RUGGLES v. AYESH, et al.

State Civil Lawsuit Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. 23CV036598
Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch, presiding
Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch
Last Updated July 26, 2023 at 11:10 PM EDT (3 years ago) Update UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert AlertsSpaceJump Jump
Summary

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

Parties
No Logo Ariel Maria Ruggles, Plaintiff
v.
No Logo ISSIC AYESH, Defendant
No Logo SARA AYESH, Defendant
Other Parties
No Logo Frank Roesch,
Attributes
Case Type Civil Unlimited
Complaint Type Other Personal Injury/Propert...
Department Department 17
Filing Location Rene C. Davidson Courthouse
Timeline
  Entries (7) Tab Overlap Calendar Events Tab Overlap Related (0) Tab Overlap Tools Right End
Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.
Blank 7 Filed: 6/23/2023, Entered: None Assignment
Case assigned to Hon. Frank Roesch in Department 17 Rene C. Davidson Courthouse
Request RequestSpace
Blank 6 Filed: 6/23/2023, Entered: None Event
Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 11/17/2023 at 09:00 AM in Rene C. Davidson Courthouse at Department 17
Request RequestSpace
Blank 5 Filed: 6/22/2023, Entered: None Document
Notice of Case Assignment Filed by: Clerk
Request RequestSpace
Blank 4 Filed: 6/22/2023, Entered: None Document
Notice of Case Management Conference Filed by: Clerk
Request RequestSpace
Blank 3 Filed: 6/22/2023, Entered: None Document
Summons on Complaint Issued and Filed by: Ariel Maria Ruggles (Plaintiff) As to: SARA AYESH (Defendant); ISSIC AYESH (Defendant)
Request RequestSpace
Blank 2 Filed: 6/22/2023, Entered: None Document
Civil Case Cover Sheet Filed by: Ariel Maria Ruggles (Plaintiff) As to: SARA AYESH (Defendant); ISSIC AYESH (Defendant)
Request RequestSpace
Blank 1 Filed: 6/22/2023, Entered: None Document
Complaint Filed by: Ariel Maria Ruggles (Plaintiff) As to: SARA AYESH (Defendant); ISSIC AYESH (Defendant)
Request RequestSpace

Statistics

This case has been viewed 79 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro