Len Wallace, et al ., Petitioners v. Montana, et al .
Administrative Proceeding Supreme Court of the United States ,
Case No. 08-1395
Update Alerts Jump
Summary Parties Attributes Timeline
Summary
No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.
Parties
Attributes
Lower Court
Supreme Court of Montana
Lower Court Case No(s).
05-473
Lower Court Decision Date
12/31/2008
Timeline
Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.
11
Filed: 10/13/2009, Entered: None
Petition DENIED.
10
Filed: 9/16/2009, Entered: None
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 9, 2009.
9
Filed: 9/9/2009, Entered: None
Letter of August 31, 2009, from counsel for Sportsmen for I-143, et al . received.
8
Filed: 8/31/2009, Entered: None
Brief of respondents Montana, et al . in opposition filed.
7
Filed: 6/26/2009, Entered: None
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 31, 2009, for all respondents.
6
Filed: 6/15/2009, Entered: None
Response Requested . (Due July 15, 2009)
5
Filed: 6/9/2009, Entered: None
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2009.
4
Filed: 6/1/2009, Entered: None
Waiver of right of respondents Sportmen for I-143 & Montana Wildlife Federation to respond filed.
3
Filed: 5/27/2009, Entered: None
Waiver of right of respondents Montana, et al . to respond filed.
2
Filed: 5/11/2009, Entered: None
Appendix of Len Wallace, et al . filed.
1
Filed: 5/11/2009, Entered: None
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2009)
No calendar events were found for this docket.
Statistics
This case has been viewed 15 times.
Information Facts
https://www.plainsite.org/courts/supreme-court-of-the-united-states/len-wallace-et-al-petitioners-v-montana-et-al/26s8l5yvj/
Primary Sources
Government agencies: SEC/EDGAR, federal and state courts, USPTO, IRS, and others
AI text generation None
AI document summarization None
AI-augmented search None
AI-generated images None
AI chat or Q&A interface Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents Possible
Document content is reproduced directly from government sources. Some filings in our database may themselves contain AI-generated content submitted by third parties to government agencies.