United States v. Omar Clarence Phillips
Appeal Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Case No. 14264

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Request Update Request UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Get E-Mail Alerts

Space Space

  Text Tab Overlap Citations (23) Tab Overlap Cited By (51) Right End

286 F.2d 428

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Omar Clarence PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14264.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 13, 1960.

Philip M. Carden, Nashville, Tenn., Dale M. Quillen, Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for appellant.

Ray Jenkins, Asst. U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., John C. Crawford, Jr., U. S. Atty., and John F. Dugger, Asst. U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., on brief, for appellee.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MILLER and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

1

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court and the court being duly advised:

2

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad Company v. Turnipseed, Administrator, 219 U.S. 35, 31 S.Ct. 136, 55 L.Ed. 78; Hawes v. State of Georgia, 258 U.S. 1, 42 S.Ct. 204, 66 L.Ed. 431; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U.S. 178, 45 S.Ct. 470, 69 L.Ed. 904; Casey v. United States, 276 U.S. 413, 48 S.Ct. 603, 72 L. Ed. 632; Morrison et al. v. California, 291 U.S. 82, 54 S.Ct. 281, 78 L.Ed. 664; Caudillo v. United States, 9 Cir., 253 F. 2d 513.

Statistics

This case has been viewed 128 times.

No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?