Ka.D. et al v. Solana Beach School District et al Document 7: Motion to Substitute Attorney

Filed July 3, 2008

BackBack to Ka.D. et al v. Solana Beach School District et al, California Southern District Court Case No. 3:08-cv-00622-W-POR

Joint MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Solana Beach School District, Mary Ellen Nest. (Creighton, Jennifer). (jah).

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 Case 3:08-cv-00622-W-POR Document7 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 1 of3
JENNIFER 8. CREIGHTON, STATE BAR NO. 202799
WINET, PATRICK & WEAVER
SOUTH MELROSE DRIVE, SUITE 200
VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92081-6666
TELEPHONE: (760) 758-4261
Attorneys for Defendants Solana Beach School District and Mary Ellen Nest
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Ka.D., a minor, by her mother, Ky.D., as her CASE NO. "08 CV 0622 JLS POR
next friend; Ky.D. and B.D., ACTION DATE:
Plaintiffs, VC JUDGE:
VS. JOINT MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION
OF ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
SOLANA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT and
MARY ELLEN NEST,
Defendants.

TO THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants, SOLANA BEACH
SCHOOL DISTRICT and MARY ELLEN NEST, makes the following substitution: new legal
representative, Daniel R. Shinoff, at Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff & Holtz, APC, 2488 Historic Decatur
Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92106, telephone number (619) 232-3122 in place of former
legal representative, Jennifer $. Creighton, at Winet, Patrick & Weaver, 440 South Melrose Drive,
Suite 200, Vista, CA 92081, telephone (760) 758-4261.
Mit
Hf
if
JOINT MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
CASE NO. '08 CV 0622 JLS POR
Page 2 10


Case 3:08-cv-00622-W-POR Document 7
I consent to this substitution:
Dated: 1 fi lox
I consent to this substitution:
Dated: ot
I consent to this substitution:
Dated:_ @ [a 7 lox”
I consent to this substitution:
Dated: / f | Lys
By:
By:
Filed 07/03/2008 Page2of3
Ellen We
Mary Elfen Nest
(Bester “fresh
“Leslie Fausset, Superintendent, Solana Beach
School District
WINET, PATRICK & WEAVER

Jenifer” Cr
Defendants, Sol
Mary Ellen Nest
hton) Attorneys for
‘each School District and
STUTZ, ARTIANO, SHINOFF & HOLTZ,
APC



CLA LE
Daniel R. Shinoff,A
Solana Beach School District and
Nest


JOINT MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
CASE NO. '08 CV 0622 JLS POR
Page 3 Case 3:08-cv-00622-W-POR Document7 Filed 07/03/2008 Page3of3
Ka.D.. v. Solana Beach School District and Mary Ellen Nest (GI20546)
United States District Court, Southern District of California, Case No. 08 CV0622 JLS (POR)
JENNIFER $. CREIGHTON, STATE BAR NO. 202799
WINET, PATRICK & WEAVER §. MELROSE DRIVE, SUITE 200
VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92081
TELEPHONE: (760) 758-4261
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Vicki Asturias, declare:
Tam employed in the County of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action. My business address is 440 South Melrose Drive, Suite 200,
Vista, California 92081.
On July 3, 2008, | served the foregoing documents:
. JOINT MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
on all interested persons in this action addressed as follows:
Via Electronic Service Via U.S. Mail
Maureen Graves Daniel R. Shinoff
Law Offices of Maureen Graves Stutz, Artiano, Shinoff & Holtz, APC Schubert Court 2488 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92617 San Diego, CA 92106
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants
(X) BY MAIL: By placing an envelope for collection and mailing following our ordinary
business practices. ] am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and
processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and that
the correspondence shall be deposited with the United States Postal Service this same day
in the ordinary course of business in a sealed envelope with first-class postage prepaid at
Vista, California.
(X) BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: On the dated stated above, I served the documents via
CM/ECF described above on designated recipients through electronic transmission of
said documents; a certified receipt is issued to filing party acknowledging receipt by
CM/ECF's system. Once CM/ECF has served all designated recipients, proof of
electronic service is returned to the filing party.
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of
this court at whose direction the service was made.
Executed on July 3, 2008, at Vista, California.
a
Vicki Asturias
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?