Verify, Inc v. Tesla, Inc. Document 8: stipulation

Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Case No. 18CV329713
Filed August 31, 2018

D9. Third Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond To Complaint

BackBack to Verify, Inc v. Tesla, Inc.

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1
AARTI REDDY (SBN 274889)
E-mail: aareddy@tesla.com
TESLA, INC.
TESLA, INC. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
6800 Dumbarton Circle
Fremont, CA Telephone: (510) 602-
Electronically Filed
by Superior Court of CA,
County of Santa Clara,
on 8/31/2018 9:36 AM
Reviewed By: M. Olaivar
Case #18CVEnvelope:
Attorneys for Defendant
TESLA, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

VERIFY, INC., California corporation,

Plaintiff,

Case No.: 18CVTHIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
v.
TESLA, INC.,
Defendant.
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No.: 18CV329713
Page 2 IT IS
HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant Tesla,
Inc. (“Defendant”)
and
Plaintiff Verify, Inc. (“Plaintiff,” collectively, the “Parties”) through their respective attorneys that
may have
Defendant
additional lime within
Complaint. Therefore, the
last
Complaint
2018.
is
September
7,
which
answer 0r otherwise respond
to
to Plaintiff s
day for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond t
WHEREAS,
Plaintiff
WHEREAS,
Defendant was served with the
WHEREAS,
Defendant’s response to Plaintiff” s Complaint
Plaintiff‘s
filed this action on June 11, 2018;
Summons and Complaint 0n June
is
currently due
22, 201 8;
0n August 31,
2018, pursuant t0 a prior extension that Plaintiff granted 10 Defendant;
WHEREAS,

Defendant
WHEREAS,

responsive pleading;

WIIEREAS,

inasmuch as the

docket;

now requested from
Plaintiff a
7—day extension for
lo file a responsive pleading;

Defendant’s counsel has
counsel for Plaintiff agrees t0 an additional 7-day extension t0 file a
the Parties agree that a continuance
Parties are
WHEREAS,
engaged
in discussions that
is
0f a particular value
may remove
this
t0 the
Court
case from the Court’s
California Rule 0f Court 3.1 10(6) permits this Court to extend the time period
for the response after service
0f the
THE PARTIES HEREBY
initial
complaint;
S'l‘IPULATE

otherwise respond to the Complaint

responsive pleading on or before September
is
extended
7,
that
until
Defendant’s deadline to file an answer 0r
September
7,
201 8, and Defendant will file
its
201 8.

DATED:
August 29,
TESLA, INC. LEGAL
DEPARTMENT
By:

MM] REDDY
l
Attorney for Defendant
TESLA, INC
THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No.: 18CV329713
Page 3 98/39/2016 wan 12:
FAX
Iooa/ooa
DATED: August 29, 201
LAW OFFICES 0F RANDALL S. GURXTZKY
©N\IO\U§#UN#
By:
R
DALI.
S.
Attorney for Plai
VERIFY, INC.
t'
URI‘I‘ZKY
_.._.
-—
»-
wdamaunaosnszEGB—o
NNMNNMNNN

mum sflFULA'noN To EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
To RESPOND To PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Casa No.: 18CV32971
Page 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Verify, Inc. v. Tesla, Inc.
Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 18CV
I, the undersigned, certify that I am employed in the County of Alameda, that I am over the
age of eighteen years, am not a party to the within action, and that my business address is 5 Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, California 94555.
On August 29, 2018, I served the foregoing document described as:

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THIRD STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
on the parties stated below, by the following means of service:

By First-Class Mail: I am readily familiar with the Company’s practice for collection and
processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, the correspondence is deposited
with the United States Postal Service on the same day as collected, with first-class postage thereon
fully prepaid, in San Mateo, California, for mailing to the office of the addressee following
ordinary business practices.

By Personal Service: I caused each such envelope to be given to a courier messenger to
personally deliver to the office of the addressee(s) listed below.

By Overnight Courier: I caused each such envelope to be given to an overnight mail
service at Fremont, California, to be delivered to the office of the addressee on the next business
17 day.


By Electronic Mail: I caused each document to be sent by electronic mail to the email
address(es) indicated below.

Randall S. Guritzky
LAW OFFICES OF RANDALL S. GURITZKY
1524 North Potrero Avenue
South El Monte, CA 626-580-3275; randall.guritzky@gmail.com
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
25 August 29, 2018, at Fremont, California.
Iris dela Calzada
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No.: 18CV329713
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?