Louis Godinez, et al., v. Stallion Tire Co., Inc. et al.,
State Civil Lawsuit Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles,
Case No. BC012407
|
|
|
|
 Update  Alerts Jump |
| Summary • Parties • Attributes • Timeline |
| Summary |
|
No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.
|
|
| Parties |
|
 |
Louis Godinez, Plaintiff/Petitioner |
|
|
Represented by Lerglund & Johnson
|
|
|
Lucy Godinez, Plaintiff/Petitioner |
|
|
Represented by Lerglund & Johnson
|
|
| v. |
|
|
|
Applied Power Inc., Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
|
Arrow-hart, Inc., Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
|
Brad Ragan, Inc., Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
|
Enepac Corporation, Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
|
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. The, Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
|
Russ Chandler & Associates,inc., Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
|
Stallion Preses And Tires, Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
|
Stallion Tire Co. Inc., Defendant/Respondent |
|
|
Represented by Stark, Rasak & Clarke
|
|
| Other Parties |
|
|
|
Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP, Atty for Defendant and Cross-Complnt
Officially listed as "Wolf Rifkin & Shapiro"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Attributes |
| Type |
Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction) |
| Status |
Dismissed - Other 05/19/1992 |
|
|
| Timeline |
| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
| 14 |
Filed: 3/5/1992, Entered: 3/5/1992 |
Substitution of Attorney |
|
|
|
 Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 13 |
Filed: 2/21/1992, Entered: 2/21/1992 |
Substitution of Attorney |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 12 |
Filed: 4/24/1991, Entered: 4/24/1991 |
Complaint In Intervention |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 11 |
Filed: 2/27/1991, Entered: 2/27/1991 |
At-issue Memorandum |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 10 |
Filed: 2/21/1991, Entered: 2/21/1991 |
Answer |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 9 |
Filed: 1/22/1991, Entered: 1/22/1991 |
Demurrer |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 8 |
Filed: 1/18/1991, Entered: 1/18/1991 |
Answer To Cross-complaint |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 7 |
Filed: 1/11/1991, Entered: 1/11/1991 |
Cross Complaint |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 6 |
Filed: 1/11/1991, Entered: 1/11/1991 |
Answer |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 5 |
Filed: 12/20/1990, Entered: 12/20/1990 |
Cross Complaint |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 4 |
Filed: 12/20/1990, Entered: 12/20/1990 |
Answer |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 3 |
Filed: 12/6/1990, Entered: 12/6/1990 |
Answer |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 2 |
Filed: 12/6/1990, Entered: 12/6/1990 |
Cross Complaint |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 1 |
Filed: 10/10/1990, Entered: 10/10/1990 |
Complaint |
|
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
 |
Date: 5/19/1992, Time: 08:30:00, Status: None |
|
|
|
|
Date: 4/17/1992, Time: 11:00:00, Status: None |
|
|
|
|
Date: 10/21/1991, Time: 08:30:00, Status: None |
|
|
|
|
Date: 5/20/1991, Time: 08:30:00, Status: None |
|
|
|
|
Date: 5/16/1991, Time: 08:30:00, Status: None |
|
|
|
|
Date: 2/11/1991, Time: 08:30:00, Status: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statistics
This case has been viewed 2 times.
|
|
|
