United States v. McDaniel
Appeal Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Case No. 03-6235

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Request Update Request UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Get E-Mail Alerts

Space Space

  Text Tab Overlap Citations (0) Tab Overlap Cited By (19) Right End
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KENNETH EUGENE MCDANIEL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-111, CA-00-90-3) Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: May 30, 2003 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Eugene McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Eugene McDaniel appeals from the district court?s order denying his ?Motion for an Order to Compel/Specific Performance of a Plea Agreement.? We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McDaniel, Nos. CR-9-111; CA-00-90-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[End Page 2]

Statistics

This case has been viewed 25 times.

No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?