SNODGRASS, et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al

Federal Civil Lawsuit New Jersey District Court, Case No. 1:96-cv-01814-JBS
Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Last Updated January 25, 2017 at 7:12 PM EST (9.6 years ago) Update UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Alerts
Summary Parties (79) Timeline (421) Attributes (18) Tools

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

Complaints
Not on file here yet. COMPLAINT filed; jury demand FILING FEE $ 120.00 RECEIPT # 219419 (js)ComplaintDocument 1
4/19/1996
Not on file here yet. AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by MICHAEL WILKS, et al., in 1:96-cv-01814 , (Answer due 12/2/96 for FORD MOTOR COMPANY ) amending [1-1] (mgr)Amended ComplaintDocument 10
11/22/1996
Not on file here yet. SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by plaintiffs MICHAEL WILKS, et al. in 1:96-cv-01814 , (Answer due 12/7/96 for FORD MOTOR COMPANY ) amending [1-1] complaint (mgr)Amended ComplaintDocument 11
11/27/1996
Not on file here yet. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT , (Answer due 5/25/98 for FORD MOTOR COMPANY, for UNITED TECHNOLOGIES ) amending [1-1] complaint against TERI SNODGRASS, ROSE CAMPBELL, ROBERT L. BAKER, WILLIAM H. CARTER, KENDALL M. ELLIS, JILL P. FLETCHER, JUDITH SHEMNITZ, FRANK SHERRON, THOMAS G. SCHLECK, TAMAZ TAL, JAMES ...Amended ComplaintDocument 45
5/15/1998
Not on file here yet. FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT by TERI SNODGRASS in 1:96-cv-01814 , (Answer due 12/14/00 for FORD MOTOR COMPANY, for UNITED TECHNOLOGIES ) amending [1-1] complaint (db)Amended ComplaintDocument 174
12/4/2000
Responses
Not on file here yet. ANSWER to Complaint by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, with jury demand. (lc)AnswerDocument 3
5/16/1996
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for an order to dismis the New Jersey State Law Claims asserted by the named plaintiff Michael Wilks. by defendant, FORD MOTOR CO. Motion hearing set for 4:00 9/19/96. (MEMO SUBMITTED) (See Civil 96-3125) ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED. (lc) Modified on 09/10/1996Motion to DismissDocument 7
9/9/1996
Not on file here yet. ANSWER to Complaint by FORD MOTOR COMPANY in 1:96-cv-01814; jury demand. (Certificate of Service attched thereto) (lc)AnswerDocument 16
12/6/1996
Not on file here yet. ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES in 1:96-cv-03125, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES in 1:96-cv-01814, UNITED TECH. AUTO in 1:96-cv-03198; jury demand (lc)AnswerDocument 22
1/31/1997
Not on file here yet. ANSWER by defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY To Third Amended Class Action complaint. (lc)AnswerDocument 51
6/8/1998
Not on file here yet. ANSWER to Complaint by defendant, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMOTIVE, INC. jury demand. (lc)AnswerDocument 50
6/9/1998
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for judgment on the pleadings by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES in 1:96-cv-01814, FORD MOTOR COMPANY in 1:96-cv-01814, Motion set for 4:45 2/10/99 on [75-1] motion (All papers submitted purs. to Rule 7.1(f) (lc)Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsDocument 75
2/2/1999
Not on file here yet. ANSWER by defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY to fifth amended complaint (db)AnswerDocument 221
7/23/2001
Not on file here yet. AMENDED ANSWER to fifth Amended Complaint by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY: amends [221-1] complaint answer (db)Amended AnswerDocument 222
7/25/2001
Summary Judgment
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for summary judgment in the case of MARGIE MAYES by defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [205-1] motion . (ORAL ARGUMENT) (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 205
6/15/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for summary judgment in the cases of ROBERT BAKER, JILL FLETCHER AND JUDITH SHEMNITZ by defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [206-1] motion . (ORAL ARUGMENT) (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 206
6/15/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for summary judgment in the case of KENDALL ELLIS by defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [207-1] motion . (ORAL ARGUMENT) (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 207
6/15/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for summary judgment in the case of JEFFREY SWIKLINSKI by defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [208-1] motion . (ORAL ARGUMENT) (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 208
6/15/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for summary judgment in the case of TERI SNODGRASSby defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [209-1] motion . (ORAL ARGUMENT) (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 209
6/15/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for summary judgment in the case of JAMES and KAY NAVE by defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [210-1] motion . (ORAL ARGUMENT) (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 210
6/15/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for summary judgment in the case of WILLIAM CARTER by defts. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [211-1] motion . (ORAL ARGUMENT)(Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 211
6/15/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for partial summary judgment by plaintiffs WILLIAM H. CARTER, ROBERT L. BAKER, KENDALL M. ELLIS, JILL P. FLETCHER, JUDITH SHEMNITZ, FRANK SHERRON, TAMAZ TAL, JAMES J. NAVE, KAY F. NAVE, PAMELA GEORGE , MARGIE MAYES, JEFFREY SWIKLINSKI , Motion set for 1:30 7/26/01 on [214-1] motion ...Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 214
6/18/2001
Not on file here yet. Notice of RENEWED MOTION for partial summary judgment on Causation Issue by TERI SNODGRASS et al. Motion set for 8/16/02 on [277-1]. (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 277
7/25/2002
Not on file here yet. Notice of MOTION for partial summary judgment in the case of JEFFREY SWIKLINSKI by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY in Motion set for 10/18/02 on [291-1] motion . (Brief/PO Subm) (db)Motion for Summary JudgmentDocument 291
9/27/2002

Statistics

This case has been viewed 129 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro