Dyer v. City of Melrose
Administrative Proceeding Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 93

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Request Update Request UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Get E-Mail Alerts

Space Space

  Text Tab Overlap Citations (0) Tab Overlap Cited By (62) Right End
215 U.S. 594 (1910)

DYER
v.
CITY OF MELROSE.

No. 93.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 20, 1910.
Decided January 24, 1910.
ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS.

Mr. Chester M. Pratt for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Claude L. Allen for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Hibernia Savings Society v. San Francisco, 200 U.S. 310; McIntosh v. Aubrey, 185 U.S. 122; Railroad Co. v. Peniston, 18 Wall. 5; case below, Dyer v. Melrose, 197 Massachusetts, 99.

Statistics

This case has been viewed 87 times.

No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?