| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
 |
Filed: 5/3/2019, Entered: 5/3/2019 |
|
|
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 122 |
Filed: 5/3/2019, Entered: 5/3/2019 |
|
|
JUDGMENT entered in favor of GGP, Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc. against 4A84455.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 5/3/19.(Johnson, D.)
|
|
 Request |
|
|
|
| 121 |
Filed: 4/30/2019, Entered: 4/30/2019 |
 |
|
ORDER. Sterling has filed a 120 motion to withdraw its 116 amended motion for attorney's fees. The Court construes this as motion as also seeking withdrawal of any relief sought in the 106 motion, which the Court previously 118 denied as moot but noted it would take into account in deciding the 116 motion. The 120 motion to withdraw is GRANTED. This resolves all outstanding issues in the case. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Sterling and GGP and against 4A84455, in accordance with the 114 and 115 orders. The Clerk is directed to close the case.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/30/2019. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 120 |
Filed: 4/29/2019, Entered: 4/29/2019 |
|
|
MOTION to Withdraw 116 Amended MOTION for Attorney Fees by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 119 |
Filed: 4/18/2019, Entered: 4/18/2019 |
|
|
ORDER. The Court's 115 order granting GGP's motion for summary judgment required GGP to "file on the docket within 21 days a short notice on what relief in its 57 third-party complaint it wishes to pursue in light of th[e] ruling." The Court warned that "[i]f GGP indicates that it does not wish to continue pursuing any relief on its third-party complaint or does not respond by the deadline, the Court will dismiss the third-party complaint." GGP has not filed any such notice on the docket by the deadline, April 17, 2019. Accordingly, GGP's 57 third-party complaint against PSC is DISMISSED under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/18/2019. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 4/11/2019, Entered: 4/11/2019 |
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to 116 Amended MOTION for Attorney Fees . Responses due by 5/2/2019 (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 118 |
Filed: 4/11/2019, Entered: 4/11/2019 |
|
|
ORDER. Per the Court's 114 order, Sterling has filed an 116 amended motion for attorney's fees. Plaintiff is directed to respond to the motion within 21 days, or by May 2, 2019. In light of the amended motion, the 106 motion for fees is DENIED as moot, though the Court will take into account both the timing of that motion and the arguments raised in the 107 and 110 briefs in deciding the current motion. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/11/2019. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 117 |
Filed: 4/10/2019, Entered: 4/10/2019 |
|
|
Memorandum in Support re 116 Amended MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 116 |
Filed: 4/10/2019, Entered: 4/10/2019 |
|
|
Amended MOTION for Attorney Fees by Sterling Jewelers, Inc..Responses due by 5/1/2019 Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 115 |
Filed: 3/27/2019, Entered: 3/27/2019 |
|
|
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, GGP's 97 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and PSC's 95 motion for summary judgment is DENIED as moot. GGP shall file on the docket within 21 days a short notice on what relief in its 57 third-party complaint it wishes to pursue in light of this ruling. If GGP indicates that it does not wish to continue pursuing any relief on its third-party complaint or does not respond by the deadline, the Court will dismiss the third-party complaint.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/27/2019. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 114 |
Filed: 3/27/2019, Entered: 3/27/2019 |
|
|
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Sterling's 87 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and its 80 motion in limine is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against 4A84455 and in favor of Sterling. In addition, 4A84455 claims against the John and Jane Doe defendants are DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to terminate them from the case. The Court further notes that Sterling has filed a 106 motion for attorney's fees in which it indicates that it may file an updated motion for fees with respect to plaintiff's non-federal claims at the conclusion of the action. Sterling is directed to file such any such motion within 21 days. If Sterling fails to file any motion by the deadline, the Court will rule on the current 106 motion. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/27/2019. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 113 |
Filed: 3/11/2019, Entered: 3/11/2019 |
|
|
RESPONSE re 112 Notice,,,,,,, by Fabian WadeStatement of Citizenship of Parties. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 112 |
Filed: 3/4/2019, Entered: 3/4/2019 |
|
|
NOTICE. The Court's 105 order dismissed plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the only federal claim. Thus, the 36 amended complaint's cited basis for jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, appears to have disappeared. The Second Circuit has cautioned that where all federal claims are dismissed before trial, district courts should usually decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims. See Klein & Co. Futures v. Bd. of Trade of City of New York, 464 F.3d 255, 262 (2d Cir. 2006) ("It is well settled that where... the federal claims are eliminated in the early stages of litigation, courts should generally decline to exercise pendent jurisdiction over remaining state law claims."). Nonetheless, because plaintiff has not had an opportunity to plead facts that might support the exercise of the Court's diversity jurisdiction, the Court will allow plaintiff to file a statement on the docket indicating the citizenship of each party against which plaintiff's claims are asserted and also indicating whether or not plaintiff seeks damages in excess of $75,000. The plaintiff shall file such statement on the docket within 7 days of this order. The plaintiff's statement may also address whether the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction if there is no diversity. The defendants may also file a statement within 7 days of this order indicating whether the Court should continue to exercise supplemental jurisdiction if there is no diversity. Failure to file the statement may lead to dismissal of the case, as the Court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/4/2019. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 111 |
Filed: 10/12/2018, Entered: 10/12/2018 |
|
|
ANSWER to 57 Third Party Complaint by Professional Security Consultants, Inc..(Coon, Lorinda)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 110 |
Filed: 10/9/2018, Entered: 10/9/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 106 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by 4A84455. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 109 |
Filed: 10/2/2018, Entered: 10/2/2018 |
|
|
ANSWER to 36 Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses. by GGP, Inc..(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 108 |
Filed: 9/28/2018, Entered: 9/28/2018 |
|
|
ANSWER to 36 Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Special Defenses by Sterling Jewelers, Inc..(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 107 |
Filed: 9/28/2018, Entered: 9/28/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Support re 106 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 106 |
Filed: 9/28/2018, Entered: 9/28/2018 |
|
|
MOTION for Attorney Fees by Sterling Jewelers, Inc..Responses due by 10/19/2018 Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 105 |
Filed: 9/17/2018, Entered: 9/17/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Sterling's 42 and GGP's 45 motions to dismiss the 36 amended complaint are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The claims for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count One) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count Four) are DISMISSED in full. The defamation per se claim against GGP (Count Three) is DISMISSED. In addition, PSC's 70 motion to dismiss the 57 third-party complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. GGP's negligence claim (Count One) against PSC is DISMISSED. Finally, the Clerk is directed to terminate Kay Jewelers, Inc. as a defendant.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/17/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 104 |
Filed: 8/30/2018, Entered: 8/30/2018 |
|
|
REPLY to Response to 95 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Professional Security Consultants, Inc.. (Coon, Lorinda)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 103 |
Filed: 8/30/2018, Entered: 8/30/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Support re 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by GGP, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 102 |
Filed: 8/16/2018, Entered: 8/16/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by 4A84455. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Material Facts)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 101 |
Filed: 8/16/2018, Entered: 8/16/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 95 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by 4A84455. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Material Facts)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 100 |
Filed: 8/6/2018, Entered: 8/6/2018 |
|
|
REPLY to Response to 87 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 7/31/2018, Entered: 8/1/2018 |
|
|
Set Deadlines as to 87 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment . Responses to opposition due by 8/13/2018 (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 99 |
Filed: 7/31/2018, Entered: 7/31/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The 96 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Defendant Sterling Jewelers' reply to the 93 Opposition is now due August 13, 2018. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/31/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 98 |
Filed: 7/31/2018, Entered: 7/31/2018 |
|
|
ORDER granting 82 Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 7/31/2018. (Fries, J.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 97 |
Filed: 7/30/2018, Entered: 7/30/2018 |
|
|
MOTION for Summary Judgment by GGP, Inc..Responses due by 8/20/2018 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Statement of Material Facts)(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 96 |
Filed: 7/30/2018, Entered: 7/30/2018 |
|
|
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 87 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment until August 13, 2018 by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 95 |
Filed: 7/27/2018, Entered: 7/27/2018 |
|
|
MOTION for Summary Judgment by Professional Security Consultants, Inc..Responses due by 8/17/2018 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Statement of Material Facts)(Coon, Lorinda)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 94 |
Filed: 7/24/2018, Entered: 7/24/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The 91 Motion to Amend for Leave to Amend Complaint is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the attached.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/24/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 93 |
Filed: 7/23/2018, Entered: 7/23/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 87 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by 4A84455. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Material Facts, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 92 |
Filed: 7/9/2018, Entered: 7/9/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 91 MOTION to Amend/Correct First Amended Complaint filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 91 |
Filed: 7/5/2018, Entered: 7/5/2018 |
|
|
MOTION to Amend/Correct First Amended Complaint by 4A84455.Responses due by 7/26/2018 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Supplement Proposed Second Amended Complaint, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 5)Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 90 |
Filed: 7/2/2018, Entered: 7/2/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 82 MOTION to Quash filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 89 |
Filed: 7/2/2018, Entered: 7/2/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Support re 87 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 88 |
Filed: 7/2/2018, Entered: 7/2/2018 |
|
|
Statement of Material Facts re 87 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 87 |
Filed: 7/2/2018, Entered: 7/2/2018 |
|
|
Second MOTION for Summary Judgment by Sterling Jewelers, Inc..Responses due by 7/23/2018 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A 4A84455 Deposition (May 2017), # 2 Exhibit B 4A84455 Deposition (May 2018), # 3 Exhibit C John Decker Deposition, # 4 Exhibit D Carmen Santos Deposition, # 5 Exhibit E Jamileth Anes Deposition, # 6 Exhibit F Shevada Davis Deposition, # 7 Exhibit G Matthew Vieweg Deposition, # 8 Exhibit H 4A84455 Bank Statements, # 9 Exhibit I Plaintiffs Response to Defendant Sterling Jewelers Inc.s Request for Admissions to the Plaintiff, # 10 Exhibit J Plaintiffs Amended Response to Defendant Sterling Jewelers Inc.s First Set of Interrogatories to the Plaintiff)(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 86 |
Filed: 6/25/2018, Entered: 6/25/2018 |
|
|
REPLY to Response to 80 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Testimony of Dr. Sohrab Zahedi filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 85 |
Filed: 6/13/2018, Entered: 6/14/2018 |
|
|
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for discovery dispute including 82 MOTION to Quash Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/13/18.Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
Filed: 6/13/2018, Entered: 6/13/2018 |
|
|
RESPONSE filed by 4A84455. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 83 |
Filed: 6/13/2018, Entered: 6/13/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The discovery dispute regarding the 82 Motion to Quash is REFERRED to Judge Robert A. Richardson.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/13/2018. (Mac Dougall, Sarah)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
Filed: 6/11/2018, Entered: 6/11/2018 |
|
|
MOTION to Quash by 4A84455.Responses due by 7/2/2018 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law, # 2 Affidavit Egbarin Declaration, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits 1-11)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 81 |
Filed: 5/23/2018, Entered: 5/23/2018 |
|
|
Memorandum in Support re 80 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Testimony of Dr. Sohrab Zahedi filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 80 |
Filed: 5/23/2018, Entered: 5/23/2018 |
|
|
MOTION in Limine to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Testimony of Dr. Sohrab Zahedi by Sterling Jewelers, Inc..Responses due by 6/13/2018 (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 79 |
Filed: 5/9/2018, Entered: 5/9/2018 |
|
|
NOTICE of Appearance by Robert G. Clemente on behalf of Professional Security Consultants, Inc. (Clemente, Robert)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 78 |
Filed: 4/19/2018, Entered: 4/19/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The Court has reviewed the attached correspondence about the parties' discovery dispute regarding the plaintiff's request to limit his deposition to topics not covered in his pre-suit interview. The Court concurs with the defendant and will not restrict it from asking questions about subjects already covered in the plaintiff's sworn, pre-suit interview. When the plaintiff participated in that interview, the complaint had not yet been filed, so the defendant would not have had notice about the facts and legal theories cited at that time. Also the language of Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 does not allow for the limiting of a deposition based on sworn testimony given before a complaint has been filed. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/19/2018. (MacDougall, S.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 77 |
Filed: 4/12/2018, Entered: 4/13/2018 |
|
|
Docket Entry Correction re 76 Notice of Deposition. Entered in error - Per the local rules, discovery is not to be filed. (Fanelle, Nicholas)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 76 |
Filed: 4/12/2018, Entered: 4/12/2018 |
|
|
*Entered in Error* NOTICE by GGP, Inc. Of the Deposition of 4A84455 (Neborsky, Dawn) Modified on 4/13/2018 (Fanelle, Nicholas).
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 75 |
Filed: 3/26/2018, Entered: 3/26/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The Court has reviewed the parties' discovery dispute submissions (see attached). Because the nature of the dispute and the parties' arguments are adequately set forth in the attached correspondence and objections, the Court has ruled on the items in dispute without the need for a telephonic conference. The Court's rulings on the objections are as follows. Sterling Jewelers' Objections to Plaintiff's Interrogatories: 1. Sustained. 7.(III) Sustained. 9. This objection is sustained absent a showing of some connection to a national policy implemented by Sterling related to this issue. 10. This objection is sustained absent a showing of some connection to a national policy implemented by Sterling related to this issue. 14. Sustained. 18. Sustained.19. Sustained. 20. Sustained as to information beyond the response already set forth by Sterling. 21. Overruled. 22. Sustained. 23. This objection is overruled as to policies, practices, and procedures applicable at the Buckland Hills Mall store from the last three years. It is sustained as to the rest of the request. 24. This objection is sustained absent proof of connection to this case. 25. This objection is sustained absent proof of connection to this case. 26. Sustained. 28. Sustained. 29. This objection is overruled as to policies, practices, and procedures applicable at the Buckland Hills Mall store from the last three years. It is sustained as to the rest of the request. 30. Overruled. Sterling Jewelers' Objection to Plaintiff's Requests for Production:2. Sustained as to information beyond the response already set forth by Sterling. 5. Sustained, except that any responsive non-privileged documents must be produced. 10. Sustained. 12. Sustained. 16. The parties have indicated that this dispute was resolved. 17. The Court construes this language to request "all documents constituting the lease agreement." Sterling shall produce all such documents. 18. The Court construes this language to request "all documents constituting the security services agreement." Sterling shall produce all such documents. 19. The Court construes this language to request "all documents constituting any other agreements" between Kay and GGP "concerning the events involving the plaintiff, which occurred on March 18, 2017." Sterling shall produce all such documents. 31. This objection is overruled because the Court's standing protective order (ECF No. 4) applies to all documents produced in this case. 34. This objection is overruled because the Court's standing protective order (ECF No. 4) applies to all documents produced in this case. GGP's Interrogatories Objections: 1. Sustained. 3. Sustained. 9. This objection is sustained absent a showing of some connection to a national policy implemented by GGP related to this issue. 10. This objection is sustained absent a showing of some connection to a national policy implemented by GGP related to this issue. 11. This objection is sustained absent a showing of some connection to a national policy implemented by GGP related to this issue. 14. Sustained. 18. Sustained. 19. Sustained. 20. Sustained. 21. This objection is overruled as to policies, procedures, and practices from the last three years. It is sustained as to the rest of the request. 22. Overruled. 23. Sustained. 25. This objection is sustained absent proof of connection to this case. 26. Although GPP objected to this interrogatory, it has already provided an answer to it. 28. Sustained. 29. This objection is overruled as to policies, procedures, and practices from the last three years. It is sustained as to the rest of the request. 30. Overruled. GGP's Request for Production Objections: 2. Sustained. 10. Sustained. 12. Sustained. 16. The Court construes this language to request "all documents constituting the lease agreement." GGP shall produce all such documents. 17. The Court construes this language to request "all documents constituting the lease agreement." GGP shall produce all such documents. 18. The Court construes this language to request "all documents constituting the lease agreement." GGP shall produce all such documents. 19. The Court construes this language to request "all documents constituting the lease agreement." GGP shall produce all such documents. 40. To the extent that this response states an objection concerning the absence of a protective order, it is overruled because the Court's standing protective order (ECF No. 4) applies to all documents produced in this case. The Court cannot rule on any objections that GGP made to requests for production numbers 3-9, because GGP did not submit its own discovery dispute letter and because the plaintiff omitted the pages containing those requests from his discovery letter. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/26/18. (Attachments: (1) Defendant Sterling Jeweler's Discovery Dispute Letter) (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 74 |
Filed: 3/9/2018, Entered: 3/12/2018 |
|
|
RESPONSE re 70 Third Party MOTION to Dismiss filed by GGP, Inc. (Fanelle, Nicholas)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 73 |
Filed: 3/9/2018, Entered: 3/9/2018 |
|
|
RESPONSE TO THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS filed by GGP, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn) Modified on 3/12/2018, entered in error see document # 74 . (Fanelle, Nicholas)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 72 |
Filed: 3/7/2018, Entered: 3/7/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The 71 Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/7/2018. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
Filed: 3/6/2018, Entered: 3/6/2018 |
|
|
MOTION for Daniel I. Prywes to Withdraw as Attorney by Jane Does, John Does, GGP, Inc., Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Prywes, Daniel)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 70 |
