Name: Rivo USA Co., Ltd. v. Arro Corporation :: Illinois Northern District Court :: Federal Civil Lawsuit No. 1:17-cv-08513, Judge Virginia M. Kendall presiding
Creator: Illinois Northern District Court
Published: 2017-11-22
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Keywords: court documents, legal case, docket, PACER, Illinois Northern District Court

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

71	Filed: 11/14/2018, Entered: None	Compel

	Request

68	Filed: 11/6/2018, Entered: None	Clarify

	Request

45	Filed: 7/16/2018, Entered: None	Clarify

	Request

	Filed: 11/27/2017, Entered: None	Unknown Document Type
	CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. (nsf, )
	Request

	Filed: 11/27/2017, Entered: None	Unknown Document Type
	SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Arro Corporation (pg, ) Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Attachment 3
	Request

110	Filed: 8/15/2019, Entered: 8/15/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and Stipulation of Dismissal 109 . Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

109	Filed: 8/14/2019, Entered: 8/14/2019
	STIPULATION of Dismissal (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

108	Filed: 8/12/2019, Entered: 8/12/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing set for 8/13/2019 is stricken. Briefing schedule as set in Minute Entry 104 dated 7/17/2019 stands. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

107	Filed: 8/2/2019, Entered: 8/2/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Attorney Erin Simone Johnson'sMotion to withdraw as attorney 105 is granted. Motion hearing set for 8/5/2019 is stricken. Status hearing set for 8/13/2019 at 9:00 AM.Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

106	Filed: 7/30/2019, Entered: 7/30/2019
	NOTICE of Motion by Erin Simone Johnson for presentment of motion to withdraw as attorney 105 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/5/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

105	Filed: 7/30/2019, Entered: 7/30/2019
	MOTION by Attorney Erin Johnson to withdraw as attorney for Arro Corporation. No party information provided (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

104	Filed: 7/17/2019, Entered: 7/17/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Counter Claimants' Motion to resume briefing schedule for Rivo's Motions for Summary Judgment 102 is granted. Briefing schedule reset as to Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment 88 , 90 , 91 and 92 . Responses due by 8/14/2019. Replies due by 8/28/2019. Ruling will be by mail. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

103	Filed: 7/17/2019, Entered: 7/17/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cole: In reflecting on the course of my discussions yesterday with counsel for the parties and in reflecting further on the nature and factual intricacy -- at least for the jury -- of the case, I thought it appropriate to call to the parties' attention the following insights for their continued consideration as they go forward with discussions. As the late Judge Will sagely noted, the best case can be lost and the worst case can be won...None of these risks should be underestimated." Matter of Superior Beverage/Glass Container Consol. Pretrial, 133 F.R.D. 119, 127 (N.D. Ill. 1990). And more recently, the Seventh Circuit has emphasized that [j]uries can be unpredictable so there is always a possibility of liability in a jury trial even in the strongest of cases. Surgery Center at 900 N. Michigan Ave, LLC v. American Physicians Assurance Corp., Inc., 922 F.3d 778, 785 (7th Cir. 2019). Indeed, [e]stimating likely jury verdicts is by its very nature an unpredictable pursuit, and from time to time juries are bound to return verdicts that are either substantially more or substantially less than the insurers [or counsels] estimates. Nat'l Indem. Co. v. Chipman, 2013 WL 12303139, at *14 (D. Utah 2013). Of course, all of this is known to counsel but it is well from time to time that these fundamental truths not retreat into the background of decision-making.Mailed notice (jms, )
	Request

102	Filed: 7/16/2019, Entered: 7/16/2019
	MOTION by Counter Claimants Arro Corporation, Arro Corporation, Defendant Arro Corporation to set a briefing schedule Motion to Resume Briefing Schedule for Rivo's Motions for Summary Judgment (Gale, Todd)
	Request

101	Filed: 7/16/2019, Entered: 7/16/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cole:Settlement conference held. Despite their sincere efforts, the parties were unable to reach a settlement. I would be remiss if I did not note the efforts of counsel in the case. The plaintiff was represented by W. Clifton Holmes of The Holmes Law Group, Ltd. in Chicago, while the defendant was represented by Todd Gale of Dykema Gossett, PLLC in Chicago. They displayed a measure of excellence and courtesy that is unfortunately all too rare in today's fractious and overly competitive atmosphere. They brought conspicuous skills to this case, and their conduct is proof that lawyers can act civilly and courteously in their dealings with with each other and with the opposing party without sacrificing in the slightest the obligations they owe to their clients. All matters relating to the referral having been completed, the referral is closed and the case returned to Judge Kendall. Judge Honorable Jeffrey Cole no longer referred to the case.Mailed notice (jms, )
	Request

