Name: Rumbin v. Duncan :: Connecticut District Court :: Federal Civil Lawsuit No. 3:11-cv-00904
Creator: Connecticut District Court
Published: 2011-06-03
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Keywords: court documents, legal case, docket, PACER, Connecticut District Court

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

78	Filed: 11/20/2018, Entered: None	Clerk's Certificate re: Notice of Appeal

	Request

77	Filed: 11/20/2018, Entered: None	Notice of Appeal

	Request

76	Filed: 11/1/2018, Entered: None	Order on Motion to Transfer / Disqualify / Recuse Judge

	Request

64	Filed: 4/17/2018, Entered: None	Reopen Case

	Request

63	Filed: 7/31/2017, Entered: None	USCA Mandate

	Request

60	Filed: 3/21/2016, Entered: None	Unknown Document Type
	NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 56 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, by Peter R. Rumbin. (Payton, R.) (Entered: 03/22/2016)


59	Filed: 3/21/2016, Entered: None	Unknown Document Type
	MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal by Peter R. Rumbin. (Payton, R.) (Entered: 03/22/2016)
	Request

58	Filed: 3/21/2016, Entered: None	Unknown Document Type
	Letter from Peter R. Rumbin Dated 3/16/2016 (Payton, R.) (Entered: 03/22/2016)
	Request

53	Filed: 8/6/2014, Entered: None	Unknown Document Type
	OBJECTION re 51 MOTION Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 08/07/2014)
	Request

52	Filed: 8/5/2014, Entered: None	Unknown Document Type
	Objection re 51 MOTION Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 08/06/2014)
	Request

45	Filed: 8/20/2012, Entered: None
	RULING AND PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 39 Motion for Protective Order. The Court orders: (1) Plaintiff is prohibited from contacting defense counsel by telephone or visiting the offices of any defense counsel; (2) Plaintiff is required to communicate with defense counsel only in writing. See attached Ruling and Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on August 20, 2012. (Caldwell, M.) (Entered: 08/20/2012)


81	Filed: 3/11/2020, Entered: None	Order

	Request

80	Filed: 3/11/2020, Entered: None	Notice

	Request

79	Filed: 9/11/2019, Entered: None	USCA Mandate

	Request

75	Filed: 8/30/2018, Entered: None	Transfer/Disqualify/Recuse Judge

	Request

74	Filed: 7/23/2018, Entered: None	~~SEALED Motion

	Request

73	Filed: 7/20/2018, Entered: None	Exhibit

	Request

72	Filed: 5/24/2018, Entered: None	Letter

	Request

71	Filed: 5/24/2018, Entered: None	memorandum in support of motion

	Request

70	Filed: 5/17/2018, Entered: None	Acknowledgment of Service

	Request

69	Filed: 5/16/2018, Entered: None	Exhibit

	Request

68	Filed: 5/14/2018, Entered: None	MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion

	Request

67	Filed: 5/14/2018, Entered: None	Notice of Appearance

	Request

66	Filed: 5/9/2018, Entered: None	MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion

	Request

62	Filed: 3/24/2016, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 59 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal. Judgment in this case was entered on February 22, 2016. Plaintiff filed his 60 Notice of Appeal on March 21, 2016, less than thirty (30) days after Judgment was entered. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A), Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal is timely. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 24, 2016. (Overbey, C.) (Entered: 03/24/2016)
	Request

61	Filed: 3/21/2016, Entered: None
	Index to Record on Appeal by Peter R. Rumbin re 60 Notice of Appeal, 8 USM Service Info to IFP Plaintiff, 34 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion,, 13 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 30 Statement of Material Facts, 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, 46 MOTION for Clarification 13 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 41 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 51 MOTION Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint re 12 MOTION to Dismiss, 32 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 59 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal, 58 Letter, 10 Notice of Appearance, 52 Response, 56 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 40 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 1 Complaint, 48 Response, 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 24 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, 17 MOTION for Extension of Time until 9/27/11 to file a response to Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, 50 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, 33 Order Returning Submission, 42 Response, 20 Order on Motion to Seal Case,, 2 MOTION to Seal Case, 31 Acknowledgment of Service, 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment, USM Service Papers Sent, 29 Notice (Other), 39 MOTION for Protective Order, 16 Notice of Appearance, 18 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 27 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel,, 49 Response, 11 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 57 Judgment, 44 Response, 53 Objection, 12 MOTION to Dismiss, 35 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 26 Answer to Complaint, 36 MOTION for Disclosure, 21 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, 15 Notice of Appearance, 9 Electronic Summons Issued, 22 Response, 55 Order, 14 Notice (Other), 45 Order on Motion for Protective Order, 43 Response, 47 Objection, 23 MOTION for Extension of Time. For docket entries without a hyperlink, contact the court to arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (Payton, R.) (Entered: 03/22/2016)
	Request

60	Filed: 3/21/2016, Entered: None
	NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 56 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, by Peter R. Rumbin. (Payton, R.) (Entered: 03/22/2016)
	Request

59	Filed: 3/21/2016, Entered: None
	MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal by Peter R. Rumbin. (Payton, R.) (Entered: 03/22/2016)
	Request

58	Filed: 3/21/2016, Entered: None
	Letter from Peter R. Rumbin Dated 3/16/2016 (Payton, R.) (Entered: 03/22/2016)
	Request

57	Filed: 2/22/2016, Entered: None
	JUDGMENT entered in favor of Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner against Peter R. Rumbin.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 2/22/2016.(LaMura, K.) (Entered: 02/22/2016)
	Request

56	Filed: 2/17/2016, Entered: None
	RULING (see attached) granting Defendants' 51 Renewed Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk is directed to dismiss the Complaint as to these Defendants with prejudice, and to close the file. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 17, 2016. (Overbey, C.) (Entered: 02/17/2016)
	Request

55	Filed: 2/17/2016, Entered: None
	RULING (see attached) denying Plaintiff's 53 Appeal and Objection to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Decision. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 17, 2016. (Overbey, C.) (Entered: 02/17/2016)
	Request

54	Filed: 2/4/2016, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER denying Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Clarification. Plaintiff's questions raised in the Motion for Clarification were answered by Defendants in their Responses ( 48, 49 ). Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 4, 2016. (Overbey, C.) (Entered: 02/04/2016)
	Request

53	Filed: 8/6/2014, Entered: None
	OBJECTION re 51 MOTION Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 08/07/2014)
	Request

52	Filed: 8/5/2014, Entered: None
	Objection re 51 MOTION Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 08/06/2014)
	Request

51	Filed: 7/18/2014, Entered: None
	MOTION Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint re 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner.Responses due by 8/8/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit)(Sciarrino, Christine) (Entered: 07/18/2014)
	Request

50	Filed: 6/25/2014, Entered: None
	RULINGS (see attached) denying without prejudice 12 United States' Motion to Dismiss Complaint and granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion of Defendants Duncan and Geithner [Doc. 12 ] to dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED, without prejudice to renewal or reassertion as a motion for summary judgment upon submission of proofs consistent with this Ruling no later than July 18, 2014. The motion of Defendants Beth Harris and the University of Chicago [Doc. 28 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint against those Defendants is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 25, 2014. (Dorais, L.) (Entered: 06/25/2014)
	Request

49	Filed: 6/13/2014, Entered: None
	RESPONSE re 46 MOTION for Clarification 13 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner. (Sciarrino, Christine) (Entered: 06/13/2014)
	Request

48	Filed: 6/10/2014, Entered: None
	RESPONSE re 46 MOTION for Clarification 13 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Beth Harris. (Noonan, Patrick) (Entered: 06/10/2014)
	Request

47	Filed: 6/5/2014, Entered: None
	OBJECTION re 12 MOTION to Dismiss, 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 06/05/2014)
	Request

46	Filed: 5/30/2014, Entered: None
	MOTION for Clarification 13 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 06/03/2014)
	Request

45	Filed: 8/20/2012, Entered: None
	RULING AND PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 39 Motion for Protective Order. The Court orders: (1) Plaintiff is prohibited from contacting defense counsel by telephone or visiting the offices of any defense counsel; (2) Plaintiff is required to communicate with defense counsel only in writing. See attached Ruling and Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on August 20, 2012. (Caldwell, M.) (Entered: 08/20/2012)
	Request

44	Filed: 8/13/2012, Entered: None
	RESPONSE re 12 MOTION to Dismiss, 43 Response filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 08/14/2012)
	Request

43	Filed: 8/7/2012, Entered: None
	RESPONSE re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner, Beth Harris. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 08/07/2012)
	Request

42	Filed: 7/26/2012, Entered: None
	RESPONSE re 40 Memorandum in Opposition to 28 Motion for MSJ filed by Beth Harris. (Noonan, Patrick) Modified on 7/27/2012 to link to motion for summary judgment (Lynch, K.). (Entered: 07/26/2012)
	Request

41	Filed: 7/24/2012, Entered: None
	Memorandum in Opposition re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 07/24/2012)
	Request

40	Filed: 7/24/2012, Entered: None
	Memorandum in Opposition re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 07/24/2012)
	Request

