The United States v. R. T. Hooe and Others
Administrative Proceeding Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. Unknown

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Request Update Request UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Get E-Mail Alerts
  Text Tab Overlap Citations (0) Tab Overlap Cited By (79) Right End

5 U.S. 318

1 Cranch 318

2 L.Ed. 121

R. T. HOOE and others.

February Term, 1803


IN this case it was decided, that in appeals and writs of error from the courts of the United States, in the district of Columbia, a statement of facts must accompany the transcript.


The act of congress of 27th February 1801, concerning the district of Columbia, directs that writs of error shall be prosecuted in the same manner, under the same regulations, and the same proceedings shall be had therein, as is, or shall be provided in the case of writs of error on judgments, or appeals upon orders or decrees, rendered in the circuit court of the United States.


In the case of Jennings v. The Brig Perseverance, 3 Dallas, 337, it was held that under the provisions of the judiciary act, unless a statement of facts appeared upon the record, the court could not say there was error.


This case has been viewed 225 times.

No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Sign Up
Need Password Help?