ORDER denying [79] without prejudice, Dfts Motion to Supplement its previously filed Reply in support of Motion for Sum Jgm. Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/03/05. (erv, )
No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
There was a problem locating the requested document.
Page 1
Case 1:03-cv-02461-MSK-MEH
Document 80
Filed 10/03/2005
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Case No. 03-cv-02461-MSK-OES LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v.
FELDMEIER EQUIPMENT, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULES
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Supplement its Previously Filed Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Adjudication (Motion) filed September 16, 2005. A review of the Motion indicates that the Defendant has not complied with applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Local Rules of Practice dated April 15, 2002, specifically, D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(A), IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion (#79) is DENIED, without prejudice. Dated this 3rd day of October, 2005.
BY THE COURT:
Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
Case 1:03-cv-02461-MSK-MEH
Document 80
Filed 10/03/2005
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable Marcia S. Krieger
Case No. 03-cv-02461-MSK-OES
LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
FELDMEIER EQUIPMENT, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULES
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Supplement its
Previously Filed Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Adjudication (Motion) filed September
16, 2005. A review of the Motion indicates that the Defendant has not complied with applicable
provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the United States District Court for the District
of Colorado Local Rules of Practice dated April 15, 2002, specifically, D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(A),
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion (#79) is DENIED, without prejudice.
Dated this 3rd day of October, 2005.
BY THE COURT:
Marcia S. Krieger
United States District Judge
Third party AI contribution in government documents
Possible
Document content is reproduced directly from government sources. Some filings in our database may themselves contain AI-generated content submitted by third parties to government agencies.
Back to 
