Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Plff. In Err. v. N. P. Scott
Administrative Proceeding Supreme Court of the United States, Case No. 286

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Request Update Request UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Get E-Mail Alerts

  Text Tab Overlap Citations (0) Tab Overlap Cited By (42) Right End

219 U.S. 209

31 S.Ct. 171

55 L.Ed. 183

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,
v.
N. P. SCOTT.

No. 286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued October 19, 20, 1910.

January 3, 1911

Messrs. Charles H. Moorman, Joseph R. Lamar, Benjamin D. Warfield, and Henry L. Stone for plaintiff in error.

Assistant to the Attorney General Kenyon as amicus curioe.

No counsel for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Lurton delivered the opinion of the court:

1

This case was heard with No. 215, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, just decided. [219 U. S. 186, 55 L. ed. ——, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 164.] Like that case it presents only the question of the constitutionality of the Carmack amendment of the act to regulate commerce.

2

The facts are not substantially different, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is affirmed upon the authority of that case.

3

Affirmed.

Statistics

This case has been viewed 127 times.

No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?