Verify, Inc v. Tesla, Inc. Document 10: Stipulation and Order

Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Case No. 18CV329713
Filed September 6, 2018

Fourth Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint

BackBack to Verify, Inc v. Tesla, Inc.

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 18CVSanta Clara – Civil
K. Lev
Electronically Filed
by Superior Court of CA,
County of Santa Clara,
on 9/6/2018 10:15 AM
Reviewed By: K. Lev
Case #18CVEnvelope: 1914145
Page 2 IT IS
HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant Tesla,
Plaintiff Verify, Inc. (“P1aintiff,” collectively, the “‘Parties”)
#WN
Defendant
may have
additional time within
Complaint. Therefore, the
last
Complaint
,
is
which
to
Inc.
(“Defendant”) and
through their respective attorneys that
answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff s
day for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond
to Plaintiff s
September 21 201 8.
WHEREAS,
Plaintiff filed this action
WHEREAS,
Defendant was served with the
WHEREAS,
Defendant’s response to Plaintiff s Complaint
on June
11,
2018;
Summons and Complaint on June
22, 201 8;
\Omflmm
7,
WHEREAS,
on September
Defendant’s counsel has
now requested from Plaintiff a
14-day extension for
Defendant to file a responsive pleading;

WHEREAS,

responsive pleading;

WHEREAS,

inasmuch as the

docket;
counsel for Plaintiff agrees to an additional 14-day extension to file a
the Parties agree that a continuance
Parties are
WHEREAS,

currently due
2018, pursuant to a prior extension that Plaintiff granted t0 Defendant;

is
engaged in discussions
that
is
of a particular value to the Court
may remove
from the Court’s
California Rule of Court 3.1 10(6) permits this Court to extend the time period
for the response after service
of the
initial
complaint;
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that Defendant’s

this case

otherwise respond to the Complaint

its
is
extended
until
deadline to file an answer or
September 21, 2018, and Defendant will file
responsive pleading 0n or before September 21, 2018.

DATED:
September
5,

TESLA, INC. LEGAL
DEPARTMENT
By:

AKRTI
REESE
Attorney for Defendant
TESLA, INC
FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No.2 18CV329713
Page 3
DATED: September ,
LAW OFFICES OF RANDALL
S.
GURITZKY
J

By:
ALL

S.
GURITZKY
Attorney for Plaintiff

VERIFY,INC.
T
t
tt
lr2T
ta

,d

+-'-;;'.
i.i

FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESFOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
-
Case
No.: 18CV32971
Page 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Verifiz, Inc. v. Tesla, Inc.
Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 18CV
I, the undersigned, certify that I am employed in the County of Alameda, that I am over the
age of eighteen years, am not a party to the within action, and that my business address is Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, California 94555.
On
September
6,
201 8,
I
served the foregoing document described
as:
I
FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
T0 RESPOND T0 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
o
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THIRD STIPULATION TEXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

on the panics
stated below,
by the following means of service:

D

By First-Class Mail: I am readily familiar with the Company’s practice for collection and
processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, the correspondence is deposited
with the United States Postal Service on the same day as collected, with first-class postage thereon
fully prepaid, in San Mateo, California, for mailing t0 the office 0fthe addressee following
ordinary business practices.

D
By
Personal Service:
I
caused each such envelope t0 be given

personally deliver t0 the office 0f the addressee(s) listed below.

D
By Overnight
Courier:
I
t0 a courier
messenger to
caused each such envelope to be given to an overnight mail
on the next business
service at Fremont, California, to be delivered to the office of the addressee

day.
g
By
Electronic Mail:
I
caused each document to be sent by electronic mail
to the email
address(es) indicated below.

Randall
S.
Guritzky

LAW OFFICES OF RANDALL S. GURITZKY

1524 North Potrero Avenue
South E1 Monte, CA 626-580-3275; randall.guritzkxfirbgmailcom

I

declare under penalty ofpcrjury that the foregoing
September
6,
20!
8, at
is
true
and correct. Executed on
Fremont, California.

Iris
dela Calzada

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No.: 18CV329713
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?