Freeman v. Schointuch, et al Document 49: Scheduling Order

Page 1

18/28/1993 Chad ‘98 AP BOISE JHY Document'€5 ®& MEFeth4 Re 999 Page 1 ofits 9 2 > f

IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

CHRISSANN FREEMAN,

Plaintiff, v. - CIVIL ACTION NO. Y-98-958 JUDGE GRIMM RICHARD SCHOINTUCH, et al., FILED ENTERED LODGED..-—s—s REL tiVED Defendants.

Nov 41999 CLE! KU! Piet ler COURT THIRD AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER ey DISTRICT OF KARVLANDS

Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Motion to Extend Discovery and Dispositive

Monons Deadlines, the Second Amended Scheduling Ordgnis hereby amended as follows:

1. Discovery shali close on January 31,

2. Dispositive Motions shall be sub

Page 2

16/2071999 G&Seel :9826¥5 - f :

COPIES TO:

James F. Lee, Jr., Bar # 10806 Brandon M. Gladstone, Bar #014191 1211 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Suite 425 Washington, DC 20036

(202) 530-8100 Counsel for defendants Gipe Associates, Inc. and Boblin, Cywinski & Jackson

H. Robert Erwin, Jr., Esquire The Erwin Law Firm, P.A.

8 West Madison Street Baltimore, MD 21201

(410) 385-6000 Counsel for Plaintiff Chnssann Freeman @H2%8-JHY Document29 & Meade R704/1999 Page 26f#e %&