| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
 134 |
Filed: 11/21/2002, Entered: 11/22/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, The parties in this matter having reported to the Court that this case has been settled, it is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED AGREED. (signed by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/22/02] (stas)
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 11/21/2002, Entered: 11/25/2002 |
Terminated Case |
|
Case closed (stas)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 8/29/2002, Entered: 8/29/2002 |
Suspense Deadline |
|
Case Settled per LMB chambers. Dismissal document to be received in Clerk's Office set 9/30/02; Trial Docket: yes (clerk) Modified on 11/21/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
Filed: 8/28/2002, Entered: 9/3/2002 |
Discovery - Miscellaneous |
|
Deposition Designations filed by Petris Technology (ltun)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 128 |
Filed: 8/28/2002, Entered: 8/29/2002 |
Response |
|
Response by Petris Technology to [120-1] objecions to and appeal of by Science Applications to Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Pltf's Motion for Default Judgment or Alternative Relief (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 127 |
Filed: 8/28/2002, Entered: 8/29/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
MEMORANDUM by Science Applications in opposition to [118-1] fourth motion by Petris Technology In Limine (LARGE PLEADING) [Exhibit 510 & 511 - UNDER SEAL] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 126 |
Filed: 8/28/2002, Entered: 8/29/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
MEMORANDUM by Science Applications in opposition to [117-1] third motion by Petris Technology In Limine (Auction Function)(LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 125 |
Filed: 8/28/2002, Entered: 8/29/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
MEMORANDUM by Science Applications in opposition to [116-1] second motion by Petris Technology In Limine (Spoliation) (LARGE PLEADING) [Exhibit 511 - UNDER SEAL] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 124 |
Filed: 8/28/2002, Entered: 8/29/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
MEMORANDUM by Science Applications in opposition to [115-1] first motion by Petris Technology In Limine (Daubert) (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk) Modified on 08/29/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 132 |
Filed: 8/26/2002, Entered: 9/3/2002 |
Proposed Jury Instructions |
|
Proposed Jury instructions by Petris Technology (ltun)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 131 |
Filed: 8/26/2002, Entered: 9/3/2002 |
Proposed Voir Dire |
|
PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by defendant Petris Technology (ltun)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 130 |
Filed: 8/26/2002, Entered: 9/3/2002 |
Proposed Jury Instructions |
|
Proposed Jury instructions by Science Applications (ltun)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
Filed: 8/26/2002, Entered: 9/3/2002 |
Proposed Voir Dire |
|
PROPOSED VOIR DIRE by plaintiff Science Applications (ltun)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 123 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/28/2002 |
Transcript |
|
TRANSCRIPT for dates of 08/09/02 - TRJ - FILED (pmil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 121 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 8/30/02 for [120-1] objections to and appeal of by Science Applications Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Pltf's Motion for Default Judgment or Alternative Relief (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 120 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief |
|
OBJECTIONS TO AND APPEAL OF by Science Applications Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Pltf's Motion for Default Judgment or Alternative Relief (LARGE PLEADING) (Exhibit 324 - UNDER SEAL) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 8/30/02 for [115-1] motion by Petris Technology In Limine (Daubert), set for 10:00 8/30/02 for [116-1] motion by Petris Technology In Limine (Spoliation), set for 10:00 8/30/02 for [117-1] motion by Petris Technology In Limine (Auction Function), set for 10:00 8/30/02 for [118-1] motion by Petris Technology In Limine (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 118 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Motion in Limine |
|
FOURTH MOTION by Petris Technology In Limine (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 117 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Motion in Limine |
|
THIRD MOTION by Petris Technology In Limine (Auction Function) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 116 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Motion in Limine |
|
SECOND MOTION by Petris Technology In Limine (Spoliation) (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 115 |
Filed: 8/23/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Motion in Limine |
|
FIRST MOTION by Petris Technology In Limine (Daubert) (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 122 |
Filed: 8/22/2002, Entered: 8/26/2002 |
Response/Reply - Miscellaneous |
|
REPLY MEMORANDUM in support by Petris Technology of [106-1] motion by Petris Technology for Summary Judgment (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
 114 |
Filed: 8/19/2002, Entered: 8/20/2002 |
Response in Opposition to Motion |
|
RESPONSE by Science Applications in opposition to [106-1] motion by Petris Technology for Summary Judgment tog. w/Exhibits to pltf's opposition to deft's motion for summary judgment (large pleading) (Exhibitis B, 508,511,517 and 518 are filed UNDER SEAL) (clar) Modified on 08/23/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 113 |
Filed: 8/19/2002, Entered: 8/20/2002 |
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief |
|
