Hundreds of plaintiffs filed this multidistrict products liability litigation, consolidated in the Southern District of New York before Judge Cathy Seibel in April 2013, against Bayer Healthcare Pharm...
MOTION for Joseph M. Lyon to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10648398. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Denielle Davenport. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Lyon, Joseph) (Entered: 03/02/2015)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Molly Rauschuber. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Malik, Shezad) (Entered: 03/02/2015)
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00361-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 3/2/2015 (km). (Entered: 02/27/2015)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF HEYGOOD ORR & PEARSON AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF DESOREE MADKINS: ORDERED that Heygood, Orr & Pearson serve Plaintiff Desoree Madkins with a copy of this Order on or before March 4, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Desoree Madkins SHOW CAUSE on April 3, 2015 10:00 am why Heygood, Orr & Pearson's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before March 27, 2015. So Ordered. Show Cause Hearing set for 4/3/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 3/27/2015. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/25/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03742-CS(lnl) (Entered: 02/27/2015)
PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLAINTIFF NOTIFIES THE COURT that it dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Case Management Order No. 22A, each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/25/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06171-CS (lnl) (Entered: 02/26/2015)
ORDER granting (1836) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 22A (CMO 22A), and for the reasons stated on the record in court today, Defendants Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1836), is GRANTED as to the above-captioned Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the case in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-MD-2434, Doc. 1836. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/25/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06190-CS (lnl) (Entered: 02/25/2015)
NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Miranda Roberson, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05413-CS (lnl) (Entered: 02/25/2015)
NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P41(a), Plaintiff, Sara Platt, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05408-CS (lnl) (Entered: 02/25/2015)
NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Eva White, hereby dismissed the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08471-CS(lnl) (Entered: 02/25/2015)
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE: COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Patricia Brewer, by and through her attorneys, ROBINSON CALCAGNIE ROBINSON SHAPIRO DA VIS, INC., and hereby voluntarily dismisses her Complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(i). Each party will bear its own costs and fees. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09896-CS(lnl) (Entered: 02/25/2015)
PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT PLAINTIFF, Jessi Sargent, hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Case Management Order No. 22A, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/23/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05245-CS (lnl) (Entered: 02/25/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 23, 2015 re: Status of the Third Wave of SOL Letter Motions. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 02/23/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated February 23, 2015 re: Venue Designation of IDP Plaintiff Keisha Johnson. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes) (Entered: 02/23/2015)
NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a conference proceeding held on 04/02/2014 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(O'Donnell, Angela) (Entered: 02/20/2015)
TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: conference held on 4/2/2014 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Angela O*Donnell, (914) 390-4025. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/16/2015. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/26/2015. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/26/2015.(O'Donnell, Angela) (Entered: 02/20/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated February 20, 2015 re: European Document Issue in Thurmond case. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amended Motion)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 02/20/2015)
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - The Certificate of Good Standing Expired MOTION for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10616735. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Morran Brown. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Amato, John) Modified on 2/27/2015 (bcu). Modified on 2/27/2015 (ad). (Entered: 02/20/2015)
PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLAINTIFF NOTIFIES THE COURT that it dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Case Management Order No. 22A, each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/18/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06477-CS(lnl) (Entered: 02/20/2015)
REPLY to Response to Motion re: (2133 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00986-CS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Christina Taylor-riendeau. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00986-CS(Kassan, Randi) (Entered: 02/19/2015)
REPLY to Response to Motion re: (32 in 7:14-cv-00891-CS, 2132 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Jennifer Pinkney. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00891-CS(Kassan, Randi) (Entered: 02/19/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2133 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00986-CS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00986-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 02/19/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (32 in 7:14-cv-00891-CS, 2132 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00891-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 02/19/2015)
MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. Document filed by Christina Taylor-riendeau.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00986-CS(Kassan, Randi) (Entered: 02/19/2015)
MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. Document filed by Jennifer Pinkney.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00891-CS(Kassan, Randi) (Entered: 02/19/2015)
ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (2129) Motion for Kelly Kristine McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 02/19/2015)
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07518-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/19/2015 (km). (Entered: 02/18/2015)
MOTION for Kelly Kristine McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Corrected). Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Evelyn Ramirez, Kalaki Clarke, Kenneth Clarke, Cherie Sperato, Frank Sperato, Rita Sanchez-Sandler, Geoffrey Sandler, Toyana Robinson, Michaela Ramsey, Shaquayla Reynolds, Gina Lafata, Tiffany Gregg, LaTanya Barron, Cynthia Solano, Sylvia Montes, Kevin Chow, Shelley Chow, Stacy Nunez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Fleishman, Wendy) (Entered: 02/18/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-91) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Indiana, Minnesota and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/18/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 02/18/2015)
ORDER: pursuant to CMO 7, the Orders dismissing Plaintiffs' cases are VACATED with respect to the above-captioned cases. Specifically, Doc. 1771 is vacated as to Plaintiffs Brashier, Davis, Santoro, Scherrer, Wash and Wittler only, and Doc. 1947 is vacated as to Plaintiff Waters only. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/17/2015) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl) (Entered: 02/18/2015)
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09515-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/18/2015 (km). (Entered: 02/17/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 13, 2015 re: IDP Replacement Selection. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 02/13/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-90) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Illinois, Minnesota, Mississippi, Texas and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/10/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 02/11/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 10, 2015 re: Waiver of Venue Objections (Rauschuber). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 02/10/2015)
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Kelly K. McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10583050. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Evelyn Ramirez, Kalaki Clarke, Kenneth Clarke, Cherie Sperato, Frank Sperato, Rita Sanchez-Sandler, Geoffrey Sandler, Toyana Robinson, Michaela Ramsey, Shaquayla Reynolds, Gina Lafata, Tiffany Gregg, LaTanya Barron, Cynthia Solano, Sylvia Montes, Kevin Chow, Shelley Chow, Stacy Nunez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Fleishman, Wendy) Modified on 2/10/2015 (bcu). (Entered: 02/10/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated February 9, 2015 re: Plaintiff's Response to Case Managment Order 22. Document filed by Ashley Brown.(Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 02/09/2015)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lawrence L. Jones, II on behalf of Alishia Warrick. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00846-CS(Jones, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/06/2015)
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Kevin M. Zielke, dated 2/5/2015 re: Counsel writes: Please be advised that Susan Artinian is no longer with Dykema Gossett PLLC effective February 1, 2015. In accordance, please accept this correspondence as the Notice of Withdrawal. Further she should be removed from the service list and email notifications with regard to the above-referenced matter. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall effectuate this request. So Ordered. Attorney Susan Artinian terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/6/2015) (lnl) (Entered: 02/06/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-89)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/4/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 02/06/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2109 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 13- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Susan Chruszcyzyk. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07551-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 02/05/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2109 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 13- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Carliss Wooten-Griffin. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07439-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 02/05/2015)
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Brent William Bailey, dated 1/29/2015, re: Counsel writes to request that his name be removed from the service list and e-mail notifications regarding the above-referenced litigation; as he is no longer active in this litigation. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court shall effectuate this request. So Ordered. Attorney Brent William Bailey terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/3/2015) (lnl) (Entered: 02/04/2015)
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Destiny Dawn Newton.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00098-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis) Modified on 2/5/2015 (km). (Entered: 02/04/2015)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on 2105 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated January 30, 2015 re: Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal of Case. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/2/2015) (lnl) (Entered: 02/03/2015)
SECOND MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 02/02/2015)
MOTION to Dismiss No. 13- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 02/02/2015)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Elizabeth Sellers hereby voluntarily dismisses this action, without prejudice, against all Defendants. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/30/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01070-CS(fk) (Entered: 02/02/2015)
ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2018), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiff in the table below has outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiff in the table below has 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiff has not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the case in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 2018): Shakemeia Johnson 14-cv-6093. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/30/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06093-CS(fk) (Entered: 02/02/2015)
ORDER granting (2103) Motion for Matthew Steven Davis to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08833-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 02/02/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated January 30, 2015 re: Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal of Case. Document filed by Ashley Brown.(Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 01/30/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated January 30, 2015 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Twelfth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 01/30/2015)
MOTION for Matthew Steven Davis to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10548539. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Cook. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08833-CS(Davis, Matthew) (Entered: 01/30/2015)
MOTION for Kevin M. Zielke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Zielke, Kevin) (Entered: 01/30/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-88) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Indiana, Missouri, Nebraska and Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/30/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 01/30/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-87) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/29/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 01/30/2015)
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ALI AL-KHAFAJI: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Ali Al-Khafaji ONLY, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). So Ordered. Ali Al-Krafaji terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/29/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01977-CS(lnl) (Entered: 01/29/2015)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (14 in 7:14-cv-05397-CS) PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO AND MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDER (DOC. 1947) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF CHANELLE COLEMAN"S CLAIMS FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET CONTAINING ALL CORE CRITERIA. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Coleman's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 16. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/29/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05397-CS (lnl) (Entered: 01/29/2015)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (17 in 7:14-cv-03106-CS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF LAW OFFICES OF BILL BAILEY, PLLC, GRUBER & GRUBER AND LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD A. SNYDER AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF TIARA PETTIS. ENDORSEMENT: There being no opposition, the application is granted. Plaintiff is pro se until such time as new counsel appears on her behalf. Mr. Bailey is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. The Clerk shall docket this Order in 13-MD-2434 and 14-Cv-3106. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/23/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03106-CS(lnl) (Entered: 01/29/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-86) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/22/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 01/29/2015)
ORDER withdrawing (2066) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; withdrawing (13) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-05379-CS. ENDORSEMENT: The application is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion doc. 13. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/23/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05379-CS. (mml) (Entered: 01/28/2015)
ORDER granting (2093) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00472-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 01/26/2015)
MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jennifer Kohlbrecher, Steve Kohlbrecher. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, # 3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, # 4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00472-CS(Holland, Eric) (Entered: 01/26/2015)
DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Bernice Cantrell. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01070-CS(Hageman, Todd) Modified on 1/28/2015 (km). (Entered: 01/26/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 23, 2015 re: Request to remove CMO 22A filing. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05379-CS(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 01/23/2015)
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ASHLEY D. RATLIFF: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Ashley D. Ratliff, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/20/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09518-CS (lnl) (Entered: 01/22/2015)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Wilson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Johnson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
ORDER granting (2058) Motion for Lizette Miller-Radovic to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09051-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
MOTION for Lizette Miller-Radovic to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10515774. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brittney Rixner. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit LaSupremeCtCertificateofGoodStanding, # 2 Text of Proposed Order ProposedOrder)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09051-CS(Radovic, Lizette) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before February 3, 2015, why the court should not dismiss her case, with prejudice, as time-barred. Specifically, plaintiff is ordered to comply with CMO 22A, which directs Plaintiff to file either a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or a letter of no more than three pages distinguishing her case from the Truitt Order's holding. Plaintiff's failure to comply, once again, with CMO 22A on or before February 3, 2015 will result in dismissal of her case with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2015. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/20/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06190-CS (lnl) (Entered: 01/21/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 20, 2015 re: IDP Replacement Selection. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 01/20/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Carol Scherrer. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05892-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Silvia Brashier. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05900-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Caitlin Wittler. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05940-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Mandy Davis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05944-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Jessica Santoro. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05896-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1905 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. And Motion to Vacate Court's Order (Doc. No. 1947). Document filed by Charlencia Waters. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05491-CS(Mencel, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Kristy Wash. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05897-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09518-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 1/20/2015 (km). (Entered: 01/16/2015)
ORDER granting (2043) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00083-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
ORDER granting (2042) Motion for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07449-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
ORDER granting (2041) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05393-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-85) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri and Oklahoma, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/16/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by brandi smith. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, # 3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, # 4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00083-CS(Holland, Eric) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Yana Sloutski. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, # 3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, # 4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07449-CS(Holland, Eric) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebecca Straughan. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, # 3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, # 4 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05393-CS(Holland, Eric) (Entered: 01/16/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-84) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina and Oklahoma, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/13/2015) (sjo) (Entered: 01/15/2015)
ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("C.M.O.") 7 and 7 A, I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria, (Doc. 1961), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet- i.e. a Plaintiff fact Sheet containing all core criteria - or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1961). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/13/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 01/14/2015)
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 1/12/2015, re: Counsel writes to request an adjournment of the January 21 Mirena MDL status conference. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/12/2015) (lnl) (Entered: 01/12/2015)
DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Robert Goss, Amber Goss. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02721-CS(Gallucci, Daniel) Modified on 1/13/2015 (km). (Entered: 01/12/2015)
DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Sara Ann Dewolf. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05331-CS(Gallucci, Daniel) Modified on 1/13/2015 (km). (Entered: 01/12/2015)
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Opinion and Order to, and close, the cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the cases in the caption, and the following pending motions in 13-MD-2434: Docs. 1834, 1837, 1839, 1841, 1843-1845, 1847, 1848, 1850, 1851, 1853-1858. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl) (Entered: 01/12/2015)
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting 2028 Motion to Vacate 2028 MOTION to Vacate (13 in 7:14-cv-05397-CS, 1947 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss . ENDORSEMENT: The order dismissing Ms. Baker's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk's Office is directed to terminate the motion at doc. 47. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/8/2015) (rj) (Entered: 01/08/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Clarice Snow. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03334-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 01/08/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Ronda Emmrich. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03260-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 01/08/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Brittany Veach. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03266-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 01/08/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Jennifer Ann Whelchel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03265-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 01/08/2015)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Lakisha Kidd. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02152-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 01/08/2015)
MOTION to Vacate (13 in 7:14-cv-05397-CS, 1947 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, . Document filed by Channelle Coleman.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05397-CS(Watson, Leila) (Entered: 01/07/2015)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 7, 2015 re: IDP Venue Objections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 01/07/2015)
ORDER granting 2025 Motion for Karen L. Stern to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
MOTION for Karen L. Stern to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10458507. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Candice Nutter. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Stern, Karen) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-83)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/31/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-82)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/30/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jackqualyn R. Quinton on behalf of Lindsey D. Stepp. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09472-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-81) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Missouri and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/30/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-80)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, New Jersey and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/18/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-79) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/8/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 01/05/2015)
MOTION to Dismiss No. 12- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/30/2014)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF LAW OFFICES OF BILL BAILEY, PLLC, GRUBER & GRUBER AND LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD A. SNYDER AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF TIARA PETTIS: The firms of Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder (collectively, "Attorneys") represent Plaintiff Tiara Petti ("Plaintiff") in this pharmaceuticals products liability action presently pending before this court. The action, which was filed on February 10, 2014, alleges that Plaintiff suffered personal injuries as a result of her alleged use of the Mirena interuterine system ("IUS"). Before the undersigned is Attorneys' application for leave to withdraw as Plaintiff Tiara Pettis' counsel. Based on the accompanying Declaration of Brent William Bailey, Esq., dated December 19, 2014, Plaintiffs Attorneys have made numerous unsuccessful attempts to contact Plaintiff to obtain information required for discovery purposes. Specifically, Attorneys have attempted on several occasions to reach Plaintiff by telephone and mail to obtain "core criteria" information for her Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS"), but Plaintiff has not responded. IT APPEARS TO THE COURT, based on the evidence presented by Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, that there is good cause to grant Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder's motion to be relieved as counsel under Local Civil Rule 1.4 of the Southern District of New York and ABA-AMRPC Rule 1.16(b). Specifically, (1) good cause for withdrawal exists because Plaintiff has not assisted Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder in the prosecution of the case, making it unreasonably difficult for Attorneys to continue to represent the client; and (2) minimal discovery has been completed in the case and no trial date has been set, and thus Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the proposed withdrawal. ACCORDINGLY, it is on this 24th day of December, 2014, ORDERED that Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC serve Plaintiff Tiara Pettis with a copy of this Order on or before 1/5/2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Tiara Pettis SHOW CAUSE on 1/21/15 at 10 am in Courtroom 621, U.S. Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601 why Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before 1/14/15. So Ordered. (Show Cause Hearing set for 1/21/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 1/14/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03106-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/29/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Nicole Sara Hemme. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01095-CS(Scott, Carmen) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jennifer Williams on behalf of Amy L Wilmet. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09328-CS(Williams, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("C.M.O.") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 1962), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 1962), and close the member cases in the table as set forth. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/23/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) (lnl) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1945), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1945) as set forth. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/23/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 12/23/2014)
ORDER No. 18D: This Order modifies Case Management Order No. 18 (13-MC-2434 Doc. 63; 13-MD-2434 Doc. 883) ("CMO 18") governing the Initial Disposition Pool. I. Voluntary Dismissal of Initial Disposition Pool Cases 1. This section replaces Section II of CMO 18. 2. After a case is selected for inclusion in the Initial Disposition Pool, the case may not be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice without a showing of good cause. 3. If a case in the Initial Disposition Pool is voluntarily dismissed by Plaintiffs, then: a. If the case is dismissed by January 16, 2015 or within thirty days after selection to the Initial Disposition Pool (whichever is later), Defendants shall identify a replacement case to the Court within fourteen days of the dismissal order. b. If the case is dismissed after January 16, 2015 or more than thirty days after selection to the Initial Disposition Pool (whichever is later), Defendants shall, within fourteen days of the dismissal order, either (i) identify up to two replacement cases, or (ii) identify a case selected by Plaintiffs to remove from the Initial Disposition Pool. In the event that Defendants choose option (ii), neither the dismissed case nor the removed case shall be replaced. If a voluntary dismissal and subsequent removal of a case from the Initial Disposition Pool pursuant to option (ii) would cause the number of cases in the Initial Disposition Pool to fall under six total cases, then Defendants must choose option (i). 4. If an Initial Disposition Pool case is dismissed due to resolution, Plaintiffs shall identify a replacement case to the Court within fourteen days of the dismissal order. II. Venue Waiver in Replacement Initial Disposition Pool Cases 5. By 5 p.m. Eastern on January 7, 2015, the parties will inform the Court and opposing counsel by email whether they agree to waive any venue objections in the following Initial Disposition Pool replacement cases and to consent to trial in the Southern District of New York: Cooke v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:13-cv-07323-CS Hayes v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:14-cv-00288-CS Hermosillo v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:13-cv-07354-CS Wofford v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:14-cv-01979-CS Plaintiffs will submit waivers signed by the client to that effect for those cases in which the client does waive venue objections. If a party declines to waive its venue objection, the party shall identify the district in which it believes that venue is proper. 6. For replacement cases selected to the Initial Disposition Pool after the date of entry of this Order, the parties will, within twenty-one days of their selection to the Initial Disposition Pool, inform the Court and opposing counsel by email whether they agree to waive any venue objections. Plaintiffs will submit waivers signed by the client to that effect for those cases in which the client does waive venue objections. If a party declines to waive its venue objection, the party shall identify the district in which it believes that venue is proper. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) (lnl) (Entered: 12/19/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (6 in 7:14-cv-05894-CS) RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Giddens. (13-MD-2434, Doc. 1771.) This "Response in Opposition to Defendant's Eight Motion to Dismiss" suffers from the same defects as a similar document Mr. Saba filed in member case 14-CV-5891. Mr. Saba should refer to my endorsement on that document. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05894-CS(lnl) (Entered: 12/19/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (7 in 7:14-cv-05891-CS) RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1766 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice (14-CV-5891 Doc. 6) is vacated as to Ms. Cobb. I grant this relief even though Mr. Saba requested that the Court "deny the Defendant's Ninth Motion to Dismiss." which was previously granted. The request raises in the in the Court's mind the question whether counsel appreciates just how late in the game his client's PFS was provided or how wasteful of the Court's resources it is to have to repeatedly vacate dismissals that were granted due to failure to comply with case management orders. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05891-CS(lnl) (Entered: 12/19/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (30 in 7:14-cv-00978-CS) MOTION to Vacate (28) Order on Motion to Dismiss. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Stephens. The Clerk of Court is requested to terminate the pending moton at 14-CV-978, Doc. 30. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00978-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/19/2014)
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Alyson Louise Oliver on behalf of Jessi Sargent. New Address: Oliver Law Group PC, 363 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 200, Troy, MI, USA 48084, 248-327-6556. (Oliver, Alyson) (Entered: 12/16/2014)
ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record on October 22, 2014, Ms. Shepherd's case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close Ms. Shepherd's case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/16/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/16/2014)
ORDER: On September 19, 2014 and October 21, 2014, pursuant to Case Management Order No. ("CMO") 22A, Defendants submitted motions to dismiss all of the claims asserted in the member cases listed in the caption. CMO 22A allows Defendants to move to dismiss cases they believe are subject to dismissal under this Court's decision in Truitt v. Bayer, No. 13-CV-7811, 2014 WL 2971179 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2014). CMO 22A provides that each plaintiff against whom Defendants so move has 30 days to respond by either submitting a letter in opposition or voluntarily dismissing her case with prejudice. If a plaintiff takes no such action within 30 days of receiving a CMO 22A motion to dismiss, Defendants may submit a proposed order of dismissal with prejudice. No plaintiff to whom this Order applies submitted any response whatsoever to Defendants' motions within the allotted 30 days. Nevertheless, either before these motions were filed or while they were pending but before the 30-day response period ended, Plaintiffs' cases were dismissed without prejudice for failure to submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") as required by CMO 7. Accordingly, it is not realistic to have expected Plaintiffs to respond to the CMO 22A motions when their cases were already dismissed albeit without prejudice. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss as to the member cases in the caption are thus DENIED without prejudice to renewal should Plaintiffs' revive their claims by submitting a PFS before their cases are dismissed with prejudice under CMO 7. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the member cases in the caption and to terminate the pending motions in these member cases and at 13-MD-2434, Doc. 1825. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05847-CS, 7:14-cv-00872-CS, 7:14-cv-04311-CS, 7:14-cv-06870-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/16/2014)
ORDER: On September 19, 2014 and October 21, 2014, pursuant to Case Management Order No. 22A ("CMO 22A," Doc. 1510), Defendants submitted motions to dismiss all of the claims asserted in the member cases listed in the caption. CMO 22A allows Defendants to move to dismiss cases they believe are subject to dismissal under this Court's decision in Truitt v. Bayer, No. 13-CV-7811, 2014 WL 2971179 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2014). CMO 22A provides that each plaintiff against whom Defendants so move has 30 days to respond by either submitting a letter in opposition or voluntarily dismissing her case with prejudice. If a plaintiff takes no such action within 30 days of receiving a CMO 22A motion to dismiss, Defendants may submit a proposed order of dismissal with prejudice. No plaintiff to whom this Order applies submitted any response whatsoever to Defendants' motions within the allotted 30 days. Indeed, none of these plaintiffs have submitted a response since the 30-day period expired on October 21, 2014 (for the September 19, 2014 motions) or November 21, 2014 (for the October 21, 2014 motions). By failing to oppose Defendants' motions to dismiss within the allotted 30 days, Plaintiffs have abandoned their claims. See Hanig v. Yorktown Cent. Sch. Dist., 384 F. Supp. 2d 710, 723 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) ("[B]ecause plaintiff did not address defendant's motion to dismiss with regard to this claim, it is deemed to be abandoned and hereby dismissed."); see also In re World Trade Ctr. Litig., 722 F.3d 483, 487 (2d Cir. 2013) ("in complex cases" district courts are accorded "particular deference [when making] discretionary determination[s] undertaken to manage the litigation before the court"). Moreover, Defendants' arguments that Plaintiffs' claims are time-barred and otherwise subject to dismissal appear to be correct under both applicable state law and the Truitt opinion. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the member cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the member cases in the caption, and to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 1829, 1832, 1833, 1835, 1838, 1842 and 1849. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 12/16/2014)
ORDER granting (1135) Motion for James A. Swartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01263-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/15/2014)
ORDER granting 701 Motion for Mark A. Cox to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/15/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 15, 2014 re: Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' application for amendment of Order No. 18. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes) (Entered: 12/15/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Timira Campbell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00034-CS(Hingle, Michael) (Entered: 12/15/2014)
ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF ELISHA N. HAWK, ESQ. (PRO HAC VICE): THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Plaintiff, Amanda Thompson, through her Counsel, pursuant to L.R.1.4, and the Court having considered the motion papers and supporting Certification of Elisha N. Hawk, Esquire in Support of Motion for Withdrawal of Elisha N. Hawk. Esq. (Pro Hac Vice), and the Court having found that good cause has been shown, IT IS, on this 12th day of December, 2014, ORDERED that Elisha N. Hawk, Esquire shall be withdrawn as Counsel Pro Hac Vice in this matter. SO ORDERED. Attorney Elisha Nicole Hawk terminated. Attorney Elisha Nicole Hawk terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/12/2014) (lnl) (Entered: 12/15/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (7 in 7:14-cv-05659-CS, 1814 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated 10/17/2014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Amended Complaint to be filed by January 5, 2015. So Ordered. (Amended Pleadings due by 1/5/2015) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/12/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05659-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/15/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Brown's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06190-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Wojtowicz's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04693-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Walton's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04525-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Thate's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04509-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Spurlock's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06479-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Smith's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05232-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Schroeder's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04522-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Piscionere's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07311-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Parnell's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04507-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Medinger's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04521-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Lovett's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03895-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Horn's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06879-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Helms' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06179-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Dollilns' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06611-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Davis' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06200-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Condich's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06875-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Blair's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06178-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Abrams' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05229-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Status of defendants' letter motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
ORDER granting 1023 Motion for Payton Dwight Hoover to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
ORDER granting 1018 Motion for Keith Walton Lapeze to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
ORDER granting (859) Motion for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01096-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/12/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 11, 2014 re: IDP Pool Cases. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 12/11/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 11, 2014 re: Bayer's IDP Replacement Selection. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 12/11/2014)
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Kathleen R. Kerner, dated 12/10/2014, re: Counsel for Amanda Thompson writes to request that the pro hac vice order signed by Your Honor on 12/8/2014, DE#1963 in case 13-md-2434 be spread to the member case for Ms. Thompson (13-cv-3560). ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk's Office is directed to spread the order at Doc. 1963 to 13-cv-3560. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/10/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03560-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/11/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Daphne Delee. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05697-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 12/10/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Trinda Morrison. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05792-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 12/10/2014)
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting 1958 MOTION for W. James Singleton to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court shall terminated Doc. 1958. (Atty W. James Singleton was added (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) (lnl) (Entered: 12/10/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i) Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff BROOKE LARRIMORE ("Plaintiff") and her counsel hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against Defendants BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ("Defendants"). Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close case # 14-cv-4316. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04316-CS(lnl) (Entered: 12/10/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Plaintiff TERESA ZUBIA and her counsel hereby give notice that the action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against Defendants BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case (14-cv-5518). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05518-CS (mml) (Entered: 12/09/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Plaintiff TIFFANY LOPEZ and her counsel hereby give notice that the action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against Defendants BAYER HEALTH CARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close 14-cv-7322. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) (mml) (Entered: 12/09/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-78) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, Illinois, Minnesota and Montana, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/9/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 12/09/2014)
ORDER granting 1956 Motion for Chantell M. Boutte to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
ORDER granting 1955 Motion for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
FIRST MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 8, 2014 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02572-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (7 in 7:14-cv-05890-CS, 1918 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Response in Opposition to Motion. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Hosey. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/5/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05890-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac vice,, . Document filed by Chantell Boutte. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Singleton, W. James) (Entered: 12/08/2014)
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for W. James Singleton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10380904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Chantell Boutte. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Singleton, W. James) Modified on 12/8/2014 (sdi). (Entered: 12/05/2014)
MOTION for Chantell M. Boutte to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10380746. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Chantell Boutte. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Boutte, Chantell) (Entered: 12/05/2014)
MOTION for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Kerner, Kathleen) (Entered: 12/05/2014)
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10379465. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Kerner, Kathleen) Modified on 12/5/2014 (wb). (Entered: 12/05/2014)
ORDER granting 1952 Motion for Michael S. Mehrmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 12/04/2014)
FIRST MOTION for Michael S. Mehrmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10375098. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Karen McLoud.(Mehrmann, Michael) (Entered: 12/04/2014)
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ANEESAH ANANI: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Aneesah Anani, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/4/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02407-CS (lnl) (Entered: 12/04/2014)
RESPONSE to Motion re: 1450 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. And Motion to Vacate Court Order Number 1654. Document filed by Ashley Stephens. (Seeger, Christopher) (Entered: 12/04/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1766 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Brianna Cobb. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05891-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 12/03/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Jessica Giddens. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05894-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 12/03/2014)
ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1905), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion (Doc. 1905). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 12/02/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated December 1, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Tenth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/01/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss No. 11- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 12/01/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-77) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/01/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 12/01/2014)
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF TINA TURNER: COMES NOW Plaintiff Tina Turner, and pursuant to Rule 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Bayer"), with each party to bear their own costs. Defendant Bayer has not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. This dismissal does not affect the claims of the other Plaintiffs in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS(lnl) (Entered: 11/25/2014)
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF BRANDI MORRISON: COMES NOW Plaintiff Brandi Morrison, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Bayer"), with each party to bear their own costs. Defendant Bayer has not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. This dismissal does not affect the claims of the other Plaintiffs in this action. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS(lnl) (Entered: 11/25/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: ASHLEY LOVE, plaintiff in the above-captioned action, by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04909-CS (lnl) (Entered: 11/25/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1905 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Chardey Johnson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05489-CS(Mencel, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/21/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-76) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/21/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 11/21/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Pamela A. Borgess dated November 20, 2014 re: Response in Opposition to Defendants' CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Eric Wojtowicz, Rebecca Wojtowicz.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04693-CS(Borgess, Pamela) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1857 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Walton per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Amanda Walton. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1856 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Thate per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Danielle Thate. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1855 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Spurlock per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Sarah Spurlock. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1854 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Smith per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Katherine Smith. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1853 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Schroeder per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Lynn Schroeder. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1851 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Piscionere per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Jessica Piscionere. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1850 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Parnell per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Ciara Parnell. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1848 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Medinger per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Brittany Medinger. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1847 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Lovett per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Leandra Lovett. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1845 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Horn per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Brooke Horn. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1843 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Helms per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Amanda Helms. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1839 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Dollins per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Rachel Dollins. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1838 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Davis per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Jessica Davis. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1837 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Condich per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Athena Condich. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1836 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Ashley Brown. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1834 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Blair per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Amanda Blair. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: 1844 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Abrams per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Lisa Abrams. (Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 11/20/2014)
DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Document filed by Ashley Love. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04909-CS(Shelquist, Robert) Modified on 11/21/2014 (km). (Entered: 11/20/2014)
ORDER: In accordance with the Court's decision on the record at the status conference held on November 19, 2014, Defendants' document production request as identified in Defendants' October 7, 2014, letter (ECF No. 1789) is granted. If a provider has already been interviewed as of the date of entry of this Order, or if the documents at issue have already been shown or sent to a provider as of this date, then the date for the production of the documents, or for the identification of documents which have already been produced, is thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order, as set forth in this order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 11/19/2014) (mml) (Entered: 11/19/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Brandi Hosey. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05890-CS(Takahashi, Momo) (Entered: 11/19/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-75) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/13/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 11/14/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (1875) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (35) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-00479-CS. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Davis. The Clerk's Office is directed to terminate the motion to vacate. (Docs. 35 and 1872.) So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/10/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00479-CS (lnl) (Entered: 11/10/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-74) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, Minnesota and North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/6/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 11/07/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bradley C. West dated 11/06/2014 re: (1841 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Fitzgerald per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Rachel Fitzgerald. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Operative Report, # 2 Exhibit B-12 O.S., # 3 Exhibit C-12 O.S.)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02572-CS(West, Bradley) (Entered: 11/07/2014)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Erin Schossow. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08826-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne) (Entered: 11/06/2014)
ORDER granting (1766) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1766), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1766). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/5/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 11/06/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1905 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Spring Jarrell. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05486-CS(Mencel, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/05/2014)
DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02407-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 11/5/2014 (km). (Entered: 11/04/2014)
LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Shayna S. Cook dated November 4, 2014 re: Reply re Work Product. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 11/04/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-73) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/31/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 11/03/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-72) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/28/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 11/03/2014)
TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/31/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Status of defendants' letter motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
ORDER granting (1889) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08086-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Wilmot's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01979-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Williams' Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03485-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Olteanu's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08860-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Offlee's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01675-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Jones' Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03383-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Hartford's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01983-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Cook's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01673-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Cochran's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08883-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Childers' Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01612-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Campbell's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00034-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Calamari's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06874-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Boudreaux's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01676-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Anderson's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01967-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by April Cochran. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - MO, # 3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - IL, # 4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - MI)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08086-CS(Holland, Eric) (Entered: 10/30/2014)
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff in the above-captioned case, Latasha Moss, and Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("BHCP"), through their respective undersigned counsel, that this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Div. P. 41(a). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 10/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07345-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/29/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (9 in 7:14-cv-05254-CS, 1797 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Response filed by Sofia Ramos-Cruz. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Ramos-Cruz. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05254-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/29/2014)
LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated 10/28/2014 re: IDP Discovery Dispute. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes) (Entered: 10/28/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated October 27, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Ninth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08559(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF JENNY L. KLOCEK: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Jenny L. Klocek, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04917-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08555(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on 1874 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gene M. Williams dated October 23, 2014 re: Removal from service list and email notifications. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is directed to remove Mr. Williams from the 13-MD-2434 docket. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/24/2014) (lnl) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08548(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08544(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08542(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-71) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/27/2014)
ORDER granting (1872) Motion for David Todd Mathews to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04262-CS, 7:14-cv-07005-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 10/24/2014)
MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00479-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Lashawn Marie Davis.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00479-CS(Overholtz, Neil) (Entered: 10/24/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gene M. Williams dated October 23, 2014 re: Removal from service list and email notifications. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/23/2014)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (1795 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 43 in 7:13-cv-07354-CS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jackqualyn Quinton dated October 9, 2014 re: Leave to Amend Complaint. Document filed by Rachel Hermosillo. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Per CMO14, Plaintiff's request to amend her complaint to add proper party Defendants is timely. The Clerk should docket this order in both 13-MD-2434 and 13-CV-7354. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/10/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07354-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/23/2014)
MOTION for David Todd Mathews to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10235478. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Ashley Brewer, Angela Ellingsworth. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from IL, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from MO, # 3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from FL, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04262-CS, 7:14-cv-07005-CS(Mathews, David) (Entered: 10/23/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08455(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/23/2014)
DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04917-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 10/23/2014 (dt). (Entered: 10/22/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 22, 2014 re: IDP Replacement Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: JODIE CHANEY, plaintiff in the above-captioned action, by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/21/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07760-CS(lnl) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08440(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08436(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08429(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08427(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08425(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08421(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08418(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08417(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/22/2014)
ORDER granting (1653) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06958-CS (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Smith per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Nelson per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Davis per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Blue per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Bere per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08415(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08412(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08409(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08398(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
MOTION to Dismiss per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) Modified on 10/21/2014 (db). Modified on 10/21/2014 (db). (Entered: 10/21/2014)
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gerard Ryan III, dated 10/17/2014, re: Counsel for Latasha Moss writes to request a 30 day extension of time to respond to Defendant's letter of September 19, 2014, in which they seek dismissal of her case pursuant to CMO 22A on the basis of an argument that matter is time barred. Should the Court need further detail of the specifics of this application, counsel requests the opportunity to address these in an ex-parte communication with Your Honor at your convenience so as to preserve the attorney-client privilege. ENDORSEMENT: Given the system we have set up, I am not inclined to extend without a good reason. No real reason has been provided, so I think I need to take counsel up on the offer of more specifics. Please provide them no later than 10/27. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/20/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07345-CS(lnl) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
ORDER NO. 23 (Scheduling Order): In addition to previously scheduled conferences, status conferences will be held on the following dates: (1) March 18, 2015; (2) April 22, 2015; (3) May 13, 2015; and (4) June 17, 2015. All conferences, including those previously scheduled, will be held at 10:00 AM. SO ORDERED. Status Conference set for 3/18/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 4/22/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 5/13/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 6/17/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/20/2014) (lnl) (Entered: 10/21/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08372(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08369(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08368(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08366(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated 10/20/2014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Tammy Calamari.(Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08350(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08348(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/20/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated 10/17/2014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Virchus Ferguson.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05659-CS(Melidonian, Lina) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Kelly J. Cook.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01673-CS(Geiger, Andrew) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Cynthia Childers.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01612-CS(Geiger, Andrew) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Janet Williams.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03485-CS(Geiger, Andrew) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Carly Boudreaux.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01676-CS(Geiger, Andrew) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Luciana Offlee.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01675-CS(Geiger, Andrew) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bryan A. Pfleeger dated 10/17/2014 re: Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiff's Claims be Dismissed as Time-Barred. Document filed by Terionne Anderson, Melissa Jones, Angie S. Cochran, Ioana F Olteanu, Michelle Wilmot, Nicole Hartford, Timira Campbell.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-70) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey and New York, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/15/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 10/17/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 16, 2014 re: Status Conference. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/16/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bryan A. Pfleeger dated 10/16/2014 re: Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiff's Claims be Dismissed as Time-Barred. Document filed by Terionne Anderson, Melissa Jones, Angie S. Cochran, Ioana F Olteanu, Michelle Wilmot, Nicole Hartford, Timira Campbell.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan) (Entered: 10/16/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff LEEANNE ACCETTURO and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03166-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/16/2014)
JUDGMENT (13-cv-08631,14-cv-00495,13-cv-08646,14-cv-00286, 14-cv-00569, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS): ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order, dated October 15, 2014, Defendant's Motion to dismiss is granted as to the plaintiffs listed in the caption; accordingly, the member cases listed in this judgment are closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 10/16/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 10/16/2014)
ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1775), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 1775), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/15/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 10/16/2014)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND TO REINSTATE CIVIL ACTION - re: (45) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-cv-08617-CS: Pursuant to Case Management Order 7 and 7 A, and upon the Motion of Plaintiff, Melissa Anderson, to Vacate Dismissal Without Prejudice and Reinstate Civil Action as filed on September 30, 2014, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice dated July 15, 2014 in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is hereby vacated as it pertains to Plaintiff Melissa Anderson. The Clerk of Court is instructed to reinstate the above captioned case filed by Plaintiff, Melissa Anderson, and terminate the pending motion, (Doc. 45). (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08617-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/15/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff HILDA MURPHREE and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07328-CS(lnl) (Entered: 10/15/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff DIANA BARRON and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07327-CS(lnl) (Entered: 10/15/2014)
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff JESSICA TYE and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer PharmaAG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2014) (lnl) (Entered: 10/15/2014)
RESPONSE re: (1250 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 5 in 7:14-cv-05254-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Sofia Ramos-Cruz. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05254-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 10/14/2014)
FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - MOTION to Reopen Case . Document filed by Sofia Ramos-Cruz.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05254-CS(Saba, Ryan) Modified on 10/14/2014 (db). (Entered: 10/13/2014)
ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONSES: This Order relates to the above-captioned case. This case was originally filed in the Western District of New York on September 4, 2014. This case was transferred into MDL 2434 on September 22, 2014. Summonses were never issued by the Western District of New York. This Court directs the Southern District of New York to issue Summonses in the above-captioned case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07662-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/09/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-69) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/7/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 10/08/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08087(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/08/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08086(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/08/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from E. James Shepherd dated October 6, 2014 re: Reply to Kayla Shepherd's Response to Bayer's Fourth Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS(Harrington, William) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Shayna S. Cook dated October 7, 2014 re: Work Product. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit)(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
ORDER granting 1781 Motion for Timothy B. Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08062(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08054(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08056(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08050(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 10/07/2014)
MOTION for Neil D. Overholtz to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Mindy J. Abercrombie. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00569-CS(Overholtz, Neil) (Entered: 10/06/2014)
MOTION for Neil D. Overholtz to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Kimberly Amanda Boog. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00286-CS(Overholtz, Neil) (Entered: 10/06/2014)
FIRST MOTION for Timothy B. Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10175540. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Carey Flint. Return Date set for 10/6/2014 at 10:39 AM. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE, # 2 Exhibit Letter of Good Standing)(Moore, Timothy) (Entered: 10/06/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-68) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Missouri and Oklahoma, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/3/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 10/03/2014)
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 1.4, that W. Roger Smith, III, of the law firm Beasley, Allen Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., is hereby substituted in place of attorneys David P. Matthews, Steve Faries, and Rachal G. Rojas, of David Matthews and Associates, as counsel of record for Plaintiff Tahrir Ismail in the above-captioned case. A declaration in support of this stipulation and order for substitution of counsel is attached pursuant to Local Rule 1.4. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that all pleadings, notices of hearing, and other filings in this matter should be served upon the undersigned incoming counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk shall terminate Docs. 7 & 8. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06167-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/03/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 2, 2014 re: IDP Replacement Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 10/02/2014)
ORDER GRANTING CLERK PERMISSION TO ISSUE SUMMONS ON AMENDED COMPLAINT: The request of Jackqualyn Quinton for permission for the Clerk of Court to issue Summons on Amended Complaint as to Defendants, Bayer Oy and Bayer Phanna AG in the above captioned action is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is granted permission to issue Summons on Amended Complaint as to Defendants, Bayer Oy and Bayer Pharma AG. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/1/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06456-CS(lnl) (Entered: 10/02/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-67)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/1/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 10/02/2014)
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting (1767) Motion for Rochelle R. Breier to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS; granting (51) Motion for Rochelle R. Breier to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04321-CS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/30/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04321-CS (lnl) (Entered: 10/01/2014)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall terminate Docs. 8 and 9. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/30/2014) (lnl) (Entered: 10/01/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ryan Saba dated September 30, 2014 re: Dismissal of Kayla Shepherd. Document filed by Kayla Shepherd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 09/30/2014)