100	Filed: 6/18/2019, Entered: 6/18/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cole: The parties have agreed that the settlement conference will be held on 7/16/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 1003. Counsel are reminded that compliance with Local Rule 5.2 (d) which requires protruding tabs for exhibits is mandatory. The parties' counsel must review and comply with this court's Standing Order for Settlement Conference, which appears on the court's website. The requirement of attendance by someone with FULL AUTHORITY is not generally satisfied by attendance of the general counsel or someone from his/her office, although that person is certainly entitled to attend and welcome to participate in the conference. Nor is it satisfied by attendance of a person who must make a phone call to get permission to settle the case in excess of some predetermined amount. Also mandatory, if possible, is the inclusion by both sides in their settlement documents of comparable results. Counsel for each party shall deliver copies of their memorandum to chambers (Room 1088) or to my courtroom deputy's office (Room 1010) on or before 7/8/2019. The submissions are NOT to be filed on the docket. Noncompliance will result in the submission being rejected. Any change in the settlement conference date must be approved by the court, pursuant to an appropriate WRITTEN MOTION, based upon a showing of good cause. Plaintiff must serve defendant with their settlement letter no later than 6/28/2019. The plaintiff must include the basis for and how they arrived at the damages being claimed.Mailed notice (jms, )
	Request

99	Filed: 6/18/2019, Entered: 6/18/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cole: The parties are directed to conference call the courtroom deputy at 312-408-5178 by 6/20/2019 to set a settlement conference date. The parties are directed to contact their respective clients in advance of the conference call to procure 3 or 4 dates that they and the principals are available for a settlement conference between 7/2/2019 and 7/31/2019.Mailed notice (jms, )
	Request

98	Filed: 6/17/2019, Entered: 6/17/2019
	EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case referred to the Honorable Jeffrey Cole pursuant to Local Rule 72.1. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/17/2019. (ph, )
	Request

97	Filed: 6/17/2019, Entered: 6/17/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 6/17/2019. Parties' Joint Motion to stay briefing schedule on Motions for Summary Judgment pending a settlement conference 95 is granted. The Court advised that due to a trial cancellation, there is time available on the calendar the week of 7/8/2019. By agreement of parties, case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cole for the purpose of a settlement conference. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

96	Filed: 6/12/2019, Entered: 6/12/2019
	NOTICE of Motion by Jennifer Ann Warner for presentment of motion to stay, 95 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 6/17/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

95	Filed: 6/12/2019, Entered: 6/12/2019
	MOTION by Defendant Arro Corporation to stay Joint Motion to Refer Case to Magistrate Judge and Stay Briefing Schedule on Rivo's Motions for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, for an Extension of Time for Arro to File Its Response to Rivo's Motions for Summary Judgment (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

94	Filed: 5/22/2019, Entered: 5/22/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file supporting memoranda of law in single overlength brief 86 is granted. Plaintiff's Motions to seal 87 and 89 are granted. Briefing schedule set as to Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment 88 , 90 , 91 and 92 . Response due by 6/19/2019. Reply due by 7/17/2019. Ruling will be by mail. Status hearing set for 5/30/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

93	Filed: 5/17/2019, Entered: 5/17/2019
	SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., Sealed Attachments and Exhibits to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I (Dkt. 92) (Attachments: # 1 Sealed Attachment B, # 2 Sealed Exhibits 1, # 3 Sealed Exhibits 2, # 4 Sealed Exhibits 3, # 5 Sealed Ex 41a, # 6 Sealed Ex 41b, # 7 Sealed Ex 41c, # 8 Sealed Ex 41d, # 9 Sealed Ex 41e, # 10 Sealed Ex 41f, # 11 Sealed Ex 41g, # 12 Sealed Ex 41h, # 13 Sealed Ex 49)(Holmes, William)


92	Filed: 5/17/2019, Entered: 5/17/2019
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., for summary judgment Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Count I (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 6, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 10, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 13, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 14, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 15, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 16, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 17, # 10 Exhibit Ex. 18, # 11 Exhibit Ex. 19, # 12 Exhibit Ex. 21, # 13 Exhibit Ex. 22, # 14 Exhibit Ex. 23, # 15 Exhibit Ex. 24, # 16 Exhibit Ex. 25, # 17 Exhibit Ex. 27, # 18 Exhibit Ex. 28, # 19 Exhibit Ex. 29, # 20 Exhibit Ex. 30, # 21 Exhibit Ex. 32, # 22 Exhibit Ex. 33, # 23 Exhibit Ex. 37, # 24 Exhibit Ex. 40, # 25 Exhibit Ex. 45, # 26 Exhibit Ex. 46, # 27 Exhibit Ex. 48, # 28 Exhibit Ex. 51, # 29 Exhibit Ex. 52, # 30 Exhibit Ex. 53, # 31 Exhibit Ex. 54, # 32 Exhibit Ex. 56, # 33 Exhibit Ex. 58, # 34 Exhibit Ex. 61)(Holmes, William)
	Request

91	Filed: 5/17/2019, Entered: 5/17/2019
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., for summary judgment Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on CounterClaimant's Counterclaim (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support_NonSealed Copy, # 2 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts_NonSealed Copy, # 3 Ex. 6, # 4 Ex. 10, # 5 Ex. 12, # 6 Ex. 18)(Holmes, William)
	Request

90	Filed: 5/17/2019, Entered: 5/17/2019
	SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Second Amended Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts)(Holmes, William)


89	Filed: 5/17/2019, Entered: 5/17/2019
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to seal Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Second Amended Complaint (Holmes, William)
	Request

88	Filed: 5/17/2019, Entered: 5/17/2019
	SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on CounterClaimant's Counterclaim (Attachments: # 1 Memo in Support, # 2 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 1, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 2, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 3, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 4, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 5, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 6, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 7, # 10 Exhibit Ex. 8, # 11 Exhibit Ex. 9, # 12 Exhibit Ex. 10, # 13 Exhibit Ex. 11, # 14 Exhibit Ex. 12, # 15 Exhibit Ex. 13, # 16 Exhibit Ex. 14, # 17 Exhibit Ex. 15, # 18 Exhibit Ex. 16, # 19 Exhibit Ex. 17, # 20 Exhibit Ex. 18)(Holmes, William)


87	Filed: 5/17/2019, Entered: 5/17/2019
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to seal Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on CounterClaimant's Counterclaim (Holmes, William)
	Request

86	Filed: 5/16/2019, Entered: 5/16/2019
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., for leave to file Supporting Memoranda of Law in Single Overlength Brief (Holmes, William)
	Request

85	Filed: 5/3/2019, Entered: 5/3/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing set for 5/30/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

84	Filed: 2/4/2019, Entered: 2/4/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 2/4/2019. Plaintiff's Motion to enforce agreement with Defendant 82 is dismissed without prejudice. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

83	Filed: 1/31/2019, Entered: 1/31/2019
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to enforce 82 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/4/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

82	Filed: 1/31/2019, Entered: 1/31/2019
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to enforce Agreement with Defendant (Holmes, William)
	Request

81	Filed: 1/27/2019, Entered: 1/27/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. On the Court's own Motion, Status hearing set for 1/28/2019 is reset for 2/4/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

80	Filed: 1/25/2019, Entered: 1/25/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing set for 1/28/2019 at 10:00 AM. (TIME CHANGE ONLY) Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

79	Filed: 1/7/2019, Entered: 1/7/2019
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiff's Motion to clarify 76 is granted. Parties' deadline for disclosing expert witnesses (not including rebuttal experts) shall be 1/25/2019. Motion hearing set for 1/9/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

78	Filed: 1/4/2019, Entered: 1/4/2019
	TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 09/12/2018 before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. - Motion Hearing. Order Number: 33278. Court Reporter Contact Information: Gayle A. McGuigan, CSR, RMR, CRR, Gayle_McGuigan@ilnd.uscourts.gov, (312) 435-6047. IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings. Redaction Request due 1/25/2019. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/4/2019. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/4/2019. (McGuigan, Gale)
	Request

77	Filed: 1/3/2019, Entered: 1/3/2019
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to clarify 76 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/9/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

76	Filed: 1/3/2019, Entered: 1/3/2019
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to clarify deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A)(Holmes, William)
	Request

75	Filed: 11/27/2018, Entered: 11/27/2018
	TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 11/20/2018 before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. - Motion Hearing. Order Number: 32917. Court Reporter Contact Information: Gayle A. McGuigan, CSR, RMR, CRR, Gayle_McGuigan@ilnd.uscourts.gov, (312) 435-6047. IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings. Redaction Request due 12/18/2018. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/28/2018. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/25/2019. (McGuigan, Gale)
	Request

74	Filed: 11/20/2018, Entered: 11/27/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 11/20/2018. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 71 is granted in part and denied in part. With regard to requests for production 34 and 35, the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal after the deposition of the Arro mid level manager. With regard to request for production 42, the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal after the parties properly meet and confer about the dispute. With regard to the ESI issues, particularly ARRO012650 and ARRO11746, Arro is directed to identify an individual or individuals who can be deposed regarding the creation of the documents. With regard to the request for inspection of ARRO013513, the motion is granted.Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

73	Filed: 11/15/2018, Entered: 11/15/2018
	ANSWER to amended complaint (SECOND) and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Arro Corporation (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

72	Filed: 11/14/2018, Entered: 11/14/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to compel, 71 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/20/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

71	Filed: 11/13/2018, Entered: 11/13/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to compel (Attachments: # 1 Memo in Support, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D, # 6 Exhibit Ex. E, # 7 Exhibit Ex. F, # 8 Exhibit Ex. G)(Holmes, William)
	Request

70	Filed: 11/7/2018, Entered: 11/7/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiff's Motion for clarification concerning case schedule 68 is granted. Parties are to exchange expert reports by 2/15/2019. Parties are to disclose rebuttal experts and exchange rebuttal expert reports by 4/5/2019. Reply expert statement or report (if any) to rebuttal report due by 4/12/2019. Completion of expert witness depositions by 4/26/2019. Summary judgment/dispositive motion shall be filed by 5/17/2019. Motion hearing set for 11/8/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

69	Filed: 11/5/2018, Entered: 11/5/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to clarify 68 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/8/2018 at 02:30 PM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

68	Filed: 11/5/2018, Entered: 11/5/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to clarify Case Schedule and Deadlines (Holmes, William)
	Request

67	Filed: 11/1/2018, Entered: 11/1/2018
	Second AMENDED complaint by Rivo USA Co., Ltd., against Arro Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A, # 2 Exhibit Ex. B)(Holmes, William)
	Request

66	Filed: 11/1/2018, Entered: 11/1/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 11/1/2018. Plaintiff's Motion to amend/correct amended Complaint 64 is granted. Defendant's oral motion to extend Fact Discovery is granted. End of Fact Discovery is extended and ordered closed by 1/25/2019. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 1/28/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

65	Filed: 10/23/2018, Entered: 10/23/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to amend/correct 64 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/1/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

64	Filed: 10/23/2018, Entered: 10/23/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to amend/correct amended complaint 4 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A)(Holmes, William)
	Request

63	Filed: 10/23/2018, Entered: 10/23/2018
	Parties contacted the courtroom deputy as directed and advised they do not request a referral to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of a settlement conference. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

62	Filed: 10/4/2018, Entered: 10/4/2018
	Second Amended Answer to Amended Counterclaim by Rivo USA Co., Ltd., (Holmes, William)
	Request

61	Filed: 10/2/2018, Entered: 10/2/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Counter Defendant's Motion for leave to file second amended Answer to Amended Counterclaim 59 is granted. Motion hearing set for 10/10/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

60	Filed: 9/28/2018, Entered: 9/28/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to amend/correct 59 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/9/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

59	Filed: 9/27/2018, Entered: 9/27/2018
	MOTION by Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to amend/correct amended document 40 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer to Amended Counterclaim (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A)(Holmes, William)
	Request

58	Filed: 9/12/2018, Entered: 9/12/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 9/12/2018. Plaintiff's Motion to compel 52 is dismissed based upon the Defendant's representations they will respond to Plaintiff's requests for production. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

57	Filed: 9/11/2018, Entered: 9/11/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing set for 9/12/2018 at 9:30 AM. (TIME CHANGE ONLY) Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

56	Filed: 9/6/2018, Entered: 9/6/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to compel,, 52 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/12/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

55	Filed: 9/5/2018, Entered: 9/5/2018
	AMENDED Agreed Confidentiality Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/5/2018. Mailed notice(lk, )
	Request

54	Filed: 9/5/2018, Entered: 9/5/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 9/5/2018. Parties' Joint Motion to amend Agreed Confidentiality Order 50 is granted. Parties' Joint Motion to amend Scheduling Order and Case Deadlines 48 is granted. End of Fact Discovery is extended and ordered closed by 12/14/2018. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 12/17/2018 at 9:00 AM. Parties shall disclose experts (not including rebuttal experts)by December 14, 2018. Parties are to exchange expert reports (not including rebuttal experts) by January 11, 2019. Parties are to disclose rebuttal experts and exchange rebuttal expert reports by March 1, 2019. Reply expert statement or report (if any) to rebuttal report due by March 8, 2019. Completion of expert witness depositions by March 22, 2019. Summary judgment/dispositive motion shall be filed by April 12, 2019. Parties are ordered to contact the courtroom deputy by 10/12/2018 to inform the Court if they are requesting a referral to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of a settlement conference. Plaintiff's oral motion to file exhibits regarding Motion to Compel under seal is granted. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

53	Filed: 9/5/2018, Entered: 9/5/2018
	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A, # 2 Exhibit Ex. B, # 3 Exhibit Ex. C, # 4 Exhibit Ex. D, # 5 Exhibit Ex. E, # 6 Exhibit Ex. F, # 7 Exhibit Ex. G, # 8 Exhibit Ex. H, # 9 Exhibit Ex. I, # 10 Exhibit Ex. J, # 11 Exhibit Ex. K)(Holmes, William)


52	Filed: 9/4/2018, Entered: 9/4/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to compel (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A_Public Filing Version, # 2 Exhibit Ex. B_Public Filing Version, # 3 Exhibit Ex. C_Public Filing Version, # 4 Exhibit Ex. D_Public Filing Version, # 5 Exhibit Ex. E_Public Filing Version, # 6 Exhibit Ex. F_Public Filing Version, # 7 Exhibit Ex. G_Public Filing Version, # 8 Exhibit Ex. H_Public Filing Version, # 9 Exhibit Ex. I_Public Filing Version, # 10 Exhibit Ex. J_Public Filing Version, # 11 Exhibit Ex. K Public Filing Version)(Holmes, William)
	Request

51	Filed: 9/3/2018, Entered: 9/3/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to amend/correct 50 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/5/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

50	Filed: 8/30/2018, Entered: 8/30/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to amend/correct order on motion for protective order, 14 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A)(Holmes, William)
	Request

49	Filed: 8/30/2018, Entered: 8/30/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by Jennifer Ann Warner for presentment of motion to amend/correct 48 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/5/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

48	Filed: 8/30/2018, Entered: 8/30/2018
	MOTION by Counter Claimant Arro Corporation, Defendant Arro Corporation to amend/correct order on motion for order,,,, terminate deadlines and hearings,,,, set deadlines/hearings,,, 43 JOINT (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

47	Filed: 7/19/2018, Entered: 7/20/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 7/19/2018. Plaintiff's Motion for clarification 45 is granted. See attached corrected Order. Mailed notice (Attachments: # 1 Corrected Order) (lk, )
	Request

46	Filed: 7/15/2018, Entered: 7/15/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion to clarify 45 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 7/19/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

45	Filed: 7/15/2018, Entered: 7/15/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to clarify Order (Holmes, William)
	Request

44	Filed: 7/5/2018, Entered: 7/5/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Rivo USA Co., Ltd. ("Rivo") and Arro Corporation ("Arro") have dueling breach of contract complaints resulting from a bad business arrangement over cookie and cupcake mix. See (Dkt. Nos. 4 , 22 ). Pending is Rivo's Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts I-XV and XVIII of Arros Amended Counterclaim. See (Dkt. No. 24 ). The Counterclaim alleges breach of contract for failure to pay invoices on various shipments (Count I); fourteen claims raised in the alternative to Count I as breach of contract claims specific to each particular unpaid invoice sent from Arro to Rivo (Counts II-XV); and finally a claim for breach of contract for the failure to comply with a temporary price reduction for other products shipped for sale (Count XVIII). The motion is denied. [24.] Breach of contract claims under Illinois law require a party show the existence of a contract, performance by the plaintiff, breach by the defendant, and resulting damages. Hammarquist v. United Cont'l Holdings, Inc., 809 F.3d 946, 949 (7th Cir. 2016) (there must be a contract and failure to comply with the terms constitutes a breach); Zirp-Burnham, LLC v. E. Terrell Assocs., Inc., 826 N.E.2d 430, 439 (Ill. App. 2005). When a claim involves purchase orders for goods, "an order or other offer to buy goods for prompt or current shipment shall be construed as inviting acceptance either by a prompt promise to ship or by the prompt or current shipment of conforming or non-conforming goods[.]" 810 ILCS 5 § 2-206(1)(b); Central Ill. Pub. Svc. Co. v. Atlas Minerals, Inc., 146 F.3d 448, 450-451 (7th Cir. 1998). To survive a motion to dismiss, Arro must allege "sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 673 F.3d 547, 555 (7th Cir. 2012) (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). A motion to dismiss tests the sufficiency of claims, not their merit. Gibson v. City of Chicago, 910 F.2d 1510, 1520 (7th Cir. 1990). Arro alleges that Rivo through its parent company communicated four separate "opening orders for the Walmart TCF baking mixes" with each order containing two purchase orders per item (snickerdoodle cookie mix, chocolate chip cookie mix, chocolate cupcake mix, and vanilla cupcake mix). See (Dkt. No. 22 , at 26). Each specific order itemized the number of cases per order, the price per case, the total number of cases for each product, and noted that payment for the orders was due within 30 days. Id. Arro next alleges that they produced and/or invoiced Rivo for the requested products over a variety of days spanning from April 20 to September 22, 2017. Id. 28-35. Additionally, Arro alleges that they shipped product to Rivo over the same period of time and that some but not all of the invoices they sent went unpaid by Rivo within the 30 days specified on the invoices. Id. 49-64. Although certainly not well-organized, these facts establish the existence of a contract between Arro and Rivo; they allege some performance in the production and shipment of the requested products by Arro; and they further allege a breach by Rivo in not paying for its orders. Finally, Arro identifies specific unpaid amounts forming the basis of damages. All of this information is within the Amended Complaint as background or within Count I for a breach of contract. Therefore Rivos Motion to Dismiss Count I 24 is denied. As the remaining Counts II-XV related to this particular series of purchase orders and transactions are pled in the alternative, they are dismissed as moot. The final issue raised by Rivo is its request to dismiss Count XVIII because it is either the same affirmative defense raised by Arro in response to Rivo's Amended Complaint, see (Dkt. Nos. 4 , 11 ), or because it fails to state a claim. Rivo does not cite to any authority as to why an affirmative defense and a counterclaim may not be similar, and the Federal Rules only require that both (affirmative defenses and counterclaims) meet the pleading requirements. See Heller Fin., Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co., 883 F.2d 1286 (7th Cir. 1989); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. As for the sufficiency of Arro's claim, Count XVIII alleges the breach of a contract whereby the parties agreed to split the cost related to pulling one of its products from shelves of retailer Walmart. See (Dkt. No. 22 , 180). The same basic contract formation and breach elements apply. In its Counterclaim Arro alleges that the parties discussed splitting the cost associated with Rivo's decision to pull the chocolate cookie products from retail store shelves. Id. 180, 181. After a telephone discussion, Arro's President sent an email to Rivo's CEO that discussed terms of an agreement where Arro would reduce the price of other products sent for sale until the cost associated with pulling the chocolate chip cookie mix was "fully amortized." Id. 183. The email further identified splitting the $0.41 per unit cost of removing 900,000 units from the shelves on a "50/50 basis" and exactly how much Arro would reduce the cost of its other items until the de-shelving charge was paid off. Id. Although the email did contain mention that Arro would "put Arro and Rivo's other costs on paper and figure out a method to sort out who is responsible for which costs during the next 4-6 weeks," id., the remaining contents suggest an agreement we split the cost of $369,000 and Arro does so by reducing the price of other items shipped to Walmart for consumer sale. Furthermore, Arro performed on its end of the agreement and they allege that Rivo has not with the result being "extensive damages" incurred by Arro for its price reduction of other shipped products. Id. 185-186. Applying the 12(b)(6) standard, Arro has sufficiently pled facts forming the basis of a breach of contract as to Count XVIII and so Rivo's Motion to Dismiss Count XVIII 24 is also denied. The Court only adds further that disputes as to the existence of a contract or contracts are legal issues that are particularly well-suited for summary judgment where the facts are not in dispute. Echo, Inc. v. Whitson Co., Inc., 121 F.3d 1099, 1102 (7th Cir. 1997). Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

43	Filed: 6/12/2018, Entered: 6/12/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Parties' Joint Motion to amend scheduling Order and case deadlines 41 is granted, but the parties are warned that any further extensions will not be considered absent extraordinary circumstances. End of Fact Discovery is extended and ordered closed by 10/12/2018. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 10/15/2018 at 9:00 AM.Parties shall disclose experts (not including any rebuttal expert reports) due by 10/12/2018. Parties shall exchange expert reports (not including rebuttal experts) by 11/9/2018. Parties shall disclose rebuttal experts and exchange rebuttal reports by 12/21/2018. Dispositive motions with supporting memoranda shall be filed on or before 2/1/2019. Motion hearing set for 6/18/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

42	Filed: 6/12/2018, Entered: 6/12/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of motion for order 41 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 6/18/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

41	Filed: 6/11/2018, Entered: 6/11/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., for order Parties' Joint Motion for Order Amending Scheduling Order and Case Deadlines (Holmes, William)
	Request

40	Filed: 6/5/2018, Entered: 6/5/2018
	AMENDED answer to counterclaim 25 Amended Answer to Amended Counterclaim (Holmes, William)
	Request

39	Filed: 6/5/2018, Entered: 6/5/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Counter Defendant's Motion for leave to file amended answer 36 is granted. Motion hearing set for 6/7/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

38	Filed: 6/5/2018, Entered: 6/5/2018
	TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 05/31/2018 before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. - Status Hearing. Order Number: 31049. Court Reporter Contact Information: Gayle A. McGuigan, CSR, RMR, CRR, Gayle_McGuigan@ilnd.uscourts.gov, (312) 435-6047. IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings. Redaction Request due 6/26/2018. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/6/2018. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/4/2018. (McGuigan, Gale)
	Request

37	Filed: 6/4/2018, Entered: 6/4/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of (Holmes, William)
	Request

36	Filed: 6/4/2018, Entered: 6/4/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendants Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to amend/correct answer to counterclaim 25 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Memo in Support, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A_Amended Answer to Amended Counterclaim)(Holmes, William)
	Request

35	Filed: 5/31/2018, Entered: 6/1/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing held on 5/31/2018. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

34	Filed: 4/10/2018, Entered: 4/10/2018
	REPLY by Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to response in opposition to motion 32 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A, # 2 Exhibit Ex. B)(Holmes, William)
	Request

33	Filed: 4/4/2018, Entered: 4/4/2018
	ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Arro Corporation by Jennifer Ann Warner (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

32	Filed: 4/4/2018, Entered: 4/4/2018
	RESPONSE by Arro Corporation in Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Counter Defendants Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Rivo USA Co., Ltd., 24 (Warner, Jennifer)
	Request

31	Filed: 3/20/2018, Entered: 3/20/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant/Counter Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for extension of time to file response/reply 29 regarding Motion to Dismiss 24 is granted. Response due by 4/4/2018. Reply due by 4/11/2018. Status Hearing reset for 5/31/2018 at 9:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 3/21/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

30	Filed: 3/16/2018, Entered: 3/16/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by Erin Simone Johnson for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply 29 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/21/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

29	Filed: 3/16/2018, Entered: 3/16/2018
	MOTION by Counter Claimants Arro Corporation, Arro Corporation, Defendant Arro Corporation for extension of time to file response/reply to Rivo's Motion to Dismiss Counter-Claimants Counts I though XV and XVIII (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

28	Filed: 3/7/2018, Entered: 3/7/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Counter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 24 . Response due by 3/21/2018. Reply due by 3/28/2018. Status Hearing set for 5/16/2018 at 9:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 3/13/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

26	Filed: 3/1/2018, Entered: 3/1/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by William Clifton Holmes for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 24 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/13/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Holmes, William)
	Request

25	Filed: 3/1/2018, Entered: 3/1/2018
	ANSWER to counterclaim Answer to Amended Counterclaim by Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,(Holmes, William)
	Request

27	Filed: 2/28/2018, Entered: 3/2/2018
	Parties contacted the courtroom deputy as directed and informed the Court they do not agree to have the case referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of a settlement conference. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

24	Filed: 2/27/2018, Entered: 2/27/2018
	MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Counter Defendants Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Rivo USA Co., Ltd., (Holmes, William)
	Request

23	Filed: 2/20/2018, Entered: 2/20/2018
	TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 02/06/2018 before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. - Initial Status Hearing. Order Number: 29844. Court Reporter Contact Information: Gayle A. McGuigan, CSR, RMR, CRR, Gayle_McGuigan@ilnd.uscourts.gov, (312) 435-6047. IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings. Redaction Request due 3/13/2018. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/23/2018. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/21/2018. (McGuigan, Gale)
	Request

22	Filed: 2/15/2018, Entered: 2/15/2018
	AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM filed by Arro Corporation against Rivo USA Co., Ltd., .(Gale, Todd)
	Request

21	Filed: 2/6/2018, Entered: 2/6/2018
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial Status hearing held on 2/6/2018. End of Fact Discovery ordered closed by 8/31/2018. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 9/4/2018 at 9:00 AM. End of Expert Discovery ordered closed by 10/1/2018 (not including any rebuttal expert reports). Parties will exchange mandatory initial discovery responses on February 5, 2018. Parties will disclose electronically stored information on March 19, 2018. The parties have agreed to mutually produce privilege logs to one another for any and all Discovery called for, or required, under the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project, on or before April 20, 2018. Dispositive motions with supporting memoranda shall be filed on or before 10/26/2018. Parties are directed to contact the courtroom deputy by 2/28/2018 to inform the Court if they are requesting a referral to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of a settlement conference. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

20	Filed: 2/6/2018, Entered: 2/6/2018
	STATUS Report Corrected Joint Initial Status Report by Arro Corporation (Gale, Todd)
	Request

19	Filed: 2/5/2018, Entered: 2/5/2018
	CERTIFICATE of Service Notice of Service of Initial Disclosures by William Clifton Holmes on behalf of Rivo USA Co., Ltd., (Holmes, William)
	Request

18	Filed: 2/5/2018, Entered: 2/5/2018
	CERTIFICATE of Service Notice of Service of Arro Corporation's Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery Requests by Todd A Gale on behalf of Arro Corporation (Gale, Todd)
	Request

17	Filed: 2/1/2018, Entered: 2/1/2018
	NOTICE of Motion by Erin Simone Johnson for presentment of motion to amend/correct 16 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/6/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

16	Filed: 2/1/2018, Entered: 2/1/2018
	MOTION by Counter Claimant Arro Corporation, Defendant Arro Corporation to amend/correct status report 15 Motion to File a Corrected Joint Initial Status Report (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Johnson, Erin)
	Request

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

15	Filed: 1/31/2018, Entered: 1/31/2018
	STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Rivo USA Co., Ltd., (Holmes, William)
	Request

14	Filed: 1/30/2018, Entered: 1/30/2018
	AGREED Confidentiality Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/30/2018. Mailed notice(lk, )
	Request

13	Filed: 1/26/2018, Entered: 1/26/2018
	MOTION by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., for protective order PARTIES' AGREED MOTION (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A)(Holmes, William)
	Request

12	Filed: 1/25/2018, Entered: 1/25/2018
	RESPONSE by Plaintiff Rivo USA Co., Ltd.,, Counter Defendant Rivo USA Co., Ltd., to answer to amended complaint, counterclaim 11 Answer to Counterclaim (Holmes, William)
	Request

11	Filed: 1/4/2018, Entered: 1/4/2018
	ANSWER to amended complaint , COUNTERCLAIM filed by Arro Corporation against Rivo USA Co., Ltd., . by Arro Corporation (Gale, Todd)
	Request

10	Filed: 12/20/2017, Entered: 12/20/2017
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant's Agreed Motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's amended Complaint 7 is granted. Answer shall be due on or before 1/4/2018. Motion hearing set for 12/21/2017 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

9	Filed: 12/18/2017, Entered: 12/18/2017
	ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Arro Corporation by Todd A Gale (Gale, Todd)
	Request

8	Filed: 12/18/2017, Entered: 12/18/2017
	NOTICE of Motion by Erin Simone Johnson for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer 7 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/21/2017 at 09:00 AM. (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

7	Filed: 12/18/2017, Entered: 12/18/2017
	MOTION by Defendant Arro Corporation for extension of time to file answer (AGREED MOTION) (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

6	Filed: 12/18/2017, Entered: 12/18/2017
	ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Arro Corporation by Erin Simone Johnson (Johnson, Erin)
	Request

5	Filed: 12/7/2017, Entered: 12/7/2017
	SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rivo USA Co., Ltd., as to Arro Corporation on 11/30/2017, answer due 12/21/2017. (Holmes, William)
	Request

4	Filed: 11/29/2017, Entered: 11/29/2017
	AMENDED complaint by Rivo USA Co., Ltd., against All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A, # 2 Exhibit Ex. B)(Holmes, William)
	Request

3	Filed: 11/27/2017, Entered: 11/27/2017
	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 2/6/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 1/31/2018. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. Prior to the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties are to exchange initial disclosures (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)). At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, )
	Request

2	Filed: 11/27/2017, Entered: 11/27/2017
	NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes the MIDP Standing Order. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jjr, )
	Request

1	Filed: 11/22/2017, Entered: 11/22/2017
	COMPLAINT filed by RIVO USA CO., LTD.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-13829940. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A, # 2 Exhibit Ex. B, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Holmes, William)
	Request

AI text generation	None
AI document summarization	None
AI-augmented search	None
AI-generated images	None
AI chat or Q&A interface	Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents	Possible