMENTS TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC 54 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

57	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	DECLARATION OF FERMIN H. LLAGUNO IN SUPPORT OF TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.'S APPLICATION TO HAVE CERTAIN FILED DOCUMENTS PLACED UNDER SEAL 54 filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

56	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A. INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION TO HAVE CERTAIN FILED DOCUMENTS PLACED UNDER SEAL 54 filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

55	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A, INC'S ATTACHMENT ONE (1) TO IT APPLICATION TO HAVE CERTAIN FILED DOCUMENTS PLACED UNDER SEAL filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

54	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A. INC'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO HAVE CERTAIN FILED DOCUMENTS PLACED UNDER SEAL filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. Lodged Proposed Order.(mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

53	Filed: 7/14/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: Response in Support of Motion 50 . (mz) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
	Request

52	Filed: 7/10/2009, Entered: None
	AMENDED ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND VICTOR RODRIGUEZ TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by defendants Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 07/10/2009)
	Request

51	Filed: 7/10/2009, Entered: None
	AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by defendant Pam Brookwell. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 07/10/2009)


50	Filed: 6/30/2009, Entered: None
	RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of Plaintiff's Opposition To The Motion For Protective Order And Ex Parte Application To Seal That Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc's filed on June 29, 2009, filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller (ec) (Entered: 07/09/2009)
	Request

49	Filed: 7/9/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky denying Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc's Ex Parte Application To Have Certain Filed Documents Placed Under Seal 40 . (ec) (Entered: 07/09/2009)
	Request

48	Filed: 7/6/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Notice of Manual Filing 46 . Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Attached document is a Notice of Manual filing, not a Memorandum in Opposition as indicated in the docket entry text. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (bm) (Entered: 07/06/2009)
	Request

47	Filed: 7/6/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Calvin R House counsel for Defendant Los Angeles County. Adding Jeremy R. Schwartz as attorney as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles, Pam Brookwell for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Pam Brookwell (House, Calvin) (Entered: 07/06/2009)
	Request

46	Filed: 7/4/2009, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM in Opposition for Protective Order and Seal Documents filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Biller, Dimitrios) (Entered: 07/04/2009)
	Request

45	Filed: 6/30/2009, Entered: None
	RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically filed document: The document is accepted as filed. The Court has already considered the document above in making its ruling RE: Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 37 (ir) (Entered: 06/30/2009)
	Request

44	Filed: 6/30/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 6/22/2009 10:02 p.m. (mo) (Entered: 06/30/2009)
	Request

43	Filed: 6/30/2009, Entered: None
	TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 6/22/2009 10:02 a.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Huntington Court Reporters & Transcription Inc, phone number (626) 792-7250. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 7/21/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/31/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/28/2009. (mo) (Entered: 06/30/2009)
	Request

42	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION OF SERVICE filed by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., served on June 29, 2009. (Llaguno, Fermin) (Entered: 06/29/2009)
	Request

41	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION OF SERVICE filed by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., served on June 29, 2009. (Llaguno, Fermin) (Entered: 06/29/2009)
	Request

40	Filed: 6/29/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. of Ex Parte Application to Have Certain Filed Documents Placed Under Seal; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof; Declaration of Fermin H. Llaguno; Attachment One to Ex Parte; Attachment One to Ex Parte (Redacted); Proposed Order. (Anderton, D) (Entered: 06/29/2009)
	Request

39	Filed: 6/25/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Document submitted as Declaration with Opposition as an attachment. In this case incorrect event was used because main document is a Declaration. RE: Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 37 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (ir) (Entered: 06/26/2009)
	Request

38	Filed: 6/24/2009, Entered: None
	opposition opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard 28 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Biller, Dimitrios) (Entered: 06/24/2009)
	Request

37	Filed: 6/24/2009, Entered: None
	opposition opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene 25 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Biller, Dimitrios) (Entered: 06/24/2009)
	Request

36	Filed: 6/24/2009, Entered: None
	re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard 28 Notice of Errata filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Biller, Dimitrios) (Entered: 06/24/2009)
	Request

35	Filed: 6/24/2009, Entered: None
	to Ex Parte Application to Stay Plaintiff's Discovery Motions filed by Toyota Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard 28 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Biller, Dimitrios) (Entered: 06/24/2009)
	Request

34	Filed: 6/22/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF MOTION HEARING held before Magistrate judge Ralph Zarefsky: Plaintiff's motion to conduct discovery before the Rule 26(f) conference 5 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion re stipulated protective orders 8 is denied without prejudice. The ex parte application of Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. for a stay 28 is deemed moot. The Court's rulings are made pursuant to the reasons stated on the record. No further order shall issue. Court Recorder: Recorded on CourtSmart. (ib) (Entered: 06/23/2009)
	Request

33	Filed: 6/22/2009, Entered: None
	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Orde regarding Toyota Motor Sales, USA Inc's Ex Parte Application to Intervene 25 is DENIED without prejudice to TMS appearing before Judge Zarefsky during the discovery process to assert its interest in maintaining the non-disclosure of its information IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge George H. King. (ir) (Entered: 06/22/2009)
	Request

32	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE filed by Intervenor Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard 28 , Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related) 30 , Memorandum in Support of Motion 26 , EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene 25 , Memorandum in Support of Motion, 29 served on 6/18/09. (ir) (Entered: 06/22/2009)
	Request

31	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE filed by Intervenor Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard 28 , Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related) 30 , Memorandum in Support of Motion 26 , EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene 25 , Memorandum in Support of Motion, 29 served on 6/18/09. (ir) (Entered: 06/22/2009)
	Request

30	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Fermin H Llaguno in support of Toyota Motor Sales, USA Inc's EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard 28 filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (ir) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
	Request

29	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard 28 filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (ir) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
	Request

28	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	EX PARTE APPLICATION for Stay of any discovery motions, hearing or disclosures pertaining to Toyota until the Court has ruled on the Motion to Intervene and Toyota is given a full opportunity to be heard filed by Intervenor Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (ir) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
	Request

27	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Fermin H LLaguno in support Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc's EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene 25 filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (ir) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
	Request

26	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene 25 filed by Movant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.. (ir) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
	Request

25	Filed: 6/18/2009, Entered: None
	EX PARTE APPLICATION to Intervene filed by Intervenor Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc..(ir) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
	Request

24	Filed: 6/12/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re: Reply Brief 23 and Stipulation for Order, 22 served on 6/12/09. (mz) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
	Request

23	Filed: 6/12/2009, Entered: None
	REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER 22 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (mz) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
	Request

22	Filed: 6/12/2009, Entered: None
	STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AND TO START DISCOVERY BEFORE THE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 PART 2, # 2 PART 3, # 3 PART 4, # 4 PART 5)(mz) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
	Request

21	Filed: 6/9/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, upon County of Los Angeles; Los Angeles District Attorney's Office by serving Christina Chavez; Los Angeles District Attorney's Office on behalf of Victor Rodriguez by serving Christina Chavez; Pam Brookwell by serving Station Deputy at the East Los Angeles Sherriff's Department. The Summons and Complaint were served on 5/5/09 by personal service, by statute not indicate. Due Diligence declaration not indicated. Original Summons not returnd. (ir) (Entered: 06/12/2009)
	Request

20	Filed: 6/10/2009, Entered: None
	ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by defendant Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, Victor Rodriguez.(House, Calvin) (Entered: 06/10/2009)


19	Filed: 6/8/2009, Entered: None
	ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. King: Counsel shall read this order carefully and shall have available the Federal Rule ofCivil Procedure 26 in complying with this Order. This matter is set for Scheduling Conference on Monday, 8/3/09 at 1:30 pm at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 E. Temple Street, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California. Counsel primarily responsible for the conduct of this litigation and who has the authority to enter into stipulations and to make admissions regarding all matters that the participants may reasonably anticipate may be discussed, or the party if unrepresented, SHALL ATTEND IN PERSON. By no later than JULY 6, 2009, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall meet, in person, and discuss the matters setforth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f); By no later than JULY 20, 2009, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall file a joint REPORT OF PARTIES PLANNING MEETING (See document for further details). (ir) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
	Request

18	Filed: 6/1/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, re ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT 3 served on 5/11/09. (bm) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
	Request

17	Filed: 6/1/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, upon Los Angeles County served on 5/5/2009, answer due 5/26/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by Personal Service service, by statute not indicated, upon whom not indicated. Due Dilligence declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (bm) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
	Request

16	Filed: 6/1/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, upon Pam Brookwell served on 5/5/2009, answer due 5/26/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by Personal Service and Substituted Service service, by Federal and State statute, upon George Megahano. Due Dilligence declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (bm) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
	Request

15	Filed: 6/1/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, upon Victor Rodriguez served on 5/5/2009, answer due 5/26/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by Personal Service service, by statute not indicted, upon Carmen Faulistino. Due Dilligence declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (bm) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
	Request

14	Filed: 6/1/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, upon Los Angeles District Attorney's Office served on 5/5/2009, answer due 5/26/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by Personal Service service, by Federal and State Statute statute, upon Carmen Faulastino. Due Dilligence declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (bm) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
	Request

13	Filed: 6/8/2009, Entered: None
	REPLY MOTION for Order for to (A) Conduct Discovery Before the Rule 26(f) Conference; and (B) Request for Additional Discovery Pursuant to Rule 26(d) MOTION for Order for to (A) Conduct Discovery Before the Rule 26(f) Conference; and (B) Request for Additional Discovery Pursuant to Rule 26(d) 5 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County. (House, Calvin) (Entered: 06/08/2009)
	Request

12	Filed: 6/5/2009, Entered: None
	ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendant Pam Brookwell.(House, Calvin) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
	Request

11	Filed: 5/28/2009, Entered: None
	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller, MOTION to (A) Conduct Discovery Before the Rule 26(f) Conference; and (B) Request for Additional Discovery Pursuant to Rule 26(d) 5 , Memorandum in Support of Motion, 6 , Declaration (Motion related), 7 , MOTION for Stipulated Protective Orders Pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) 8 , Memorandum in Support of Motion 9 , Declaration (Motion related) 10 served on 5/28/09. (es) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
	Request

10	Filed: 5/28/2009, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Dimitrios P. Biller in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Stipulated Protective Orders Pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) 8 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Additional Pages to Declaration of Dimitrios P. Biller, # 2 Additional Pages to Declaration of Dimitrios P. Miller in Support of Motion, # 3 Additional Pages to Declaration of Dimitrior P. Biller in Support of Motion, # 4 Additional Pages of Declaration of Dimitrios P. Biller in Support of Motion)(es) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
	Request

9	Filed: 5/28/2009, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for or Stipulated Protective Orders Pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) 8 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (es) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
	Request

8	Filed: 5/28/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Stipulated Protective Orders Pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. Motion set for hearing on 6/22/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. (es) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
	Request

7	Filed: 5/28/2009, Entered: None
	DECLARATION of Dimitrios P. Biller in Support of Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for An Order to (1) Start Discovery Before the Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference; and (2) for Additional Discovery 5 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Additional 9 Pages of Declaration of Dimitrios P. Biller)(es) Modified on 6/1/2009 (es). (Entered: 06/01/2009)
	Request

6	Filed: 5/28/2009, Entered: None
	MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to (A) Conduct Discovery Before the Rule 26(f) Conference; and (B) Request for Additional Discovery Pursuant to Rule 26(d) MOTION for Order for to (A) Conduct Discovery Before the Rule 26(f) Conference; and (B) Request for Additional Discovery Pursuant to Rule 26(d) 5 filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (es) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
	Request

5	Filed: 5/28/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to (A) Conduct Discovery Before the Rule 26(f) Conference; and (B) Request for Additional Discovery Pursuant to Rule 26(d) filed by plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. Motion set for hearing on 6/22/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. (es) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
	Request

4	Filed: 5/21/2009, Entered: None
	ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Los Angeles County. (Attachments: # 1 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties)(House, Calvin) (Entered: 05/21/2009)


3	Filed: 5/5/2009, Entered: None
	ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT (See document for further details) by Judge George H. King. (ir) (Entered: 05/06/2009)
	Request

2	Filed: 5/1/2009, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AS TO Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (et) (Entered: 05/06/2009)
	Request

98	Filed: 1/13/2010, Entered: None
	MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky: Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/20/2010. (See document for details). (ib)
	Request

1	Filed: 5/1/2009, Entered: None
	COMPLAINT against Defendants Los Angeles County, Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, Victor Rodriguez, Pam Brookwell, Does 1-10. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Dimitrios P. Biller. (Attachments: # 1 Part 1 to Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet). (et) (Entered: 05/06/2009)

AI text generation	None
AI document summarization	None
AI-augmented search	None
AI-generated images	None
AI chat or Q&A interface	Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents	Possible