39	Filed: 7/18/2012, Entered: None
	MOTION for Protective Order by Beth Harris.Responses due by 8/8/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit)(Noonan, Patrick) (Entered: 07/18/2012)
	Request

38	Filed: 7/16/2012, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER denying 36 Motion for Disclosure, which is not a cognizable motion. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on July 16, 2012. (Caldwell, M.) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
	Request

37	Filed: 7/16/2012, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time.The deadline for Plaintiff's responses to 12 the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Duncan and Geithner and 28 the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Harris is July 23, 2012. No further extensions of this deadline will be considered. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on July 16, 2012. (Caldwell, M.) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
	Request

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

36	Filed: 7/12/2012, Entered: None
	MOTION for Disclosure by the Defendants to reveal all relevant information concerning the matter before the court. by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 07/12/2012)
	Request

35	Filed: 7/10/2012, Entered: None
	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply for fourteen days as to 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 07/10/2012)
	Request

34	Filed: 6/14/2012, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER granting, the time for objection having passed and no objection having been made, 32 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The Court understands the request for an extension of time to apply to Plaintiff's responses to both of the pending dispositive motions. The deadline for Plaintiff's responses to 12 the Motion to Dismiss and 28 the Motion for Summary Judgment is July 9, 2012. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on June 14, 2012. (Caldwell, M.) (Entered: 06/14/2012)
	Request

33	Filed: 6/5/2012, Entered: None
	ORDER Returning Submission as Deficient: Copy of Summons Service Return for Defendant Beth Harris returned to Peter R. Rumbin. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 6/4/12. (Torrenti, R.) (Entered: 06/05/2012)
	Request

32	Filed: 5/24/2012, Entered: None
	MOTION for 14-30 Day Extension of Time to File Response to 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Peter R. Rumbin. (Brown, S.) Modified on 5/25/2012 (Brown, S.). (Entered: 05/25/2012)
	Request

31	Filed: 5/19/2012, Entered: None
	ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed upon US Attorney on 6/22/11 Acknowledgment filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 05/21/2012)
	Request

30	Filed: 4/27/2012, Entered: None
	Statement of Material Facts re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Beth Harris. (Noonan, Patrick) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
	Request

29	Filed: 4/27/2012, Entered: None
	NOTICE by Beth Harris re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Notice of Service (Noonan, Patrick) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
	Request

28	Filed: 4/27/2012, Entered: None
	MOTION for Summary Judgment by Beth Harris.Responses due by 5/18/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Affidavit of Norma Carmona)(Noonan, Patrick) (Entered: 04/27/2012)
	Request

27	Filed: 4/24/2012, Entered: None
	RULING denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. See attached Ruling. Plaintiff is directed to file and serve papers in opposition to the Government's motion to dismiss the Complaint on or before May 25, 2012, failing which the Court will decide the motion on the present record. If Plaintiff files opposing papers, the Government may, if so advised, file and serve reply papers not later than June 8, 2012. If the court desires oral argument, the parties will be advised by Chambers. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on April 24, 2012. (Caldwell, M.) (Entered: 04/24/2012)
	Request

25	Filed: 10/14/2011, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint by October 21, 2011. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on October 14, 2011. (Wilson, D.) (Entered: 10/14/2011)
	Request

26	Filed: 10/13/2011, Entered: None
	ANSWER to 1 Complaint with Special Defenses by Beth Harris.(Malone, P.) (Entered: 10/18/2011)
	Request

24	Filed: 10/5/2011, Entered: None
	SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Timothy Geithner (Second Notice) by Peter R. Rumbin. (Falcone, K.) (Entered: 10/05/2011)
	Request

23	Filed: 9/29/2011, Entered: None
	Second MOTION for 14 day Extension of Time to 10/11/11 to Respond to Complaint by Beth Harris. (Brown, S.) (Entered: 09/30/2011)
	Request

22	Filed: 9/26/2011, Entered: None
	Plaintiff's RESPONSE re 11 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Peter R. Rumbin. (Ghilardi, K.) (Entered: 09/27/2011)
	Request

20	Filed: 9/13/2011, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER denying 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Case. Local Civil Rule 5(e) provides that the power to seal shall be used "sparingly and only for clear and compelling reasons." Such "extraordinary circumstances" do not exist in this case, in which Plaintiff alleges that the government is unlawfully withholding a portion of Plaintiff's Social Security as payment for Plaintiff's federal education loans. However, personal identifying information, specifically the last four digits of Plaintiff's social security number, should be redacted from the complaint where it appears at pages 38-40. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 13, 2011. (Lacedonia, J.) (Entered: 09/13/2011)
	Request

18	Filed: 9/13/2011, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 17 Motion by Defendant Beth Harris for Extension of Time until September 27, 2011 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 13, 2011. (Lacedonia, J.) (Entered: 09/13/2011)
	Request

21	Filed: 9/12/2011, Entered: None
	SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter R. Rumbin. Arne Duncan served on 8/25/2011, answer due 10/24/2011; Timothy Geithner served on 8/31/2011, answer due 10/30/2011; Beth Harris Served on 6/28/11, answer due 9/27/11 Correcting document 19(Malone, P.) (Entered: 09/14/2011)
	Request

19	Filed: 9/12/2011, Entered: None
	ENTERED IN ERROR SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter R. Rumbin. Arne Duncan served on 8/25/2011, answer due 9/15/2011; Timothy Geithner served on 8/31/2011, answer due 9/21/2011; Beth Harris served on 6/28/2011, answer due 9/27/2011. (Malone, P.) Modified on 9/14/2011 to correct relief (Malone, P.). (Entered: 09/13/2011)
	Request

17	Filed: 8/29/2011, Entered: None
	First MOTION for Extension of Time until 9/27/11 to file a response to Plaintiff's 1 Complaint which was served upon defendant on June 28, 2011 by Beth Harris. (Malone, P.) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
	Request

16	Filed: 8/29/2011, Entered: None
	NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony D. Sutton on behalf of Beth Harris (Malone, P.) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
	Request

15	Filed: 8/16/2011, Entered: None
	NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick M. Noonan on behalf of Beth Harris (Pesta, J.) (Entered: 08/16/2011)
	Request

14	Filed: 8/4/2011, Entered: None
	NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant Opposing 12 MOTION to Dismiss As required by Local Rule 12(a) (Malone, P.) (Entered: 08/04/2011)
	Request

13	Filed: 8/4/2011, Entered: None
	Memorandum in Support re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Part 2, # 2 Memorandum in Support Part 3)(Malone, P.) (Entered: 08/04/2011)
	Request

12	Filed: 8/4/2011, Entered: None
	MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner.Responses due by 8/25/2011 (Malone, P.) (Entered: 08/04/2011)
	Request

11	Filed: 8/4/2011, Entered: None
	Memorandum in Opposition re 2 MOTION to Seal Case filed by Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner. (Malone, P.) (Entered: 08/04/2011)
	Request

10	Filed: 8/4/2011, Entered: None
	NOTICE of Appearance by Christine L. Sciarrino on behalf of Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner (Malone, P.) (Entered: 08/04/2011)
	Request

9	Filed: 6/9/2011, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner, Beth Harris with answer to complaint due within 60 days. Attorney Peter R. Rumbin 87 Second St. Hamden, CT 06514. (Malone, P.) (Entered: 06/09/2011)
	Request

8	Filed: 6/9/2011, Entered: None
	USM 285 forms together with Summons, OPTD, Text Order Grantig IFP, Text Order Referring Case to Magistrate, and all instructions mailed to IFP plaintiff to complete and return to Clerk's office. (Malone, P.) (Entered: 06/09/2011)
	Request

7	Filed: 6/8/2011, Entered: None
	ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE THE COURT WILL ISSUE. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 6/8/11. (Margolis, Joan) (Entered: 06/08/2011)
	Request

6	Filed: 6/7/2011, Entered: None
	ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Joan G. Margolis for ruling on 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 6/7/11. Motions referred to Joan G. Margolis(Pesta, J.) (Entered: 06/07/2011)
	Request

5	Filed: 6/3/2011, Entered: None
	Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Discovery due by 12/3/2011. Signed by Clerk on 6/3/2011. (Fazekas, J.) (Entered: 06/06/2011)
	Request

4	Filed: 6/3/2011, Entered: None
	MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Peter R. Rumbin. (Fazekas, J.) (Entered: 06/06/2011)
	Request

3	Filed: 6/3/2011, Entered: None
	MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Peter R. Rumbin. (Fazekas, J.) (Entered: 06/06/2011)
	Request

2	Filed: 6/3/2011, Entered: None
	MOTION to Seal Case by Peter R. Rumbin. (Fazekas, J.) (Entered: 06/06/2011)
	Request

1	Filed: 6/3/2011, Entered: None
	COMPLAINT against Arne Duncan, Timothy Geithner, Beth Harris, filed by Peter R. Rumbin.(Fazekas, J.) (Entered: 06/06/2011)
	Request

AI text generation	None
AI document summarization	None
AI-augmented search	None
AI-generated images	None
AI chat or Q&A interface	Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents	Possible