Objections by Science Applications to exhibits cited in support of Petris Technology, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 112 |
Filed: 8/19/2002, Entered: 8/20/2002 |
Motion to Strike |
|
MOTION by Science Applications to Strike , and by Science Applications objections to affidavits file in support of Petris Technology, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 111 |
Filed: 8/19/2002, Entered: 8/19/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
Re-NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 8/30/02 for [106-1] motion by Petris Technology for Summary Judgment (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 8/19/2002, Entered: 8/20/2002 |
Motion Hearing |
|
Motion hearing [112-1] motion by Science Applications to Strike set at 10:00 8/30/02, [112-2] motion by Science Applications objections to affidavits file in support of Petris Technology, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment set at 10:00 8/30/02 (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 110 |
Filed: 8/13/2002, Entered: 8/13/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER that [90-1] objections to and appeal by Petris Technology of Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Dft's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld on the Basis of Privilege are DENIED; that [103-1] motion by Science Applications for Reconsideration of SAIC's motion for partial summary judgment following in camera review of documents ([97-1] order dated 7/19/02) is DENIED; The Clerk is directed to remove oral argument of SAIC's Motion for Reconsideration from the 8/16/02 docket (See order for details) ( signed by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 8/13/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 109 |
Filed: 8/9/2002, Entered: 8/9/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDERED, for reasons stated from the bench, denying w/o prejudice [93-1] motion by Science Applications for Default Judgment or alternative relief against Petris Technology to its ability for inferences at trial ( signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas R. Jones Jr. ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 8/9/02] (dana) Modified on 08/09/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 8/9/2002, Entered: 8/9/2002 |
Minutes-Miscellaneous |
|
Minute entry: Mag. Judge Jones. Rpt. Casamo. (FTR) Appearance of counsel. Matter called, argued and pltf's motion for sanctions is Denied w/o prejudice to its ability to argue for inferences at trial. Order to be entered. (dana)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 108 |
Filed: 8/8/2002, Entered: 8/8/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 8/23/02 for [106-1] motion by Petris Technology for Summary Judgment (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 107 |
Filed: 8/8/2002, Entered: 8/8/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Petris Technology in support of [106-1] motion by Petris Technology for Summary Judgment (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 106 |
Filed: 8/8/2002, Entered: 8/8/2002, Terminated: 11/21/2002 |
Motion for Summary Judgment |
|
MOTION by Petris Technology for Summary Judgment (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 105 |
Filed: 8/8/2002, Entered: 8/8/2002 |
Transcript |
|
TRANSCRIPT for dates of 7/19/02 (LMB) - filed (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 104 |
Filed: 8/7/2002, Entered: 8/7/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 8/16/02 for [103-1] motion by Science Applications for Reconsideration of SAIC's motion for partial summary judgment following in camera review of documents ([97-1] order dated 7/19/02) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 103 |
Filed: 8/7/2002, Entered: 8/7/2002, Terminated: 8/13/2002 |
Motion for Reconsideration |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Reconsideration of SAIC's motion for partial summary judgment following in camera review of documents ([97-1] order dated 7/19/02) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 102 |
Filed: 8/7/2002, Entered: 8/7/2002, Terminated: 11/21/2002 |
Motion for Leave to File |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Leave to Supplement the Record in Support of Motion for Default Judgment or Alternative Relief (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 101 |
Filed: 7/26/2002, Entered: 7/30/2002 |
Reply to Response to Motion |
|
REPLY by Science Applications to response to [93-1] motion by Science Applications for Default Judgment or alternative relief against Petris Technology (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 100 |
Filed: 7/26/2002, Entered: 7/26/2002, Terminated: 11/21/2002 |
Answer to Counterclaim |
|
ANSWER by Science Applications to Counterclaim (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 99 |
Filed: 7/26/2002, Entered: 7/26/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER that the Court, pursuant to Judge Brinkema's Order of 7/19/02, has conducted an in camera review of the documents at issue, "to determine whether the atty-client communications support the crime-fraud exceptions to the privileges." In particular, this Court reviewed Pltf's Privilege Log and examined all the documents submitted under seal by Pltf, as directed by Judge Brinkema. The pertinent documents so reviewed are labeled as follows: SFP000001-SFP000015 and SFP000018-SFP000029 MARKED PRIVILEGE; KS 00001-KS 00234. Upon review of all the aforementioned documents, the Privilege Log, and the earlier submissions of all the parties, the Court finds and determines that the atty-client communications therein do not support the crime-fraud exception to the privilege. The Clerk of this Court is directed to maintain the documents filed 7/24/02 in camera under seal. ( signed by Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 7/26/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 7/26/2002, Entered: 7/26/2002 |
Set/Reset Deadlines: |
|
