Federal District Appellate Supreme
Washington Western District Court Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States Supreme Court

Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc

Federal Civil Lawsuit Washington Western District Court, Case No. 2:19-cv-00067-MJP
District Judge Marsha J. Pechman, presiding
Tags
District Judge Marsha J. Pechman

Reality Check: Tesla, Inc.

This docket is featured in the January 7, 2020 article Reality Check: Tesla, Inc..

Last Updated July 1, 2022 at 8:15 PM EDT (4.2 years ago) Update UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Alerts
Summary Parties (2) Timeline (110) Attributes (19) Tools
Cristina Balan, a former Tesla engineer who worked on battery systems and who later became a public whistleblower regarding Tesla's battery manufacturing practices, filed this defamation lawsuit in Ja...

AI case summary available.
Upgrade to PlainSite Pro to read it.

Complaints
COMPLAINT, filed by Cristina Balan against defendant(s) Tesla Motors Inc with JURY DEMAND (Summons(es) issued) (Receipt # SEA094286) (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit, # (2) Civil Cover Sheet)(ST)ComplaintDocument 1
1/15/2019
Responses
ANSWER to [1] Complaint with JURY DEMAND Attorney Darin M Sands added to party Tesla Motors Inc(pty:dft) by Tesla Motors Inc.(Sands, Darin)AnswerDocument 5
2/14/2019
MOTION to Dismiss Petitioners Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award or, Alternatively, Motion to Transfer, filed by Defendant Tesla Motors Inc. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/1/2022, (Mills, Jason)Motion to DismissDocument 87
3/10/2022
Orders
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's [17] Motion to Compel Arbitration. This matter is stayed until the conclusion of the arbitration by written decision of the arbitrator. The Parties are to notify the Court within 10 days of the decision. The Parties will also advise the Court ev...Order on Motion to CompelDocument 40
6/27/2019
ORDER denying Plaintiff's [47] Motion for Relief from the Court's Order Granting Partial Arbitration. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)Order on Motion for ReliefDocument 62
3/16/2020
Order on Motion to DismissDocument 102
6/16/2022
Related Cases

Statistics

This case has been viewed 2,528 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro