Page 1
Case 1:06-cv-01983-ESH Document6 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 1 of2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAX ANALYSTS and ALLEN KENNEY, Plaintiffs, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Vv. ) No. 1:06-CV-1983-ESH Defendant. ) )
PLAINTIFFS’ CONSENT RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A VAUGHN INDEX OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION; AND SCHEDULING AGREEMENT Plaintiffs’ and defendant’s counsel have agreed and stipulated as follows, subject to the Court’s approval:
1. Plaintiffs will respond to defendant’s dispositive motion, to be filed and served on or before February 28, 2007, within 30 days after service, on or before March 30, 2007.
2. Plaintiffs and defendant jointly request that the Court hold Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Vaughn Index or in the Alternative for In Camera Inspection in abeyance, pending defendant's filing and service of its dispositive motion and until plaintiffs further advise the Court whether they wish to pursue that motion. Respectfully submitted, UM § OS® jeu WILLIAM A. DOBROVIR D.C. Bar No. 030148 P.O. Box 198 Sperryville, VA 22740-0198
(540) 987-9114
Page 2
Case 1:06-cv-01983-ESH Document6 Filed 01/31/2007 Page2of2 Commu, Zp bbl CORNISH F. HITCHCOCK D.C. Bar No. 238824 Suite 350 5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20015
(202) 364-1050 Dated: 31 January 2007 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Plaintiffs’ Consent Response to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Vaughn Index or in the Alternative for In Camera Inspection; and Scheduling Agreement was filed electronically this 3lst day of January, 2007, and that a copy thereof will be mailed electronically to:
David M. Katinsky, Esq.
Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 227 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Counsel for Defendant IRS Ded. 9.(dhotasal— CORNISH F. HITCHCOCK
Page 3
Case 1:06-cv-01983-ESH Document6-2 Filed 01/31/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAX ANALYSTS and ALLEN KENNEY, Plaintiffs, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Vv. ) No. 1:06-CV-1983-ESH Defendant. } )
ORDER
In regard to Plaintiffs’ Consent Response to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Vaughn Index or in the Alternative for In Camera Inspection; and Scheduling Agreement, it is this _ day of , 2007, ORDERED
1. Defendant shall file a dispositive motion on or before February 28, 2007, and plaintiffs shall file their response thereto on or before March 30, 2007.
2. The Court shall not rule on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Vaughn Index or in the Alternative for In Camera Inspection until a further filing on that matter by plaintiffs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Back to 
