United States v. Denise Brown, in Re Richard A. Hamar
Appeal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 77-8193

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Request Update Request UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Get E-Mail Alerts

  Text Tab Overlap Citations (0) Tab Overlap Cited By (24) Right End

557 F.2d 226

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Denise BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
In re Richard A. HAMAR.

No. 77-8193.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 27, 1977.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

Order Assessing Penalty

1

Richard A. Hamar, counsel who commenced the appeal, is assessed a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100.00), to be paid into the Registry of the Clerk of this Court within 28 days from the date of the filing of this order for failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence.

2

The penalty is assessed under Rule 46(c), F.R.App.P. There are extenuating circumstances, but he should not have excused himself from "protecting the record."

Statistics

This case has been viewed 84 times.

No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?