1/18/2011 CONS W/ 3778-VCL CONF ORD ON DISCOVERY IN RE EMERSON RADIO SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
State Civil Lawsuit Court of Chancery of Delaware,
Case No. 3392-VCL
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster, presiding
|
 |
|
| Last Updated October 18, 2019 at 1:35 PM EDT (6.3 years ago) |
Update Alerts Jump |
| Summary Parties Attributes Timeline |
| Summary |
|
No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.
|
|
| Parties |
|
 |
Pinchuk, Warren, Plaintiff |
|
|
▼ Represented by Rigrodsky & Long PA
|
Name |
Phone |
Fax |
E-Mail |
|
 |
Seth Rigrodsky |
+1 302 295 5310 |
+1 302 654 7530 |
sdr@rigrodskylong.com |
|
|
| v. |
|
|
 |
Binney, Michael A B, Defendant |
|
|
▼ Represented by Sparks, A Gilchrist - Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP
|
|
 |
Driscoll, W. Michael, Defendant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ho, Christopher, Defendant |
|
|
▼ Represented by Sparks, A Gilchrist - Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP
|
|
 |
Ma, Adrian, Defendant |
|
|
▼ Represented by Sparks, A Gilchrist - Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP
|
|
 |
Mahathir, Mirzan, Defendant |
|
|
|
|
 |
Peterson, David R., Defendant |
|
|
|
|
 |
Pitts, Greenfield, Defendant |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sethi, Kareem E, Defendant |
|
|
|
|
 |
Will, Eduard, Defendant |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wirsching, Norbert R, Defendant |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wirsching, Norbert W, Defendant |
|
|
|
|
| Other Parties |
|
|
 |
Audit Committee of Emerson Radio Corp, Interested Party |
|
|
▼ Represented by Ashby & Geddes
▼ Represented by Duane Morris LLP
|
|
 |
Berger Berkowitz, Lisa S, Intervenor |
|
|
▼ Represented by Prickett Jones & Elliott
|
|
 |
Berkowitz, David E, Intervenor |
|
|
▼ Represented by Prickett Jones & Elliott
|
|
 |
Emerson Radio Corp, Nominal Defendant |
|
|
▼ Represented by Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP
▼ Represented by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
|
|
 |
New Castle County, Sheriff, Sheriff |
|
|
▼ Represented by New Castle County DE Sheriffs Office
|
|
|
| Attributes |
| Timeline |
No calendar events were found for this docket.
|
|
|
Statistics
This case has been viewed 1 time.
|
|
|