ORDER granting (1633) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1633), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1633). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/30/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) Modified on 2/18/2015 (lnl). (Entered: 09/30/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07877(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/30/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07873(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/30/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated September 29, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Eighth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 09/29/2014)
MOTION for Rochelle Ricci Breier to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10150972. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 7:13-cv-05767-CS(Breier, Rochelle) Modified on 9/29/2014 (bcu). Modified on 9/30/2014 (bcu). Modified on 10/1/2014 (lnl). (Entered: 09/29/2014)
NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) (Entered: 09/26/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07801(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/26/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07799(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/26/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-66)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, New Jersey and North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/25/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 09/25/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07719(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/24/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07715(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/24/2014)
ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1638), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 1638), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/23/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) (Entered: 09/23/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07686(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/23/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07685(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/23/2014)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ebony Carey dated 09/23/2014 re: (1411 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Ebony Carey. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01951-CS(Pfleeger, Bryan) (Entered: 09/23/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07684(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/23/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07682(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/23/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07671(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2014: # 1 Appendix) (sjo). (Entered: 09/23/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07662(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07661(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07659(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07654(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07653(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07648(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/22/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07647(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Entered: 09/22/2014)
ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (1702) Motion for Michael Ray Clinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Wilmot. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Williams. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Watson. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Vilchis. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Tye. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Soto. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Salvaleon-Cua. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Rowland. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Rokovich. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Olteanu. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Offlee. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Moss. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Middleton. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Maholmes. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Jones. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Hartford. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Ferguson. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Davis. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Cook. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Coe. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Cochran. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Childers. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Chaney. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Cervantes. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Campbell. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Calamari. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Boudreaux. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Barron. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Anderson. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07602(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07589(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/19/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07566(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
ORDER: On September 5, 2014, Plaintiffs Marvetta Davis and Lourdes Gonzalez, whose cases are currently in the Initial Disposition Pool ("IDP"), (see Doc. 1524), filed notices that they were dismissing their claims against Defendants with prejudice, (Docs. 1641, 1642). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), no court order is necessary to effectuate these dismissals because Defendants have not served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Case Management Order No. ("CMO") 18, however, states that a "dismissal order" triggers a 14-day period within which Defendants must select a replacement case following an IDP plaintiffs voluntary dismissal. (See Doc. 883, at Paragraph 6.) Accordingly, this Order shall constitute a "dismissal order" under CMO 18. Defendants must select plaintiffs to replace Ms. Davis and Ms. Gonzalez in the IDP within fourteen days of the entry of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/18/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05330-CS, 7:13-cv-06805-CS (lnl) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07565(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07563(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07562(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07561(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07560(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-64) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/18/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07551(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07549(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/18/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07518(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
AMENDED MOTION for Michael Ray Clinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Diana Olatunbosun, Yessica Cano, Kathryn Cordell, Yvette Ezell, Hannah Fulmer, Katherine Gallaher, Jaclyn Gargulinski, Cara Lawson, Elina Lloyd, Sally McAdam, Vanessa Valdez. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Clinton, Michael) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07516(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07512(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07511(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07509(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07508(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07507(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/17/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Sydney Nichole Lowe. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03402-CS(Scott, Carmen) (Entered: 09/16/2014)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jackqualyn R. Quinton on behalf of Summer Creekmore. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07437-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1638 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice For Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Kayla Shepherd. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS(Saba, Ryan) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07469(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07467(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07465(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07464(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07450(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07446(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07439(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07437(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/15/2014)
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-62)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/11/2014) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07418(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07413(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07322(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07321(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07320(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07319(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07318(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07317(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07316(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07315(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07314(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07313(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07312(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07311(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Sylvia Davidow, dated 9/10/2014, re: Counsel for the plaintiff Samantha Badger writes to request that the Court remove my contact information from all Court notices subject to the MDL 2434. ENDORSEMENT: Ms. Davidow should be removed as an attorney to be noticed from both 13-md-2434 and 14-cv-6477. So Ordered. Attorney Sylvia Davidow terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/11/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06477-CS (lnl) (Entered: 09/12/2014)
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY: Sharon Love substitutes Jackqualyn R. Clinton, as counsel of record in place of Mark C. Choate. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 9/9/2014) (mml) (Entered: 09/10/2014)
STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07310(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 09/10/2014)
Third party AI contribution in government documents
Possible
Document content is reproduced directly from government sources. Some filings in our database may themselves contain AI-generated content submitted by third parties to government agencies.
Update
Alerts
Jump
