| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
 238 |
Filed: 1/25/1995, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 1/25/95 by Hon. John A. Nordberg : Finding the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan terminated as [136-1] moot. No notice (ldg) . Modified on 11/19/2010 (ym, ). (Entered: 01/26/1995)
|
|
 Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
 |
|
|
| 237 |
Filed: 11/14/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER from Linda McCartney to Clerk dated 10/20/94. (ldg) . Modified on 11/19/2010 (ym, ). (Entered: 11/15/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 236 |
Filed: 9/20/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of transferred case. US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Case No. 1:94-CV-592 (Attachments). (ar) . Modified on 11/19/2010 (ym, ). (Entered: 09/22/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 235 |
Filed: 8/30/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
PROOF of mailing certified receipt nos. P-851-525-145, P-851-525-146 and P-851-525-148 (ar) . Modified on 11/19/2010 (ym, ). (Entered: 08/30/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 234 |
Filed: 8/10/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 8/10/94 by Hon. John A. Nordberg : Defendants' motions to transfer are granted. This cause is ordered transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (See reverse of minute order). terminating case , Case transferred to Dist of: Western District of MI Mailed notice (ldg) (Entered: 08/11/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 233 |
Filed: 7/15/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 7/15/94 by Hon. Joan H. Lefkow : Enter Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that defendants' motions to transfer this cause to the United States District Court for the Western Distrit of Michigan be granted. In light of that recommendation, it is further recommended that defendant Shane's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction be denied as moot. Telephoned notice (ldg) (Entered: 07/18/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 232 |
Filed: 7/14/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION concerning motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan [136-1] (ldg) (Entered: 07/18/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 231 |
Filed: 5/23/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by plaintiffs to defendants' response to plaintiffs' citation of newly decided authority regarding defendants' motion to dismiss and/or transfer [136-1]; Notice of filing (ldg) (Entered: 05/24/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 230 |
Filed: 5/3/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by plaintiffs' to citation of newly decided authority regarding defendants motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan and/or transfer [136-1]; Notice of filing (ldg) (Entered: 05/04/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 229 |
Filed: 4/19/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
CITATION by plaintiffs of newly decided authority regarding defendants' motion to dismiss and/or transfer (Attachments) (eav) (Entered: 04/20/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 228 |
Filed: 4/14/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by defendants regarding reply brief in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment that the '934, '303 and '828 patents are invalid and unenforceable [227-1] (eav) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 227 |
Filed: 4/14/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY BRIEF by defendants in support of motion for summary judgment that the '934, '303, and '828 patents are invalid and unenforceable [171-1] (Exhibits) (eav) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 226 |
Filed: 3/15/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 3/15/94 by Hon. Joan H. Lefkow : Status hearing held. By telephone, attorney Hansing representing plaintiff, and attorneys Rupert and Young representing defendants. While pending motions await decision, the parties will explore the possibility of settlement and the possibility of consent to disposition of all or portions of the case by the magistrate judge. No notice (eav) (Entered: 03/16/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 225 |
Filed: 3/15/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
CHRONOLOGICAL LISTING by plaintiffs of all pending motions (eav) (Entered: 03/16/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 224 |
Filed: 3/10/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
STATUS REPORT submitted by plaintiffs (Exhibit). (fce) (Entered: 03/11/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 223 |
Filed: 2/28/1994, Entered: None |
 |
|
MINUTE ORDER of 2/28/94 by Hon. Joan H. Lefkow : The above entitled case has been referred to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Joan H. Lefkow. Parties are directed to file a written status report describing the claims, the progress of the litigation, and identifying all pending motions and their status. A status hearing has been set for March 15, 1994 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 2496. Mailed notice (eav) (Entered: 03/01/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 222 |
Filed: 2/16/1994, Entered: None |
|
|
REFERRAL ORDER of 2/16/94: Case referred to Magistrate Judge Joan H. Lefkow pursuant to local General Rule 2.41(b) to conduct hearings and enter appropriate orders on the following pretrial motion/matter: Discover supervision. Conduct necessary proceedings and issue Report and Recommendation on dispositive motion specified below (e.g., motion for injunction, to dismiss, for summary judgment, for Social Security review, for class certification, to set aside judgment.) Conduct necessary proceedings and enter Order/Report and Recommendation on all nondispositive motions and dispositive pretrial matters through filing of pretrial materials including final pretrial order, with the exceptions or additions specified: Defendant's motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs' motion for protective order and defendant's motion to compel, for a protective order are referred for decision. The case is also being referred for supervision of discovery and the entry of a final pretrial order. Any cut-off dates may be modified by Magistrate-Judge. Mailed notice (eav) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 221 |
Filed: 12/29/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
APPENDIX B containing pages B1-B413 filed by plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin, plaintiff Musco Corporation regarding memorandum [219-1] (fce) (Entered: 01/08/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 220 |
Filed: 12/29/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
APPENDIX A containing pages A1-A331 filed by plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin, plaintiff Musco Corporation regarding memorandum [219-1] (fce) (Entered: 01/08/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 219 |
Filed: 12/29/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
OPPOSITION by plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin, plaintiff Musco Corporation to motion for summary judgment that the '934, the '303, and the '828 patents are invalid and unenforceable [171-1], motion for sanctions [171-2] (Attachments); Notice of filing (fce) Modified on 01/08/1994 (Entered: 01/08/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 218 |
Filed: 12/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 12/21/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Granting plaintiff's oral motion for leave to file its response to defendants motion for summary judgment that "934, 303 and '828 Patents are invalid and unenforceable and for sanctions in excess fifteen pages [0-0]. Court will rule by mail on defendants' motions to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer. Telephonic status conference held. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 01/07/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 217 |
Filed: 12/23/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of joinder with defendant Shane Group's motion to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer to the Western District of Michigan (Attachments); Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 01/06/1994)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 216 |
Filed: 12/14/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to defendant Qualite's joinder with defendant Shane Group requesting to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan [136-1] (Exhibit); Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 12/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 215 |