Deadline updated; Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 8/9/02 for [93-1] motion by Science Applications for Default Judgment or alternative relief against Petris Technology (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 7/24/2002, Entered: 7/26/2002 |
Docket Annotation |
|
Documents received IN CAMERA and UNDER SEAL per Judge Brinkema's Order of 7/19/02, labeled as: SFP000001 - SFP000015 and SFP000018 - SFP000029 MARKED PRIVILEGED; DS 00001 - KS 00234 (Located in Civil Vault) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 98 |
Filed: 7/23/2002, Entered: 7/23/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
MEMORANDUM of Law by Petris Technology in opposition to [93-1] motion by Science Applications for Default Judgment or alternative relief against Petris Technology (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 97 |
Filed: 7/19/2002, Entered: 7/22/2002 |
Order |
|
For the reasons stated in open court, ORDER granting in part, denying in part [82-1] motion by Science Applications for Partial Summary Judgment, granting [90-1] motion by Petris Technology of Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Dft's Motion to Compel Production of Withheld on the Basis of Privilege [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS] ( signed by Judge M. Brinkema ) Copies Mailed: 07/19/02 [EOD Date: 7/22/02] (rtra)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 7/19/2002, Entered: 7/22/2002 |
Minutes-Miscellaneous |
|
Minute entry: Judge Brinkema; Reporter: Thomson; Appearances by counsel for parties. Matter came on for Pltf's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment-Argued and Granted in part; Deft's objections to Magistrate Judge's Order-Granted, Remanded to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Order to follow. (rtra)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96 |
Filed: 7/17/2002, Entered: 7/18/2002 |
Response |
|
Response by Science Applications to [90-1] motion by Petris Technology of Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Dft's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld on the Basis of Privilege (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 95 |
Filed: 7/12/2002, Entered: 7/17/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 7/26/02 for [93-1] motion by Science Applications for Default Judgment or alternative relief against Petris Technology (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 94 |
Filed: 7/12/2002, Entered: 7/17/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
Brief by Science Applications in support of [93-1] motion by Science Applications for Default Judgment or alternative relief against Petris Technology (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 93 |
Filed: 7/12/2002, Entered: 7/17/2002, Terminated: 8/9/2002 |
Motion for Default Judgment |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Default Judgment or alternative relief against Petris Technology (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
Filed: 7/11/2002, Entered: 7/12/2002 |
Reply to Response to Motion |
|
REPLY by Science Applications to response to [82-1] motion by Science Applications for Partial Summary Judgment (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 91 |
Filed: 7/9/2002, Entered: 7/10/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 7/19/02 for [90-1] objections to and Appeal by Petris Technology of Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Dft's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld on the Basis of Privilege (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 90 |
Filed: 7/9/2002, Entered: 7/10/2002, Terminated: 8/13/2002 |
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief |
|
OBJECTIONS TO AND APPEAL by Petris Technology of Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Dft's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld on the Basis of Privilege (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 89 |
Filed: 7/8/2002, Entered: 7/9/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
BRIEF by Petris Technology in opposition to [82-1] motion by Science Applications for Partial Summary Judgment (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 88 |
Filed: 7/8/2002, Entered: 7/9/2002 |
Answer to Amended Complaint |
|
ANSWER by Petris Technology to Frist Amended Complaint (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 87 |
Filed: 7/5/2002, Entered: 7/8/2002 |
Objection |
|
OBJECTIONS by defendant Petris Technology to [77-1] exhibits list by Science Applications and [85-1] amended exhibits list by Science Applications (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 86 |
Filed: 7/1/2002, Entered: 7/2/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 7/19/02 for [82-1] motion by Science Applications for Partial Summary Judgment (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 85 |
Filed: 7/1/2002, Entered: 7/2/2002 |
Exhibit |
|
Amended Trial Exhibit list by Science Applications (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
Filed: 7/1/2002, Entered: 7/2/2002 |
Objection |
|
OBJECTIONS by plaintiff Science Applications to [79-1] Exhibits by Petris Technology and Order (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 83 |
Filed: 6/27/2002, Entered: 6/28/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 7/12/02 for [82-1] motion by Science Applications for Partial Summary Judgment (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
Filed: 6/27/2002, Entered: 6/28/2002, Terminated: 7/19/2002 |
Motion for Summary Judgment |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Partial Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (LARGE PLEADING) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 80 |
Filed: 6/24/2002, Entered: 6/25/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER that [64-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents is DENIED. (See order for details) ( signed by Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 6/25/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 81 |
Filed: 6/21/2002, Entered: 6/25/2002 |
Amended Complaint |
|
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Science Applications; amending [1-1] Complaint; jury demand (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
Filed: 6/21/2002, Entered: 6/21/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER granting [71-1] motion by Science Applications for Leave to File first amended complaint [64-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents under advisement granting [63-1] motion by Petris Technology for leave to Amend [33-1] answer by Petris Technology. For reasons stated from the bench, it is ORDERED, Defendant's Motion to Compel is taken under advisement. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Amend Answer is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Defendant's Exhibit M to Defendant's Memorandum is Support of the Motion to Compel is placed Under Seal ( signed by Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 6/21/02] (jsch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 6/21/2002, Entered: 6/21/2002 |
Minutes-Miscellaneous |
|
Minute entry: Magistrate Judge Poretz (FTR) Reporter: Casamo & Assoc. Appearances: Counsel for Pltf. & Deft. This matter came on for Deft's Motion to compel production of documents - Matter argued and taken under advisement. Deft's Motion for leave to file [33-1] answer by Petris Technology - Matter uncontested and Granted. Pltf's Motion for leave to file first amended complaint - Matter uncontested and Granted. Defendant's exhibit M to Defendant's Memorandum in support of the Motion to compel is placed under seal. Order to be entered. (jsch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 79 |
Filed: 6/20/2002, Entered: 6/21/2002 |
Miscellaneous Document |
|
Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List and Exhibit List) by Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
Filed: 6/20/2002, Entered: 6/21/2002 |
Discovery - Miscellaneous |
|
Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures by Science Applications (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
Filed: 6/20/2002, Entered: 6/21/2002 |
Exhibit |
|
Exhibit list by Science Applications (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 76 |
Filed: 6/20/2002, Entered: 6/21/2002 |
Witness List |
|
Witness list by Science Applications (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 74 |
Filed: 6/20/2002, Entered: 6/20/2002 |
Response/Reply - Miscellaneous |
|
REPLY MEMORANDUM in support by Petris Technology of [64-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 6/20/2002, Entered: 6/21/2002 |
Pretrial Conference - Final |
|
Pre-Trial Conference held; Judge Hilton; Appearances of counsel; Jury Trial set 10:00 9/3/02 (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
Filed: 6/19/2002, Entered: 6/20/2002 |
Response |
|
Response by Science Applications to [64-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 72 |
Filed: 6/14/2002, Entered: 6/17/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 6/21/02 for [71-1] motion by Science Applications for Leave to File first amended complaint (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
Filed: 6/14/2002, Entered: 6/17/2002, Terminated: 6/21/2002 |
Motion for Leave to File |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Leave to File first amended complaint (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 70 |
Filed: 6/7/2002, Entered: 6/10/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
Re-NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 6/21/02 for [64-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents, set for 10:00 6/21/02 for [63-1] motion by Petris Technology for leave to Amend [33-1] answer by Petris Technology (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 69 |
Filed: 6/7/2002, Entered: 6/7/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDERED, for reasons stated from the bench, pltf's motion for sanctions and appointment of a R706 expert (#49) is granted, as to additional discovery which may proceed as instructed from the bench, and is other wise denied. Pltf;s motion to compel (#61) is denied. ( signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas R. Jones Jr. ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 6/7/02] (dana)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 6/7/2002, Entered: 6/7/2002 |
Minutes-Miscellaneous |
|
Minute entry: Mag. Judge Jones. Rpt. Rudiger and Green. FTR. Appearance of counsel. Matter called, argued and pltf's motion for sanctions and appointment of R706 expert is granted as to additional discovery which may preceed as instructed, denied otherwise. Pltf's. motion to compel is denied. Order to be entered. (dana)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 6/6/2002, Entered: 6/6/2002 |
Withdrawal of Motion |
|
WITHDRAWAL of [59-1] motion by Science Applications for Protective Order (Per TRJ chambers) (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
Filed: 6/5/2002, Entered: 6/5/2002 |
Remark |
|
Supplemental submission filed by plaintiff Science Applications regarding [49-1] motion by Science Applications for Sanctions, [49-3] motion by Science Applications second motion to Compel (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
Filed: 6/5/2002, Entered: 6/5/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
Supplemental Brief by Petris Technology in opposition to [61-1] motion by Science Applications to Compel in support of an appointment of Rule 706 expert issues of substantial similarity (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
Filed: 6/4/2002, Entered: 6/5/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 6/14/02 for [64-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents, set for 10:00 6/14/02 for [63-1] motion by Petris Technology for leave to Amend [33-1] answer by Petris Technology (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 65 |
Filed: 6/4/2002, Entered: 6/5/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
