ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H. King: The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-entitled action has been settled,IT IS ORDERED that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.,, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (dgon) (Entered: 09/19/2016)
MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Gail Killefer: Mediation held on September 14, 2016 and the case has been completely settled. With the filing of this Report, the parties are advised that they must notify the trial judges deputy courtroom clerk of the fact of settlement and to promptly file documents regarding the final disposition of the case.(Killefer, Gail) (Entered: 09/14/2016)
MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge George H. King. Court conducts scheduling conference with counsel. Because this action appears to involve a limited amount in controversy, we issue the following order in lieu of scheduling dates at this time. Instead, we direct counsel to an early mediation. 1. Within 14 days hereof, Plaintiffs shall file a status report setting forth whether they intend to dismiss the Sears defendants and Mastercard; 2. Counsel shall contact forthwith Ms. Gail Killefer, ADR Coordinator for the United States District Court for the Central District of California, to set a date for early mediation before Ms. Killefer to take place within 45 days hereof. We conditionally grant defendants' request to have defendants representatives available by telephone at the mediation. However, if the telephonic appearance creates an impediment to the resolution of this case, we will direct the parties to return to mediation but with the defendants representative personally present at the mediation. 3. By no later than the close of business on Friday, August 5, 2016, counsel shall file a joint status report setting forth the date cleared with Ms. Killefer for early mediation. 4. If the case is resolved at mediation, counsel shall notify the court clerk forthwith. If the case is not resolved, counsel shall file a joint status report within 48 hours of termination of mediation. After we review that joint report, we will conduct a telephonic status conference with counsel to set scheduling dates. Court Reporter: N/A. (pso) (Entered: 08/02/2016)
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge George H. King: The Court has reviewed the parties' stipulation to extend deadline to conduct FRCvP Rule 26(f) conference and to submit joint report (Dkt No. 12). The parties' request is GRANTED. The scheduling conference set for June 27, 2016 is CONTINUED to August 1, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting shall be filed by no later than July 18, 2016. (bm) (Entered: 06/20/2016)
Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Stipulation for Extension of Time to File 12 by Chief Judge George H. King. The document is accepted as filed. Counsel to adhere to the rules and procedures of the Court when e-filing proposed orders, future filings may be stricken if not e-filed pursuant to the rules of the Court.. (dgon) (Entered: 06/20/2016)
Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Rule 26(f) Conference and Report 12 . The following error(s) was found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: Proposed order was not submitted as a separate, additional attachment to the Stipulation. A stand-alone proposed order can be e-filed by submitting a Notice of Lodging with the separate, additional attachment of the proposed order. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm) (Entered: 06/17/2016)
First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Rule 26(f) Joint Report filed by Plaintiff Wayne N. Reynolds, Karen L. Ward.(Bablove, Jesse) (Entered: 06/16/2016)
Notice of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information (G-06)
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Jesse Monroe Bablove counsel for Plaintiffs Wayne N. Reynolds, Karen L. Ward. Changing Address to 3848 Campus Dr. Suite 205 Newport Beach, CA 92660. Changing email to jbablove@dkblawyers.com. Filed by Plaintiff Wayne Reynolds and Karen Ward. (Bablove, Jesse) (Entered: 06/16/2016)
REFUND OF $400.00 made payable on 05/25/2016 to Michael Schulman for payment made on 04/15/2016 Re: REQUEST for Refund of Fees Paid 4 . (rdj) (Entered: 05/25/2016)
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. King: Counsel shall read this order carefully and shall refer to the Federal Rules of CivilProcedure, revised as of December 1, 2015, in complying with this Order. I. THIS MATTER IS SET FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON: MONDAY, JUNE 27, 2016 AT 1:30 P.M., at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 E. Temple Street, Courtroom 650, Los Angeles, California. Counsel primarily responsible for the conduct of this litigation and who has the authority to enter into stipulations and to make admissions regarding all matters that the participants may reasonably anticipate may be discussed, or the party if unrepresented, SHALL ATTEND IN PERSON. II. PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING: By no later than MAY 27, 2016, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall meet, in person, and discuss the matters set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) as well as those items identified in Part III, below. In reporting on their Discovery Plan pursuant to Rule 26(f)(3), the parties shall set forth a thoughtful and targeted plan on the subjects identified in Rule 26(f)(3)(B), and shall not simply report that they will conduct all available discovery on all conceivable matters. The parties shall also specifically report on the subjects identified in Rules 26(f)(3)(C) and (D). If necessary, the Court may refer the parties to the Magistrate Judge to conduct a discovery conference to formulate a more detailed and specific discovery plan that will govern discovery in this case. III. REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING: By no later than JUNE 13, 2016, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall file a joint "REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING" which shall (1) be so labeled, (2) state the date of the Scheduling Conference set by this Order, and (3) address not only those subjects in Rule 26(f), but also the following: (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 04/28/2016)
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT by Judge George H. King: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Chief Judge George H. King. The court fully adheres to Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which, as amended as of December 1, 2015, requires that the Rules be "construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding." Counsel shall also be guided by the following special requirements, some of which are more specific than those set out in the Local Rules: (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 04/27/2016)
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Citibank, N.A., Citicorp Credit Services Inc., Citigroup, Inc., Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 served on April 15, 2016. (Schulman, Michael) (Entered: 04/20/2016)
Pro Hac Vice Application Due (G-109) - optional html form
NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney George Hartline for Plaintiffs Wayne N. Reynolds, Karen L. Ward. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (esa) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Citibank, N.A., Citicorp Credit Services Inc., Citigroup, Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive, MasterCard, Inc., Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Company, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Karen L. Ward, Wayne N. Reynolds. (esa)
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number BC 609396 Receipt No: 0973-17653566 - Fee: $400, filed by d Citibank, N.A.. (Attorney Michael D Schulman added to party Citibank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Schulman, Michael) (Entered: 04/15/2016)
Third party AI contribution in government documents
Possible
Document content is reproduced directly from government sources. Some filings in our database may themselves contain AI-generated content submitted by third parties to government agencies.
Update
Alerts
