Roderick Serrano, Petitioner v. Washington County, Oregon, et al .
Administrative Proceeding Supreme Court of the United States ,
Case No. 05-5144
Update Alerts
Summary
Parties (2)
Timeline (9)
Attributes (4)
Tools
No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.
Roderick Serrano , Petitioner
▼ Represented by Natal, South Africa
v.
Washington County, Oregon, et al. , Respondent
▼ Represented by Unknown Firm
Related Case
04A994
Lower Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lower Court Case No(s).
04-35066
Lower Court Decision Date
1/14/2005
Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.
9
Filed: 11/28/2005, Entered: None
Rehearing DENIED.
8
Filed: 11/9/2005, Entered: None
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2005.
7
Filed: 10/28/2005, Entered: None
Petition for Rehearing filed.
6
Filed: 10/3/2005, Entered: None
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
5
Filed: 8/4/2005, Entered: None
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2005.
4
Filed: 7/18/2005, Entered: None
Waiver of right of respondent Washington County, Oregon, et al . to respond filed.
3
Filed: 6/29/2005, Entered: None
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2005)
2
Filed: 5/25/2005, Entered: None
Application (04A994) granted by Justice O'Connor extending the time to file until June 29, 2005.
1
Filed: 5/18/2005, Entered: None
Application (04A994) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 30, 2005 to July 14, 2005, submitted to Justice O'Connor.
Statistics
This case has been viewed 41 times.
Information Facts
https://www.plainsite.org/courts/supreme-court-of-the-united-states/roderick-serrano-petitioner-v-washington-county-oregon-et-al/26i4odkcv/
Primary Sources
Government agencies: SEC/EDGAR, federal and state courts, USPTO, IRS, and others
AI text generation None
AI document summarization None
AI-augmented search None
AI-generated images None
AI chat or Q&A interface Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents Possible
Document content is reproduced directly from government sources. Some filings in our database may themselves contain AI-generated content submitted by third parties to government agencies.