Verify, Inc v. Tesla, Inc. Document 6: Stipulation and Order

Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Case No. 18CV329713
Filed August 8, 2018

Stipulation and order to extend time to answer, by atty Reddy.; Granted by Judge Arand

BackBack to Verify, Inc v. Tesla, Inc.

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 TESLA
FIRM NAME:
INC.
STATE BAR N0:

FOR COURT USE ONLY
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
6800 Dumbanon
Circle
cm; Fremont
STATE:
TELEPHONE No. (51 0) 602-E-MAILADDREss.
E. Fang
EFS-OZO
ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
NAME AARTI REDDY
STREET ADDRESS
JI-
on 8/23/2018 9:09 AM
Reviewed By: E. Fang
Envelope:
18CVSanta Clara – Civil
CA
ZIP
CODE;

FAX N
aareddy@tesla.com
ArroRNEY F0R(name): Defendant, Tesla.
Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
STREETADDRESS: 191 North First Street
MAILING ADDRESS
chv AND
191 North
San Jose,
BRANCH NAME San Jose
CODE:
ZIP
First
Street
California 951
CASE NUMBER:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
180V
VERIFY, INC.
DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: TESLA,
INC.
JUDICIALOFFICER:
OTHER:
DEPT:
PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
NOTE:
This cover sheet
be used to electronically file and submit to the court a proposed order. The proposed order sent
must be in PDF format and must be attached to this cover sheet. In addition. a version ofthe proposed
an editable word-processing format must be sent to the court at the same time as this cover sheet and the
attached proposed
is to
electronically to the court
order
in
order
in
1.
PDF
Name
format are filed.
of the party submitting the
proposed order:
TESLA, INC.
2.
Title of
the proposed order:
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTENDTIME FOR DEF TO RESPOND TO
3.
4.
The proceeding
to
which the proposed order relates
a.
Description of proceeding:
b.
Date andtime:
c.
Place:
PLF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
is:
Answerto Complaint
AugustZS,
Santa Clara County Superior Court, 191 North
The proposed order was served on the other
First Street,
parties in the case.
AARTI REDDY
(TYPE
San Jose. CA

OR PRINT NAME)
-
’4&¥%lw
(
OF PARTY OR A'I'I'ORNEY)
Page
Farm Adopled
for
Mandatory Use
Judwclal Council cf California
EF87020 [Rev February
PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
_
1,
2017]
_
I
(Electronlc Flllng)

oi
Cal Rules uf Court,
rules
2 252, 3
www courts ca
gov
Page 2 EFS-OZO
CASE NAME:
VERIFY. INC.
v.
TESLA,
CASE NUMBER;
1BCV
INC.
PROOF 0F ELECTRONIC SERVICE
PROPOSED ORDER
1.
|
am
a-
at least
My
18 years old and not a party to this action.
residence or business address
6800 Dumbarton
b.
2,
My
Circle,
Fremont.
electronic service address
is
is
(specify):
CA
(specify):
kendwilliams@tesla.com
electronically served the Proposed Order (Cover Sheet) with a proposed order
an editable word—processing format as follows:
I
a.
On (name ofperson
served)
(If
the person served is
an
format attached. and a proposed order
CA
To
(electronic service
c.
On
(date):
be stated):
91
address ofperson served):
randall.guritzky@gmai|.com
8/23/
Proposed Order (Cover Sheet) with the attached proposed order in PDF format and service of the
an editable word-processing format on additional persons are described in an attachment.
Electronic service of the
proposed order
in
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws ofthe State of California that the foregoing
Date:
in
Verify Inc.
b.
E
l
Plaintiff,
PDF
attorney, the party orparties represented should also
Randall S. Guritzky, 1524 North Potrero Avenue, South El Monte,
Attorney for
in
is
true
and
correct.
August 23,
Kendra VWliams
ga-unmum: ur ucuLn-mw
(TYPE 0R PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT)
EFS—020[Rev February
1,
2017]
(Electronic Filing)
I
V
I
I

I
N
i
7/
m
PageZon
PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
Fo‘r'your protec‘tion‘and privacy. please preas the Clear
u,
_
'
Page 3
Filed
August 29, Clerk of the Court
Superior Court of CA
County of Santa Clara
18CVBy: molaivar
AARTI REDDY (SBN 274889)
E-mail: aareddy@tesla.com
TESLA, INC.
TESLA, INC. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
6800 Dumbarton Circle
Fremont, CA Telephone: (510) 602-
Signed: 8/29/2018 10:40 AM
Attorneys for Defendant
TESLA, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

VERIFY, INC., California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.
TESLA, INC.,
Case No.: 18CVSECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant.
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 18CV32971
Page 4 IT IS
HEREBY STIPULATED
Plaintiff Verify,
Defendant
may
(“P1aintiff,” collectively, the “Parties”)
Inc}.
hafile additional time within
Complaint. Theref‘pre, the
Complaint
is
last
Augujst 3 l,
WHEREAS,
day
WI [PiREAi
ai
WHEREAq,

responsive pleading;

WHEREASE,
filed
this action
answer or otherwise respond
0n June
served with the
Defendant’s counsel has
Plaintiff’s
to Plaintiff‘s
11,

8;
Summons and Complaint on June
is
currently duc
22, 2018;
on August
27,
now
requested from Plaintiff a 4-day extension for
counsel for Plaintiff agrees to an additional 4-day extension t0 file a
the Parties agree that a continuance

docket;

answer 0r otherwise respond
t
Defendant’s response t0 Plaintiff‘s Complaint
inasmuch as the Paj‘fies

through their respective attorneys that
8.
Plaintiff

(“Defendant”) and
Defendant to file a iresponsive pleading;

Inc.
prior extension that Plaintiff granted to Defendant;
WHEREAS,

to
which
for Defendant to
WI IEREAS, Defendant was
201 8, pursuant
by and between Defendant Tesla,
are
is
of a particular value
engaged in discussions that may remove
this case
to the
Court
from the Court’s
}
WHEREA$
for the response
California Rule 0f Court 3.1 10(6) permits
afq‘er
thivs
Court
to
extend the time period
service of the initial complaint;
THE PART‘IIES HEREBY STIPULATE that Defendant’s
otherwise respond *0 the Complaint
is
extended
until
August
3 1,
deadline to file an answer or
201 8, and Defendant will file
its

responsive pleading on 0r before August 31, 2018.

DATED: August 23,
TESLA, INC. LEGAL
DEPARTMENT

szfi/é

A/zzdz’i‘l

REDDY?
Attorney for Defendant
TES LA, INC
SECOND STII’ULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.2 18CV329713
Page 5 I
DATED: August
LAW OFFICES OF RANDALL
S.
GURITZKY
J


Attorney for Plaintiff
VERIFY.INC.

l
t
IT
t
2l
ZJ

TION TO EXTEND TIME FORDEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT; [PRoPOSED] ORDER
Case
No.: 18CV329713
Page 6
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall answer or
otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on or before August 31, 2018.
August 28, DATED: August 23,
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 18CV329713
Page 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Verify, Inc. v. Tesla, Inc.
Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 18CV
I, the undersigned, certify that I am employed in the County of Alameda, that I am over the
age of eighteen years, am not a party to the within action, and that my business address is Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, California 94555.
On August 23, 2018, I served the foregoing document described as:
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
8 on the parties stated below, by the following means of service:
9 ☐
By First-Class Mail: I am readily familiar with the Company’s practice for collection and
processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, the correspondence is deposited
10 with the United States Postal Service on the same day as collected, with first-class postage thereon
fully prepaid, in San Mateo, California, for mailing to the office of the addressee following
11 ordinary business practices.

By Personal Service: I caused each such envelope to be given to a courier messenger to
personally deliver to the office of the addressee(s) listed below.

By Overnight Courier: I caused each such envelope to be given to an overnight mail
service at Fremont, California, to be delivered to the office of the addressee on the next business
day.

By Electronic Mail: I caused each document to be sent by electronic mail to the email
address(es) indicated below.

Randall S. Guritzky
LAW OFFICES OF RANDALL S.
GURITZKY
1524 North Potrero Avenue
South El Monte, CA 626-580-I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
August 23, 2018, at Fremont, California.

Kendra Williams
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No.: 18CV329713
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?