Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated v. The Rockefeller University et al

Federal Civil Lawsuit California Southern District Court, Case No. 3:08-cv-00401-BEN-WMC
District Judge Roger T. Benitez, presiding
Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
District Judge Roger T. Benitez
Update UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Alerts
Summary Parties (2) Timeline (13) Attributes (17) Tools

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

Complaints
COMPLAINT against The Rockefeller University ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 148306.), filed by Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(Attachments: # (1) Part 2# (2) Part 3# (3) Part 4# (4) Part 5# (5) Part 6# (6) Part 7# (7) Part 8# (8) Part 9# (9) Part 10# (10) Part 11# (11)(joeh) Modified on 3/5/...ComplaintDocument 1
3/4/2008
Responses
MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Stay This Action by The Rockefeller University. (Attachments: # (1) Memo of Points and Authorities In Support of The Rockefeller University's Motion to Dismiss Or, In the Alternative, Stay this Action# (2) Declaration of Anat Hakim in Support of Defendant Th...Motion to DismissDocument 4
3/11/2008
Doucument rejected per Discrepancy Order [10]. MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer to Stay this Action by The Rockefeller University. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration Decl of Anat Hakim in Support of Motion to Dismiss# (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Decl of Anat Hakim# (3) Exhibit Exhibit 2 ...Motion to DismissDocument 9
3/26/2008
MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer or Stay this Action by The Rockefeller University. (Attachments: # (1) Memo of Points and Authorities In Support of the Rockefeller University's Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Transfer or Stay this Action# (2) Declaration of James Lapple...Motion to DismissDocument 11
4/1/2008
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. (Reisman, Joseph) (joeh).Motion to DismissDocument 13
5/14/2008

Statistics

This case has been viewed 118 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro