There was a problem locating the requested document.
Page 1 AE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jul-05-2013 12:40 pm
Case Number: CGC-13-531155
Filing Date: Jun-25-2013 12:38
Filed by: JEFFREY LEE
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04116298
ORDER
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. THOMAS DEE
ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., F/K/A DEE
001004116298
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Page 2 REC'D JUN 17 2013
BY FAX
e gw ee paid @r 20
CM-020
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Gar number, and address): FOR COURY USE ONLY
Sara M. Thorpe (SBN: 146529)
-- GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 941 1t
TELEPHONE NO. (415)986-5900 FAX NO. (Optional): ¥F F rE
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional) sthorpe@gordonrees.com Bo 4 a
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff United States Fire Insurance Co. f° . oe if a urt
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco
street aporess: 400 McAllister St. - bud 2 5 2013
MAILING ADDRESS: Same
cityanozipcooe: San Francisco, CA 94102
ae COPE: , CLERK OF THE COURT
. fe}
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: United States Fire Insurance Co. ~—" *" Beputy Clerk
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Thomas Dee Engineering Co., Inc.
CASE NUMBER:
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE
PLEADING AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO SERVEAND EES PMD CGC-13-531155
[~] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE > &-|26-/
Note: This ox parte application will be considered without a personal appearance. HEARING DATE:
(See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1207(2).) DEPT: TIME:
1. Applicant (name): United States Fire Insurance Company
is
a. plaintiff
b.(_] cross-compiainant
eC] petitioner
d.[("_] defendant
e.[__] cross-defendant
f. _] respondent
g.L__] other (describe):
2. The complaint or other initial pleading in this action was filed on (date): May 3, 2013
3. Applicant requests that the court grant an order extending time for service of the following pleading:
a.C_] Complaint
b.__] Cross-compliaint
c.[_] Petition
d. Answer or other responsive pleading
e. CJ Other (descnibe):
4. Service and filing of the pleading listed in item 3 is presently required to be completed by (date): June 24, 2013
5. Previous applications, orders, or stipulations for an extension of time to serve and file in this action are:
a. [__} None
b. 7] The following (describe aif, including the length of any previous extensions):
The parties agreed by stipulation to extend the time to file a responsive pleading by 15 days
pursuant to CRC 3.110(d).
6. Applicant requests an extension of time to serve and file the pleading fisted in item 3 on the following parties (name each):
United States Fire Insurance Company
Page 1 of 2
Fam aporeved for Optional Use EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Cal. Rules of Court,
fies 3.110, 3.1200-3.1207
M020 Rev. January 1, 2008) TO SERVE PLEADING AND ORDERS www. courtinto.ca.govPage 3 CM-020
CASE NAME: CASE NUMBER:
United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Thomas Dee Engincering, Inc. CGC-13-531155
7. The pleading has not yet been filed and served on the parties listed in item 6 for the following reasons (describe the efforts that have
been made fo serve the pleading and why service has not been completed):
The partics are attempting to resolve their dispute.
[-] Continued on Attachment 7.
8. An extension of time to serve and file the pleading should be granted for the following reasons:
The partics have stipulated to extend the time to file aa responsive pleading while thcy attempt to resolve
their dispute.
(__] Continued on Attachment 8.
9. If an extension of time is granted, filing and service on the parties listed in item 6 will be completed by (date):
August 26, 2013
10. Notice of this application under rules 3.1200-—3.1207 has been provided as required (describe all parties or counsel to whom
notice was given; the date, time, and manner of giving notice; what the Parties or counsel were told and their responses; and
whether opposition is expected) or [__] is not required (state reasons):
The parties have agreed to extend the time to file a responsive pleading pursuant to the stipulation attached
to this application.
Continued on Attachment 10.
11. Number of pages attached: 2
| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: June (7201 3
Sara M. Thorpe >
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF APPLICANT OR ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT) / (SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT)
Order on Application Is below [__] ona separate document.
ORDER
o
1. The application for an order extending time to shee er tale pleading is granted [__] denied.
2. The pleading must be served and filed no later than (date): &-26-13
c. Place:
4. Other orders:
Date: B-25-13
5. Acopy of this application and order must be served on all parties or their (iu have appeared in the case.
\
PNAGD
020 Rev. January 1, 2008 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Page ota
TO SERVE PLEADING AND ORDERS
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
AE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jul-05-2013 12:40 pm
Case Number: CGC-13-531155
Filing Date: Jun-25-2013 12:38
Filed by: JEFFREY LEE
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04116298
ORDER
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. THOMAS DEE
ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., F/K/A DEE
001004116298
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.
PDF Page 3
REC'D JUN 17 2013
BY FAX
e gw ee paid @r 20
CM-020
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Gar number, and address): FOR COURY USE ONLY
Sara M. Thorpe (SBN: 146529)
-- GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 941 1t
TELEPHONE NO. (415)986-5900 FAX NO. (Optional): ¥F F rE
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional) sthorpe@gordonrees.com Bo 4 a
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff United States Fire Insurance Co. f° . oe if a urt
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco
street aporess: 400 McAllister St. - bud 2 5 2013
MAILING ADDRESS: Same
cityanozipcooe: San Francisco, CA 94102
ae COPE: , CLERK OF THE COURT
. fe}
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: United States Fire Insurance Co. ~—" *" Beputy Clerk
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Thomas Dee Engineering Co., Inc.
CASE NUMBER:
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE
PLEADING AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO SERVEAND EES PMD CGC-13-531155
[~] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE > &-|26-/
Note: This ox parte application will be considered without a personal appearance. HEARING DATE:
(See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1207(2).) DEPT: TIME:
1. Applicant (name): United States Fire Insurance Company
is
a. plaintiff
b.(_] cross-compiainant
eC] petitioner
d.[("_] defendant
e.[__] cross-defendant
f. _] respondent
g.L__] other (describe):
2. The complaint or other initial pleading in this action was filed on (date): May 3, 2013
3. Applicant requests that the court grant an order extending time for service of the following pleading:
a.C_] Complaint
b.__] Cross-compliaint
c.[_] Petition
d. Answer or other responsive pleading
e. CJ Other (descnibe):
4. Service and filing of the pleading listed in item 3 is presently required to be completed by (date): June 24, 2013
5. Previous applications, orders, or stipulations for an extension of time to serve and file in this action are:
a. [__} None
b. 7] The following (describe aif, including the length of any previous extensions):
The parties agreed by stipulation to extend the time to file a responsive pleading by 15 days
pursuant to CRC 3.110(d).
6. Applicant requests an extension of time to serve and file the pleading fisted in item 3 on the following parties (name each):
United States Fire Insurance Company
Page 1 of 2
Fam aporeved for Optional Use EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Cal. Rules of Court,
fies 3.110, 3.1200-3.1207
M020 Rev. January 1, 2008) TO SERVE PLEADING AND ORDERS www. courtinto.ca.gov
PDF Page 4
CM-020
CASE NAME: CASE NUMBER:
United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Thomas Dee Engincering, Inc. CGC-13-531155
7. The pleading has not yet been filed and served on the parties listed in item 6 for the following reasons (describe the efforts that have
been made fo serve the pleading and why service has not been completed):
The partics are attempting to resolve their dispute.
[-] Continued on Attachment 7.
8. An extension of time to serve and file the pleading should be granted for the following reasons:
The partics have stipulated to extend the time to file aa responsive pleading while thcy attempt to resolve
their dispute.
(__] Continued on Attachment 8.
9. If an extension of time is granted, filing and service on the parties listed in item 6 will be completed by (date):
August 26, 2013
10. Notice of this application under rules 3.1200-—3.1207 has been provided as required (describe all parties or counsel to whom
notice was given; the date, time, and manner of giving notice; what the Parties or counsel were told and their responses; and
whether opposition is expected) or [__] is not required (state reasons):
The parties have agreed to extend the time to file a responsive pleading pursuant to the stipulation attached
to this application.
Continued on Attachment 10.
11. Number of pages attached: 2
| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: June (7201 3
Sara M. Thorpe >
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF APPLICANT OR ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT) / (SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT)
Order on Application Is below [__] ona separate document.
ORDER
o
1. The application for an order extending time to shee er tale pleading is granted [__] denied.
2. The pleading must be served and filed no later than (date): &-26-13
c. Place:
4. Other orders:
Date: B-25-13
5. Acopy of this application and order must be served on all parties or their (iu have appeared in the case.
\
PNAGD
020 Rev. January 1, 2008 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Page ota
TO SERVE PLEADING AND ORDERS
Back to 