Filed: 12/3/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER from defendant Qualite, Inc. to Judge Weisberg dated 12/03/93 (fce) (Entered: 12/07/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 214 |
Filed: 12/6/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 12/6/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Enter response to Order of Clarification. Qualite's joinder in the Shane Group's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District Michigan [136-1] should be taken as an independent motion to transfer under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). Musco has until 12/13/93 to respond. Qualite's reply, if any, due 12/23/93. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 12/07/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 213 |
Filed: 11/29/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 11/29/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : The schedule in the order entered on 11/15/93 is amended as follows: Counsel for Qualite shall inform the court by 12/03/93 regarding the motion to transfer. Musco shall have until 12/13/93 to respond. Qualite's reply, if any due 12/23/93. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 212 |
Filed: 11/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin in support of its motion for order compelling payment of expert witness fees; Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 11/24/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 211 |
Filed: 11/19/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin of change of address (fce) (Entered: 11/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 210 |
Filed: 11/15/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 11/15/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Enter order directing Qualite to clarify its position on transfer. Mailed notice (vkd) (Entered: 11/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 209 |
Filed: 11/5/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc. in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for order compelling payment of expert witness fees (Exhibits); Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 208 |
Filed: 10/25/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion to compel discovery under rule 37(a) Fed. R. Civ.; Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 207 |
Filed: 10/19/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion under Rule 37(b) for failure by plaintiffs to comply with a discovery order [191-1]; Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 206 |
Filed: 10/18/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 10/18/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Motion under Rule 37(b) for failure by plaintiffs to comply with a discovery order [191-1] entered. Defendant's response due 11/08/93. Reply to answer brief due 11/22/93. Court will rule by mail. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 10/19/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 205 |
Filed: 10/15/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY brief by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [133-1] (Exhibits); Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 10/18/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 204 |
Filed: 10/13/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to defendants' motion to compel discovery under Rule 37 (a) Fed. R. Civ. P. (Attachments); Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 10/14/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 203 |
Filed: 10/6/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by plaintiffs to defendants' motion under Rule 37(b) for failure by plaintiffs to comply with a discovery order [191-1] ; Notice of filing. (fce) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 202 |
Filed: 10/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 10/4/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Subsequent correspondence responding to plaintiff's letter dated 9/14/93 will also be disregarded. See order of 9/29/93. Counsel are reminded of their obligations under local Rule 12(d). Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 10/06/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 201 |
Filed: 9/29/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 9/29/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Qualite's motion to compel discovery under rule 37(a) Fed. R. Civ. P. continued. Plaintiff's response due 10/13/93. Reply due 10/23/93. Ruling by mail. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 10/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 200 |
Filed: 9/29/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 9/29/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Plaintiff's letter dated 09/14/93 (copy attached) will be disregarded as an improper request which if made must be set forth in an appropriate motion. (Attachment) Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 10/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 199 |
Filed: 9/24/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER to Magistrate Judge Weisberg from Edmund J. Sease dated 09/14/93 (fce) (Entered: 10/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 198 |
Filed: 9/17/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 9/17/93 by Hon. John A. Nordberg : The referral in this case is extended to include necessary proceedings and issue report and recommendation on dispositive motions including defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 09/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 197 |
Filed: 9/17/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE by plaintiff regarding memorandum [195-1] (fce) (Entered: 09/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 196 |
Filed: 9/17/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 12 statement of disputed facts by plaintiffs (1 volume: exhibits). (fce) (Entered: 09/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 195 |
Filed: 9/17/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [130-1] (fce) (Entered: 09/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 194 |
Filed: 9/15/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 9/15/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Qualite's motion to compel discovery under Rule 37 (b) Fed.R.Civ.P. continued. Plaintiff's response due 10/06/93. Reply due 10/18/93. Ruling by mail. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 09/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 193 |
Filed: 9/8/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
SURREPLY by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin regarding defendant's motion to depose attorney Hansing [139-1] (Exhibit); Notice of filing (fce) Modified on 09/09/1993 (Entered: 09/09/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 192 |
Filed: 8/26/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc in support of motion under Rule 37(b) for failure by plaintiffs to comply with a discovery order [191-1]. (srb) (Entered: 08/30/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 191 |
Filed: 8/26/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc under Rule 37(b) for failure by plaintiffs to comply with a discovery order (Exhibits A-D); Notice of filing. (srb) (Entered: 08/30/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 190 |
Filed: 8/26/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order). (srb) (Entered: 08/30/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 188 |
Filed: 8/12/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
AFFIDAVIT of William Mathews regarding memorandum [186-1] (fce) (Entered: 08/13/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 187 |
Filed: 8/12/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER from Gerald T Tschura to Clerk dated 07/23/93 (fce) (Entered: 08/13/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 186 |
Filed: 7/27/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
SURREPLY BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc., defendant Shane Grp Inc in opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to counterclaims [87-1]; Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 07/28/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 185 |
Filed: 7/20/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 7/20/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Status hearing magistrate set for 12/21/93 at 11:00 a.m. Telephone status conference held. Parties to note that this court entered orders on 06/22/93 granting requests for leave to file briefs in excess of fifteen pages. Qualite advised this court that they have joined The Shane Group's motion to transfer. Granting plaintiff's oral motion for leave to file five page surreply to defendant's motion to depose Mark Hansing [0-0]. Plaintiff is ordered to answer discovery requests served in December by Qualite asking for the production and disclosure of documents relied on by Musco's expert trial witnesses. Parties are ordered to file a motion and an agreed briefing schedule on payment of expert deposition fees. Plaintiff's motion in limine [183-1] is continued generally. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 07/21/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 184 |
Filed: 7/20/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin in support of motion in limine for an order excluding from the trial of this case any argument or evidence relating to the purported expert testimony and opinions of Thomas M. Lemons [183-1] (Exhibit)(Attachments) (fce) (Entered: 07/21/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 183 |
Filed: 7/20/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin in limine for an order excluding from the trial of this case any argument or evidence relating to the purported expert testimony and opinions of Thomas M. Lemons ; Notice of motion (fce) (Entered: 07/21/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 182 |
Filed: 7/16/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
SUPPLEMENT by defendant Qualite, Inc., defendant Shane Grp Inc to reply brief in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment that the '934 patent claim 14 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 [181-1] (Attachments); Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 07/19/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 181 |
Filed: 7/9/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY BRIEF by defendants in support motion for summary judgment that claim 14 of U.S. 934 patent 4,725,934 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 112 [94-1] (Exhibits); Notice of filing (fce) Modified on 07/12/1993 (Entered: 07/12/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 180 |
Filed: 7/9/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY BRIEF by defendants in support of cross motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [130-1] (Attachments); Notice of filing (fce) Modified on 07/12/1993 (Entered: 07/12/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 179 |
Filed: 6/25/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
AFFIDAVIT of Herbert Alex Piper; Notice of filing of replacement affidavit (fce) (Entered: 06/28/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 178 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to defendants statement of material facts as to which there is no genuine issue in support of its cross motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. patent 5,016,150 and plaintiffs' list of geuninely disputed facts. (Exhibits) (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 177 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin in opposition to defendants' motion for summary of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [130-1] (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 176 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Plaintiff's motion leave to file its brief in opposition of defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 in excess of 15 pages instanter is granted without objection. No notice [175-1] (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 175 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc. leave to file brief in excess of 15 pages instanter ; Notice of filing and notice of motion (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 174 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion for summary judgment that the '934, the '303, and the '828 patents are invalid and unenforceable [171-1], of motion sanctions [171-2] (Exhibits) (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 173 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Defendants' motion for leave to file a brief in excess of the page limit is granted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment that the '934, the '303, and the '828 patents are invalid and unenforceable [171-1],and motion for sanctions [171-2] is entered and continued. Parties to submit an agreed briefing schedule. No notice (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 172 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 12 Statement of material which there are not reasonably in dispute and which support defendant's motion for summary judgment that the '934, the '303, and othe '828 patents are invalid and unenforceable and for sanctions by defendant Qualite, Inc.; Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 171 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc. for summary judgment that the '934, the '303, and the '828 patents are invalid and unenforceable ,and for sanctions ; Notice of motion (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 170 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER from Thomas N Young to Mr. Rupert dated 06/18/93. (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 169 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY BRIEF by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin in support of motion for summary judgment as to counterclaims [87-1] (Exhibits) (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 168 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Granting plaintiff's motion to file brief in excess of 15 pages instanter [167-1] in support of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to counterclaims without objection. No notice (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 167 |
Filed: 6/22/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to file brief in excess of 15 pages instanter ; Notice of motion and hearing (fce) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 166 |
Filed: 6/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY BRIEF by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to motion for summary judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [83-1] (Exhibits) (fce) (Entered: 06/21/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 165 |
Filed: 6/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to defendants' statement of material facts as to which there is no genuine issue, and plaintiffs' statement of material facts and genuine dispute defendants' motion for summary judgment that claim 14 of U.S. Patent 4,725 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 (Exhibits) (fce) (Entered: 06/21/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 164 |
Filed: 6/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin in opposition to defendant's motion for summary that claim 14 of U.S. Patent 4,725,934 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 112 [94-1] (fce) (Entered: 06/21/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 163 |
Filed: 6/15/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of defendants' motion for leave to depose attorney Mark Hansing [139-1]; Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 06/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 162 |
Filed: 6/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
JOINT STATUS REPORT (06/10/93) by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin, defendant Qualite, Inc., defendant Shane Grp Inc; Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 06/14/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 161 |
Filed: 5/26/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY brief by defendant Shane Grp Inc in support of its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan [136-1] (Exhibits); Notice of filing (fce) (Entered: 05/27/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 160 |
Filed: 5/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 5/21/93 by Hon. John A. Nordberg : Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order: In the opinion of the Court, Musco has failed to demonstrate that the magistrate judge was clearly erroneous in deciding not to permit discovery into these materials. As Musco's treatment of these issues is but cursory, the Court does not elaborate further. Accordingly, the motion for review pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Local Rule 2.44 [146-1] is denied. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 05/24/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 159 |
Filed: 5/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER (fce) (Entered: 05/24/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 158 |
Filed: 5/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 5/21/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Status hearing magistrate is re-set for 07/13/93 at 10:30 a.m. Parties are directed to submit a joint status report and an agreed briefing schedule on all pending motions before Magistrate Judge Weisberg by 06/10/93. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 05/25/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 157 |
Filed: 5/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER from defendant Shane Grp Inc through its attorney Gerald T. Tschura to Clerk of Court dated 04/28/93. (Attachment) (fce) (Entered: 05/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 156 |
Filed: 5/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER from plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin through their attorney Edmund J. Sease to Magistrate Weisberg dated 04/28/93. (fce) (Entered: 05/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 155 |
Filed: 5/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 5/4/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Status hearing re-set for 06/10/93 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 05/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 154 |
Filed: 5/3/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to response to motion for review pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Local Rule 2.44 [146-1] (fce) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 153 |
Filed: 5/3/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 6/22/92). (vmj) (Entered: 05/03/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 152 |
Filed: 4/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by defendant Qualite, Inc.to Musco's statement of material facts (Exhibits); Notice of filing. (fce) (Entered: 04/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 151 |
Filed: 4/21/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by defendant Qualite, Inc. in opposition to motion for summary judgment as to counterclaims [87-1] (fce) (Entered: 04/22/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 150 |
Filed: 4/19/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by defendant Qualite, Inc., defendant Shane Grp Inc to plaintiff's request for review of Magistrate's ruling; Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 04/20/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 149 |
Filed: 4/2/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER dated 3/30/93 from Thomas N. Young to court regarding defendant Qualite, Inc. (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 04/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 148 |
Filed: 3/31/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 3/31/93 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Answer brief to plaintiff's request for review pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Local Rule 2.44 [146-1] due 20 Apr 93. Reply to answer brief due 3 May 93. Ruling set for 21 May 93 at 9:30 a.m. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/01/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 147 |
Filed: 3/31/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing and notice of motion by plaintiff regarding motion for review pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Local Rule 2.44 [146-1]. (vmj) Modified on 03/30/1994 (Entered: 04/01/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 146 |
Filed: 3/31/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REQUEST by plaintiffs' for review pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Local Rule 2.44 (Attachments)(Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 04/01/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 145 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
LETTER from Thomas N Young dated 03/08/93 to court. (vmj) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 144 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Gerald Theodore Tschura. (vmj) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 143 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Thomas N Young. (vmj) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 142 |
Filed: 3/16/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Shane Grp Inc by Kenneth Steven Ulrich, Gerald Theodore Tschura, Thomas N Young, Daniel P. Shapiro. (vmj) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 141 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 3/11/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Status hearing before magistrate set for 13 May 93 at 10:30 a.m. Granting defendant's motion for leave to file additional appearance [129-1] of Thomas Young and Gerald T. Tschura on behalf of Shane Group, Inc. Granting plaintiff's renewed first motion to compel and second motion to compel [101-1] and defendant's motion to compel discovery under rule 37 [96-1] in part and denied in part for reasons stated in open court. Parties to submit an agreed briefing schedule for all pending motions. Defendants' cross motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [130-1], defendants' motion for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [133-1], defendant Shane Group's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan [136-1] and defendant's motion for to depose Attorney Mark Hansing [139-1] is entered and continued. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 140 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion for leave to depose Attorney Mark Hansing [139-1] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 139 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc. for leave to depose Attorney Mark Hansing ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 138 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of motion by defendant Shane Grp Inc regarding motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan [136-1] and memorandum in support of motion [137-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
| 137 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by defendant Shane Grp Inc in support of motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan [136-1] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 136 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Shane Grp Inc to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person or in the alternative to transfer venue to the Western District of Michigan . (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 135 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
STATEMENT of material facts which are not reasonably in dispute and which support its motion for invalidity of U.S. patent No. 5,016,150 by defendants. (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 134 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant in support of motion for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [133-1] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 133 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendants for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 132 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
STATEMENT of material facts as to which there are no genuine issues in support of its cross motion for summary judgment of non infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,016,150 by defendant. (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 131 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendants in support of cross motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [130-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 130 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
CROSS MOTION by defendants for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 129 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc. for leave to file additionl appearance ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 03/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 128 |
Filed: 3/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs' in opposition to motion for leave to [120-1] depose Attorney Mark Hansing [120-2] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 03/12/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 127 |
Filed: 3/3/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by defendants' to plaintiffs' statement of material facts (motion for summary judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,016,150); Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 03/04/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 126 |
Filed: 3/3/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
APPENDIX filed by defendants' to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,016,150 [125-1] and brief in support of its cross motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,016,150. (vmj) (Entered: 03/04/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 125 |
Filed: 3/3/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendants in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [83-1]; Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 03/04/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 124 |
Filed: 2/9/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 2/9/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Ruling on plaintiff's first and second motion to compel and defendant's motion to compel reset to March 4, 1993 at 10:30 a.m. Any new motions should be reset to March 4, 1993 at 10:30 a.m. [101-1] Mailed notice (eav) (Entered: 02/10/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 123 |
Filed: 1/2/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 1/2/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : All motions reset to February 11, 1993 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 02/02/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 122 |
Filed: 1/27/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS in Qualite, Inc. answer and counterclaims to first amended complaint by counter-defendants. (vmj) (Entered: 01/28/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 121 |
Filed: 1/15/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REVISED BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion for leave to [120-1] depose Attorney Mark Hansing [120-2] (Exhibits) (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 01/19/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 120 |
Filed: 1/15/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc. for leave to depose Attorney Mark Hansing . (vmj) (Entered: 01/19/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 119 |
Filed: 1/14/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 1/14/93 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Ruling on plaintiff's renewed first motion to compel, plaintiff's renewed second motion to compel [101-1] and defendant's motion to compel [96-1] reset to February 2, 1993 at 10:30 a.m. Any new motions should be renoticed for February 2, 1993 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 01/15/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 118 |
Filed: 1/12/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RETURN OF SERVICE of summons executed upon defendant Shane Grp Inc on 1/6/93. (vmj) (Entered: 01/13/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 117 |
Filed: 1/12/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RETURN OF SERVICE of summons executed upon defendant Qualite, Inc. on 1/6/93. (vmj) (Entered: 01/13/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 116 |
Filed: 1/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by plaintiffs' to defendants' response to plaintiffs' renewed first motion to compel and second motion to compel (Exhibit). (vmj) (Entered: 01/12/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 115 |
Filed: 1/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by defendant Qualite, Inc. regarding reply brief in support of motion to compel discovery under Rule 37 [114-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 01/12/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 114 |
Filed: 1/11/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY brief by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion to compel discovery under rule 37 [96-1] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 01/12/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 113 |
Filed: 1/8/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by defendant Qualite, Inc. regarding answer [112-1] and counterclaim [112-2]. (vmj) (Entered: 01/11/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 112 |
Filed: 1/8/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
ANSWER to complaint [105-1] and COUNTERCLAIM by defendant Qualite, Inc. against plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin. (vmj) (Entered: 01/11/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 111 |
Filed: 1/5/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by defendant Qualite, Inc. to plaintiffs' renewed first motion to compel and second motion to compel [101-1] (Exhibits); Amended notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 01/06/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 110 |
Filed: 1/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin regarding motion response [109-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 01/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 109 |
Filed: 1/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF IN RESPONSE by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to defendants' motion to compel discovery under rule 37 [96-1] (Exhibits). (vmj) Modified on 01/05/1993 (Entered: 01/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 108 |
Filed: 1/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE of receipt of summons and complaint by defendant Qualite, Inc. on 12/29/92. (vmj) (Entered: 01/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 107 |
Filed: 1/4/1993, Entered: None |
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE of receipt of summons and complaint by defendant Shane Grp Inc on 12/29/92. (vmj) (Entered: 01/05/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 106 |
Filed: 12/31/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by defendant to plaintiffs' renewed first motion to compel and second motion to compel [101-1] ; notice of filing. (fce) (Entered: 01/04/1993)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 105 |
Filed: 12/22/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiffs; jury demand (fce) (Entered: 12/23/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 104 |
Filed: 12/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by plaintiffs' regarding answer [103-1], regarding first amended complaint [102-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 12/17/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 103 |
Filed: 12/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE OF CLAIMS by plaintiffs involving patent pursuant to Local Rule 13. (vmj) (Entered: 12/17/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 102 |
Filed: 12/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiffs'; jury demand; adding Shane Grp Inc. (vmj) (Entered: 12/17/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 101 |
Filed: 12/11/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RENEWED FIRST MOTION by plaintiffs' to compel and second motion to compel (Attachments)/(Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 12/14/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 100 |
Filed: 12/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 12/10/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Motion to compel discovery under rule 37 [96-1] is entered and continued. Plaintiff's response due 12/31/92. Reply to answer brief due 1/11/93. Granting oral motion to renew plaintiff's first motion to compel and plaintiff's second motion to compel [0-0]. Defendant's response to plaintiff's first and second motions to compel due 12/31/92. Plaintiff's reply due 01/11/93. Motion for summary judgment that claim 14 of U.S. Patent 4,725,934 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 112 [94-1] is entered and continued. Parties to submit an agreed briefing schedule on this motion. Setting ruling on the three motions to compel discovery under rule 37 [96-1] for 10:30 a.m. on 1/19/93. Hearing set for 01/05/93 is vacated. Mailed notice (fce) (Entered: 12/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 99 |
Filed: 12/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by defendant regarding memorandum [98-1] (fce) (Entered: 12/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 98 |
Filed: 12/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant in support of motion to compel discovery under rule 37 [96-1] (Exhibits). (fce) (Entered: 12/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 97 |
Filed: 12/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
ATTORNEY'S statement of compliance with local rules regarding discovery conference (fce) (Entered: 12/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 96 |
Filed: 12/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant to compel discovery under rule 37 ; Notice of motion. (fce) (Entered: 12/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 95 |
Filed: 12/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant in support of motion for summary judgment that claim 14 of U.S. Patent 4,725,934 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 112 [94-1] (Exhibits). (fce) (Entered: 12/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 94 |
Filed: 12/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant for summary judgment that claim 14 of U.S. Patent 4,725,934 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. Section 112 ; Notice of motion. (fce) (Entered: 12/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 93 |