Filed: 2/16/2018, Entered: 2/16/2018 |
|
|
Third Party MOTION to Dismiss by Professional Security Consultants, Inc..Responses due by 3/9/2018 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support)(Coon, Lorinda)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 69 |
Filed: 2/15/2018, Entered: 2/15/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The 68 Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/15/2018. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
Filed: 2/14/2018, Entered: 2/14/2018 |
|
|
MOTION for Richard A. Roberts to Withdraw as Attorney by Professional Security Consultants, Inc.. (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 67 |
Filed: 2/14/2018, Entered: 2/14/2018 |
|
|
NOTICE of Appearance by Lorinda S. Coon on behalf of Professional Security Consultants, Inc. (Coon, Lorinda)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 2/5/2018, Entered: 2/6/2018 |
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Professional Security Consultants, Inc. to 2/16/2018. (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
Filed: 2/5/2018, Entered: 2/5/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The 65 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/5/2018. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 65 |
Filed: 2/2/2018, Entered: 2/2/2018 |
|
|
Second MOTION for Extension of Time until February 16, 2018 to respond to the defendant, GGP, Inc.'s 57 Third Party Complaint by Professional Security Consultants, Inc.. (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 1/10/2018, Entered: 1/10/2018 |
|
|
Set Deadlines/Hearings: per scheduling order dated 8/17/17 doc. #35 Discovery due by 6/29/2018; Dispositive Motions due by 7/30/2018; Joint Status Report due by 1/8/2018; Joint Trial Brief due by 8/30/2018. (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
Filed: 1/9/2018, Entered: 1/9/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The Court has reviewed the parties' 63 joint status report. The TSC scheduled for Monday, January 15, 2018 is CANCELLED. Should the parties wish to proceed to mediation, they shall file a joint statement certifying that (1) counsel have conferred with their clients and each other, (2) the parties wish to proceed to mediation, (3) the parties are willing to participate in settlement efforts at such mediation in good faith, and (4) counsel believe that a mediation stands at least a reasonable chance of resolving the case without trial. The statement should also state whether the parties are willing to proceed to mediation before a magistrate judge.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/9/2018. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
Filed: 1/8/2018, Entered: 1/8/2018 |
|
|
Joint STATUS REPORT by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 1/5/2018, Entered: 1/9/2018 |
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Professional Security Consultants, Inc. to 2/2/2018. (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 62 |
Filed: 1/5/2018, Entered: 1/5/2018 |
|
|
ORDER. The 61 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/5/2018. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
Filed: 1/3/2018, Entered: 1/3/2018 |
|
|
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 2, 2018 to respond to the defendant, GGP, Inc.'s 57 Third Party Complaint by Professional Security Consultants, Inc.. (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 60 |
Filed: 1/3/2018, Entered: 1/3/2018 |
|
|
NOTICE of Appearance by Richard A. Roberts on behalf of Professional Security Consultants, Inc. (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 59 |
Filed: 12/22/2017, Entered: 12/22/2017 |
|
|
SUMMONS Returned Executed by GGP, Inc.. Professional Security Consultants, Inc. served on 12/13/2017, answer due 1/3/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Affidavit of Process Server)(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 58 |
Filed: 12/4/2017, Entered: 12/4/2017 |
|
|
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Professional Security Consultants, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Dawn M. Neborsky* *Bonner Kiernan Trebach & Crociata, LLP-MA* *200 Portland Street Suite 400* *Boston, MA 02114*. (Hernandez, T.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 12/1/2017, Entered: 12/1/2017 |
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Professional Security Consultants, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
Filed: 11/17/2017, Entered: 11/17/2017 |
|
|
THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Professional Security Consultants, Inc., filed by GGP, Inc..(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 56 |
Filed: 11/16/2017, Entered: 11/16/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 55 Motion to Implead is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/16/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
Filed: 11/14/2017, Entered: 11/14/2017 |
|
|
MOTION to Implead Professional Security Consultants, Inc. as a Party to this action by GGP, Inc..Responses due by 12/5/2017 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Third-Party Complaint)(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 54 |
Filed: 11/14/2017, Entered: 11/14/2017 |
|
|
REPLY to Response to 42 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by GGP, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 53 |
Filed: 11/7/2017, Entered: 11/7/2017 |
|
|
REPLY to Response to 42 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 52 |
Filed: 11/6/2017, Entered: 11/6/2017 |
|
|
RESPONSE re 51 Affidavit, 47 MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/13/2018 to file Rule 56(a)2 Statement 44 Statement of Material Facts filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 51 |
Filed: 11/3/2017, Entered: 11/3/2017 |
|
|
AFFIDAVIT re 48 Order on Motion for Extension of Time,,,,,, Signed By Nitor V. Egbarin filed by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 50 |
Filed: 10/30/2017, Entered: 10/30/2017 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 45 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 49 |
Filed: 10/30/2017, Entered: 10/30/2017 |
|
|
Statement of Material Facts re 42 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by 4A84455. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 48 |
Filed: 10/26/2017, Entered: 10/26/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 47 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED. Every statement in the defendants' 44 Statement of Material Facts cites the plaintiff's May 10, 2017 deposition. The plaintiff states in the 47 motion that he "does not object to any statement in the said transcript." For Rule 56(a)(2) purposes, this amounts to an admission of each fact in the 44 Statement. His 56(a)(2) statement should reflect such, and no extension is needed for this portion of the 56(a)(2) statement. To the extent that the 47 Motion suggests that the plaintiff needs discovery to adequately respond to the 42 summary judgment portion of the Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, the plaintiff must file "an affidavit or declaration that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition[.]" Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). But any such submission that the plaintiff makes needs to be specific and definite about what discovery he is seeking and what he thinks it would show because "a party seeking to delay resolution of a summary judgment motion on grounds that he has been deprived of certain discovery materials must show that the material sought is germane to the defense, and that it is neither cumulative nor speculative[.]... [A] bare assertion that the evidence supporting a plaintiff's allegation is in the hands of the defendant is insufficient." Alphonse Hotel Corporation v. Tran, 828 F.3d 146, 151 (2d Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). Any affidavit under Rule 56(d) must be filed within 14 days of this order. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/26/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 47 |
Filed: 10/25/2017, Entered: 10/25/2017 |
|
|
MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/13/2018 to file Rule 56(a)2 Statement 44 Statement of Material Facts by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 46 |
Filed: 10/25/2017, Entered: 10/25/2017 |
|
|
Memorandum in Opposition re 42 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 45 |
Filed: 10/9/2017, Entered: 10/9/2017 |
|
|
MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by GGP, Inc..Responses due by 10/30/2017 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support)(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 44 |
Filed: 10/9/2017, Entered: 10/9/2017 |
|
|
Statement of Material Facts re 42 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 43 |
Filed: 10/9/2017, Entered: 10/9/2017 |
|
|
Memorandum in Support re 42 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Transcript of Deposition of 4A84455)(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 42 |
Filed: 10/9/2017, Entered: 10/9/2017 |
|
|
MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by Sterling Jewelers, Inc..Responses due by 10/30/2017 (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 9/22/2017, Entered: 9/25/2017 |
|
|
Answer deadline updated for GGP, Inc. to 10/9/2017. (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
Filed: 9/22/2017, Entered: 9/22/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 40 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/22/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
Filed: 9/21/2017, Entered: 9/21/2017 |
|
|
MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/9/17 and 10/18/17 to Answer Amended Complaint and Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests 36 Amended Complaint by GGP, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Interrogatories to Defendant, # 2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant)(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 9/15/2017, Entered: 9/18/2017 |
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Sterling Jewelers, Inc. to 10/9/2017. (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
Filed: 9/15/2017, Entered: 9/15/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 38 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. The Court understands that the plaintiff objected to this motion, however the defendant's motion is supported by good cause, and this requested delay of two weeks will not cause any undue prejudice. The Court is unlikely, though, to grant any further extensions for these deadlines. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/15/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38 |
Filed: 9/14/2017, Entered: 9/14/2017 |
|
|
MOTION for Extension of Time until October 9, 2017 and October 11, 2017, respectively to Respond to the Amended Complaint and Plaintiff's Discovery Requests 36 Amended Complaint by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 37 |
Filed: 9/12/2017, Entered: 9/12/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 15 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot, because the plaintiff has filed a 36 amended complaint. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/12/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
Filed: 9/11/2017, Entered: 9/11/2017 |
|
|
AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against Jane Does, John Does, GGP, Inc., Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc., filed by 4A84455.(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 8/18/2017, Entered: 8/21/2017 |
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment.(Responses due by 9/11/2017, ) or Amended Complaint due by 9/11/2017 (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
Filed: 8/18/2017, Entered: 8/18/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The Court has reviewed the parties' 34 26(f) report. The Court approves the report, subject to the exceptions set out in the attached order. Additionally, the Court notes that because the defendant has filed the 15 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, and subject to the Court's 29 Order granting an extension of time, on or before September 11, the plaintiff shall either file a response to the motion or file an amended complaint in which it pleads as many facts as possible, consistent with Rule 11, to address the alleged defects discussed in Defendants' memorandum of law. The Court will not allow further amendments after September 11. If plaintiff chooses to amend and if defendants renew their motion to dismiss, defendants may incorporate by reference any prior briefing. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/18/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 34 |
Filed: 8/16/2017, Entered: 8/16/2017 |
|
|
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 33 |
Filed: 8/11/2017, Entered: 8/11/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 32 Motion to Withdraw Appearance is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/11/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
| 32 |
Filed: 8/10/2017, Entered: 8/10/2017 |
|
|
MOTION for Janice D. Lai to Withdraw as Attorney by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Lai, Janice)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 31 |
Filed: 8/8/2017, Entered: 8/8/2017 |
|
|
ANSWER to 1 Complaint, with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by GGP, Inc..(Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 30 |
Filed: 8/3/2017, Entered: 8/3/2017 |
|
|
NOTICE by Sterling Jewelers, Inc. re Order on Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, Order on Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 7/31/2017, Entered: 8/2/2017 |
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/11/2017 (Johnson, D.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
Filed: 7/31/2017, Entered: 7/31/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The plaintiff's 26 Motion for an Extension of Time is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court grants plaintiff's request for an extension to respond to defendant Sterling Jewelers' 15 Motion to Dismiss--however, the Court will only allow the plaintiff an additional 30 days in which to do so. Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss is due Sept. 11, and the Court will not grant further extensions of this deadline. To the extent that the plaintiff contends that the Court may not consider the transcript that Sterling Jewelers cites in their 15 Motion to Dismiss in connection with deciding the Motion to Dismiss or that the Court may do so only by considering the alternative motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff may make any arguments in support of that contention in his memorandum in opposition to the 15 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant GGP, Inc.'s 28 Motion for Extension of Time also is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/31/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
Filed: 7/28/2017, Entered: 7/28/2017 |
|
|
MOTION for Extension of Time until August 8, 2017 To File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint 1 Complaint, by GGP, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 27 |
Filed: 7/28/2017, Entered: 7/28/2017 |
|
|
RESPONSE re 26 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment until 12/7/2017 filed by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 26 |
Filed: 7/28/2017, Entered: 7/28/2017 |
|
|
Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment until 12/7/2017 by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 25 |
Filed: 7/27/2017, Entered: 7/27/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 24 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED. Local Rule 7(b)(3) states that "[a]ll motions for extensions of time, whether for consideration by the Clerk or a Judge, shall include a statement of the moving counsel that (1) he or she has inquired of opposing counsel and there is agreement or objection to the motion or that (2) despite diligent efforts, he or she cannot ascertain opposing counsel's position." The plaintiff's statement that he has not sought the consent of defense counsel to file this motion disregards the rule entirely, for the second time. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/27/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
Filed: 7/26/2017, Entered: 7/26/2017 |
|
|
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment until 12/7/2017 by 4A84455. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 23 |
Filed: 7/26/2017, Entered: 7/26/2017 |
|
|
ORDER. The 22 Stipulation of Extension of Time is DENIED and does not operate to extend any deadlines in this case. Local Rule 7(b)(2) states that requests for extensions of time need to be filed as a motion and decided by a judge. The parties cannot stipulate to extensions of time. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/26/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
Filed: 7/25/2017, Entered: 7/25/2017 |
|
|
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by GGP, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 21 |
Filed: 7/25/2017, Entered: 7/25/2017 |
|
|
NOTICE of Appearance by Dawn M. Neborsky on behalf of GGP, Inc. (Neborsky, Dawn)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 20 |
Filed: 7/21/2017, Entered: 7/21/2017 |
|
|
Supplemental SUMMONS Returned Executed by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 19 |
Filed: 7/21/2017, Entered: 7/21/2017 |
|
|
Supplemental SUMMONS Returned Executed by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 18 |
Filed: 7/21/2017, Entered: 7/21/2017 |
|
|
Supplemental SUMMONS Returned Executed by 4A84455. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 17 |
Filed: 7/19/2017, Entered: 7/19/2017 |
|
|
Statement of Material Facts re 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 16 |
Filed: 7/19/2017, Entered: 7/19/2017 |
|
|
Memorandum in Support re 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Transcript of Sworn Interview of 4A84455)(Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 15 |
Filed: 7/19/2017, Entered: 7/19/2017 |
|
|
MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc..Responses due by 8/9/2017 (Mize, Joshua)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 14 |
Filed: 7/18/2017, Entered: 7/18/2017 |
|
|
NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen P. Brown on behalf of Sterling Jewelers, Inc. (Brown, Stephen)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 13 |
Filed: 7/18/2017, Entered: 7/18/2017 |
|
|
NOTICE of Appearance by Colleen J. Vellturo on behalf of Sterling Jewelers, Inc. (Vellturo, Colleen)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 12 |
Filed: 7/13/2017, Entered: 7/13/2017 |
|
|
SUMMONS Returned Executed by 4A84455. Jane Does served on 6/28/2017, answer due 7/19/2017; John Does served on 6/28/2017, answer due 7/19/2017; GGP, Inc. served on 6/28/2017, answer due 7/19/2017; Kay Jewelers Inc. served on 6/28/2017, answer due 7/19/2017; Sterling Jewelers, Inc. served on 6/28/2017, answer due 7/19/2017. (Egbarin, Nitor)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 11 |
Filed: 7/7/2017, Entered: 7/7/2017 |
|
|
CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re 9 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel I. Prywes to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number 0205-4456745) by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Lai, Janice)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 10 |
Filed: 7/7/2017, Entered: 7/7/2017 |
|
|
CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re 8 MOTION for Attorney(s) Joshua A. Mize to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number 0205-4456722) by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Lai, Janice)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 7/6/2017, Entered: 7/6/2017 |
|
|
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Daniel I. Prywes. Certificate of Good Standing due by 9/4/2017. Signed by Clerk on 07/06/2017. (Hernandez, T.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 7/6/2017, Entered: 7/6/2017 |
|
|
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Joshua A. Mize. Certificate of Good Standing due by 9/4/2017. Signed by Clerk on 07/06/2017. (Hernandez, T.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
Filed: 7/5/2017, Entered: 7/5/2017 |
|
|
MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel I. Prywes to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number 0205-4456745) by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Lai, Janice)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 8 |
Filed: 7/5/2017, Entered: 7/5/2017 |
|
|
MOTION for Attorney(s) Joshua A. Mize to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number 0205-4456722) by Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Lai, Janice)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 7 |
Filed: 7/5/2017, Entered: 7/5/2017 |
|
|
NOTICE of Appearance by Janice D. Lai on behalf of Sterling Jewelers, Inc. (Lai, Janice)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 6 |
Filed: 6/19/2017, Entered: 6/19/2017 |
|
|
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Jane Does, John Does, GGP, Inc., Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nitor V. Egbarin* *Law Office of Nitor V. Egbarin, LLC* *100 Pearl Street 14th Floor* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Hernandez, T.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 5 |
Filed: 6/19/2017, Entered: 6/19/2017 |
|
|
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/PRO SE PARTIES : Counsel or pro se parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of Request to Issue Summons, 3 Electronic Filing Order, 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 1 Complaint, filed by 4A84455, 4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 06/19/2017.(Hernandez, T.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 4 |
Filed: 6/15/2017, Entered: 6/19/2017 |
|
|
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 06/15/2017.(Hernandez, T.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 3 |
Filed: 6/15/2017, Entered: 6/19/2017 |
|
|
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 06/15/2017.(Hernandez, T.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 2 |
Filed: 6/15/2017, Entered: 6/19/2017 |
|
|
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Motions to Dismiss due on 9/15/2017. Amended Pleadings due by 8/14/2017. Discovery due by 12/15/2017. Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2018 Signed by Clerk on 06/15/2017.(Hernandez, T.)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 6/15/2017, Entered: 6/16/2017 |
|
|
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Filed: 6/15/2017, Entered: 6/15/2017 |
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Jane Does, John Does, GGP, Inc., Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc.. (Egbarin, Nitor) Modified on 6/16/2017 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
Filed: 6/15/2017, Entered: 6/15/2017 |
|
|
COMPLAINT Verified Complaint against Jane Does, John Does, GGP, Inc., Kay Jewelers Inc., Sterling Jewelers, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0205-4437481.), filed by 4A84455.(Egbarin, Nitor) Modified on 6/16/2017 to correct filed against parties (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Request |
|
Update
Alerts
Jump