Penthouse International Ltd. And Forum I Nternational Ltd. v. National Federation Of Independent Busin Ess

Administrative Proceeding USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. 91073409-OPP
Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Update UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert AlertsSpaceJump Jump
Summary

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

Parties
No Logo Penthouse International Ltd. And Forum I Nternational Ltd., Plaintiff

Represented by Attn: Stevan J. Bosses

Name Phone Fax E-Mail
Space Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper And Scinto
v.
No Logo National Federation Of Independent Business, Defendant

Represented by Unknown Firm

Name Phone Fax E-Mail
Space J.t. Martin +1 202 296 3650
Attributes
Type Opposition
Date in Location 21-JUL-86
Status Code 9
Location Code 900
Charge to Location Code 900
Timeline
  Entries (6) Tab Overlap Calendar Events Tab Overlap Related (2) Tab Overlap Tools Right End
Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 6 Filed: 7/21/1986, Entered: None N
Terminated
Request Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply)Space LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 5 Filed: 7/7/1986, Entered: None T
Board's Decision: Sustained
Request Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply)Space LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 4 Filed: 5/23/1986, Entered: None T
Notice Of Default
Request Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply)Space LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 3 Filed: 3/17/1986, Entered: None T
Pending, Instituted
Request Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply)Space LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 2 Filed: 3/17/1986, Entered: None E
Notice Sent; Answer Due (due Date)
Request Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply)Space LREF
Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 1 Filed: 1/27/1986, Entered: None N
Filed And Fee
Request Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply)Space LREF

Statistics

This case has been viewed 19 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro