GARCIA v. TESLA, INC., et al .
State Civil Lawsuit Superior Court of California, County of Alameda ,
Case No. 23CV031654
Superior Court Judge James Reilly , presiding
Last Updated May 23, 2023 at 10:50 PM EDT (1.7 years ago)
Update Alerts Jump
Summary Parties Attributes Timeline
Summary
No one has written a summary of this case yet. Sign up or sign in to contribute one.
Parties
Ricardo Garcia , Plaintiff
v.
Does 1 through 100 , Defendant
Ivan Doe , Defendant
Tesla, Inc. , Defendant
Other Parties
Brenda Wong, Esq. , Attorney
Mike Arias,Esq , Attorney
Sahar Malek, Esq. , Attorney
James Reilly ,
Attributes
Case Type
Unlimited Civil
Complaint Type
Civil Rights/Discrimination
Department
Department 25
Filing Location
Rene C. Davidson Courthouse
Timeline
Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription.
8
Filed: 5/2/2023, Entered: None
Document
Notice of Related Case Filed by: Ricardo Garcia (Plaintiff)
Request
7
Filed: 4/25/2023, Entered: None
Assignment
Case assigned to Hon. James Reilly in Department 25 Rene C. Davidson Courthouse
Request
6
Filed: 4/25/2023, Entered: None
Event
Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 10/05/2023 at 03:00 PM in Rene C. Davidson Courthouse at Department 25
Request
5
Filed: 4/21/2023, Entered: None
Document
Notice of Case Assignment Filed by: Clerk
Request
4
Filed: 4/21/2023, Entered: None
Document
Notice of Case Management Conference Filed by: Clerk
Request
3
Filed: 4/21/2023, Entered: None
Document
Summons on Complaint Issued and Filed by: Ricardo Garcia (Plaintiff) As to: Tesla, Inc. (Defendant); Ivan Doe (Defendant); DOES 1 through 100 (Defendant)
Request
2
Filed: 4/21/2023, Entered: None
Document
Civil Case Cover Sheet Filed by: Ricardo Garcia (Plaintiff) As to: Tesla, Inc. (Defendant); Ivan Doe (Defendant); DOES 1 through 100 (Defendant)
Request
1
Filed: 4/21/2023, Entered: None
Document
Complaint Filed by: Ricardo Garcia (Plaintiff) As to: Tesla, Inc. (Defendant); Ivan Doe (Defendant); DOES 1 through 100 (Defendant)
No calendar events were found for this docket.
Statistics
This case has been viewed 13 times.