Page 1
Case 3:23-cv-04984-JSC Document 48 Filed 04/23/24 Page1of1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, CASENoC 23-cv-04984-JSC Plaintiff(s) ADR CERTIFICATION BY v. PARTIES AND COUNSEL Tesla, Inc., Defendant(s)
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has:
1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” (available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr).
2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and 3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution
options.
Date: 04/23/2024 Plaintiff Party Date: 04/23/2024 /s/ James H. Baker Attorney Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties: 1 intend to stipulate to an ADR process E) prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management conference Date: 04/23/2024 /s/ James H. Baker
Attorney E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR Options.” Form ADR-Cert rev. 1-15-2019
Back to 