Filed: 12/8/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by defendant Qualite, Inc. regarding defendant's brief in support of its motion for summary judgment and statement of material facts as to which there is no genuine issue. (vmj) (Entered: 12/10/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 92 |
Filed: 12/8/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 12 Statement of material facts as to which there are no genuine issues by defendant Qualite, Inc. (vmj) (Entered: 12/10/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 91 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 12/3/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Telephone conference held. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of infringement of the 150 Patent [83-1] and plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment as to counterclaims [87-1] are entered and continued. Granting plaintiffs' motion for leave to file instanter brief in excess of fifteen pages [89-1]. Parties to submit agreed briefing schedule on plaintiffs' MSJ of infringement on the 150 patent. Defendant to file motion to compel under Rules 37 and 56(f) re: MSJ as to counterclaims. Hearing set for December 15, 1992 is vacated. Status hearing set for January 5, 1993 stands . Oral ruling given granting plaintiffs' motion for leave to file first amended complaint on the condition plaintiffs reimburse defendant for any additional expense incurred in deposing Mr. Gordin as to 828 patent. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 90 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of hering and notice of filing by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin regarding motion for leave to file instanter brief in excess of fifteen pages [89-1], regarding [88-1], regarding motion for summary judgment as to counterclaims [87-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 89 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs' Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin for leave to file instanter brief in excess of fifteen pages . (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 88 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 12 Statement of material facts as to which there are no genuine issues by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin, counter-defendant Musco Corporation, counter-defendant Musco Sports Lightin. (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 87 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin, counter-defendant Musco Corporation, counter-defendant Musco Sports Lightin for summary judgment as to counterclaims . (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 86 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of hearing and notice of filing by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin regarding motion for summary judgment of infringement of U. Patent 5,016,150 [83-1], regarding statement [84-1], regarding memorandum [85-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 85 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin in support of motion for summary judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent 5,016,150 [83-1] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 84 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 12 Statement of material facts as to which there are no genuine issues by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin. (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 83 |
Filed: 12/3/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin for summary judgment of infringement of U. Patent 5,016,150 . (vmj) (Entered: 12/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 82 |
Filed: 12/4/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
Document Sealed (pursuant to Court Order of 6/22/92). (vmj) (Entered: 12/04/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 81 |
Filed: 12/4/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment as to counterclaims (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 12/04/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 80 |
Filed: 11/25/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
ANNEX to plaintiffs' reply to defendant's response to plaintiffs' motion for leave to file first amended complaint (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 79 |
Filed: 11/25/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by plaintiffs' to defendant's response to plaintiffs' motion for leave to file first amended complaint. (vmj) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 78 |
Filed: 11/25/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE of filing by defendant Qualite, Inc. regarding motion reply [77-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 77 |
Filed: 11/25/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY brief by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,725,934 [64-1] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 76 |
Filed: 11/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by defendant Qualite, Inc. to motion for leave to file First Amended Complaint [67-1] (Exhibits); notice of filing. (fce) (Entered: 11/17/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 75 |
Filed: 11/6/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
STATEMENT by plaintiffs of disputed facts regarding Qualite's summary judgment motion of non-infringement of U.S. Patent 4,725,934. (vmj) (Entered: 11/09/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 74 |
Filed: 11/6/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
APPENDICES filed by plaintiffs' to memorandum in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,725,934 [73-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 11/09/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 73 |
Filed: 11/6/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs' in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,725,934 [64-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 11/09/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 72 |
Filed: 10/22/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
STIPULATION regarding deadlines for briefing schedules. (vmj) (Entered: 10/26/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 71 |
Filed: 10/22/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 10/22/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Granting agreed motion to serve additional interrogatories [70-1]. By agreement between the parties plaintiffs' response to defendant's motion for summary judgment due November 16, 1992. Defendant's reply due November 25, 1992. Defendant's response to plaintiffs' motion to amend due November 16, 1992. Plaintiffs' reply due November 25, 1992. Ruling reset to December 15, 1992 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 10/23/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 70 |
Filed: 10/22/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
AGREED MOTION to serve additional interrogatories (Attachment); Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 10/23/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 69 |
Filed: 10/6/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 10/6/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint [67-1] is entered and continued. Defendant's response due October 28, 1992. Plaintiff's reply due November 18, 1992. Ruling set for December 1, 1992 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 10/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 68 |
Filed: 10/6/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM of points and authorities by plaintiff in support of motion for leave to file First Amended Complaint [67-1] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 10/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 67 |
Filed: 10/6/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs' for leave to file First Amended Complaint (Attachments); Notice of filing and notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 10/07/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 66 |
Filed: 9/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
Defendant's designation of experts; Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 09/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 65 |
Filed: 9/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 9/24/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Defendant's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,725,934 [64-1] is entered and continued. Plaintiffs' response due October 28, 1992. Defendant's reply due November 18, 1992. Court will rule by mail. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 09/25/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 64 |
Filed: 9/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc. for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,725,934 ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 09/25/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 63 |
Filed: 9/18/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
STATEMENT of material facts which are not reasonably in dispute and which support its motion for partial summary judgment by defendant, Qualite, Inc. (vmj) (Entered: 09/21/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 62 |
Filed: 9/18/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by defendant Qualite, Inc. in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. patent No. 4,725,934 (Exhibits); Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 09/21/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 61 |
Filed: 9/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Kim J. Walker. (vmj) (Entered: 09/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 60 |
Filed: 9/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiffs'/counterdefendants Musco Corp and Musco Sports Lighting, Inc. by Kim J. Walker appearing pro hac vice. (vmj) (Entered: 09/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 59 |
Filed: 9/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 9/10/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Status hearing held and continued to January 5, 1993 at 10:30 a.m. Plaintiff's motion for pro hac vice appearance [58-1] is granted without objection. Kim J. Walker is granted leave to file her apperance on behalf of the plaintiffs. Defendant's oral motion for leave [0-1] to file brief in excess of 15 pages [0-2] is granted. Defendant's oral motion for leave to file motion for declaratory summary judgment [0-1] is entered and continued. Defendant's oral motion for leave to extend date to identify expert witnesses [0-1] is granted without objection. Defendant to identify its expert witnesses by October 1, 1992. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 09/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 58 |
Filed: 9/10/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs'/counter-defendants' Musco Corporation, Musco Sports Lightin and Joe C. Crookham for pro hac vice appearance . (vmj) (Entered: 09/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 57 |
Filed: 9/1/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
DESIGNATION of experts by plaintiffs. (fce) (Entered: 09/02/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 56 |
Filed: 8/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 8/24/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Telephone hearing held. Plaintiffs' motion to extend time for adding parties [54-1] to October 1, 1992 is granted. Final extension. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 08/25/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 55 |
Filed: 8/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by plaintiff in support of motion to extend time for adding parties [54-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 08/25/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 54 |
Filed: 8/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs' to extend time for adding parties ; Notice of hearing re. motion to extend time for adding parties. (vmj) (Entered: 08/25/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 53 |
Filed: 7/23/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 7/23/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg : Plaintiffs' motion for protective order [51-1] or in the alternative to quash notices of deposition of Sease and Hansing [51-2] is granted without prejudice for reasons stated in open court. No notice (vkd) (Entered: 07/24/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 52 |
Filed: 7/23/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in support of motion for protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) [51-1] or in the alternative, to quash notices of deposition of Sease and Hansing [51-2] (Exhibits A-C). (vkd) (Entered: 07/24/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 51 |
Filed: 7/23/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs for protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) , or in the alternative, to quash notices of deposition of Sease and Hansing (Attachment); notice of hearing and filing. (vkd) Modified on 07/24/1992 (Entered: 07/24/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 50 |
Filed: 7/20/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin to response to motion for a protective under Rule 26(c). (fce) (Entered: 07/21/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 49 |
Filed: 7/13/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION by defendant Qualite, Inc. to Musco's motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c) (Exhibits); Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 07/14/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 48 |
Filed: 6/22/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Status hearing set for September 3, 1992 is vacated and reset to September 10, 1992 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 06/23/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 47 |
Filed: 6/22/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Enter protective order. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 06/23/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 46 |
Filed: 6/22/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
PROTECTIVE ORDER. (vmj) (Entered: 06/23/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 45 |
Filed: 5/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 5/29/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Defendant's motion for leave to file late reply brief [40-1] is granted without objection. Plaintiffs' motion for protective order [22-1] is granted. Defendant's motion to compel and for protective order is moot. Defendant's motion for preliminary injunction is entered and continued generally. Plaintiffs' motion to compel is entered and continued generally. Status hearing set for September 3, 1992 at 10:30 a.m. Plaintiffs' oral motion to amend paragraph six on page five of the preliminary pretrial scheduling order [0-1] is granted. The time to join other parties is extended to August 1, 1992. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 06/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 44 |
Filed: 5/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
BRIEF by plaintiff in support of motion to compel [43-1] (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 06/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 43 |
Filed: 5/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs' to compel (Exhibit and attachments); Notice of hearing and notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 06/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 42 |
Filed: 5/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of motion for leave to late reply brief [40-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 06/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 41 |
Filed: 5/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
AFFIDAVIT of Thomas N. Young regarding motion for leave to late reply brief [40-1]. (vmj) (Entered: 06/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 40 |
Filed: 5/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant Qualite, Inc. for leave to late reply brief ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 06/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 39 |
Filed: 5/27/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY brief by defendant in support of its motion under Rules 26, 27 and 65 F.R.C.P. (Exhibits); Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 05/28/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 38 |
Filed: 5/20/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
REPLY brief by plaintiffs' to defendant's brief in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for protective order. (vmj) (Entered: 05/21/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
| 37 |
Filed: 5/13/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RESPONSE by plaintiffs' to defendant's motion to compel discovery under 37 FRCP for a protective order under Rule 26 FRCP [27-1] and for a preliminary injunction under Rule 65 FRCP [27-2] (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 05/15/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 36 |
Filed: 5/13/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
Defendant's brief in opposition to plaintiff's motion for a protective order [22-1] (Exhibits); Notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 05/14/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 35 |
Filed: 5/8/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 5/8/92 by Hon. Bernard Weisberg: Rule 16 conference set for May 29, 1992 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/11/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 34 |
Filed: 5/4/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
REFERRAL ORDER of 5/1/92: Case referred to Magistrate Bernard Weisberg pursuant to local General Rule 2.41(b). (For further detail see order). Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/05/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 33 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Thomas N. Young. (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 32 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Kenneth Steven Ulrich. (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 31 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
Additional ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Thomas Young and Kenneth Steven Ulrich. (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 30 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 4/29/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Court grants Thomas Young and Kenneth S. Ulrich leave to file additional appearances [29-1] as counsel for defendant Qualite. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 29 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant for leave to file additional appearance ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 28 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 4/29/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Answer brief to motion [27-1] due 5/13/92. Reply to answer brief due 5/20/92. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 27 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant to compel discovery under 37 FRCP for a protective order under Rule 26 FRCP and for a preliminary injunction under Rule 65 FRCP (Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 26 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 4/29/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Court grants defendant's motion for leave to file a brief in excess of 15 pages [25-1]. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 25 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by defendant for leave to file brief in excess of 15 pages instanter ; Notice of motion. (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 24 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 4/29/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Answer brief to motion [22-1] due May 13, 1992. Reply to answer brief due May 20, 1992. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 23 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
Brief by plaintiffs' in support of motion for protective order under FRCP 26(c) [22-1] (Attachments and Exhibits). (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 22 |
Filed: 4/29/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs' for protective order under FRCP 26(c) ; Notice of hearing and notice of filing. (vmj) (Entered: 05/01/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 21 |
Filed: 4/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 4/16/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Hearing held on plaintiffs motion to dismiss and for lack of jurisdiction. Court grants plaintiff leave to withdraw its motion without prejudice. Enter order by stipulation dismissing all counterclaims as to counterdefendant, Joseph P. Crookham without prejudice. terminating party Joseph Crookham No notice (vmj) (Entered: 04/20/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 20 |
Filed: 4/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
STIPULATION and ORDER for dismissal of counterdefendant Joseph P. Crookham without prejudice. (vmj) (Entered: 04/20/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 19 |
Filed: 4/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
Brief by plaintiff in support of motion to dismiss presenting defenses of failure to state claim and lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b) [18-1] (Exhibit). (vmj) (Entered: 04/20/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 18 |
Filed: 4/16/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by counter-defendant Joseph Crookham to dismiss presenting defenses of failure to state claim and lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b) . (vmj) (Entered: 04/20/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 17 |
Filed: 4/14/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Mark D. Hansing. (vmj) (Entered: 04/15/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 16 |
Filed: 4/14/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Edmund J. Sease. (vmj) (Entered: 04/15/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 15 |
Filed: 4/14/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff by Edmund J. Sease and Mark D. Hansing. (vmj) (Entered: 04/15/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 14 |
Filed: 3/27/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 3/27/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Court grants Thomas Young to appear pro hac vice [0-1] as counsel for the defendant per oral motion. Court grants Edmund J. Sease leave to appear pro hac vice [12-1] as counsel for the plaintiff. Court grants Mark D. Hansing leave to appear pro hac vice [13-1] as counsel for the plaintiff. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 13 |
Filed: 3/27/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs' for attorney Mark D. Hansing to appear pro hac vice . (vmj) (Entered: 03/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 12 |
Filed: 3/27/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MOTION by plaintiffs' for attorney Edmund J. Sease to appear pro hac vice . (vmj) (Entered: 03/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 11 |
Filed: 3/27/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 3/27/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Status hearing held; continued to 2/4/93 at 9:00 a.m. Discovery cut-off set for January 1, 1993. Enter preliminary pretrial scheduling order. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 10 |
Filed: 3/27/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
Preliminary PRE-TRIAL scheduling ORDER. (vmj) (Entered: 03/30/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 9 |
Filed: 3/20/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM [5-2] by counter-defendants' Musco Sports Lighting and Musco Corporation. (vmj) (Entered: 03/23/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 8 |
Filed: 3/2/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of Daniel P. Shapiro. (vmj) (Entered: 03/04/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 7 |
Filed: 3/2/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RULE 39 Affidavit of David Joel Chizewer. (vmj) (Entered: 03/04/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 6 |
Filed: 3/2/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant/ counter-claimant by Daniel P. Shapiro and David Joel Chizewer. (vmj) (Entered: 03/04/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 5 |
Filed: 3/2/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
ANSWER to complaint [1-1] and COUNTERCLAIM by defendant against plaintiff; cntdft Joseph Crookham (vmj) (Entered: 03/04/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 4 |
Filed: 2/26/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
MINUTE ORDER of 2/26/92 by Hon. John A. Nordberg: Status hearing set for 3/27/92 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff must report to the court on status of service and pleadings, the possibility of settlement in the case and, if no possibility of settlement exists, the preliminary pretrial scheduling order must be completed and presented to the court for entry instanter regardless of the status of the pleadings. Plaintiff shall notify all other parties of court's action. No notice (vmj) (Entered: 02/27/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 3 |
Filed: 2/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
RETURN OF SERVICE of summons executed upon defendant Qualite, Inc. on 1/30/92. (vmj) (Entered: 02/25/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 2 |
Filed: 1/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
NOTICE by plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin of claims involving patents pursuant to Local Rule 13 (fce) (Entered: 01/31/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
|
|
| 1 |
Filed: 1/24/1992, Entered: None |
|
|
COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of Donald William Rupert as attorney(s) for plaintiff Musco Corporation, plaintiff Musco Sports Lightin with Rule 39 affidavits ( original and one copy summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 through 1-4) (fce) (Entered: 01/31/1992)
|
|
Request From Archives (Scanning Fees/Delay May Apply) |
|
Update
Alerts
Jump