BARKER v. TESLA, INC., et al.
State Civil Lawsuit Superior Court of California, County of Alameda,
Case No. 22CV006357
Superior Court Judge Delbert Gee, presiding
|
 |
|
| Last Updated February 10, 2022 at 1:40 PM EST (4.3 years ago) |
 Update  Alerts Jump |
| Summary • Parties • Attributes • Timeline |
| Summary |
|
No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.
|
|
| Parties |
|
|
|
| Attributes |
| Case Type |
Unlimited Civil |
| Complaint Type |
Wrongful Termination
|
| Department |
Department 514 |
| Filing Location |
Hayward Hall of Justice |
|
|
| Timeline |
| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
| 8 |
Filed: 2/4/2022, Entered: None |
Document |
|
Challenge To Judicial Officer - Peremptory (170.6) Filed by: Kaylen S Barker (Plaintiff)
|
|
 Request |
|
|
|
| 7 |
Filed: 2/2/2022, Entered: None |
Event |
|
Case Management Conference scheduled for 05/04/2022 at 03:00 PM in Hayward Hall of Justice at Department 514
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 6 |
Filed: 2/2/2022, Entered: None |
Document |
|
Notice of Case Management Conference Filed by: Clerk
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 5 |
Filed: 2/1/2022, Entered: None |
Assignment |
|
Case assigned to Hon. Delbert Gee in Department 514 Hayward Hall of Justice
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 4 |
Filed: 2/1/2022, Entered: None |
Document |
|
Notice of Case Assignment Filed by: Clerk
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 3 |
Filed: 2/1/2022, Entered: None |
Document |
|
Summons on Complaint Issued and Filed by: Kaylen S Barker (Plaintiff) As to: TESLA, INC. (Defendant); STAFFMARK INVESTMENT LLC (Defendant)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
| 2 |
Filed: 2/1/2022, Entered: None |
Document |
|
Civil Case Cover Sheet Filed by: Kaylen S Barker (Plaintiff) As to: TESLA, INC. (Defendant); STAFFMARK INVESTMENT LLC (Defendant)
|
|
Request |
|
|
|
 1 |
Filed: 2/1/2022, Entered: None |
Document |
|
Complaint Filed by: Kaylen S Barker (Plaintiff) As to: TESLA, INC. (Defendant); STAFFMARK INVESTMENT LLC (Defendant)
|
|
|
|
No calendar events were found for this docket.
|
|
|
Statistics
This case has been viewed 97 times.
|
|
|
|
|
