Page 1
AUN A
San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group
Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-05-2007 4:18 pm
Case Number. CGC-07-467923 Filing Date: Oct-05-2007 4:15 Juke Box: 001 Image: 01904893 COMPLAINT
SYNNEX CORPORATION VS. INTERREX INC. DBA PENGUIN IMAGING et al
001001904893
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.
Page 2
C € SUM-100
SUMMONS (SOLO PARA USO DE LA CORTE)
(CITACION JUDICIAL)
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:
(AVISO AL DEMANDADO):
INTERREX, INC. dba PENGUIN IMAGING; BERNIE OZAROWSKI; and DOES | to 10, inclusive
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:
(LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):
SYNNEX CORPORATION
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have 3 copy served on the plaintiff. A fetter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case, There may be 2 court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the Callfornia Courts Online Self-Help Center (wwew.courtinfo.ca.goviselfhetp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you, If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attomey right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to callan attorney referral service. if you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free tegal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Cntine Seif-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association.
Tiene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entrequen esta citacién y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en estas corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una Hamada telefonica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte, Es posible que haya un formutario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de fa corte y mas Informacién en ef Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfheip/espanol), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condade o en Ia corte que Je quede mas cerca. Sino puede pagar Ia cuota de presentacién, pida al secretarfo de ia corte que te dé un formulario de exencién de pago de cuotas. Sino presenta su respuesta a tempo, puede perder ef caso por incumplimiento y fa corte le podré quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia.
Hay otros requisites legales, Es recomendable que flame a un abogado Inmediatamente. Sino conoce a un abogado, puede Hamar aun servicio de remisién a abogados. SI no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con fos requisitos para obtener servicios legates gratuites de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en ef sitio web de Calffornia Legal Services, (www lawtrelpcalifornia.org], en ef Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California,
(www. courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/espanol/) o poniéndose en contacto con fa corte o el colegio de abogados locales.
The name and address of the court is: - ~ (El nombre y direccidn de la corte es). wane Ga Q 7 - 4 6 7 9 ao SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO =
Main Courthouse Branch 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102
The name, address, and telephone number of plaintiffs attomey, or plaintiff without an attorney, is:
(El nombre, fa direccién y ef numero de teléfono del abogado del demandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es):
Jay M. Tenenbaum (Bar # 134221) Phone No.: (71 3 991-9131
SEALS & TENENBAUM Fax No.: (714) 991-6526
2323 W. Lincoln Ave., Suite 127, Anaheim, CA 92801 Nip
DATE: Clerk, by PALATE : eputy
(Fecha) OCT = 5 200? Gordon Park-Li (Secretaria) or 1“ eagjuntoy
(For proof of service of this summons, use Proof of Service of Summons (form POS-010).)
(Para prueba de entrega de esta citatién use ef formutario Proof of Service of Summons, (POS-070)).
NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED: You are served
[SEAL] 1. (—) as an individuat defendant.
2. [__] as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify):
3. [1] on behatf of (specify):
under: [__} CCP 416.10 (corporation) [7] CCP 416.60 (minor) (__.] CCP 416.20 (defunct corporation) [_] CCP 416.70 (conservatee) (_] CCP 416.40 (association or partnership) [[_] CCP 416.90 (authorized person) (_) other (specify):
4. [__] by personal delivery on (catey:
Page tof 1 Code of Civil Procedure §§ 412 20, 485
LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
SUM-100 [Rev. January 1, 2004] SUMMONS
Page 3
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY amo ae end actress): FOR COURT USE ONLY cmo19 Jay M. Tenenbaum (State Bar # 134221) SEALS & TENENBAUM 2323 W. Lincoln Ave. Suite 127, Anaheim, “4 r¥091 6526 receprone no: (714) 991-' FAXNO:; 991- ATTORNEY FOR (Name): San Francisco County ‘Superior cour SUPERIOR COURT OF GALIFoRma, county oF SAN FRAN CISCO grreet anoness: 400 McAllister Street oct - 5 2007 MAILING ADDRESS: * ery ano 2 cove: San Francisco 94102 GORDON PAH, Clerk erancu name. Main Courthouse CASE NAME: Be Deputy Clerk SYNNEX V. INTERREX CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation aren 2 CEC -07-4679 25 LJ amount Amount Cj Counter CI Joinder 0 / 4 “ demanded demanded fs Filed with first appearance by defendant | “° exceeds $25,000) _ $25,000 or fess) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT:
jiems 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
~ Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract LO Auto (22) (_] Breach of contract/warranty (06) Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09)
Employment
Other PUPDIWD (Personal InJury/Property Other collections {09) [__] construction defect (10) Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort insurance coverage (18} [_] Mass tort (40)
Asbestos (04) [_] other contract (37) Securities litigation (28) [__] Product ability (24) Real Property EnvironmentaVToxic tort (30) L__] Medical matpractice (45) Eminent domain/inverse [__] insurance coverage claims arising from the [__) other PYPOWD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case Non-PUPDIWD (Other) Tort [_] Wrongful eviction (33) types (41)
Business torV/unfair business practice (07) CL] Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment C_] civil rights (08) Untawtul Detainer Enforcement of judgment (20) [_} Detamation (13) L] Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Comptaint (_] Franttt6) “ foH{32) [_] rico (27 [1] intettectual property (19) [] rugs (38) [__] other complaint (not specified above) (42) [_] Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review Misceltaneous Civil Petition [__] otner non-PUPDAND tort (35) Asset forfeiture (05)
Provisionalty Complex Civit Litigation (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403)
[_] Antitrust/Trade regulation (03)
Partnership and corporate governance (21)
{_] Petition re: arbitration award (11) CJ Other petition (not specified above) ( 43) LJ Writ of mandate (02)
(_]_ Other judicial review (39)
[__] Wrongful termination (38) {__] Other emptoyment (15)
2. Thiscase L_is isnot complex under rule 3.400 of the Catifornia Rules of Court. If the case Is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management:
a.L_] Large number of separately represented parties © d. CJ Large number of witnesses b.L__] Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. L__] Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court c. L_| Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. I Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision 3, Remedies sought (check aif that apply): aLlx] monetary b.(_] nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief sc. (__]punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): TWO (2) 5, This case L_Jis isnot actass action suit.
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-0
Date: October 2, 2007 Jay M. Tenenbaum
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE 7
e Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except under the Probate Code, Famity Code, or Welfare and Institutions in sanctions.
* File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by focal court rule,
® If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the action or proceeding.
« Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740
small claims cases or cases filed Code). (Cal, Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result
or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only. sot?
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judas! Council of Californie CM-010 (Rev. July 1, 2007]
Cal. Rudes of Court, niles 2 30, 3.220, 3. 400-3.403, 3.740, Ca Standents of Judicial Administration, aid. 3.10 ww.courbinie.ce gov LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial C ‘council Forms
i I SS
Page 4
Oo «© 4 DA Ww & WY NH = Ko NN NH RB ND OND ON ee eae a Sl ll el SBS NS RRR BO BF SF 6b Be ANA H Bw NY = S
c C SUMMONS ISSUED
JAY M. TENENBAUM, ESQ. Bar No. 13422] F ib D ourt SEALS & TENENBAUM San Francisco Chines eberor C ATTORNEYS AT LAW act = 5° 2007 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92801 ANAHEIM, CALIF 41.Clerk
(714) 991-9131 GORDON Pane et ——H se SeButy Clerk
P. NATT ATTORNEYS FOR: PLAINTIFF, SYNNEX CORPORATION CASEMANAGEMENT CONTERENCESE FEB ~ 8 2008 -10# SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 212 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO , MAIN COURTHOUSE SYNNEX CORPORATION, ) Case No, G6 -07-4679 25 ) Plaintiff, )} DEMAND = $4,608.73 ) vs. } COMPLAINT FOR:
) INTERREX, INC, dba PENGUIN IMAGING; ) 1. BREACH OF BERNIE OZAROWSKI: and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, ) CONTRACT ) 2. BREACH OF Defendants. ) PERSONAL GUARANTEE ) LIMITED CIVIL CASE Plaintiff, SYNNEX CORPORATION, ("Plaintiff") alleges:
1. Plaintiff is, and at all times herein mentioned was, a Delaware Corporation qualified to do business in California.
2. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that Defendant, INTERREX, INC, dba PENGUIN IMAGING, is and was a New Jersey Corporation that entered into an agreement agreeing to the jurisdiction of this court.
3. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that Defendant, BERNIE OZAROWSKI, is and was an individual that entered into an agreement agreeing to the jurisdiction of this court.
Ht 1 145820 COMPLAINT This is an attempt to collect a debt. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose. =
Page 5
Oo 8 SN DA WA S&S WY NHN = N WN BW BK KOO ND RD mmm me lt tlt RP Y8eRaAR EBL S&F SFetwR aarkranss
c € 4, Plaintiff is unaware of the true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise of the defendants sued herein as Does 1 to 10, inclusive, and therefore sues these defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this complaint to show the true name and capacities of the fictitiously named Doe defendants when Plaintiff ascertains same.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
BREACH OF CONTRACT
AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
5. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 3, inclusive, of this Complaint as though wholly set forth herein.
6. Plaintiff alleges that on or about JANUARY 3, 2005, a written agreement was made between SYNNEX CORPORATION and INTERREX, INC. dba PENGUIN IMAGING; BERNIE OZAROWSKI; DOES I to 10, inclusive. By the terms of said agreement, Plaintiff agreed to provide a booth at a trade show to Defendant(s). Defendant(s) promised to pay Plaintiff the agreed upon price of the booth. A copy of the signed agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof by this reference.
7, On or about APRIL 23, 2005 Defendants(s), and each of them, breached the agreement by failing to either pay for the booth or cancel prior to the deadline provided for within the contract. Plaintiff is entitled to liquidated damages pursuant to the agreement in the event Defendant fails to cancel in a timely fashion. Demand for the outstanding balance owed of $4,608.73 was made upon Defendant(s), and each of them. Defendant(s), and each of them, have failed and refused and continue to fail and refuse to pay the remaining balance due.
8. Plaintiff has performed all obligations to Defendant(s) except those obligations Plaintiff was prevented or excused from performing.
9. Plaintiff suffered damages legally (proximately) caused by Defendant(s) breach of the agreement in the sum of $4,608.73 which is the outstanding balance and reasonable value now due, owing and unpaid, despite Plaintiff's demands, plus prejudgment interest thereon at the rate of 1.5% per month (18% per annum) from APRIL 23, 2005.
2 145820 ‘ COMPLAINT This is an attempt to collect a debt. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.
Page 6
Do ff SD wr F&F WD KH = — et Ww MN = & N No Nh N No Ny to NOUN —_ —_ _ —_ —_ o ws] nn ry = lao nN — So oe oo =~] nan wn c € SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF PERSONAL GUARANTEE AGAINST DEFENDANT _BERNIE OZAROWSK]
10. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs | through 10, inclusive, of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.
11, Asanalternative and cumulative remedy, Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that on or about JANUARY 3, 2005, Defendant BERNIE OZAROWSKI, as | guarantor, executed and delivered to Plaintiff his/her signed Personal Guarantee. A true and correct copy of said Guarantee is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference is incorporated herein. Under the terms of said Guarantee, said Defendant BERNIE OZAROWSKI, as Guarantor, for valuable consideration, agreed to be primarily liable to Plaintiff for the payment of all sums which were then due or which might thereafter become due to Plaintiff on account of any extension of credit to Defendant INTERREX, INC. dba PENGUIN IMAGING.
— &
12. Defendant BERNIE OZAROWSKI is indebted to Plaintiff in the principal sum of $4,608.73 as is more fully set forth in the First Cause of Action. Although demand has been made for payment, neither said sum nor any part thereof has been paid, and there is still due, owing and unpaid the sum of $4,608.73.
13. Defendant breached the personal guarantee with Plaintiff by failing to pay Plaintiff the sum of $4,608.73.
14, Pursuant to the terms of the written guarantee, Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable costs of collection incurred in enforcing the terms of the personal guarantees against Defendant, in the sum according to proof at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant(s), and each of them, as follows:
ON THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
1. For the principal sum of $4,608.73; 3 145820 COMPLAINT This is an attempt to colfect adebt. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.
Page 7
Oo fo ~ DA vA F&F WY NO = bh wm N BH KO KOO Ro RDO ee OES OO ES ele BS RRR BEB TF FS CGeB A AARHEKH |= C C
2. For interest at the rate of 1.5% per month (18% per annum) from on and after APRIL 23, 2005; ON THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 3, For the principal sum of $4,608.73; 4, For interest at the rate of 1.5% per month (18% per annum) from APRIL 23, 2005 ON _ALL CAUSES OF ACTION
5. For cost of suit incurred herein; and
6. For such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
7. PLAINTIFF REMITS ALL DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF THE JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT OF THIS COURT.
DATED: October 2, 2007 SEALS & TENENBAUM by: __ JAY M. TENENBAUM, ESQ.
Aone for Plaintiff tl 4 145820 COMPLAINT This is an attempt to collect a debt. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.
Page 8
EXHIBIT “A”
Page 9
” ‘ 1 Syy L6 LFONE A .
~ ny = ~~ ~“ = yy A < - Ac& $3.7 UF os Drive Premont, CA $05.38
(800) 756-9888 © (510) 656-7333 FeuU"e
R48 Ceibeldiey er 6 diesen (if yes, check which) ate devat! bfx m crea cuted Cetra aE nll *
Q Na, Le EPIL LLVALP W Oranowsec j la prcheses tw Syrex.
‘ Oz-# does K |
Page 10
lication
Credit
3h 2 3 altel fai le ALT I | ala 1 (ate | LES K Ra | |e Is ; HS i bt
eel
(i
?
i
3423 3
With Ll
—
; jv
le (querwrtery home mxbens)
aSS3a7
95°
& paneword te
Credit FAX.
(864) 289-4175 Seplicetion, ceneact your SYHMAMEX suing represantative Pinca orders, ctweck ordur statue, ebtade gerd ong
(800) 756-9888
Hi sj hl F
Page 11
August 29, 2007 Seals & Yenenbaum 2323 W. Lincoln Avenue, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92801 Re: Synnex Vs. —_Interrex/Penguin Imaging / Bernie Ozarowski Our File No: 26596 Your File No: 145820 Amount: $4,608.73 Dear Sirs:
Please find enclosed additional information we received in our office. Best regards, J ermandez 1 Department:
¢ Andersen Group Worldwide, LLC.
3409 N. Hullen Street, Suite 200 Metairie, LA 70002-3485 Toll Free 800-257-5786 or 504-207-5707 © Fax 504-207-5700 © www.theandersengroup.com
Page 12
c C
1| JAY M. TENENBAUM, ESQ. Bar No. 134221 SEALS & TENENBAUM cour 2|| ATTORNEYS AT LAW | San Francisco County Super 2323 W. Lincoln Ave., Suite 127 .
Anaheim CA 92801 oct - 5 2007 991-9131 ‘ i | Attorneys for: PLAINTIFF, BY. Deputy Clerk | SYNNEX CORPORATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA | COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MAIN COURTHOUSE
- 923 | SYNNEX CORPORATION, Case NEE 07-467 2 27 Plaintiff, } DECLARATION PURSUANT TO ) CCP 395 (b): VENUE FOR vs. ) PERSONAL, FAMILY OR } HOUSEHOLD OBLIGATIONS || INTERREX,. INC. dba PENGUIN IMAGING; ) 1s BERNIE OZAROWSKI, ) LIMITED CIVIL ) ~Beferrdants—: “ye | ) I, Jay M. Tenenbaum, declare as follows: Yes No
1. This is an obligation of the defendant for goods, __ _X
services, loan or extension of credit intended primarily for personal, || family or household use.
| 2. San Francisco is the County:
| a. In which the defendant in fact signed the contract. xX _ b. In which the defendant resided at the time the contract
| was entered into _ _ c. In which the defendant resided at the commencement of
the action _ _* | ] declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on || October 2, 2007, at Anaheim, California.
Jay M. Tenenbaum, Esq.
/Declarant
DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CCP 395 (b): VENUE FOR PERSONAL, FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD OBLIGATIONS
Back to 