MEMORANDUM by Petris Technology in support of [64-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents, [63-1] motion by Petris Technology for leave to Amend [33-1] answer by Petris Technology (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
Filed: 6/4/2002, Entered: 6/5/2002, Terminated: 6/24/2002 |
Motion to Compel |
|
MOTION by Petris Technology to Compel production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
Filed: 6/4/2002, Entered: 6/5/2002 |
Motion to Amend/Correct |
|
MOTION by Petris Technology for leave to Amend [33-1] answer by Petris Technology (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 62 |
Filed: 5/31/2002, Entered: 6/3/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 6/7/02 for [61-1] motion by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
Filed: 5/31/2002, Entered: 6/3/2002 |
Motion to Compel |
|
MOTION by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
Filed: 5/31/2002, Entered: 6/3/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 6/7/02 for [59-1] motion by Science Applications for Protective Order (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 59 |
Filed: 5/31/2002, Entered: 6/3/2002 |
Motion for Protective Order |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Protective Order (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
Filed: 5/30/2002, Entered: 5/30/2002 |
Order |
|
Consent Order that the hearing on the Motion will occur at 10:00 am on 6/7/02, and any additional submissions shall be filed with the Court by 5:00 pm on Wednesday 6/5/02. (See order for details) ( signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton ) Copies Mailed: yes (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 5/30/2002, Entered: 5/30/2002 |
Set/Reset Deadlines: |
|
Deadline updated; Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 6/7/02 for [49-1] motion by Science Applications for Sanctions, set for 10:00 6/7/02 for [49-3] motion by Science Applications second motion to Compel, set for 10:00 6/7/02 for [35-1] motion by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
Filed: 5/16/2002, Entered: 5/17/2002 |
Transcript |
|
TRANSCRIPT for dates of 05/09/02 (TRJ) - filed. (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 56 |
Filed: 5/9/2002, Entered: 5/10/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for the reasons stated from the bench, that 1) The pretrial conference is continued to 6/20/02, at 10:45 am ; 2) Pltf may conduct additional deposition and document discovery as stated from the bench; 3) Defense counsel will forthwith make good faith efforts to arrange for pltf's counsel and experts to use all third party software needed to run, prior to 5/29/02, a functional copy of Petris X software; 4) Further consideration of Pltf's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 49) is continued to 5/31/02, at 10:00 am ( signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas R. Jones Jr. ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/10/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 5/9/2002, Entered: 5/10/2002 |
Set/Reset Deadlines: |
|
Deadline updated; reset Pretrial Conference for 10:45 6/20/02 (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 5/9/2002, Entered: 5/9/2002 |
Motion Hearing |
|
Motion hearing as to Petris Technology [49-1] motion by Science Applications for Sanctions set at 10:00 5/31/02, [49-2] motion by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert set at 10:00 5/31/02, [49-3] motion by Science Applications second motion to Compel set at 10:00 5/31/02 (dana)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 5/9/2002, Entered: 5/9/2002 |
Minutes-Miscellaneous |
|
Minute entry: Mag. Judge JOnes. FTR. APpearance of counsel. Matter called, parties adduced evidence, rested, arguement, and the motions for sanctiosn, appointment of expert, and motion to compel- cont. to May 31, 2002 for further proceedings. Order to be entered. (dana)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
Filed: 5/7/2002, Entered: 5/7/2002 |
Affidavit |
|
AFFIDAVIT by Petris Technology of Eric Dean (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 54 |
Filed: 5/6/2002, Entered: 5/6/2002 |
Response/Reply - Miscellaneous |
|
REBUTTAL MEMORANDUM in support by Science Applications of [49-1] motion by Science Applications for Sanctions, [49-2] motion by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert, and [49-3] motion by Science Applications second motion to Compel (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 5/3/2002, Entered: 5/3/2002 |
Set/Reset Deadlines: |
|
Deadline updated; Motion Hearing Deadline set for 2:00 5/9/02 for [49-1] motion by Science Applications for Sanctions, set for 2:00 5/9/02 for [49-2] motion by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert, set for 2:00 5/9/02 for [49-3] motion by Science Applications second motion to Compel (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
Filed: 5/1/2002, Entered: 5/1/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
MEMORANDUM by Petris Technology in support of [49-2] motion by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert tog. w/opposition to pltfs motion to compel (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
Filed: 5/1/2002, Entered: 5/1/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
Brief by Petris Technology in opposition to [49-2] motion by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert tog. w/Memo in support of the apporintment of a Rule 706 expert on infringement issues (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 52 |
Filed: 4/29/2002, Entered: 4/30/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for Ryan Chadwick to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 100 154484 (signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton) Copies Mailed: Yes [EOD Date: 4/30/02] (kjon)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Save 25% on a pre-paid one year subscription. |
|
|
| 51 |
Filed: 4/26/2002, Entered: 4/29/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 5/3/02 for [49-1] motion by Science Applications for Sanctions, set for 10:00 5/3/02 for [49-2] motion by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert, set for 10:00 5/3/02 for [49-3] motion by Science Applications second motion to Compel (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50 |
Filed: 4/26/2002, Entered: 4/29/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
Brief by Science Applications in support of [49-1] motion by Science Applications for Sanctions, [49-2] motion by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert, [49-3] motion by Science Applications second motion to Compel (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
Filed: 4/26/2002, Entered: 4/29/2002 |
Motion for Sanctions |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Sanctions , and by Science Applications for the appointment of Rule 706 expert , and by Science Applications second motion to Compel (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
Filed: 4/9/2002, Entered: 4/9/2002 |
Withdrawal of Motion |
|
WITHDRAWAL of [45-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel responses (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 47 |
Filed: 4/5/2002, Entered: 4/8/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 4/12/02 for [45-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel responses (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
Filed: 4/5/2002, Entered: 4/8/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
MEMORANDUM by Petris Technology in support of [45-1] motion by Petris Technology to Compel responses (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 45 |
Filed: 4/5/2002, Entered: 4/8/2002 |
Motion to Compel |
|
MOTION by Petris Technology to Compel responses (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 44 |
Filed: 3/27/2002, Entered: 3/27/2002 |
Pretrial Order |
|
Protective Order as to Science Applications, Petris Technology governing the handling and labeling of confidential information (See order for details) (signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton) Copies Mailed yes (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 3/27/2002, Entered: 3/27/2002 |
Set/Clear Flags |
|
**Set Protective Order Flag. (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
Filed: 3/21/2002, Entered: 3/21/2002 |
Order |
|
Joint/Consent Order Regarding Pltf's Motion to Compel that 1) Petris shall produce its responsive documents, with an accompanying priviliege log, at the offices of SAIC's counsel in Houston, TX on or before the morning of Wednesday, 3/20/02; 2) Petris' General Objection No. 7 is withdrawn except...Petris further agrees to an ongoing supplementation with respect to its production of documents relating to financial information, namely, Request nos. 67-69,81-82,86-88, and 94-95; 3) SAIC's Document Request Nos. 114,115,116,117 and 118 are limited in scope to the Petris X product...; 4) SAIC will withdraw requests numbered 101,102 and 106-109 without prejudice to a later filed motion to compel...; 5) Petris shall respond to Document Request No. 84 by producing a list of all Petris products from 1995; 6) Request Nos. 90 and 92 are limited in scope to the Petris X product; 7) In response to Request No. 9, Petris agrees to give SAIC all documents and information necessary to allow SAIC to replicate, for the purposes of litigation, the current PetrisX website...; 8) The parties agree, at this time, SAIC can log on to the Petris website, access the Internet Data Room, and create its own password which will give SAIC access to certain public domain rooms on the PetrisX component of Petris' website...; 9) SAIC's Document Request Nos. 70 - 80 are withdrawn...; 10) Petris agrees that it will not rely on general objections No. 2-6 and 8-16 as grounds for withholding documents...; 11) Petris's general objection No. 1 is deferred pending SAIC's review of Petris's privilege log and a subsequent motion, if any, challenging Petris's claim of privilege. (See order for details) ( signed by Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz ) Copies Mailed: yes (clerk) Modified on 03/21/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 3/15/2002, Entered: 3/15/2002 |
Minutes-Miscellaneous |
|
Minute entry: Magistrate Judge Poretz. Reporter: Rudiger & Green. Appearances: Counsel for Pltf. & Deft. This matter came on for Pltf's Motion to compel production of documents - Matter argued and taken under advisement. (jsch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
Filed: 3/14/2002, Entered: 3/15/2002 |
Stipulation |
|
Stipulation filed by Science Applications, Petris Technology that Dft Petris Technoloyg, Inc. withdraws its objection to personal jurisdiction for purposes of trial and any appeal. Science Applications International Corp. withdraws interrogatory Nos. 1-7 of its First Set of Interrogatories and request Nos. 70-80 of its First Requests For Production of Documents (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
Filed: 3/14/2002, Entered: 3/14/2002 |
Reply to Response to Motion |
|
REPLY by Science Applications to response to [35-1] motion by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
Filed: 3/13/2002, Entered: 3/13/2002 |
Memorandum in Opposition |
|
Brief by Petris Technology in opposition to [35-1] motion by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
Filed: 3/13/2002, Entered: 3/13/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for Carl C. Butzer to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 100 153159 ( signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/13/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
Filed: 3/8/2002, Entered: 3/11/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 3/15/02 for [35-1] motion by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
Filed: 3/8/2002, Entered: 3/11/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
Brief by Science Applications in support of [35-1] motion by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (large pleading) (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
Filed: 3/8/2002, Entered: 3/11/2002 |
Motion to Compel |
|
MOTION by Science Applications to Compel for production of documents (clar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38 |
Filed: 3/7/2002, Entered: 3/11/2002 |
Transcript |
|
TRANSCRIPT for dates of February 8, 2002 (LMB) - filed (stas)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
Filed: 3/5/2002, Entered: 3/6/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for John Kiley Edwards to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 100 152865 ( signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/6/02] (pmil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
Filed: 2/19/2002, Entered: 2/20/2002 |
Answer |
|
ANSWER to Complaint by Petris Technology; jury demand (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
Filed: 2/8/2002, Entered: 2/11/2002 |
Order |
|
For the reasons stated in open court, ORDER denying [11-1] motion by Petris Technology to Abstain, denying [11-2] motion by Petris Technology to Stay, denying [9-1] motion by Petris Technology to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction ( signed by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema ) Copies Mailed: 02/08/02 [EOD Date: 2/11/02] (rtra)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 2/8/2002, Entered: 2/11/2002 |
Minutes-Miscellaneous |
|
Minute entry: Judge Brinkema; Reporter: Thomson; Appearances by counsel for parties. Matter came on for Deft's Motion to Abstain/Stay and Deft.'s Motion to Dismiss for lack of Personal Jurisdiction-Argued and Denied. Order to follow. (rtra)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
Filed: 2/6/2002, Entered: 2/6/2002 |
Affidavit |
|
Supplemental Declaration of Nancy W. Hamilton by Science Applications in Support of [18-1] Response to Dft's Motion to Dismiss (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
Filed: 2/6/2002, Entered: 2/6/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER that [28-1] motion by Science Applications for Leave to File Supplemental Declaration in Support of Pltf's Response to Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the supplemental Declaration of Nancy W. Hamilton and the Exhibits attached thereto in support of its response to dft's Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and considered as part of the record herein. (See order for details) ( signed by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/6/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
Filed: 2/6/2002, Entered: 2/6/2002, Terminated: 2/6/2002 |
Motion for Leave to File |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Leave to File Supplemental Declaration in Support of Pltf's Response to Motion to Dismiss (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
Filed: 2/6/2002, Entered: 2/6/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for Patrick Andrew Zummo to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 100 152067 ( signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/6/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
Filed: 2/5/2002, Entered: 2/6/2002 |
Affidavit |
|
Declaration of Jeffrey W. Pferd by Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
Filed: 2/4/2002, Entered: 2/5/2002 |
Response/Reply - Miscellaneous |
|
REBUTTAL BRIEF in support by Petris Technology of [11-1] motion by Petris Technology to Abstain (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
Filed: 2/4/2002, Entered: 2/5/2002 |
Response/Reply - Miscellaneous |
|
REPLY BRIEF in support by Petris Technology of [9-1] motion by Petris Technology to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
Filed: 1/31/2002, Entered: 2/1/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for Brent Clark Perry to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 100 152068 ( signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/1/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
Filed: 1/30/2002, Entered: 1/31/2002 |
Order |
|
Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(B) Conference it is hereby ordered that: The Rule 26(f) report annexed to this Order is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless modified by the Court. (see order for details) ( signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa C. Buchanan ) Copies Mailed: yes (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 1/30/2002, Entered: 1/31/2002 |
Pretrial Conference - Initial |
|
Initial pretrial conference held; MJ Buchanan; Appearances of counsel; Discovery Plan: Approved; Settlement: Not discussed. ADR schedule in Texas case (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
Filed: 1/29/2002, Entered: 2/1/2002 |
Order |
|
PROTECTIVE ORDER PLACING PLEADINGS UNDER SEAL, that 1) SAIC's Reposne to Petris Technology's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and the Exhibits attached thereto; and 2) SAIC's Response to Petris Technology's Motion to Abstain and/or Stay, and the Exhibits attached thereto shall be filed under seal, to be used by the parties as directed by the Court. (See order for details)( signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 2/1/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
Filed: 1/29/2002, Entered: 1/30/2002 |
Order |
|
Consent Order that dft's motion is GRANTED and dft shall have up to and including 2/4/02 within which to file its reply briefs in support of the Petris motions and it is further ordered that service of the reply briefs shall be accomplished as set forth above (see order for details) (signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies Mailed: Yes (kjon)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
Filed: 1/28/2002, Entered: 1/28/2002, Terminated: 1/29/2002 |
Motion for Protective Order |
|
MOTION by Science Applications for Protective Order Placing Pleadings Under Seal (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Filed: 1/28/2002, Entered: 1/28/2002, Terminated: 11/21/2002 |
