Page 1
JECT
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jan-14-2009 10:21 am
Case Number: CGC-08-480871 Filing Date: Jan-13-2009 10:20 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02370962 ORDER
RICHARD F SOWINSKI DR VS. AMERIGAS PROPANE LP et al
001002370962
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.
Page 2
WN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE anh, CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff Dr. Richard F, Sowinski (‘Plaintiff’) filed his complaint in this matter on October 15, 2008. Thereafter, Plaintiff and defendant U-Haul Co, of California (“UHC”) agreed to a 15 day extension of time to January 7, 2009, for UHC to respond to the complaint while the
parties engaged in a review of various collateral matters that could impact the timing, nature and
“ BL. Cc 1 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP R Raymond Rothman (SBN 142437) — Brooke L. Rowland (SBN 251707) 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 4400 4 Los Angeles, CA $0071-3106 Telephone: 213.680.6400 | Facsimile: 213.680.6499 Email: rick.rothman@bingham.com cS brooke.rowland@bingham.com ea! ™@ 6 f| Attomeys for Defendant => = 2 -HAUL CO, OF CALIFORNIA = ~™ 7 :
i © a Bs um 3 Ges | DR. RICHARD F, SOWINSKI, IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, - Plaintiff, v.
AMERIGAS PROPANE LP.; ALL STAR GAS | CORPORATION (FORMERLY EMPIRE GAS CORPORATION); CAMPORA WHOLESALE | PROPANE, INC.; CORNERSTONE PROPANE, L.P. (FORMERLY COAST GAS); | FERRELLGAS, L.P.; FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P.; HERITAGE | PROPANE/NORTHERN ENERGY; KAMPS PROPANE, INC.; PROFLAME, INC.; | SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON; SUBURBAN PROPANE GAS | CORPORATION; U-HAUL CO, OF > CALIFORNIA AND DOES 1-500, Defendants.
| scope of any responsive pleading.
AJ7280241 5.144851 50-0000330333
No. CGC-08-480871
STIPULATION AND
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 40 2-23-€
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Page 3
Oo oF KN A UH fF WY Ne — pms —“— 6 th = ~e — —= — — tt — Qo “Oo oo =~ nN Ww bh a tw WwW wat
C C
After being served with the complaint in this action, UHC has been in contact with counsel for both plaintiff and certain defendants. UHC is in the process of discussing with these defendants various issues regarding the potential response to the Complaint. Availability during the holidays has caused some delay with respect to these discussions, and UHC ts not yet ina position to finalize a response to the Complaint. .
On December 22, 2008, Plaintiff submitted a Petition for Coordination to the Judicial Council of The State of California in order to coordinate this matter with other propane related cases. The Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Coordination specifically requests a stay of this case and other propane related cases pending the resolution of the Petition.
Because there are a number of preliminary issues that remain under discussion and Plaintiff's recently filed Petition for Coordination may impact the timing, nature and scope of any responsive pleading to the Complaint, both Plaintiff and UHC believe that good cause exists to further extend the time for UHC to respond tothe Complaint. _ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties, through their undersigned counsel, that the time for UHC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is hereby extended to and including February 23, 2009. DATED: January ‘7, 2009
Bingham McCutchen LLP - R Raymond Rothman Attorneys for Defendant U-HAUL CO. OF CALIFORNIA AJ72802415.170485150-0000330333 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Page 4
to nN bo
ow Se NA wh eS
c Cc DATED: January b , 2009
’ Graham & Martin, LLP
: F. SOWINSKI he Defendant u-Haul shall have ont! 2-23-09 4 respond to complaint.
Date: January !3 2009. |, .
The Hon. Arlene Borick — A
ARLENE T. BORIC
Judge Pro Tempore
Al72802415.1/0485150-0000330333 3
AGE aM RCVDAT 11812009 5:33:48 PH IPaciic Standard Timel* SVR:LAFAXI1S * DINS:2864{* CSI0:47148500992° CURATION trnmn-s}:00-32
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Page 5
ta ow -e SN A
¢ C
PROOF OF SERVICE
Iam over 18 years of age, not a party to this action and employed in the County of Los Angeles, California at 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 4400, Los Angeles, California 90071-3106. Iam readily familiar with the practice of this office for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service and correspondence is . deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. Today I served the attached:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
by causing a true and correct copy of the above to be placed in the United States Mail at Los Angeles, California in sealed envelope(s) with postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Anthony G, Graham Graham & Martin LLP 950 South Coast Drive, Stiite 220 Costa Mesa, CA. 92626 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on January 7, 2009. Ph {Sheila Matthias
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLALINT
A/T2806557.1/0485 1 50-0000322892
Back to 
