Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

13	Filed: 3/18/2014, Entered: 3/18/2014	Unknown Document Type
	Notice Of Entry Of Judgment Filed By Respondent
	Request

12	Filed: 2/3/2014, Entered: 2/3/2014
	Order Order Returning Administrative Record
	Request

11	Filed: 1/30/2014, Entered: 1/30/2014	Unknown Document Type
	Mini Minutes For Jan-30-2014 09:30 Am For Dept 302
	Request

10	Filed: 1/30/2014, Entered: 1/30/2014	Text Judgment
	The Court Ordered The Following Judgment Entered: - Judgment On Order Denying Petition For Peremptory Or Alternative Writ Of Mandate - See Scanned Document
	Request

9	Filed: 1/30/2014, Entered: 1/30/2014
	Order Denying Petition For Peremptory Or Alternative Writ Of Mandate
	Request

8	Filed: 1/30/2014, Entered: 1/30/2014	Unknown Document Type
	Law And Motion, 302, Ruling: No Argument. The Court Adopted Its Tentative Ruling. Petitioner Roger Chan's Hearing On Writ Of Mandamus Is Denied. The Court Denies Petitioner's Request To Include The July 26, 2013, Clarification Of Pace Physician Assessment Of Roger Chan, M.d ("clarification") Document To The Administrative Record. (petitioner's Exhibits To Petition For Alternative Writ Of Mandate, Exh. 11-c.) Petitioner Has Not Shown That He Exercised Reasonable Diligence In Attempting To Produce The Clarification Document At The Administrative Hearing. (ccp Â§ 1094.5(e).) Even If The Court Considered The Clarification Document, Upon Independent Review, The Weight Of The Evidence Supports The Administrative Law Judge's Findings. A Strong Presumption Of Correctness Is Afforded To The Administrative Law Judge's Findings. (fukuda V. City Of Angels (1999) 20 Cal.4th 805, 817.) The Evidence Shows That Respondent Had Legal Grounds To Discipline Petitioner Under Business & Professions Code Â§ 2305. (administrative Record, Exh. 1.) Further, The Weight Of The Evidence Supports The Finding That Respondent's Disciplinary Requirements Are Consistent With Its Goals To "aid In The Rehabilitation Of The Licensee." (business & Professions Code Â§ 2229.) Order Signed In Open Court. Judgment Signed In Open Court. Judge: Ernest Goldsmith, Clerk: Lesley Fiscella, Reporter: Sherry Sawyer, Csr5976
	Request

7	Filed: 1/22/2014, Entered: 1/22/2014	Unknown Document Type
	Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Reply To Respondents Oppos Ot Petition For Writ Of Mandate Filed By Petitioner Chan Md, Roger S.
	Request

6	Filed: 1/16/2014, Entered: 1/16/2014	Answer
	Answer To Petition For Writ Of Mandate/ Prohibition/ Certification Filed By Respondent Medical Board Of California
	Request

5	Filed: 1/16/2014, Entered: 1/16/2014	Generic Civil Filing (with Fee)
	(1st Appearance) Respondent Medical Board Of California's Memo Of P&a In Oppos To Petitioner's Memorandum Iso Petition For Peremptory Or Alternative Writ Of Mandate Filed By Respondent Medical Board Of California
	Request

4	Filed: 12/12/2013, Entered: 12/12/2013	Unknown Document Type
	Court Reporting Services Less Than 1 Hour Filed By Petitioner Chan Md, Roger S.
	Request

3	Filed: 12/12/2013, Entered: 12/12/2013	Unknown Document Type
	Notice Of Motion Of Hearing On Writ Of Mandamus Filed By Petitioner Chan Md, Roger S. Hearing Set For Jan-30-2014 At 09:30 Am In Dept 302
	Request

2	Filed: 12/11/2013, Entered: 12/11/2013	Memorandum Of Points And Authorities;
	Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Petition For Peremptory Or Alternative Writ Of Mandate, Judicial Review Of Administrative Hearing Filed By Petitioner Chan Md, Roger S.
	Request

1	Filed: 12/11/2013, Entered: 12/11/2013	Petition For Writ Of Mandate/ Prohibition/ Certification
	Petition For Writ Of Mandate/ Prohibition/ Certification Filed By Petitioner Chan Md, Roger S. As To Respondent Medical Board Of California Department Of Consumer Affairs State Of California Judicial Council Civil Case Cover Sheet Filed
	Request

Date: 1/30/2014, Time: 09:30:00, Status: None

Notice Of Motion Of Hearing On Writ Of Mandamus Off Calendar Jan-30-2014 Denied Mini Minutes: Appearances: Robert Stewart, Esq., 415.479.3600, For Petitioner Roger S. Chan Md. Brenda Reyes, Deputy Attorney General, 415.703.5541, For Respondent Medical Board Of California Department Of Consumer Affairs. Ruling: No Argument. The Court Adopted Its Tentative Ruling. Petitioner Roger Chan's Hearing On Writ Of Mandamus Is Denied. The Court Denies Petitioner's Request To Include The July 26, 2013, Clarification Of Pace Physician Assessment Of Roger Chan, M.d ("clarification") Document To The Administrative Record. (petitioner's Exhibits To Petition For Alternative Writ Of Mandate, Exh. 11-c.) Petitioner Has Not Shown That He Exercised Reasonable Diligence In Attempting To Produce The Clarification Document At The Administrative Hearing. (ccp Â§ 1094.5(e).) Even If The Court Considered The Clarification Document, Upon Independent Review, The Weight Of The Evidence Supports The Administrative Law Judge's Findings. A Strong Presumption Of Correctness Is Afforded To The Administrative Law Judge's Findings. (fukuda V. City Of Angels (1999) 20 Cal.4th 805, 817.) The Evidence Shows That Respondent Had Legal Grounds To Discipline Petitioner Under Business & Professions Code Â§ 2305. (administrative Record, Exh. 1.) Further, The Weight Of The Evidence Supports The Finding That Respondent's Disciplinary Requirements Are Consistent With Its Goals To "aid In The Rehabilitation Of The Licensee." (business & Professions Code Â§ 2229.) Order Signed In Open Court. Judgment Signed In Open Court. Judge: Ernest Goldsmith, Clerk: Lesley Fiscella, Reporter: Sherry Sawyer, Csr5976

AI text generation	None
AI document summarization	None
AI-augmented search	None
AI-generated images	None
AI chat or Q&A interface	Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents	Possible

Roger S. Chan Md v. Medical Board Of California Department Of Consumer