Page 1
Case 3:25-cv-06052-DGE
Document 13
Filed 01/16/26
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
JEFFREY L. DENNIS et al., v.
Plaintiffs,
TESLA INC.,
CASE NO. 3:25-cv-06052-DGE ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. NO. 11)
Defendant.
This matter comes before the Court on its own review of the record. Pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), a party may amend its pleading once as a matter of right no
later than 21 days after service of a responsive pleading, or relevant here, 21 days after service of
a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). On December 29, 2025, Defendant filed
a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. (Dkt. No. 11.) On January 16, 2026, Plaintiffs filed an
amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 12.)
As Plaintiffs’ amended complaint supersedes their original complaint, the Court DENIES
as moot Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 11) Plaintiff’s original complaint (Dkt. No. 1).
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. NO. 11) - 1
Page 2
Case 3:25-cv-06052-DGE
Document 13
Filed 01/16/26
Page 2 of 2
See Valadez v. Chertoff, 656 F.3d 851, 857 (9th Cir. 2011); Umouyo v. Bank of America
NA, 2022 WL 2392386, at *1 (W.D. Wash. July 1, 2022). Defendant may, at its discretion, file a
new motion to dismiss based on the amended complaint.
Dated this 16th day of January, 2026.
A
David G. Estudillo United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. NO. 11) - 2
Back to 