Response to Motion |
|
RESPONSE by Science Applications to [11-1] motion by Petris Technology to Abstain and/or [11-2] motion by Petris Technology to Stay and Brief in Support (UNDER SEAL) (clerk) Modified on 02/01/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
Filed: 1/28/2002, Entered: 1/28/2002, Terminated: 11/21/2002 |
Response to Motion |
|
RESPONSE by Science Applications to [9-1] motion by Petris Technology to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (UNDER SEAL) (clerk) Modified on 02/01/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
Filed: 1/25/2002, Entered: 1/28/2002 |
Discovery - Miscellaneous |
|
Joint Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan and Report by Science Applications, Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
Filed: 1/24/2002, Entered: 1/25/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, that the joint motion of the parties to reschedule the Rule 16(b) Pretrial Conference is DENIED. The parties may plan for exchange of Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures after 2/8/02, but should appear on 1/30/02 prepared to plan for discovery in this district if the motion to dismiss/abstain is denied. (signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas R. Jones Jr.) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 1/25/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
Filed: 1/18/2002, Entered: 1/22/2002 |
Affidavit |
|
Declaration of James W. Pritchett by Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
Filed: 1/16/2002, Entered: 1/16/2002 |
Financial Disclosure Statement |
|
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
Filed: 1/16/2002, Entered: 1/16/2002 |
Notice of Hearing. |
|
NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline set for 10:00 2/8/02 for [11-1] motion by Petris Technology to Abstain, set for 10:00 2/8/02 for [11-2] motion by Petris Technology to Stay, set for 10:00 2/8/02 for [9-1] motion by Petris Technology to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
Filed: 1/16/2002, Entered: 1/16/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
BRIEF by Petris Technology in support of [11-1] motion by Petris Technology to Abstain and/or [11-2] motion by Petris Technology to Stay (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
Filed: 1/16/2002, Entered: 1/16/2002, Terminated: 2/8/2002 |
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief |
|
MOTION by Petris Technology to Abstain , and/or by Petris Technology to Stay (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
Filed: 1/16/2002, Entered: 1/16/2002 |
Memorandum in Support |
|
BRIEF by Petris Technology in support of [9-1] motion by Petris Technology to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
Filed: 1/16/2002, Entered: 1/16/2002, Terminated: 2/8/2002 |
Motion to Dismiss |
|
MOTION by Petris Technology to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
Filed: 1/11/2002, Entered: 1/16/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER setting Initial Pretrial Conference for 10:10 1/30/02 Discovery Deadline for 5/10/02 Final Pretrial Conference for 1:00 5/16/02 (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton ) Copies Mailed: yes (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
Filed: 1/4/2002, Entered: 1/8/2002 |
Order |
|
ORDER, that dt's motion is GRANTED and dft shall have up to and including 1/16/02, within which to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint and such response shall be deemed timely filed. (See order for details)( signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 1/8/02] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 1/4/2002, Entered: 1/8/2002 |
Set/Reset Deadlines: |
|
Deadline updated; reset Answer deadline to 1/16/02 for Petris Technology (clerk) Modified on 01/24/2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
Filed: 1/2/2002, Entered: 1/3/2002 |
Summons Returned Executed |
|
ALIAS SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Petris Technology 12/17/01 Answer due on 1/7/02 for Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
Filed: 12/26/2001, Entered: 1/2/2002 |
Financial Disclosure Statement |
|
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Science Applications (kjon)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
Filed: 12/13/2001, Entered: 12/17/2001 |
Summons Returned Executed |
|
Summons returned unexecuted as to Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 12/13/2001, Entered: 1/3/2002 |
Summons Reissued |
|
ALIAS SUMMONS (orig & 1) issued & given to atty for service by SPS for Petris Technology (kjon)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 12/13/2001, Entered: 12/17/2001 |
Summons Reissued |
|
ALIAS SUMMONS (orig & 1) issued and given to atty for service by SPS for Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
Filed: 12/11/2001, Entered: 12/12/2001 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for Nancy W. Hamilton to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 100 150808 ( signed by Judge James C. Cacheris ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/12/01] (pmil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
Filed: 12/10/2001, Entered: 12/11/2001 |
Order |
|
ORDER, for Charles L. Babcock to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 25.00 Receipt # 100 150809 ( signed by Judge James C. Cacheris ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/11/01] (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
Filed: 12/10/2001, Entered: 12/10/2001 |
Complaint |
|
COMPLAINT Filing Fee $ 150.00 Receipt # 100 150807; jury demand (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 12/10/2001, Entered: 12/10/2001 |
Summons Issued |
|
SUMMONS(ES) (orig & 1) issued and given to atty for service by SPS for Petris Technology (clerk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -- |
Filed: 12/10/2001, Entered: 12/10/2001 |
Set/Clear Flags |
|
Jury Trial Flag (clerk)
|
|
|
|
Update
Alerts
Jump