United Assoc Of Jour, et al v. United Assoc Of Jour, et al

Federal Civil Lawsuit Connecticut District Court, Case No. 2:90-cv-00244-TEC
District Judge T. Emmet Clarie, presiding

No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.

		Leonard, Murray, Plaintiff

		Michael Ford, Plaintiff

		Steamfitters Local No. 218, Plaintiff

		United Assoc Of Journeymen & Apprentices, Plumbing/pipe, Plaintiff


v.

		Dominic Carnavale, Defendant

		Donald McNamara, Defendant

		Law Offices Of John J Murray, Defendant Officially listed as "John J. Murray"

		M. Eddie Moore, Defendant

		Marvin J. Boede, Defendant

		United Assoc Of Journeymen & Apprentices Plumbing/pipe, Defendant

Office	Hartford
Filed	3/19/1990
Jury Demand	None
Demand	$0
Nature of Suit	730 - Labor: Reporting/Disclosure
Cause	No cause code entered
Jurisdiction	Federal Question
Disposition	Dismissed - Lack of Jurisdiction
County	XX US, Outside State
Terminated	5/13/1992
Origin	1
Reopened	None
Lead Case	None
Related Case
Other Court Case	None
Def Custody Status
Flag	CLOSED

Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.

--	Filed: 10/1/1992, Entered: 10/1/1992	Remark
	Defendant's Exhibits A - I sent 9/1/92; receipt acknowledged by Jrome Paun 9/29/92 (Carpenter, M.)


--	Filed: 9/23/1992, Entered: 9/23/1992	Remark
	Plaintiff's Exhibits destroyed as they were not picked up by 9/15/92 per ltr 9/1/92 (Carpenter, M.)


36	Filed: 5/13/1992, Entered: 5/13/1992	Order on Motion for Judgment
	JUDGMENT re: It is ord that this act be and h3erevby is dismissed w/out costs to any party .. for United Assoc Of Jour, John J. Murray, M. Eddie Moore, Donald McNamara against United Assoc Of Jour, Steamfitters Local N, Leonard Murray ( signed by Clerk ) (Former Employee)


--	Filed: 5/13/1992, Entered: 5/13/1992	Terminated Case
	Case closed (Johnson, D.)


35	Filed: 4/8/1992, Entered: 4/8/1992	~Notice (other)
	NOTICE to Counsel Regarding Rule 16(a) Lack of Prosecution. Status Report due on 4/28/92 ( Signed by Clerk ) (Former Employee)

Statistics

This case has been viewed 54 times.


Issues	Laws	Cases	Pro	Articles	Firms	Entities